As an essential part of BRB, RPE cells are of critical importance to maintain the structural integrity of the retina(15, 16). And RPE cells, susceptible to the negative effects of OxS, are generally exposed to high levels of ROS(17), resulting from the higher oxygen consumption of the retina. Previous studies have correlated the cumulative ROS-induced damage in RPE cells with the early stage of AMD(18). Therefore, early intervention measurements are of essential importance to prevent OxS-induced damage in RPE cells. The anti-oxidative and anti-apoptotic functions of LBP have so far been addressed on various eye diseases, including retinitis pigmentosa(19), glaucoma(20), retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury(21) and diabetic retinopathy(22). The chemical composition analysis of LBP showed that glycopeptides in LBP could alleviate lipid peroxidation(23–25). Given the above, our study aims to explore how LBP prevent OxS and apoptosis in ARPE-19 cells and its potential mechanism.
In our experiment, a classic model(26) was utilized to explore the influence of LBP on H2O2-triggered OxS(27–29). H2O2 was employed to imitate the pathogenesis of AMD. As demonstrated in CCK-8 assays, exposure to 500 µM H2O2 distinctly reduced the viability of ARPE-19 cells, whereas LBP pretreatment reversed this phenomenon in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting that LBP effectively prevented H2O2 from inducing cell damage.
It is reported that the H2O2-caused OxS is relative to the increase of ROS levels, the excessive ROS could be eliminated by strengthening antioxidant enzymes, thereby reducing the apoptotic state of ageing RPE cells(30, 31). Inspired by this, DCFH-DA staining was firstly used to detect ROS levels, and the subsequent flow cytometry data presented that the fluorescence intensity of ROS in the H2O2 group increased significantly. In contrast, LBP pretreatment reduced the H2O2-triggered ROS enhancement. The level of MDA was also consistent with the level of ROS. Besides, anti-oxidant levels in ARPE-19 cells, viz., SOD, CAT and GSH-Px, were maintained to a high extent in response to LBP pretreatment. These results indicated that LBP reduced H2O2-triggered OxS in ARPE-19 cells through improving endogenous antioxidant activity.
According to the previous studies, the activation of the apoptotic triggered by ROS presents an essential influence throughout AMD pathogenesis(32). In particular, the Bcl-2 family and caspase-3 proteins are two major regulators during cell apoptosis(33, 34). The impact of H2O2 exposure resulted in an increase in apoptotic proteins (Bax and caspase-3), but a decrease in the anti-apoptotic protein (Bcl-2). However, 24 hours of LBP pretreatment before H2O2 incubation reversed the previously observed phenomenon, as evidenced by the reduced expression of Bax and caspase-3 protein and the augment of Bcl-2 protein. These results indicated that LBP was capable to lower the apoptosis of ARPE-19 cells, hence preventing the internal oxidative damage.
Furthermore, Nrf2 has heavily participated in the process of cell redox homeostasis, which serves to resist OxS by promoting the expression of antioxidant enzymes(35, 36). However, few researches have focused on the relationship between LBP and the Nrf2 pathways in oxidative damage. Once the cells stimulated by OxS, Nrf2 would dissociate from Keap1 and transfer into the nucleus to activate HO-1(37, 38). Our results indicated LBP pretreatment alone haven’t increased nuclear translocation of Nrf2, and similarly, the expression of HO-1 was not affected. However, under the stimulation of OxS, LBP heightened the nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and the expression of HO-1. Thus, H2O2 was essential for Nrf2 translocation and the expression of antioxidant protein, which was consistent with the results of Hao et al(39). Furthermore, our results indicated that Nrf2 siRNA partly reversed the preventing function of LBP on H2O2-caused cell death. Therefore, LBP-induced activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway plays an effective role in preventing the H2O2-triggered OxS in ARPE-19 cells. However, the conclusion was limited as only one retinal cell line and in-vitro experiments were carried out in our study. Hence, other retinal cell lines and more in-vivo research are necessary to verify the effects of LBP and H2O2.