There are two methods of the satellitism test of Haemophilus spp., one is to use discs containing V factor, X factor or both, and the other is to use S. aureus to provide V factor, and to use blood in the medium containing blood to provide X factor. The latter is more widely used because it is easy to use.
Improper use of media can easily lead to false identification. Trace amounts of hemin in the medium or in a heavy inoculum are responsible for false positives of H. influenzae, and insufficient medium to maintain the growth of bacteria is the cause of false negatives of H. parainfluenzae [19, 20]
Our research suggested that among the factors that caused positive results in the satellitism tests of Haemophilus, such as the type of medium, different strains of S. aureus, and type of medium used for activating S. aureus, the latter had a much greater impact than the other factors. The use of BAPs to activate S. aureus was most likely to produce false positives for H. influenzae in the satellitism test. S. aureus uses the iron-regulated surface-determinant (Isd) system to acquire iron ions in blood cells. S. aureus binds hemoglobin through the surface-exposed hemoglobin receptor IsdB [21–23]. Thus, hemoglobin that has not yet been transported through the peptidoglycan layer can be released due to binding instability. This may be why the satellitism test using BAPs-activated S. aureus is prone to false positives.
Furthermore, our research also found that the effect of different strains of S. aureus on H. influenzae on MHAPs and TSAPs might be reversed, even if they were all activated on NAPs. This might be because the stability of the binding between hemoglobin and IsdB of ATCC 25923 was not as strong as that of ATCC 29213 on MHAPs, and the opposite was true for the satellitism test using TSAPs.
The beef extract powder test we performed showed that even if S. aureus was activated on NAPs, TSAPs supplemented with beef extract powder were more likely to grow H. influenzae colonies than the ones not supplemented. This might be why the satellitism tests on MHAPs or NAPs were more likely to produce false positives for H. influenzae, perhaps because both media formulations contained beef extract powder and trace heme remained in the beef extract powder due to incomplete cleansing of blood cells before beef processing. However, it is unknown why a few colonies of H. influenzae grow on TSAPs under the same condition, and further research is needed.
Although in our experiments the reference strains of H. parainfluenzae were more likely to produce false negatives on NAPs, the clinical isolates were more likely to produce false negatives on MHAPs, with some discrepancies. This suggests that neither MHAPs nor NAPs are sufficient to sustain the growth of all strains of H. parainfluenzae in the satellitism test. However, from another aspect, the amount of NAD required for the growth of H. parainfluenzae was five times that required for the growth of H. influenzae (1–5 pg/ml vs. 0.2–1 pg/ml) [24], which can explain why some strains of H. parainfluenzae fail to grow on MHAPs or NAPs. This might be because NAD produced from S. aureus metabolism on MHAPs or NAPs is insufficient to meet the needs of some strains of H. parainfluenzae, and the growth of these strains on TSAPs might be due to the generation of sufficient NAD.