Antibiotics are used for treating of infections. Antibiotic resistance is continually increasing and leads to a public health threat, which is worsened by the overuse of antibiotics. Due to an increase in the use of synthetic antibiotics, the incidence of bacterial resistance to antibiotics have been increased and there is a need for new antibacterial agents. Bacterial infection as a major therapeutic challenge leads to morbidity and mortality worldwide (27). Use of antibiotics for the treatment of infections is limited because of a rise in the prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) bacteria. Also, the discovery of novel agents along with elevated antibacterial resistance in bacteria is increasing (28). In this research, we evaluated the impact of the platelet components on the inhibition of bacterial growth. The PL and PF4 results indicated that PF4 had a significant effect on bacterial growth inhibition. According to the findings of the agar-well diffusion and MIC assays, PL was found with no demonstrable activity against bacterial growth and could not completely inhibit the growth of the considered bacteria. PF4 and PL were employed to inhibit S aureus (ATCC25923), E. coli (ATCC 25922), P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), E. faecalis (ATCC 29212), A. baumannii (ATCC 19606), and K. pneumoniae (ATCC 10031). In vitro findings have indicated that PF4 could inhibit the growth of S. aureus (ATCC25923), E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) A. baumannii (ATCC 19606). Compared to Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria are more sensitive to PF4. Yue et al. demonstrated that CXCL4 is a critical chemokine playing a critical role in bacterial clearance in P. aeruginosa infection by using neutrophils to the lungs as well as intracellular bacterial killing (29).
Tang et al. evaluated the possible antibacterial activity of platelet proteins. They stimulated normal human platelets using human thrombin in vitro. Using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, components of the stimulated-platelet supernatants were purified to homogeneity. Purified peptides, which showed an inhibitory effect on Escherichia coli ML35 in the agar diffusion assay were characterized using amino acid analysis, mass spectrometry, and sequence determination, through which seven thrombin-releasable antimicrobial peptides were identified from human platelets: connective tissue activating peptide 3 (CTAP-3), PF4, RANTES, fibrinopeptide A (FP-A) platelet basic protein, thymosin β-4 (Tβ-4), and fibrinopeptide B (FP-B). Except for FP-A and FP-B, purification of all peptides from acid extracts of non-stimulated platelets were done. Then, in vitro antibacterial effect of seven released peptides was evaluated against E. coli and S. aureus and Candida albicans, and Cryptococcus neoformans. Each peptide was found with activity against a minimum of two organisms. Generally, they were stronger against bacteria than against fungi (30). This interaction can markedly affect the balance between infection and immunity. Jafarzadeh evaluated the antibacterial activity of human PC in Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureus, Micrococcus luteus, Escherichia coli, and Proteus vulgaris. Human PC exhibited antibacterial effect against S. aureus and S. epidermidis, while no effect was found against M. luteus, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and P. vulgaris (31).
In a study by Shariati et al., the potential antibacterial and wound healing properties of two different platelet-derived biomaterial (PdB) (CaCl2-PdB and F-PdB) analyzed against methicillin-resistant S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. The results of disk diffusion (DD) and broth microdilution (BMD) showed that both PdB performed very well on MRSA, whereas P. aeruginosa was inhibited only by F-PdB and was less susceptible to MRSA than PdBs. The time-kill assay also showed that F-PdB has an antibacterial effect in four hours for two strains. Histopathological studies showed that the treated groups had fewer inflammatory cells and necrotic tissues (32). The antibacterial and wound healing effects of PL on K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii burn wound infections were investigated. PdB could inhibit the growth of A. baumannii at the highest concentration (0.5), whereas no inhibitory effects were found against K. pneumoniae. In contrast, PdB could significantly inhibit the bacterial growth in treated animal wounds than the control groups (P value < 0.05) (33).
The inhibitory effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) were determined on the growth of S. aureus, E. coli, Streptococcus agalactiae, K. pneumonia, P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Shigella sp., and Serratia sp .PRP–1 was generated using the one-step blood centrifugation method; whereas, for PRP–2 and PPP the two-step centrifugation protocol was used. The whole blood (WB) and platelet-poor plasma were found with no discernible impact on the growth parameters of the evaluated bacteria in the present study, PRP–1 could reduce the growth rate of some selected strains. Likewise, although PRP–2 could inhibit the growth of Shigella sp., E. coli, S. aureus, S. agalactiae, and S. epidermidis, it was not effective in the growth of P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, and Serratia sp. (24).
Gilbertie’s study indicated that a PRP lysate (PRP-L) had antibiofilm effects and restored the antibacterial effect on synovial fluid biofilms in vitro and reported that PRP-L can augment current antibacterial treatment regimens which in turn reducing morbidity and mortality associated with infectious arthritis. The current assessed the inhibitory effects of PL and PF4 on the growth of common pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli, K. pneumonia, P. aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus spp. Their findings indicated in vitro inhibitory effects of PL and PF4 on the growth of these pathogenic bacteria (34).
The effect of platelet gel (PG) obtained from umbilical cord blood (UCB) on diabetic foot ulcers was assessed and no significant difference was found in the wound size between PG, PPP, and placebo groups (35). The antibacterial effect of PPP, PRP, PG, and solvent/detergent-treated PL biomaterials was evaluated on wound bacteria. It has been reported that plasma complements cause the antibacterial effect of plasma and platelet biomaterials against K. pneumoniae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus (36). According to Palankar’s study, platelets kill bacteria through the bridge between innate and adaptive immunity using PF4 and FcγRIIA. Accordingly, through the connection between innate and adaptive immune mechanisms, platelets and anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies cause an antibacterial host reaction (37). The medication for the combination of delivery of PL and vancomycin (VCM) hydrochloride was developed by Rossi and colleagues as an anti-infective model drug for chronic skin ulcers. They found the mechanical strength to withstand packaging and handling stress capable of absorbing a huge amount of wound exudate for forming a protective gel on the lesion site (38).
In Gordon’s study on the antimicrobial effect of equine PL, findings demonstrated the potential value of PL as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial (39). Rostami investigated the in vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity of platelet-rich plasma against selected oral and periodontal pathogens, PRP had strong in vitro antibacterial activity against Streptococcus Mitis, Streptococcus Mutans, and Neisseria Lactamica with the mean zone of inhibition diameters of 6.73 ± 0.52, 5.8 ± 0.43 and 6.67 ± 0.43 mm, respectively. PRP is an effective antibacterial agent along with conventional antibiotic treatments against oral and periodontal infections (40).The current research results indicated the in vitro inhibitory effects of PF4 on the growth of S. aureus, E. faecalis, and A. baumannii. More studies, both in vitro and in vivo, must examine the antibacterial effects of PF4 and PL.