The target patients who had quantifiable RNAs in the nasopharyngeal sample took Molnupiravir orally for 5 days according to the standard protocol. Fever of 38 degrees was observed once (group A), twice (group B), and three or more (groups C) 10 days after oral administration (Figure 1).
There were no significant differences in the Ct values of the A group, the B group, and the C group. However, there were differences in symptoms during and after oral administration (Table 2). No deaths were observed during the observation period. No exacerbation of the risk factor was observed in patients with at least one risk factor. Compared to before administration, there was no myelosuppression such as such as thrombocytopenia during the observation period, and no hepatic dysfunction or renal dysfunction was observed. No significant changes in blood pressure or pulse were observed.
Patients in A group had a fever of 38 degrees or higher and then reduced to 36 degrees or lower and have not had a fever since then. Nausea and anaphylaxis were observed in 1 patient each within 14 days after the start of oral administration. Two patients were disturbed loudly, one had hypoglycemic symptoms, and one tube-fed patient required sputum aspiration for 12 days, but it improved with the use of antiemetics and antihistamines. Two patients with tube feeding have resumed rehabilitation without any accident. Each is a separate patient.
Patients in B Group had a fever of 38 degrees or higher and then decreased to 36 degrees or lower, but had only one fever of 38 degrees or higher during 10 days. No fever occurred since the administration of acetaminophen. During oral administration, one developed nausea and another developed vomiting. It improved with the use of antiemetics. In the 14 days after the start, a large amount of sputum was discharged by 2 people, and suction was required. One of them is a vomiting patient. Aspiration was suspected. Two had poor eating, and one had nausea. In addition to these patients, one patient had SaO2 (Saturation artery Oxygen) of 90% or less and required oxygen administration (0.5-1 L / min). No increase in white blood cells (WBC) or C-reactive protein (CRP) was observed. X-ray examination and computerized tomography (CT) scan examination could not be performed due to the spread of infection. After that, one tube feeding patient could eat without fever and resumed rehabilitation without accident.
Patients in C group had a fever of 38 degrees or higher and then decreased to 36 degrees or lower but had a fever of 38 degrees or higher twice or more in 10 days. No fever occurred since the administration of acetaminophen. However, symptoms were noted in seven patients who did not have a fever. 1. During the oral administration, one person had feeling dizzy, but no numbness, paralysis, nystagmus, or pupil abnormalities were observed in the extremities and the condition improved without medication. 2. During the oral administration, one person had headaches, but improved with the use of acetaminophen. CT scan had no abnormalities. 3. One diarrhea were observed after the oral administration but improved without antidiarrheal or relieve intestinal ailments. 4. One of the two diarrhea patients, during administration, felt nausea, drained a large amount of sputum, and was given oxygen. This patient became inedible and improved with one week-long infusion and was then able to feed orally. 5. Patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease discharged more sputum after infection, was given oxygen. After dosing, nausea and vomiting were observed, but improved with the use of antiemetics. However, developed an eating disorder, and received nutrition from a nasogastric tube. 6. Patient with chronic interstitial pneumonia had a large discharge of sputum during the oral administration and was given oxygen. This patient then vomited and developed an eating disorder and was fed from a nasogastric tube. 7. One patient had melena during oral administration, but there is a possibility of colorectal cancer, and a colonoscopic examination is planned.
In the 14 days after the start, a large amount of sputum was discharged from 3 patients, and suction was required. Two of them were vomiting patients. Aspiration was suspected. These two patients became inedible due to difficulty swallowing and underwent tube feeding management. At the same time, swallowing training was conducted, and as a result, the patient was able to eat. Oxygen was administered (1-3 L / min) to 3 patients who had SaO2 of 87% or less. Two of them were patients who required sputum aspiration. The two patients had elevated WBC and CRP, had a history of sepsis, suspected bacterial pneumonia, added a loxoprofen antipyretic, and administered meropenem antibiotics to improve. One of them ended the oxygen administration, another continued to receive oxygen due to a history of brainstem infarction. One had a history of interstitial pneumonia, which was improved by steroid administration for 3 days, and the oxygen dose was reduced (0.5-1 L / min). They had SaO2 of 95% or more. If it worsens, we plan to manage the ventilator considering the need for endotracheal intubation. Rehabilitation has been resumed except for the 3 patients.