Changes of body weight and blood glucose in mice
Body weight changes of mice were shown in Fig 1(a). During the experiment, mice in N group gained weight slowly. Within 4 weeks of the experiment, the weight of the mice fed the high-glucose-fat diet increased continuously and was always higher than that of the mice fed the normal diet. At the fourth week, the mice fed high-glucose-fat diet had a 45.5% higher body weight gain than that in the N group (23.4±1.01 g). After the fifth week, the body weight growth rate of mice in LPL, LPM, and LPH group was slower and the body weight gain was significantly lower than that in HFD group, at the end of the experiment, the body weight of mice in the LPH group (28.07±1.07 g) was significantly lower than the body weight of HFD group (32.03±0.89 g) (P<0.05).
The changes of fasting blood glucose in mice were shown in Fig 1(b). During the experiment, the changes of blood glucose in group N were not obvious. Within 4 weeks of the experiment, there was no significant difference in blood glucose of mice fed high-glucose-fat diet compared with the N group, but the blood glucose began to increase significantly in the fifth week, up to 8.83 mmol/L. After the administration of L. paracasei JY062, the blood glucose of mice could decrease significantly, at the end of the experiment, the blood glucose in LPL, LPM and LPH group was 7.44 mmol/L, 7.00 mmol/L and 6.29 mmol/L, respectively, significantly lower than that in HFD group 9.17 mmol/L. Therefore, L. paracasei JY062 can alleviate the changes of body weight and blood glucose in mice with glycolipid metabolic disorder, thereby improving the symptoms of glycolipid metabolic disorder.
3.2 Changes of oral glucose tolerance in mice
The changes of oral glucose tolerance in mice were shown in Fig 1(c). Due to the administration of glucose, the blood glucose concentration of the mice increased rapidly within 30 min (N group: 12.2±0.36 mmol/L, HFD group: 18.6±1.05 mmol/L, LPL group: 16.9±1.29 mmol/L, LPM group: 16.6±1.21 mmol/L, LPH group: 14.7±0.64 mmol/L), but the blood glucose concentration of mice decreased significantly at 1 h (N group: 9.3±0.51 mmol/L, HFD group: 14.7±0.71 mmol/L, LPL group: 13.3±0.6 mmol/L, LPM group: 11.8±0.91 mmol/L, LPH group: 10.8±0.4 mmol/L), and at 2 h, the blood glucose concentration of mice in N group returned to normal level, the blood glucose concentration of mice in HFD group was still at high level(12.6±0.72 mmol/L), while the blood glucose of mice in LPL, LPM, LPH group decreased significantly compared with HFD group, but did not return to normal level, which were 11.1±0.61 mmol/L , 9.5±0.7 mmol/L, and 7.7±0.5 mmol/L respectively.
Glucose tolerance of mice was shown in Fig 1 (b). The AUC glucose value of HFD, LPL and LPM LPH groups were significantly higher than that of in N group mice. Compared with HFD group (1728), The AUC glucose value of LPL and LPM LPH group was significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the AUC glucose value of LPH group was the lowest (1260). The results showed that L. paracasei JY062 can improve glucose tolerance in a dose-dependent manner.
Changes of blood lipid index in mice
The changes of blood lipid in mice were shown in Table 1. After 10 weeks of high-glucose-fat diet, the mice in HFD group significantly (P<0.05) increased the TC (1.09 times), TG (84.5%), LDL-C (1.08 times) concentrations and decreased (P<0.05) the HDL-C (50.27%) level compared to N group mice. After 7 weeks of L. paracasei JY062 intervention, TG, TC and LDL-C in different dose groups of L. paracasei JY062 were significantly decreased compared with HFD group, while HDL-C was significantly increased (P<0.05). LPH group had the best effect, significantly (P<0.05) decreased the TC (40.11%), TG (42.46%), LDL-C (39.38%) concentrations and increased (P<0.05) the HDL-C (1.05 times) level compared to HFD group mice.
Table 1. Effects of L. paracasei JY062 on blood lipid index of mice
Group
|
TC(mmol/L)
|
TG(mmol/L)
|
LDL-C(mmol/L)
|
HDL-C(mmol/L)
|
N
|
2.73 ±0.18c
|
0.97± 0.07c
|
0.77 ±0.09c
|
3.70 ±0.67a
|
HFD
|
5.71 ±1.07a
|
1.79 ±0.07a
|
1.60± 0.18a
|
1.84 ±0.55c
|
LPL
|
4.20 ±0.39b
|
1.30± 0.05b
|
1.18± 0.09b
|
2.69 ±0.18b
|
LPM
|
3.08 ±0.63bc
|
1.00 ±0.06c
|
0.88± 0.16c
|
2.98 ±0.08ab
|
LPH
|
3.42 ±0.53bc
|
1.03 ±0.20c
|
0.97± 0.16bc
|
3.78 ±0.46a
|
Note: Different letters mean the significant difference between different groups of mice (P<0.05).
Changes on the adipoinsular axis
The changes of leptin, adiponectin, insulin, GLP-1 and FFA in mice were shown in Fig 2. After 3 weeks of a high-glucose-fat diet, the mice in HFD group significantly (P<0.05) increased the leptin (1.43 times), insulin (1.17 times), FFA (68.80%) concentrations and decreased (P<0.05) the adiponectin (64.25%) and GLP-1 (71.02%) level compared to N group mice. After 7 weeks of L. paracasei JY062 intervention, compared with the HFD group, The contents of leptin, insulin and FFA in different dose groups of L. paracasei JY062 were significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the contents of adiponectin and GLP-1 were significantly increased (P<0.05). LPH group had the best effect, significantly (P<0.05) decreased the leptin (54.34%), insulin (39.95%), FFA (40.68%) concentrations and increased (P<0.05) the adiponectin (1.53 times) and GLP-1 (1.35times) level compared to HFD group mice.
Histopathological analysis of liver and pancreas
As shown in Fig 3 (a), the liver structure of mice in N group was mildly abnormal, with mild edema of some liver cells, clear nucleus and vacuolated cytoplasm (yellow arrows).There was no inflammatory cell infiltration and steatosis in liver parenchyma of N group. While as shown in Fig 3 (b), the liver structure of mice was severely abnormal, with a large area of hepatic cell steatosis and a large number of lipid droplets of different sizes in HFD group (yellow arrows). Some cells were severely edematous, swollen and vacuolized, as shown by the red arrow in Fig 3 (b). After 7 weeks of L. paracasei JY062 intervention, compared with the HFD group, as shown in Fig 3 (c-e), the degree of edema and steatosis of liver cells was reduced, the liver cells were homogenized, and the liver cell space was reduced. In addition, among the three doses of L. paracasei JY062, LPH group had the best effect, which hepatocyte status was similar to that of N group.
It can be seen from Fig 3 (h) that the pancreatic tissue structure of mice in group N was clear, without vacuolation and inflammatory cell infiltration. The islet was a spherical cell-like structure, distributed between the acinus, with a clear boundary with the surrounding glands. And the islet cells were arranged regularly, with high cell density and abundant cytoplasm. In the HFD group, the islets were distributed between the acinus and the surrounding glands, and the islets were not clearly demarcated with the surrounding glands. The number of islets was also significantly reduced, with a large number of inflammatory cells infiltrating, as shown by the red arrow in Fig 6 (i). After 7 weeks of L. paracasei JY062 intervention, compared with the HFD group, the arrangement of islet cells gradually became regular, the number of islets gradually increased, and the boundary between islets and surrounding glands gradually became clear. In LPH group, some telangiectations occurred, as shown by the black arrow in Fig 3 (k).
Effect of L. paracasei JY062 on gene expression of glycolipid metabolism
The glycolipid metabolism-associated genes expression of experimental mice after diet intervention was shown in Fig 4. In the case of long-term intake of high-glucose-fat diet, L. paracasei JY062 relieved glycolipid metabolism disorders and reduced lipid accumulation and glycogen synthesis in mice. As shown in Fig 4, the expression levels of adiponectin related genes (AdipoQ, Adipor2), AMPK and insulin resistance related genes (GLUT-4, PGC-1α) in HFD group were significantly lower than N group (P<0.05). And fat synthesis related genes (SREBP-1c, ACC and FAS) in HFD group were significantly higher than N group (P<0.05). After 7 weeks of L. paracasei JY062 intervention, compared with the HFD group, the gene expression levels of AdipoQ, Adipor2, AMPK, GLUT-4, PGC-1α in different doses of L. paracasei JY062 group were significantly up-regulated (P<0.05). And the gene expression levels of SREBP-1c, FAS, and ACC were significantly down-regulated (P<0.05). Among them, LPH group had the best effect, significantly (P<0.05) increased the AdipoQ (1.82 times), Adipor2 (2.02 times), AMPK (3.84 times) GLUT-4 (1.38 times) and PGC-1α (1.85 times) and decreased (P<0.05) the SREBP-1c (47.2%), FAS (44.6%) and ACC (50.9%) relative expression levels compared to HFD group mice. Meanwhile, the key protein expressions in glycolipid metabolism were shown in Fig 4. Compared with the N group, the protein expressions levels of AdipoQ, AMPK, GLUT-4 in the liver tissue of the HFD group decreased (P<0.05), and the protein expressions of SREBP-1c increased (P<0.05). Compared with the HFD group, the expression levels of AdipoQ, AMPK, GLUT-4 protein in the liver tissue of mice in the LPL, LPM and LPH group increased (P<0.05), and the protein expression levels of SREBP-1c decreased (P<0.05). LPH group had the best effect. Compared with HFD group, the relative expression levels of AdipoQ, AMPK and GLUT-4 were increased by 152%, 169% and 157%, respectively. The relative expression of SREBP-1c protein decreased by 51.95% (P<0.05).The results suggested that L. paracasei JY062 can activate adiponectin by regulating glycolipid disorder in mice with glycolipid metabolism disorder through APN-AMPK pathway.
Gut microbiota analysis
As can be seen from the Fig 5, compared with the mice in the N group, the Chao1, Shannon and Simpson index of the mice in the HFD group were significantly decreased after 10 weeks of feeding with a high-glucose-fat diet (P<0.05). These indicated that the richness and diversity of gut microbiota species of mice were significantly reduced when glucose and lipid metabolism disorders occurred. Compared with the HFD group, the LPL group had no significant difference in Chao1, Shannon and Simpson index, while the LPM group and the LPH group had significant differences (P<0.05), LPH group had the best effects. The results suggested that L. paracasei JY062 can restore the richness and diversity of gut microbiota in mice with glucose and lipid metabolism disorders.
It can be seen from Fig 5 (d), the contribution of PC1 was 35.05%, the contribution of PC2 was 23.01%, and the three sample points in group N were relatively concentrated, indicating that the structure of gut microbiota of mice in group N was relatively similar, and the gut microbiota of mice in group N was relatively similar. The composition of flora species was relatively stable. After feeding with high-glucose-fat diet for 10 weeks, the flora of HFD group mice was significantly different from that of N group in the first and second principal coordinates, which showed that there were great changes in the gut microbiota of mice with glucose and lipid metabolism disorder. The LPL, LPM, LPH groups were separated from the HFD group flora and gradually approached the N group of mice. The results also indicated that L. paracasei JY062 could regulate the gut microbiota structure of mice with glucose and lipid metabolism disorders to a certain extent, and improved the similarity and stability of the gut microbiota community structure.
In this study, the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the intestines of mice in the N group were 49.91% and 16.36%, the ratio of Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes was 0.328, and the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the intestines of mice in the HFD group were 61.18% and 61.18%. 17.11%, the ratio of Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes was 0.18, and the ratio of Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes decreased significantly compared with N group mice (P<0.05). This showed that the ratio of Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes was significantly reduced in mice fed a high-glucose-fat diet after 10 weeks. In the LPL, LPM, and LPH groups, the ratios of Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes were 0.10, 0.14, and 0.15, respectively. In the LPH group, the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were 34.28% and 5.28%. The relative abundance decreased compared with the HFD group. In addition, Verrucomicrobia was proved to be closely related to the occurrence of diabetes and obesity, and the relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia was significantly increased in the LPH group, reaching 27.35% (P<0.05). L. paracasei JY062 can improve glucose and lipid metabolism disorder to a certain extent by reducing the abundance of Firmicutes, increasing the abundance of Bacteroidetes and the relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia. However, the effect of probiotics on gut microbiota was very complicated.
As can be seen from the Fig 6, compared with the mice in the N group, the gut microbiota of HFD group was dominated by Dubosiella (14.78%), Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group (7.66%), and uncultured Muribaculaceae bacterium (13.60%). 3 harmful bacteria genera increased, Lactobacillus (3.07%), Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002 (0.45%), Akkermansia (0.13%), Bifidobacterium (0.08%), Allobaculum (0.01%) were the main 5 beneficial bacteria The proportion had decreased. These results suggested that feeding a high-glucose-fat diet affects the composition of the intestinal microbiota in mice, thereby affecting the glucose and lipid metabolism in mice. In the LPL, LPM and LPH groups, compared with the HFD group of mice, five genera, mainly Lactobacillus, Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002, Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Allobaculum, increased, Dubosiella (14.78%), Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group (7.66 %), 4 genera dominated by Muribaculaceae (13.60%) declined, among which in LPH group, Lactobacillus (18.77%), Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002 (19.92%), Akkermansia (27.35%), Bifidobacterium (8.5%) were The main dominant bacterial genera, Lactobacillus, Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002, Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, have protective effects in glucolipid metabolism diseases such as obesity caused by diet. The above results indicated that L. paracasei JY062 can enhance the intestinal homeostasis of mice, increase the abundance of Lactobacillus, Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002, Akkermansia, and Bifidobacterium to alleviate the abnormal glucose and lipid metabolism caused by high-glucose-fat diet.
Effect of JY062 on the concentration of SCFAs
In order to further explore the mechanism of JY062 in resisting glycolipid metabolism, the levels of SCFAs in the feces of each group of mice were analyzed, and the results were shown in Fig 7. Among the SCFAs in the feces, compared with the N group, acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid significantly decreased in the HFD mice, which were reduced by 42.75%, 53.37% and 39.56%, respectively. However, after 7 weeks of JY062 intervention, the concentration of acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid were significantly increased, especially the concentration of butyric acid in the LPH group, which was 1.8 times higher than that of the HFD group (P<0.05).
Relationship between SCFAs and gut microbiota
As the metabolites of gut microbiota, the content of SCFAs is closely related to the composition of gut microbiota. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in the gut microbiota can stimulate the production of SCFAs. In this study, a heat map of the relationship between the content of acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid in SCFAs and the composition of gut microbiota in mice was analyzed. As can be seen from Fig 8, the acetic acid content was positively correlated with Bifidobacterium, Candidatus_Saccharimonas and Turicibacter, and negatively correlated with Faecalibaculum. In the analysis of species composition at the genus level and the content of SCFAs, it was found that the abundance of Bifidobacterium decreased and the relative abundance of Faecalibaculum increased in the HFD group. The relative abundance of Candidatus_Saccharimonas and Turicibacter increased, and the relative abundance of Faecalibaculum decreased. This indicated that L. paracasei JY062 could increase acetate content by increasing the abundance of Candidatus_Saccharimonas and Turicibacter and decreasing the abundance of Faecalibaculum. In addition, as can be seen from the figure, butyric acid content was positively correlated with Bifidobacterium, Muribacalum and Turicibacter, and negatively correlated with Faecalibaculum. In the analysis of species composition at the genus level and the content of SCFAs, it was found that the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium decreased and the relative abundance of Faecalibaculum increased after a long-term high-sugar and high-fat diet.