Comparison of Isolated Calcaneal Spur Excision and Plantar Fasciotomy in Addition to Spur Excision In Patients with Plantar Heel Pain Accompanied by Calcaneal Spur

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1826049/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Comparison of Isolated Calcaneal Spur Excision and Plantar Fasciotomy in Addition to Spur Excision In Patients with Plantar Heel Pain Accompanied by Calcaneal Spur

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1826049/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: The aim of this study is to clinically compare isolated calcaneal spur excision and plantar fascia release in addition to spur excision in patients with plantar heel pain accompanied by calcaneal spur.

Method: Patients who did not benefit from conservative treatment and underwent surgical excision of the calcaneal spur and/or plantar fasciotomy were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure performed. Evaluation was done according to the pre- and postoperative foot function index (FFI) using pain and functional evaluation. Pain, disability, and activity restriction were evaluated with FFI. The radiological results and FFI scores of both groups were measured before and after surgery and the difference between the groups was compared.

Results: Of the 46 patients in our study group, 30 (65.2%) were female and 16 (34.8%) were male. The average age was 41.2. There was a significant improvement in postoperative foot function index scores in both groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative functional results when the groups were compared.

Conclusion: In patients whose plantar heel pain associated with calcaneal spur does not improve despite conservative treatments, both isolated spur excision and plantar fascia release in addition to spur excision may be effective treatment modalities that improve foot functions.

Plantar Heel Pain

Calcaneal Spur

Plantar Fasciitis

Calcaneal Spur Excision

Plantar heel pain is a common clinical condition in orthopedic practice and is observed in about 10 percent of the population(1). The pain is usually around the medial tubercle at the site of attachment of the plantar fascia to the calcaneus (2). Although the exact cause of this pain is unknown, plantar fasciitis, calcaneal spur, calcaneal periostitis, and entrapment of the lateral plantar nerve are some known etiological factors (1,3).

Plantar calcaneal spur (PCS) is defined as the growth of calcaneus tuberosity and is observed in about 15 percent of the population (2). Although the relationship between PCS and plantar heel pain has been decribed before, it can also be asymptomatic (2). It has been reported that the pain caused by PCS may be related to the size of the spur, whether it compresses the inferior calcaneal nerve, whether it creates a micro-tear in the plantar fascia, and existing inflammation (2,5).

The first treatment options for plantar heel pain accompanied by PCS are always conservative treatments (1,3–4). Calcaneal drilling and endoscopic or open spur excisions have been described in stubborn pains that do not respond to conservative treatment (3,7–8). Considering that PCS can also cause plantar fasciitis, some authors have also suggested plantar fasciotomy.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who did or did not undergo plantar fasciotomy in addition to calcaneal spur excision in patients who did not respond to conservative treatment for symptomatic PCS.

Patients who; applied with the complaint of heel pain between 2015 and 2011, were diagnosed with calcaneal spur clinically and radiologically, did not benefit from the conservative treatment applied for 12 months, and underwent surgical calcaneal spur excision and/or plantar fasciotomy were evaluated in the study retrospectively. Patients who had no radiological and clinical findings before and after surgery, whose calcaneal spur was less than 3 mm on lateral radiography, who had a follow-up of less than 6 months, who had significant pes planus, pes cavus, or other plantar arch deformity were excluded from the study. The remaining 46 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure performed. The first group was determined as those who had undergone isolated calcaneal spur excision, and the second group was determined as patients who had undergone plantar fasciotomy in addition to calcaneal spur excision.

All patients had been treated by the same surgeon. A horizontal incision of 3–4 cm was made on the medial heel, centering the PCS through the baseline (Figure-1). In patients who underwent PPF, using dissection scissors not exceeding 1/2 thickness of the fascia, the proximal-central part of the fascia was loosened before PCS excision was performed, and the lateral and deep fascia parts were preserved. PCS was osteotomized under scopy (Fig. 2). The PCS was held with a forceps and peeled off from the surrounding soft tissue connections. The PCS residue was corrected with a rasp. In both groups, the length of the Achilles tendon was elongated and its tension was reduced by applying a splint that kept the ankle in 90 degrees dorsiflexion for 2 weeks postoperatively. After the fifteenth day, the splint was applied only at night and continued for a month. In both groups, the patients were mobilized without any weight-bearing for the first 15 days after the surgery, and with partial weight-bearing after the 15th day. In the first month, they were mobilized on foot, without support.

Clinical Evaluation: Evaluation was done according to the pre- and postoperative foot function index (FFI) using pain and functional evaluation. Pain, disability, and activity restriction were evaluated with FFI. With the 9-parameter pain scale, the level of foot pain in various situations in daily use is measured. With the 9-parameter disability scale, the difficulty level of functional activities related to foot problems is measured. With the 5-parameter activity restriction scale, the degree of activity restriction due to foot problems is measured (9). High scores indicate more pain, disability, and restriction of activity (10).

The radiological results and FFI scores of both groups were measured before and after surgery and the difference between the groups was compared (Figs. 3 and 4). Then, the difference between the results of both groups was evaluated.

Statistical analyzes of the data were made using SPSS v. 18.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, ABD) in silico. Descriptive statistics were presented as minimum-maximum and mean ± standard deviation values. Preoperative and postoperative clinical scores were compared using the paired sample test. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the groups. <0.05p value was considered significant.

Of the 46 patients in our study group, 30 (65.2%) were female and 16 (34.8%) were male. The mean age was 41.2 (range 23–62), the follow-up period was 36.17 months (range 14–64), and the preoperative waiting time was 16.2 months (range 12–24) (Table 1). 16 of the patients only underwent calcaneal spur excision. In 30 of the patients, plantar fasciatomy was performed in addition to calcaneal spur excision.

Table 1

General Evaluation Table.
	data	mean	median	min	max	st.deviation
Age	46 / 46	41.2	41.5	23.0	62.0	9.81
Follow-up Period (month)	46 / 46	36.17	35.5	14.0	64.0	14.52
Pre-operative waiting time	.46 / 46	10.17	8.5	10.0	24.0	5.47
Pre-operative calcaneal pitch angle	.46 / 46	22.15	22	18.0	26.0	6.9
Post-operative calcaneal pitch angle	46 / 46	18.20	18.0	14.0	24.0	6.49
Pre-operative talus-1st metatarsus angle (Meary’s angle)	.46 / 46	-1.58	-2.0	-3.0	4.0	2.49
Post-operative talus-1st metatarsus angle (Meary’s angle)	46 / 46	-1.82	-3.0	-4.0	3.0	2.66
Pre-operative pain FFI	. 46 / 46	58.96	58.0	48.0	68.0	4.33
Post-operative pain FFI	. 46 / 46	11.15	11.0	6.0	18.0	3.05
Pre-operative disability FFI	. 46 / 46	53.02	52.0	44.0	64.0	3.92
Post-operative disability FFI	.46 / 46	9.09	8.5	4.0	15.0	2.72
Pre-operative activity restriction FFI	. 46 / 46	13.17	13.5	9.0	18.0	2.54
Post-operative activity restriction FFI	. 46 / 46	4.11	4.0	2.0	10.0	1.82

The mean preoperative FFI pain score was 58.96 (range 48–68), the mean postoperative FFI pain score was 11.15 (range 6–18); the mean preoperative FFI disability score was 53.02 (range 44–64), the mean postoperative FFI disability score was 9.09 (range 4–15); the mean preoperative FFI activity restriction score was 13.17 (range 9–18), and the mean postoperative FFI activity restriction score was 4.11 (range 2–10).

The average PCS size was measured as 4.43 mm (min 3–max 8). A general evaluation table of the data was made (Table 1).

In The Group Where Isolated Pcs Excision Was Performed:

The mean preoperative FFI pain score was 58.69 (range 54–64), the mean postoperative FFI pain score was 12 (range 7–18). The FFI pain score was significantly decreased (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative FFI disability score was 52.5 (range 48–58), the mean postoperative FFI disability score was 9.06 (range 5–14). The FFI disability score was significantly decreased (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative FFI activity restriction score was 12.31 (range 9–18), the mean postoperative FFI activity restriction score was 3.88 (range 2–9). The FFI restriction score was significantly decreased ( p < 0.001).

In The Group Where Pcs Excision And Ppf Are Applied:

The mean preoperative FFI pain score was 59.1 (range 48–68), the mean postoperative FFI pain score was 10.7 (range 6–16). The FFI pain score was significantly decreased (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative FFI disability score was 53.3 (range 44–64), the mean postoperative FFI disability score was 9.1 ( range 4–15). The FFI disability score was significantly decreased (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative FFI activity restriction score was 13.63 (range 10–18), the mean postoperative FFI activity restriction score was 4.23 (range 2– 10). The FFI restriction score was significantly decreased ( p < 0.001).

There was no significant difference in postoperative functional results when the groups were compared (Table 2).

Table 2

Post-operative comparison of functional scores
	Group 1(n = 16)	Group 2 (n = 30)	p
FFI pain score	12 ± 3.2	10.7 ± 2.8	0.171
FFI activity restriction score	3.8 ± 1.9	4.2 ± 1.7	0.530
FFI disability score	9.6 ± 2.6	9.1 ± 2.7	0.965

The first step in the treatment of plantar fasciitis is conservative treatment (11). Conservative treatment consists of physical therapy methods that will relieve tension in the plantar fascia, orthoses for the plantar region, and anti-inflammatory treatments. 85–90% of patients respond to conservative treatments. In patients who do not respond to conservative treatment within 12 months, an indication for surgical treatment may occur (12).

In this study, surgical treatment was applied to patients who had plantar heel pain for 12 months, were diagnosed with plantar fasciitis, and did not respond to conservative treatments for at least 12 months. As measured by the FFI scores of patients who underwent isolated calcaneal spur excision and calcaneal spur excision combined with plantar fascia release, clinically significant improvement was observed in the foot and ankle.

Surgical treatment options for plantar fasciitis include surgical methods such as conventional open fasciotomy, endoscopic fasciotomy, neurolysis or denervation, osteotomy of the calcaneus, spur excision, or drilling (8,13–17). As these techniques can be applied alone, combined treatment options are also applied. It has been reported that these methods have made significant improvements in functional scores in patients who have not benefited from conservative treatment (13–18). Comparing the group in which a special rehabilitation program that strengthens the sole and corticosteroid injection was applied and the group in which PPF + PCS was applied, the FFI score at 12 months and the VAS score at 24 months were found to be significantly superior in favor of the surgical group (19). In a study investigating patients whose pain persisted despite both conservative treatment and PPF, PCS excision was performed and pain, functional outcomes, and complications were evaluated. After PCS excision, satisfactory functional results and relief of pain were reported according to Roles Maudsley scoring, and PCS excision was reported as a safe surgery with a low complication rate (20). There is no consensus on which method is superior in surgical treatment (13–21). In several studies, it has been reported that endoscopic methods provide faster recovery and faster return to work compared to open surgery [21–23]. In a retrospective study, where the effects of open and endoscopic surgeries were compared, it has been reported that functional results are better in the early period after endoscopic surgery, but similar functional results are observed in long-term follow-ups (24).

The etiology of plantar heel pain is complex and multifactorial (1,4). The most common pathogenesis is considered to be Plantar fasciitis (4,5). The relationship between calcaneal spur and plantar fasciitis is controversial (2,4,24–28). In a recent study, the calcaneal spur was evaluated in a separate category according to the extent of the spur, and both types were reported to be associated with plantar fasciitis (4). In another study, it was reported that the length of the calcaneal spur causes pain in plantar fasciitis and affects functional scores (28). There is no clear indication for spur resection in the literature (23–28). Nevertheless, there are studies that argue that the removal of the spur provides an improvement in pain and functional scores [8–29]. In this study, there was no significant difference in pain and clinical scores between the group that underwent plantar fascia release in addition to calcaneal spur excision and the group that underwent only spur excision.

There are some limitations of this study. The first is the small number of patients. Limitations arising from the retrospective nature of the study are among others.

In conclusion, in patients with plantar heel pain who do not benefit from conservative treatment, spur excision can be performed in isolation, or additional plantar fascia release can be applied. In both surgical procedures, functionally satisfactory results can be obtained with low complication rates.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the Bursa Medicalpark Hospital (Registration number 2021/112/14). The study have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained prior to study participation from all participants

Consent for publication: No individual person’s data will be published, therefore consent for publication is not applicable.

Availability of data and materials : The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from authors on reasonable request.

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding: Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions: MS ,FF,EB,OL conceptualized the study, devised the methodology and performed the literature review, wrote the first draft and revised subsequent revisions of the manuscript. MS,FF, EB,OL reviewed the literature, critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Acknowledgements Not applicable

McMillan, Andrew M., et al. "Diagnostic imaging for chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Journal of foot and ankle research 2.1 (2009): 1-11.
Kirkpatrick, Joshua, Omid Yassaie, and Seyed Ali Mirjalili. "The plantar calcaneal spur: a review of anatomy, histology, etiology and key associations." Journal of anatomy 230.6 (2017): 743-751
El Shazly, Ossama, and Atef El Beltagy. "Endoscopic plantar fascia release, calcaneal drilling and calcaneal spur removal for management of painful heel syndrome." The Foot 20.4 (2010): 121-125.
Zhou, Binghua, et al. "Classification of calcaneal spurs and their relationship with plantar fasciitis." The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 54.4 (2015): 594-600.
Johal, K. S., and S. A. Milner. "Plantar fasciitis and the calcaneal spur: fact or fiction?." Foot and Ankle Surgery 18.1 (2012): 39-41
Hassab, H. K., and A. S. El-Sherif. "Drilling of the os-calcis for painful heel with calcanean spur." Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 45.1-4 (1974): 152-157.
Johannsen, Finn, et al. "Plantar fasciitis treated with endoscopic partial plantar fasciotomy—One-year clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up." The Foot 39 (2019): 50-54.
El Shazly, Ossama, and Atef El Beltagy. "Endoscopic plantar fascia release, calcaneal drilling and calcaneal spur removal for management of painful heel syndrome." The Foot 20.4 (2010): 121-125.
Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Mazza J, Stuck RM. A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised. J Foot Ankle Res 2013;6:5.
Trevethan R. Evaluation of two self-referent foot health instruments. Foot (Edinb) 2010;20:101-8
Buchbinder, Rachelle. "Plantar fasciitis." New England Journal of Medicine 350.21 (2004): 2159-2166.
James L, Jeffrey C, Steven R, Robert M, John M, John V, Lowell S, Howard Z, Richard B, Jeffrey B. The diagnosis and treatment of heel pain: A clinical practice guideline–revision 2010. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010,49: 1–19.
Jerosch, Jörg, et al. "Indication, surgical technique and results of endoscopic fascial release in plantar fasciitis (EFRPF)." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12.5 (2004): 471-477.
Conflitti JM, Tarquinio TA. Operative outcome of partial plantar fasciectomy and neurolysis to the nerve of the abductor digiti minimi muscle for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 2004;25:482–7.
Jay RM, Davis BA, Schoenhaus HD, Beckett D. Calcaneal decompression for chronic heel pain. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1985;75:535–7.
Tomczak RL, Haverstock BD. A retrospective comparison of endoscopic plantar fasciotomy to open plantar fasciotomy with heel spur resection for chronic plantar fasciitis/heel spur syndrome. J Foot Ankle Surg 1995;34(May–June (3)):305–11.
Onwuanyi ON. Calcaneal spurs and plantar heel pad pain. Foot 2000;10(December (4)):182–5.
Lane GD, London B. Heel spur syndrome: a retrospective report on the percutaneous plantar transverse incisional approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 2004;43(November–December (6)):389–94.
Johannsen F, Konradsen L, Herog R et al. Endoscopic fasciotomy for plantar fasciitis provides superior results when compared to a controlled non-operative treatment protocol: a randomized controlled trial. Knee surg sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Oct;28(10):3301-08. Doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05855-3.
Vellingiri K, Ethiraj P, Shanthappa AH, et al. A prospective study of surgical excision of calcaneal spur for relief of chronic heel pain. International Journal of Health and Clinical Research, 2021;4(3):64-66
Johannsen, Finn, et al. "Endoscopic fasciotomy for plantar fasciitis provides superior results when compared to a controlled non-operative treatment protocol: a randomized controlled trial." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 28.10 (2020): 3301-3308
Kinley S, Frascone S, Calderone D, Wertheimer SJ, Squire MA, Wiseman FA (1993) Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy versus traditional heel spur surgery: a prospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg 32(6):595–603
Nery C, Raduan F, Mansur N, Baunfeld D, Del Buono A, Mafulli N (2013) Endoscopic approach for plantar fasciopathy: a longterm retrospective study. Int Orthop 37(6):1151–1156
Chou AC, Ng SY, Koo KO (2016) Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy improves early postoperative results: a retrospective comparison of outcomes after endoscopic versus open plantar fasciotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg 55(1):9–15
Wainwright AM, Kelly AJ, Winson IG. Calcaneal spurs and plantar fasciitis. Foot 1995;5(September (3)):123–6.
Alshami AM, Souvlis T, Coppieters MW. A review of plantar heel pain of neural origin: differential diagnosis and management. Manual Ther 13:103–111, 2008.
Hossain M, Makwana N. “Not plantar fasciitis”: the differential diagnosis and management of heel pain syndrome. Orthop Trauma 25:198–206, 2011
Kuyucu, Ersin, Figen Koçyiğit, and Mehmet Erdil. "The association of calcaneal spur length and clinical and functional parameters in plantar fasciitis." International Journal of Surgery 21 (2015): 28-31.
Torudom, Yingyong. "Plantar fascia release and calcaneal spur excision for sub-calcaneal heel pain." Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand= Chotmaihet thangphaet 92 (2009): S1-3.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Comparison of Isolated Calcaneal Spur Excision and Plantar Fasciotomy in Addition to Spur Excision In Patients with Plantar Heel Pain Accompanied by Calcaneal Spur

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Material Method

Results

In The Group Where Isolated Pcs Excision Was Performed:

In The Group Where Pcs Excision And Ppf Are Applied:

Discussion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1