Comparison of physical exercise intensity scores between aerobics group and non-exercise group
The independent sample t test was performed on the physical exercise intensity scale scores of the aerobics group and the non-exercise group. The results showed that, the score of the aerobics group was significant higher than the non-exercise group (P < 0.001).
Comparison of physical exercise sensory scores between aerobics group and non-exercise group
The independent sample t-test of the physical exercise sensory scores between aerobics group and non-exercise group results showed that, the aerobics group has significant higher scores on the three positive emotion subscales: refreshment, quietness, and active participation than the non-exercise group. The score of the negative emotion subscale of the fatigue group in the aerobics group is lower than that in the non-exercise group, there is no significant difference in statistical test. The data illustrated that professional women who participated in aerobics exercise felled better than those who did not. It can be seen from Table 1 and Table 2 that increase in physical exercise intensity is directly proportional to professional women’s feelings of uplift feeling, quiet sense, and participation initiative. But it inversely proportional to fatigue, indicating that participation in exercise can enhance the ability of professional women to correctly understand and deal with objective things. It can significantly improve the athletic ability of professional women, promote professional women to be more passionate on life and work, relieve professional women’s feeling of physical and mental fatigue at work, and stabilize professional women’s mentality. It can improve professional women’s self-confidence and enthusiasm for life and work, and enable professional women to obtain great satisfaction in life or work, thereby improve the positive emotions of professional women.
Table 1
Comparison of physical exercise intensity scores between aerobics group and non-exercise group
Influence factor | Aerobics group n = 93 | non-exercise group n = 96 | t | P |
Exercise intensity | 41.34 ± 1.460 | 10.60 ± 0.659 | -18.986 | 0.000*** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
Table 2
Comparison results of physical exercise sensory scores between aerobics group and non-exercise group
| Aerobics group n = 93 | non-exercise group n = 96 | t | P |
Uplift feeling | 9.43 ± 0.608 | 7.20 ± 0.300 | -3.247 | 0.001** |
Quiet sense | 8.67 ± 0.561 | 6.24 ± 0.303 | -3.776 | 0.000*** |
Fatigue | 5.98 ± 0.364 | 5.69 ± 0.286 | -0.626 | 0.532 |
Participation initiative | 9.43 ± 0.590 | 7.31 ± 0.311 | -3.144 | 0.002** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
The Influence Of Aerobics On Work Involvement
The independent sample t-test was performed on work engagement between the aerobics group and the non-exercise group. The results were shown in Table 3. The scores of vitality, dedication and focus of the aerobics group are significant higher than those of the non-exercise group. The data illustrated that professional women participating in aerobics exercise can be significant improved on the feeling of fatigue at work, so that professional women have better energy, more physical energy to devote themselves to work. They have stronger adaptability to work, and a certain degree of concentration on work.
Table 3
Comparison of the scores of work engagement between the aerobics group and the non-exercise group
| Aerobics group n = 93 | non-exercise group n = 96 | t | P |
Vitality | 24.99 ± 0.671 | 21.87 ± 0.806 | -2.981 | 0.003** |
Dedication | 24.41 ± 0.661 | 21.18 ± 0.900 | -2.900 | 0.004** |
Focus | 21.66 ± 0.481 | 19.23 ± 0.692 | -2.898 | 0.004** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
The Influence Of Aerobics On Life Satisfaction
The independent sample t test was performed on the life satisfaction scores of the aerobics group and the non-exercise group. The results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Comparison of life satisfaction scores between aerobics group and non-exercise group
| Aerobics group n = 93 | non-exercise group n = 96 | t | P |
General life satisfaction | 20.09 ± 0.742 | 16.67 ± 0.711 | -3.332 | 0.001** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
The independent sample t-test of life satisfaction scores between aerobics group and non-exercise group were shown in Table 4. The score of aerobics in the general life satisfaction scale is higher than that of the non-exercise group, indicating that professional women who participate in aerobics exercise could achieve life satisfaction.
The correlation analysis of aerobics on positive emotion, work involvement and life satisfaction
Correlation analysis was carried out on the exercise intensity and positive emotions, work involvement, and life satisfaction of professional women in the aerobics exercise group and non-exercise group. The specific results are shown in Table 5. The results showed that a high degree of positive correlation between exercise intensity and sense of refreshment, quietness, active participation, vitality, dedication, and focus. The results showed that in the range of moderate-intensity exercise, the higher exercise intensity, the better the professional women's sense of refreshment, quietness, active participation, vitality, dedication, concentration, and the higher the life satisfaction.
Table 5
Correlation analysis between exercise volume and positive emotions, work engagement, and life satisfaction (r)
Refreshment | quietness | Fatigue | active participation | vitality | dedication Focus | General Life satisfaction |
Exercise intensity | R 0.231** | 0.206** | 0.125 | 0.201** | 0.210** | 0.226**0.203** | 0.718** |
P 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.088 | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.002 0.005 | 0.000 |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
Physical exercise intensity scale post-test score results
In this study, an independent sample t test was performed on the post-test scores of physical exercise intensity between the experimental group and the control group. The results are shown in Table 6. The data showed that the exercise intensity of the experimental group is significant higher than that of the control group, and the average score of the exercise scale of the experimental group is 56.43, reaching the level of heavy exercise level.
Table 6
Comparison results of the post-test scores of the physical exercise intensity scale between the experimental group and the control group
| experimental group (n = 14) | control group (n = 14) | t | P |
exercise intensity | 56.43 ± 5.433 | 12.21 ± 3.803 | 6.667 | 0.000*** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
Post-test Score Results Of Physical Exercise Perception Scale
In this study, an independent sample t test was performed on the experimental group and the control group's physical exercise sensory post-test scores. The results were shown in Table 7. The data showed that after exercise, the participants in the experimental group had a significant increase in refreshment, quietness, and active participation, but had a decrease in fatigue. This stated that aerobics exercise can improve the mental state of the participants, improve participants' participation in life and work, and relieve fatigue.
Table 7
Comparison results of the post-test scores of the physical exercise perception scale between the experimental group and the control group
| experimental group (n = 14) | control group (n = 14) | t | P |
Refreshing | 9.21 ± 0.350 | 4.79 ± 0.447 | -7.797 | 0.000*** |
Sense of quiet | 8.07 ± 0.633 | 5.07 ± 0.370 | -4.091 | 0.000*** |
Fatigue | 7.21 ± 0.897 | 6.14 ± 0.563 | -1.012 | 0.321 |
Active participation | 10.00 ± 0.419 | 5.57 ± 0.609 | -5.992 | 0.000*** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
The participants in the experimental group are better than the control group in the aerobics exercise intensity and exercise feeling. The data showed that via aerobics exercises, participants in the experimental group have a certain improvement in refreshment, quietness, and increase in their sense of active participation. There’s no obvious difference the experimental group and the control group in terms of fatigue, indicating that via aerobics exercise, the participants in the experimental group will not feel physical and mental fatigue due to the increase in exercise intensity. Through the improvement of mental refresh, the sense of quietness, the sense of active participation, and the alleviation of fatigue, the participants’ mood towards work and life had been improved to a certain extent.
The independent sample t test was performed on the test scores of the experimental group and the control group after work input. As shown in Table 8, via aerobics exercise, the work engagement state of the experimental group is significant higher than that of the control group, that is, through aerobics exercise, the work engagement state of the experimental group had been improved and improved to a certain extent.
Table 8
Comparison results of the post-test scores of the experimental group and the control group's work engagement scale
| experimental group (n = 14) | control group (n = 14) | t | P |
Vitality | 24.43 ± 1.098 | 18.79 ± 0.648 | -4.426 | 0.000*** |
Dedication | 26.14 ± 0.937 | 19.00 ± 1.016 | -5.168 | 0.000*** |
Focus | 21.50 ± 0.900 | 15.79 ± 0.681 | -5.063 | 0.000*** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
General Life Satisfaction Scale Post Test Score Results
The independent sample t test on the general life satisfaction scores of the experimental group and the control group were shown in Table 9. This showed that after aerobics exercises, the life satisfaction of the experimental group is higher than that of the control group, that is, the life satisfaction of the experimental group has been improved to a certain extent by aerobics exercise.
Table 9
Comparison results of the post-test scores of the general life satisfaction scale between the experimental group and the control group
| experimental group (n = 14) | control group (n = 14) | t | P |
General life satisfaction | 25.07 ± 0.774 | 11.29 ± 0.910 | -11.539 | 0.000*** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |
Post-test results of body composition of the experimental group and the control group
The result of body composition of the experimental group and the control group were shown in Table 10. The independent sample t test results show that, the weight and BMI between the experimental group and the control grouphad no significant difference. The body fat mass, body fat percentage and lean body mass of the experimental group were significantly much lower than the control group. The further data showed that after 12 weeks of aerobics exercise, the values of all the five above indicators of body composition of the experimental group were lower than the control group.
Table 10
Comparison results of post-test scores of body composition between the experimental group and the control group (n = 14)
| experimental group | control group | t | P |
Body weight | 54.57 ± 0.998 | 56.36 ± 1.097 | 1.204 | 0.240 |
Body fat mass | 14.92 ± 0.788 | 20.13 ± 0.998 | 4.096 | 0.000*** |
Body fat percentage | 27.17 ± 1.078 | 35.60 ± 1.327 | 4.930 | 0.000*** |
BMI | 19.84 ± 1.465 | 20.56 ± 0.398 | 1.287 | 0.209 |
Lean body mass | 39.72 ± 0.562 | 36.23 ± 0.858 | -3.406 | 0.002** |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001 |