1H NMR spectroscopy of DSPE-PEG-Mal-Tf
The synthesis scheme of A54-PEG-SA is shown in Scheme 2. To identify the junction between transferrin ligand and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine PEG Maleimide (DSPE-PEG-Mal), we performed 1H NMR spectra with chloroform-d. As shown in Figure 1A, the peaks at about 3.57 ppm in the spectrum pf DSPE-PEG-Mal was belonging to the proton of -PEG, and the peaks at about 6.60-6.70 ppm belonging to the proton of -maleimide. Peaks at 3.57 ppm attributed to -PEG were also observed in the spectrum of DSPE-PEG-Tf, and at the same time, while the proton peak of maleimide (6.60-6.70 ppm) at the composition could not be observed, which indicated that maleimide was linked. Together, these results demonstrate the successful synthesis of DSPE-PEG-Tf.
Scheme 2. Synthetic Scheme of DSPE-PEG-Tf
Synthesis and characterization of LPs, Tf-LPs, LP/DOX, Tf-LP/DOX
Liposomes were prepared by membrane ultrasound and doxorubicin encapsulation via ammonium sulfate gradient method. The particle size and size distribution of liposomes were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Table 1). As shown in Figure1B-E, the average particle sizes of blank liposomes (LPs) and transferrin modified liposomes (Tf-LP) were 83.97±4.79 nm and 91.25±7.39 nm, respectively. On the other hand, doxorubicin loaded liposomes (LP/DOX) and transferrin modified liposomes loaded with doxorubicin (Tf-LP/DOX) were 62.58±5.69 nm and 48.05±7.76 nm, respectively. TEM examinations showed that each type of liposomes had a hollow spherical morphology, and their average particle sizes were similar to those measured by DLS. These results suggested that the average particle size of liposomes could be reduced by encapsulating them within the anti-cancer drug of DOX, which could be due to the intermolecular interaction. It should be noted that liposomes with size< 80 nm are effective at delivering the drug into lesion sites, which could provide an excellent anticancer capability [43].
Drug loading, encapsulation efficacy and Drug release
Then, the drug loading (DL) and encapsulation efficacy (EE) of liposomes were quantified by a fluorescence spectrophotometer via a centrifugal ultrafiltration method. As displayed in Table 1, both of LP and Tf-LP had a high DOX encapsulation efficiency, which was 88.11±3.39% and 93.82±1.28%, respectively. The drug loading of LP and Tf-LP were calculated to be 9.85±0.69% and 10.26±0.72%, respectively. The drug release profiles suggested that free DOX exhibited a rapid release behavior, with approximately 100% of DOX was released within 10 h (Figure 1F). In comparison, Tf-LP/DOX had a proper sustained release profile, with 89.8% of DOX was released within 24h. We also found that the drug release behavior of Tf-LP/DOX was quite similar to that of LP/DOX, suggesting that the transferrin modification slightly influenced the drug release performance of liposomes.
Table 1. Particle Diameter and Zeta Potential of blank LP, TF-LP, LP/DOX, Tf-LP/DOX. Drug loading, encapsulation efficacy of LP/DOX and Tf-LP/DOX.
Figure 1. (A) 1H NMR of DSPE PEG-Tf,the major peaks were pointed out; (B)The size distribution and morphology of LPs; (C) The size distribution and morphology of Tf-LP; (D) The size distribution and morphology of LP/DOX; (E) The size distribution and morphology of Tf-LP/DOX; (F) Drug release of free DOX, LP/DOX, Tf-LP/DOX.
AFP specific expression and AFP promoter drives Fth expression in AFP-positive cells
The expression levels of AFP protein in HepG2 and LO2 cells were verified by western blot analysis. The results showed that LO2 cells had a lower amount of APF protein as compared with HepG2 cells (Figures 2A and 2C). As the expression level of AFP protein is a good indicator of AFP activity [25], HepG2 cells were considered AFP positive, while LO2 cells were considered as AFP-negative in this study. The above result demonstrated the feasibility of AFP as the promoter in AFP/Fth plasmid and provide the basis for the subsequent verification test.
To examine whether transfected by the plasmid which contains ferritin heavy chain at the same time with AFP as a promoter caused ferritin overexpression, western blot was performed. As presented in Figures 2B and 2D, the expression level of ferritin in HepG2 with transfection was significantly higher than those without transfection. On the other hand, transfection for 48 h resulted in a higher amount of ferritin expressed in HepG2 cells than those for 24 h. These results have supported that ferritin could be overexpressed after the liver cancer cells were transfected with AFP/Fth. Transfection for 48h as a key time point was then chosen for the following studies.
Specific upregulation of TfR
To examine the effects of AFP/Fth transfection time (24 and 48h) on the TfR expression level, hepatoma carcinoma cells (HepG2) were transfected with or without ferritin reporter gene and observed through a laser confocal microscope via an immunofluorescence method. Apparently, TfR was specifically up-regulated in transfected hepatoma carcinoma cells, as evidence showing that the green fluorescence intensity of transfected HepG2 was much stronger than that of untransfected one (Figure 2E). It was also found that the HepG2 transfected with ferritin reporter for 48 h had a higher fluorescence intensity than those transfected for 24 h, indicating that the expression level of TfR could be increased after transfection and showed a more satisfied expression with a proper prolonged transfection time. Collectively, these growing evidences demonstrated that the AFP / Fth plasmid induced the upregulation of TfR on its cell surface after transfection, providing a basis for subsequent targeted therapy.
The signal decreased effect in MRI
The collected cells were subjected to MR imaging to study the contrast imaging effect caused by changed iron uptake ability via AFP/Fth transfection. It was observed in all three groups (non-transfection HepG2 cells group, 24h-transfection HepG2 cells group, 48h-transfection HepG2 cells group) that cells supplemented with an extra FAC concentration resulted in a significant decrease in the signal intensity. It can be explained that on the basis of regulation of transferrin receptors on cancer cell surface, the extra FAC supplement leaded to more cellular iron accumulation, which caused the T2WI intensity signal decline. The growing results of T2-/T2*-WI also suggested that the signal intensity of 24h/48h-transfection HepG2 cells were significantly lower than those without transfection, whether FAC or not (Figure 2F). These phenomena maybe induced by the ferritin overexpression and transferrin receptor upregulation in hepatoma cells after AFP/Fth plasmid transfected. On the other hand, 48h-transfection HepG2 cells group further showed lower signal intensity than those 24h-transfection. It was indicated that 48-hour transfection give rise to a more receptor overexpression possibility so that more iron could be transported into the cell, compared to 24-hour transfection. The quantitative analysis according to the region of interest (ROI=8px) of the T2*WI were analyzed and showed in Figure 2G and 2H. This serial of analysis confirmed that as shown in previous transfection experiments, ferritin overexpression, transferrin receptor up-regulation could lead to the intracellular iron accumulation in the condition of FAC provided, which then bring about the lower T2WI intensity.
Figure 2. (A) Western Blot for AFP of LO2 and HepG2 cells; (B) Western Blot for ferritin of different transfection duration; (C) quantitative values of AFP expression in LO2 and HepG2 cell (*p < 0.05 , vs LO2 cell group n = 3); (D) quantitative values of ferritin expression in HepG2 cells transfected for 24h, 48h, comparing to untransfected HepG2 cells (***p<0.001, vs HepG2 cell group and transfection for 24h group, n=3); ; (E) immunofluorescence for observation that TfR upregulation of HepG2 cells untransfected and transfected for 24h, 48h. (F) MRI for HepG2 cells untransfected or transfected for 24h, 48h; with or without FAC (c=0.5mM) provided; (G) Quantitative T2WI signal intensity analysis of HepG2 cells that unsupplied with FAC untransfected or transfected for 24h, 48h; (H) Quantitative T2WI signal intensity analysis of HepG2 cells that provided with FAC untransfected or transfected for 24h, 48h (**p<0.01, ***p<0.001, vs HepG2 cell group and transfection for 24h group, n=3).
Cellular uptake of transferrin modified particles in HepG2 cells
The cellular uptake of liposomes was observed by a fluorescence inverted microscope. A fluorescence dye of FITC was used to label the blank and target-modified liposomes, which was abbreviated as LPFITC and Tf-LPFITC, respectively. As shown in Figures 3A and 3B, both of transfected and untransfected HepG2 cells showed a gradual increase in fluorescence intensity as the incubation time was increased, suggesting that the cellular uptake of liposomes was time dependent. Looking deeply, transfected HepG2 cells treated with Tf-LPFITC had a stronger fluorescence intensity than those treated with LPFITC, indicating that transferrin-modification could remarkably increase the uptake of liposomes. However, this behavior was not observed in the untransfected HepG2 cells, suggesting that transferrin-modification could specifically target the liposomes to the transfected cells, rather than the untransfected ones. As we mentioned previously, transferrin receptors were largely upregulated on the surface of HepG2 cells after the cells were transfected. The transferrin on the surface of liposomes could specifically target the transferrin receptors, thereby leading to the observation that a higher number of Tf-LPFITC were uptake by the transfected HepG2 cells. Previous research also reported that the transferrin modified nanoparticles have a similar specific homing function for tumor cells that owned abundant TfR to mediate the cellular uptake of drugs [28, 44, 45].
The cytotoxicity of various liposomes
The toxicity of liposomes loaded with or without Dox was investigated via an MTT assay, in which HepG2 cells with or without transfection were used. As revealed in Figure 3C, LPs and Tf-LP showed little toxicity to cells at the tested concentration of10-100 μg/ml. Subsequently, we examined the toxicity effects of Tf-LP/DOX and LP/DOX toward HepG2 cells with or without transfection, in which DOX was used as positive controls. In general, all of the three liposomes reduced the cell viability with increasing the DOX concentration, in which free DOX exhibited the best anti-cancer efficiency (Figures 3D and 3E). In the case of HepG2 without transfection, Tf-LP/DOX and LP/DOX showed a similar ability to kill the cancer cells at the same dose of DOX. For the transfected HepG2 cells, the viability of cells treated with Tf-LP/DOX was clearly lower than those treated with LP/DOX at DOX concentrations of 2-4 μg/ml, which suggested that transferrin modification endows liposomes with a greater anticancer efficiency.
Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence images of untransfected and transfected HepG2 cells incubated with LPFITC and Tf-LPFITC for 0.5 h, 2 h, 6.0 h and 12.0 h, respectively (scale bar=50μm); (B) The quantitative analysis of fluorescence signals, (*p < 0.05 , **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, n = 3); (C) Cell viability was measured for HepG2 cells incubated for with LPs and Tf-LP at various doses for 24h; (D) Cell viability was measured for HepG2 cells incubated for 24 h with LP/DOX and Tf-LP/DOX at various doses for 24h; (E) Cell viability was measured for HepG2 cells that transfected for 48h and then incubated for with LP/DOX and Tf-LP/DOX at various doses for 24h; **p<0.01, (***p<0.001, vs free DOX group, n=6).
Western blotting for tumor transfection
To further verify the targeting expression of Fth in AFP positive hepatocellular carcinoma, the expression level of ferritin was studied via the western blotting method. As shown in Figure 4A, the transfection induced a higher expression level of Fth observed in tumor as compared to liver tissue, which should be mainly attributed to the active targeting ability of Tf-LP/DOX. The quantitative data in Figure 4B also showed that the expression level of Fth protein in transfected tumor was much higher than that in liver and non-transfected tissues, which was in accordance with the easier results obtained in western blotting analysis of cells.
Targeting ability of transferrin modified particles in vivo.
In vivo targeting ability of transferrin-modified liposomes was investigated by intravenously injected the mice with ICG-labeled Tf-LP (Tf-LP/ICG) or LP/ICG. After 24h and 48h of injection, the fluorescence images of major organs and tumors were captured, followed by quantifying the fluorescence intensity of tumors (Figures 4C and 4D). It was shown that the liposomes were mainly accumulated in the liver and tumor. The fluorescence signal of Tf-LP/ICG in tumor collected in transfected mice was significant stronger than that of transfected ones. Nevertheless, the tumor of mice treated with LP/ICG showed significant differences in fluorescence intensity, further verifying the enhanced targeting ability of transferrin-modified liposomes to transfected AFP positive hepatoma carcinoma cell. These results were nearly consistent with those obtained in cellular uptake.
Figure 4. (A) The ferritin expression in liver and tumor of transfection groups were measured by Western Blot assay; (B); The quantitative analysis of protein bands, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs untransfected group, n = 3; (C) Biodistribution of LP/ICG and Tf-LP/ICG in vivo at 24h and 48h; (D) Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity in tumors (n = 3).
The anti-tumor effects
To confirm the therapeutic efficacy of Tf-LP/DOX to the HepG2 cell subcutaneous hepatoma model, we randomly divided the model mice for 6 groups (Figure 5A), and administrated for every 5 days (Figure 5B) with a single dose of 4mg/Kg according to the mean weight of each group via tail vein injection. It should be noted that intratumor injection transfection was given two days prior to treatment for two of the group (Figure 5A). As shown in Figure 5C, the saline group showed a rapid tumor growth, with the relative tumor volume multiplied 22.37- fold within 25 days. In contrast, administration of doxorubicin loaded liposomes could effectively inhibit the tumor growth to a certain extent. It should be noted that Tf-LP/DOX showed the highest efficiency in term of inhibiting tumor growth of the transfection group, which was similar to that of free DOX. At day 25, the final relative tumor volume (RTV) in Tf-LP/DOX of transfection group was notably lower than Tf-LP/DOX of non-transfection group and LP/DOX of transfection group. Meanwhile, fluctuations in body weight in mice during the treatment were an indirect reflect of the safety of the treatment. As shown in Figure 5D, the body weights of mice treated with free DOX significantly decreased, which was on account of its systemic toxicity. Besides the similar results as cytotoxicity experiments, Tf-LP/DOX showed surprising anti-tumor effects after transfection, and its efficacy was even beyond free doxorubicin, which could be explained as the tumor microenvironment was more suitable for Tf-LP / DOX to accumulate and free doxorubicin had no targeting property in vivo in the meantime.
Histological analysis
Anti-tumor effect and side effects of different drugs on important organs during drug administration were observed through H&E staining. The anti-tumor extent was presented in Figure 5E, a multitude of tumor cells were destroyed in Tf-LP/DOX of transfection group. No obviously serious myocardial damage was observed in all groups, which may cause by the short administration period [34].
Figure 5. (A) The plasmid injection and drug injection schedule., respectively; (B) Groups during treatment; (C) Tumor growth curve after injected with various drug with 25 days,*p<0.05 and **p<0.01,vs Tf-LP/DOX (transfected group), n=5; (D) Body weight change curve of the mice; (E) Representative H&E sections of tumor tissue of mice after treatment with various drug.