3.1 Characterization and alkalinity production
Main chemical components of steel slag were shown in Table 3. Although there were some coexisted minor constituents in samples, like ZnO, SrO, MoO3, CuO, they made negligible contribution to ANC. Therefore, only main chemical constituents containing Ca, Fe, Si, Mg, Al, Mn and Cr were considered in the present study.
Table 3
Compositions of the raw steel slag sample (%)
Composition | CaO | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | MgO | MnO | Al2O3 | P2O5 | V2O5 | Cr2O3 |
Content | 41.82 | 25.05 | 11.89 | 6.61 | 5.48 | 2.18 | 1.59 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
Steel slag is a heterogeneous material containing many crystalline phases. Diffraction lines revealed that major phases in the present sample contained C2S, C3S, C2F, f-CaO, RO phase and 2CaO·Fe2O3 (C2F) as shown in Fig. 2, of which the determined f-CaO in raw steel slag was 2.3%. Microstructure and morphology of raw steel slag samples shown that the slag had a porous surface as shown in Fig. 2 (b). Alkalinity production test result in Fig. 2 (c) suggested that, for the tested L/S ratio (1:100), the stable alkalinity was in a range of 100–110 mg/L as CaCO3, and its corresponding pH was 10.5. The alkalinity releasing result was consistent with previous results by other researchers (Goetz and Riefler 2014a), however, the f-CaO content was not as high as the samples reported previous. It is known that the calcium containing components in BOF slags were mainly originated from the added flux materials among steel making process, like lime, limestone (Zvimba et al. 2017). The unreacted limestone left in steel slag was existed in f-CaO form, while the reacted lime stone were transferred to C2S, C3S, CF and other forms by molten reactions (Manchisi et al. 2020). In other words, f-CaO component in steel slag did not play a dominant role in the alkaline production process, but its porous microstructure provided a big surface area and inner channels which had a positive influence on ANC property (Yang et al. 2021).
3.2 Acid neutralization capacity
ANC test results by simulated AMD was shown in Fig. 3 (a), it can see that with the simulated AMD amount increasing, solution pH decreased from 10.5 to 2.15 at the endpoint. For 1 g sample, its consuming simulate AMD volume was 115mL at endpoint, and it was 40 mL when pH reached a neutral value of 7.03. There was a linear relationship between solution pH and added simulated AMD volume with a square R of 0.94. When pH decreased to 7.03, its calculated ANC values was 8.23 mmol H+/g slag which was agreed well with the experiment result conducted by electric arc furnace (EAF) slag. The EAF slag was neutralized by similar method using HNO3 (1M) as simulated AMD, when pH decreased to 7, the calculated ANC of EAF slag was about 5.5 mmol H+/g slag and 7.5 mmol H+/g slag for short and long experiments respectively (Jinying Yan et al. 2000).
Another significant factor on steel slag ANC property was particles size distribution, because smaller particles had larger surface area and are easier to release the alkaline components (Alizadeh and Naseri 2014). ANC results for slag sample of 20, 50 and 100 mesh size indicated that slag of bigger size had smaller ANC values, as shown in Fig. 3 (b). For example, it was 8.53 mL simulated AMD for sample of 20 mesh size when reaching the endpoint. It was much less than the sample of 200 mesh size. It was reported that particles less than 3 mm were the most effective in AMD treatment because of rapid dissolution due to their high surface area (Simmons et al. 2002). However, fine particle slags in SSLB were more likely to precipitate on the bottom of beds, and to increase running resistance (Alizadeh and Naseri 2014, Iakovleva et al. 2015), especially for passive treatment applications. Furthermore, fine slag particles are liable to release the contained heavy metals. It is a more severe problem with fine slag particles, especially for electric arc furnace steel slag (2021, Alizadeh and Naseri 2014). Therefore, it is of great significance to optimize the slag size distribution according to the ANC demand and the geographical environment of remediation site, so as to balance the advantages and disadvantages of the fine particle size.
3.3 Slag characteristics variation during alkalinity consumption process
To investigate the properties variation in neutralization process, four intermediate ANC tests were conducted by adding 23mL, 46mL, 68mL and 92mL simulated AMD respectively, i.e. 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% of the endpoint volume. For brevity, the four intermediate samples and the previous endpoint sample were denoted as S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5.
3.3.1 Leaching characteristics
Leaching ratios for various slag components were listed in Fig. 4, it can be that leaching ratios of all components generally increased with simulated AMD increasing, but with respective characteristics .
As the dominant sector in steel slag, Ca, Mg, Si, Al-bearing components had been studied extensively in regards to leaching behaviors. Reported leaching experiment had confirmed that the Mg- and Ca-bearing constituents in steel slag contribute hugely to the short-term acid neutralization process, while Si and Al-bearing constituents discharge alkaline materials over a longer period of time due to their lower dissolution rate (Masindi et al. 2021). Slag leaching result by HCl (0.1M) also confirmed that CaO is more active than other Ca-containing minerals, its leaching ratio was more than 80%; followed by was the silicates, its leaching ratio was more than 45%; then were the aluminates and ferrite, their leaching ratios were less than 30% (Hall et al. 2014).
As for the leaching results in the present study, leaching ratio and leaching concentration of Calcium-bearing components increased firstly and then decreased. Sample S2 had the maximum Ca leaching ratio of 28.73%, and leaching concentration was 9.20 mg/L.
Mg-bearing constitutes was another important alkaline resource, whose leaching ratio increased directly with the adding simulated AMD increasing with a maximum value of 56.75% at endpoint. But Mg-bearing ingredients in slags were relatively small, so its final concentration was only 2.03 mg/L.
Si-bearing components in steel slag were mainly existed in form of C3S, C2S, C2MS, therefore, when the Ca/Mg-bearing silicate components dissolved in solution, both the Si-bearing components and Ca-, Mg-bearing components had similar variation trends as illustrated in Fig. 4.
For Al-bearing constitutes, their leaching ratios were close to zero until simulated AMD volume reached 69 mL. PH trends in Fig. 2 suggested that it was in neutral range till adding 60 mL simulated AMD, which suggested that the solution was alkaline until the consuming AMD amount achieved 60 mL. Under that conditions, Al in solutions were likely to precipitate as hydroxide. Leaching concentration of Al was 0.31 mg/L shown in Fig. 4 (b).
For Fe- and Cr-bearing constitutes, their leaching ratio trends were similar to the Al-bearing ones, which may due to the pH variations mentioned above. Final concentration of Fe and Cr were only 2.14 mg/L and 1.06 mg/L at the endpoint.
For Mn containing constitutes, their concentrations in solution increased directly with the increase of the simulated AMD amount, but MnO in steel slag and 0.06 mg/L. They had minor influence on the the slag alkalinity.
3.3.2 Phase characteristics
Steel slag phase transformation in the neutralization process was showed Fig. 5. Compared with the original steel slag sample, samples neutralized by simulated AMD had stronger diffraction intensity, which may be caused by the amorphous mineral components removal when steel slag were washed by DI water and acid solution. Diffraction intensity of CaSO4·0.5 H2O became stronger with the consuming simulated AMD increasing, meanwhile components of the raw samples became weak. Secondly, steel slag was a complicated heterogeneous solid mixture formed in a molten state at high temperature (Sithole et al. 2020), making various mineral constituents complicated. Although the exact disappearance sequence for different mineral in real steel slags were difficult to obtained by XRD determination, some interesting clues were provided, which were highlighted by dotted line in Fig. 4. It is known that f-CaO was one of the most active alkaline component in steel slag, but was not prominent in the XRD patterns because of its few mass percentage. But for sample S2 ,there was a obvious f-CaO, which maybe due to the dissolution of the outer layer of the f-CaO constitute. Further dissolution reactions make f-CaO peak disappeared again. Another interesting line was the CaFeSi2O6 peak in sample S1 to S5 because its persistence in the neutralization process. It can be speculated that the CaFeSi2O6 was not likely to dissolve in simulated AMD. As for Ca2SiO4 and Ca3SiO5, the major Ca-bearing components in steel slag, their peaks had different trends by comparison the diffraction peak in range of 26.2° and 37.4°. The disappearance of Ca2SiO4 peaks was accompanied by the formation of CaSO4·0.5 H2O throughout the neutralization process, while Ca3SiO5 peaks disappeared at the beginning period. Therefor, the Ca3SiO5 phase was possibly easier to react with the simulated AMD than phase Ca2SiO4.
To investigate the phase change for single component of real steel slags in acid solutions, thermodynamic calculation was used to explore the priority of different minerals. Possible reactions between slag components and simulated AMD (0.1 M H2SO4) was listed in Table 4. The related Gibbs free energy of the reactions indicated that the reaction sequence of components with simulated AMD were CaO > MgO > FeO > C2S > C2F > C3S under room temperature (Liang Z., et al. 2020). But some synthetic pure Ca and Mg bearing minerals studied by leaching experiments and thermodynamic analysis thought that the leaching order for different phase is CaO > (Ca3Al2O6, γ-Ca2SiO4, Ca3MgSi2O8, and Ca2MgSi2O7) > (Ca12Al14O33, and Ca2Fe2O5).
Table 4
Possible reactions occurred in titration process
Component | Reactions |
\(\text{C}\text{a}\text{O}\) | \(\text{C}\text{a}\text{O}+2{H}^{+}\to {Ca}^{2+}+{H}_{2}O\) |
\(\text{M}\text{g}\text{O}\) | \(\text{M}\text{g}\text{O}+2{H}^{+}\to {Mg}^{2+}+{H}_{2}O\) |
\(\text{C}\text{a}{\left(\text{O}\text{H}\right)}_{2}\) | \(\text{C}\text{a}{\left(\text{O}\text{H}\right)}_{2}+2{\text{H}}^{+}\to {\text{C}\text{a}}^{2+}+{2\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}\) |
\(\text{M}\text{g}{\left(\text{O}\text{H}\right)}_{2}\) | \(\text{M}\text{g}{\left(\text{O}\text{H}\right)}_{2}+2{\text{H}}^{+}\to {\text{M}\text{g}}^{2+}+{2\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}\) |
\({{\text{C}\text{a}}_{2}\text{S}\text{i}\text{O}}_{4}\) | \({{\text{C}\text{a}}_{2}\text{S}\text{i}\text{O}}_{4}\to 2CaO+{SiO}_{2}\) |
| \(2\text{C}\text{a}\text{O}+4{\text{H}}^{+}\to {2\text{C}\text{a}}^{2+}+2{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}\) |
\({{\text{C}\text{a}}_{3}\text{S}\text{i}\text{O}}_{5}\) | \({{\text{C}\text{a}}_{3}\text{S}\text{i}\text{O}}_{5}\to 3CaO+{SiO}_{2}\) |
| \(3\text{C}\text{a}\text{O}+6{\text{H}}^{+}\to {3\text{C}\text{a}}^{2+}+3{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}\) |
\({{\text{C}\text{a}\text{F}\text{e}}_{2}\text{O}}_{5}\) | \({{\text{C}\text{a}\text{F}\text{e}}_{2}\text{O}}_{5}\to CaO+{{Fe}_{2}O}_{3}\) |
| \(3\text{C}\text{a}\text{O}+6{\text{H}}^{+}\to {3\text{C}\text{a}}^{2+}+3{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}\) |
\({\text{C}\text{a}\text{S}\text{O}}_{4}\) | \({\text{C}\text{a}}^{2+}+{\text{S}\text{O}}_{4}^{2-}\to {\text{C}\text{a}\text{S}\text{O}}_{4}\) |
For the typical components of BOF slags, the alkaline components in steel slag could be classified into three groups according to their solubility. The first group were f-CaO, MgO, C2F; the second group included weakly bound CaO, MgO and some loosed bound C2S; while the third group contained some tightly bound C2S, C3S, MgO and FeO) (Bodurtha and Brassard 2000). It means that the dissolved CaO, MgO and FeO were preferential to react with the simulated AMD over C2S, C3F2 and C3S. (Manchisi et al. 2020, Bodurtha and Brassard 2000, Xue et al. 2013).
3.3.3 Morphology characteristics
There was a significant change for slag particle appearance before and after acid neutralization process, morphological features of sample S1 to S5 were shown in Fig. 6. For samples S1 and S2, most slag particles still had a block shapes as raw slag samples. But for samples S3, long trips well crystallized particles were emerged. And as for sample S4 and S5, crystal dimension was much bigger than that in sample S3, in addition, there were some new formed porous precipitate on surface of the crystals. Therefore, with the added simulated AMD increasing, there were more mineral composition dissolved and precipitate. The dissolving reaction made the original steel slag particle size became smaller, while the residual was then wrapped by the new formed precipitate and grown bigger.
Chemical compositions for several specific positions selected on slag surface of various morphology were tested by EDS, shown in Table 5. Position 1 was selected on the surface of a block porous particle in sample S1, its major elements includes calcium, sulfur, oxide, the less content elements were Si, Al, and Fe was not detected. Its chemical position was not conform to sulfate calcium or Ca-bearing silicates in original steel slags. Its high sulfur content indicated the sulfate formation, while the less Si content may due to the dissolution of the silicates in steel slags. Combined the phase transition and the micro-structure determination results, it can speculated that the S1 sample was under the coupled reactions of dissolution and sulfate formation, but the dissolution reaction play a dominant role. Similar analysis were conducted for position 2 to position 6. Take position 2 for example, its Ca, S and O percentage were higher than that of position 1, especially the Si content was very small, thus it may be on sulfate surface. The high content of Ca and S of position 3 further confirmed the existence of sulfate crystal with the simulated AMD increasing. As for position 4, its major elements were Si and O, it maybe the leaching residual after Ca, Mg bearing components dissolution. Position 5 and position 6 were selected on the surface of well-crystallized sulfate in sample S4 and S5, their main elements were Ca, S and O, with minor content of Fe, and Si.
Table 5
Chemical composition of the slags via EDS (%)
Composition | Ca | S | O | Mg | Si | Al | Fe |
1 | 16.72 | 12.12 | 47.64 | 0.02 | 22.7 | 0.26 | 0.54 |
2 | 24.36 | 19.74 | 53.94 | 0.03 | 1.88 | 0.05 | - |
3 | 48.05 | 34.12 | 17.7 | - | 0.07 | - | - |
4 | 5.8 | 3.96 | 40.62 | 0.02 | 48.37 | 0.58 | 0.58 |
5 | 42.12 | 31.62 | 26.09 | 0.04 | - | 0.04 | - |
6 | 57.06 | 34.4 | 6.63 | - | 0.54 | - | 1.30 |
Surface area and pore volume determination results were describe in Fig. 7 and Table 5. The results indicating that calculated surface area and total volume increased with the consuming simulated AMD. It is easy to understand that with the dissolution reactions occurring, such as Ca- and Mg-bearing constitutes on the surface and inner of slag particles, producing new pores and dissolution channels formed, which could promote the surface area and pore diameters. Especially, the overall SEM image indicated the slag particle appearance change into strip shape from block shape, which suggested the sulfate crystal was selected on the original slag surface, while the reactions of the dissolved calcium and the added sulfate radical making the crystal grown up. Then the slag particles was encased, and was connected to adjacent particles by the grown sulfate crystals. Meanwhile, the inner undissolved ingredients of the steel slag was blocked by the new grown sulfate, leading the neutralization reaction stopped gradually. In summary, the 40% of the neutralization endpoint was seem to be a turning point for the dissolution reaction and precipitate reaction.
3.4 ANC test by real AMD
To further investigate the influence of real acid mine drainage components on ANC property of the slag sample, neutralization procedure was conducted using real AMD sample.
For acid neutralization capacity test, the titration procedures and endpoint regulation was consistent with the simulated AMD experiments. Its pH variation trends in neutralization process was described in Fig. 8. The consuming real AMD volume was 670 mL and 230 mL for 1g steel slag sample when neutralization process reached endpoint and neutral rang (pH = 7), and the corresponding ANC results were 2.34 mmol H+/g slag and 0.85 mmol H+/g slag. Compare with simulated AMD, steel slag ANC for real AMD was relatively low, which was due to the metal ions, like Fe2+, Mg2+, Al3+. The metals ion in real AMD would also consume alkaline components of steel slag (Sephton and Webb 2019, Tabelin et al. 2020). Component distribution was tested on steel slag surface was detected by EDS detector, the results indicated that the Ca-bearing areas were overlapped to the S area, thus it can be speculated the CaSO4 containing compound was formed and precipitated in the neutralization process. Moreover, the Fe-, Si- and Mg- enriched areas on the surface were observed at else areas, which may be caused by the hydroxides the of the metal ions precipitated (Eq. 1) or adsorbed (Eq. 2) from AMD solution as followings.
> Si - OH··· H- O- H [Me(OH2)3]2+⟷ > Si- O Me + H3O+ (1)
Me2++OH−⟷ Me(OH)++OH−⟷ Me(OH)2 (2)