Chronic Elevation of Troponin I Predicts the Extent of Coronary Artery Disease in Hemodialysis Patients Presenting with Acute Enzyme Elevation

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-195674/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Chronic Elevation of Troponin I Predicts the Extent of Coronary Artery Disease in Hemodialysis Patients Presenting with Acute Enzyme Elevation

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-195674/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Chronic elevation of cardiac troponin I (cTn-I) has been associated with severe angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis. However, for patients presenting with an acute rise in serum cTn-I levels, the association is less clear.

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 364 hemodialysis patients. Using coronary angiography, we correlated the asymptomatic baseline elevation of cTn-I with the severity of coronary artery stenosis when hemodialysis patients present with acute symptomatic elevation in serum cTn-I above baseline levels.

Results

In hemodialysis patients presenting with a rise in serum cTn-I above baseline levels, 59% had severe CAD, and 17% had no angiographic evidence of CAD. Hemodialysis patients with severe CAD had significantly higher baseline cTn-I levels compared to patients with non-severe CAD or normal coronaries (p < 0.0001). Baseline elevation of cTn-I in the severe CAD group was correlated with the degree of CAD occlusion (R² of 0.56, p < 0.0001), fitting a positive linear model. Furthermore, baseline cTn-I differentiates between patients with and without severe CAD with a test accuracy of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69–0.75, p < 0.001). At a value of ≥ 0.2 ng/mL (cutoff value for myocardial necrosis), the specificity of baseline cTn-I for underlying severe CAD was 0.95.

Conclusions

Elevated baseline cTn-I has good accuracy for anticipating more advanced angiographic CAD when hemodialysis patients present with a symptomatic rise in serum cTn-I above baseline levels. Baseline elevation of cTn-I can be used for cardiac disease risk management in hemodialysis patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of CAD.

Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Cardiac troponin I

end-stage renal disease

coronary artery disease

coronary angiography

In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis, coronary artery disease (CAD) is present in about 42% of this population, and is the leading cause of mortality (~ 50% of deaths) [1, 2]. Cardiac troponin I (cTn-I) is the preferred cardiac biomarker for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with both normal renal function and those on hemodialysis [3]. Also, cardiac biomarkers are a sensitive prognostic tool for poor survival, a higher risk of cardiac death and all-cause mortality in clinically stable hemodialysis patients [4–7]. Baseline cTn-I is elevated in the majority of hemodialysis patients in the absence of CAD symptoms. Many studies investigated the link between elevated cardiac biomarkers and underlying cardiac pathology in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients. However, only a few investigated the predictive role of chronically elevated cTn-I and the severity of CAD when hemodialysis patients present with symptoms and a rise in serum cTn-I above baseline levels.

Although hemodialysis patients have high CAD-related morbidity and mortality, chronic baseline cTn-I elevation is frequently overlooked due to the frequency of its occurrence. Also, clinicians are often challenged regarding the appropriate workup and management of asymptomatic patients with elevated cTn-I. This study aims to investigate the role of chronic elevation of baseline cTn-I in predicting the severity of angiographic CAD burden in hemodialysis patients presenting with a symptomatic rise in serum cTn-I above baseline levels. We also aim to determine if a specific cTn-I cutoff value can provide further information regarding the risk of having obstructive CAD.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective analysis at the Detroit Medical Center, a major academic medical center affiliated with Wayne State University. We conducted this study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol (1710000950) was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital and the medical institutional review board approved the study (M1 IRB 110717M1X). The need for informed consent was waived from the ethics committee given the retrospective nature of the analysis.

We screened all patients with a history of ESRD on hemodialysis who were hospitalized between July 2014 and September 2017 for inclusion into the study. Inclusion criteria included (1) patients with ESRD above the age of 18 on hemodialysis for three or more months, (2) patients admitted to the inpatient ward or intensive care unit with symptoms of chest pain and/or dyspnea,(3) patients who had a rise of serum cTn-I above baseline value with at least one value above the 99^th percentile upper reference limit (URL), (4) cTn-I measured in the last three months before the index admission, and the measurement was not related to an acute cardiac presentation, and (5) coronary angiography performed within 48 hours of hospital admission (Figure 1). Exclusion criteria included patients with known prior history of CAD, cocaine abuse (historical or documented by positive urine drug screening), acute sepsis, bleeding, severe anemia, and pulmonary embolism.

Study variables

CAD severity was quantified according to the coronary angiographic luminal narrowing, based on the original report, into none, mild (coronary stenosis < 50%), moderate (coronary stenosis 50-70%), and severe (coronary stenosis > 70%, or thrombus) in one or more major epicardial vessels, including the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. Demographic information and clinical characteristics were obtained by review of electronic medical records. Hypertension was defined as untreated systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or being on antihypertensive medications. Hyperlipidemia was defined as total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≤40 mg/dL in men; ≤50 mg/dL in women), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL, or by using lipid-lowering therapies. Diabetes mellitus was defined as glycosylated hemoglobin ≥ 6.5%, or by using glucose-lowering medications. For cTn-I measurements, the institution used Bayer ADVIA Centaur chemiluminometric‐immunoassay (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, New York, USA) to determine serum cTn-I. The assay’s limit of detection (LoD) is 0.02 ng/mL, and the 99^th percentile URL is 0.2 ng/. cTn-I values between 0.02 and 0.2 ng/mL are considered in the indeterminate range.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM). cTn-I values were transformed to their corresponding log¹⁰ to reduce data skewness and to use other analysis methods. The normality of data distribution was tested using the D'Agostino-Pearson normality test at 95% confidence. All four study groups (none, mild CAD, moderate CAD, and severe CAD) were found to have a normal distribution (P > 0.05). No outliers were identified at a Z-score of ±2. All data points were included in the subsequent analyses.

One-way analysis of variance was used to examine the mean differences between groups of more than two. For post-hoc analysis, Tukey's HSD test was used to compare the pair of means between groups. A Chi-Square test was used to determine differences between categorical variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression model were used to correlate the severity of angiographic CAD in the severe group with variation in baseline cTn-I levels. We calculated the test's sensitivity and specificity at various cTn-I cutoff values and used the Youden index to identify the optimal cutoff point. To measure test accuracy, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A 2-sided p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 7.04 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California, USA).

After a careful electronic medical record chart review of 1,123 patients, a total of 364 patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 62.0 ± 13.0 years, of which 215 (59%) were men, and 317 (87%) were African Americans. Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, and cTn-I values are shown in Table 1. Out of the 364 patients, 215 (59%) had severe CAD, 53 (14%) had moderate CAD, 35 (10%) had mild CAD, and 61 (17%) had no angiographic evidence of CAD. No age and sex differences were noted between CAD groups. However, the severe CAD group had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, and hyperlipidemia, but no significant differences in hypertension or smoking.

Baseline cTn-I was detectable in 307 (84%) hemodialysis patients; of those, 232 (64%) had indeterminate cTn-I elevations, and 75 (20%) had positive cTn-I elevation (at or above the 99th percentile URL). Patients with negative baseline cTn-I levels were more likely to be in the CAD-free group (p < 0.0001). On the other hand, patients with positive baseline cTn-I elevation were more likely to have severe CAD (p < 0.0001).

Table 1

Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and cTn-I levels in the study subjects
Variables	Angiographic CAD classification					P-value*
	None (n = 61)	Mild (n = 35)	Moderate (n = 53)	Severe (n = 215)	Total (n = 364)
Demographics
Age, mean (SD, years)	53 (12)	57 (15)	68 (11)	63 (12)	62 (13)	< 0.001
Female, n (%)	28 (46)	14 (40)	23 (43)	84 (39)	149 (41)	0.78
African American, n (%)	56 (92)	34 (97)	48 (91)	177 (82)	315 (86)	0.005
CAD Risk factors
Smoking, n (%)	34 (56)	14 (40)	20 (38)	116 (54)	184 (51)	0.08
Diabetes Miletus, n (%)	21 (34)	14 (40)	33 (62)	164 (76)	232 (64)	< 0.0001
Hypertension, n (%)	55 (90)	31 (89)	48 (91)	199 (93)	333 (91)	0.40
Peripheral Arterial Disease, n (%)	9 (15)	4 (11)	8 (15)	72 (33)	93 (26)	0.0005
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)	13 (21)	4 (11)	21 (40)	111 (52)	149 (41)	< 0.0001
Baseline cTn-I
LoD 0.02 ng/mL, n (%)	27 (44)	7 (20)	8 (15)	15 (7)	57 (16)	< 0.0001
Indeterminate 0.02–0.19 ng/mL, n (%)	33 (54)	26 (74)	42 (79)	131 (61)	232 (64)	0.078
99th percentile URL ≥ 0.20 ng/mL, n (%)	1 (2)	2 (6)	3 (6)	69 (32)	75 (20)	0.0001
CAD, Coronary Artery Disease; cTn-I, Cardiac Troponin I; LoD, Limit of Detection; n, number; SD, Standard Deviation; URL, Upper Reference Limit. *P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The baseline elevation of cTn-I levels in hemodialysis patients was positively correlated with the angiographic CAD burden. One-way ANOVA comparing mean baseline cTn-I levels in CAD subgroups showed a significant difference in baseline cTn-I levels (p < 0.0001). Post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test revealed that mean cTn-I level in the severe CAD group (mean = 0.17 ng/mL and SEM = 0.013) was significantly higher than the moderate CAD group (mean = 0.09 ng/mL and SEM = 0.015, p = 0.01), mild CAD group (mean = 0.08 ng/mL and SEM = 0.02, p = 0.002), and the CAD free group (mean = 0.05 ng/mL and SEM = 0.007, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2A).

Next, we correlated the severity of angiographic CAD in the severe group with baseline cTn-I levels. Pearson's correlation showed a significant positive correlation between the two variables (r = 0.56; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2B). We conducted a multiple linear regression, using baseline cTn-I as the independent variable and CAD severity as the dependent variable. We adjusted for age as a potential confounding variable in our regression model. There was a significant regression equation (p < 0.0001); for each ten-unit increase in cTn-I troponin (measured in the log transformant), the % predicted severity of CAD stenosis increased by 12.05%. After adjustment for age, gender, and CAD risk factors, CAD remained statistically significantly associated with baseline cTn-I (p < 0.0001).

cTn-I at a cutoff value of 0.10 ng/mL was found to be the optimal point with the best sensitivity-to-specificity balance. At that value, the sensitivity of elevated baseline cTn-I for a diagnosis of severe CAD was 0.8 (0.73–0.86), the specificity was 0.59 (0.52–0.65), the positive predictive value was 0.57 (0.50–0.68), and the negative predictive value was 0.81 (0.74–0.85). At a value of 0.20 ng/mL or more (cutoff value for myocardial necrosis), the sensitivity of elevated baseline cTn-I for a diagnosis of severe CAD was 0.23, and the specificity was 0.95 (Table 2). Overall, baseline cTn-I differentiates between patients with and without advanced CAD (AUC = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.69–0.75, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3).

Table 2

Sensitivity and specificity of severe CAD at various baseline cTn-I cutoff values
Cutoff value	Sensitivity	Specificity	Youden Index*
≥ 0.02 ng/mL	0.93	0.28	0.21
≥ 0.04 ng/mL	0.77	0.44	0.22
≥ 0.06 ng/mL	0.70	0.58	0.27
≥ 0.08 ng/mL	0.63	0.72	0.36
^£≥ 0.10 ng/mL	0.59	0.80	0.38
≥ 0.12 ng/mL	0.52	0.83	0.35
≥ 0.14 ng/mL	0.44	0.89	0.32
≥ 0.16 ng/mL	0.35	0.89	0.25
≥ 0.18 ng/mL	0.33	0.90	0.22
^¥≥ 0.20 ng/mL	0.23	0.95	0.17
≥ 0.22 ng/mL	0.20	0.95	0.15
≥ 0.24 ng/mL	0.18	0.95	0.13
≥ 0.26 ng/mL	0.17	0.96	0.13
≥ 0.28 ng/mL	0.14	0.97	0.12
≥ 0.30 ng/mL	0.13	0.98	≤ 0.11
CAD Coronary Artery Disease, cTn-I Cardiac Troponin I. *Youden Index: (Sensitivity + Specificity) -1. ^£Optimal cutoff with the best sensitivity-to-specificity balance. ^¥cTn-I cutoff value for myocardial necrosis.

In this study, we investigated the relationship between baseline elevation of cTn-I in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients and the angiographic CAD burden when they present with symptomatic elevation in serum cTn-I above baseline levels. For such a presentation, our findings demonstrated that in hemodialysis patients with no known prior CAD, 59% had severe angiographic CAD, and only 17% had normal coronary angiography. Moreover, baseline elevation of cTn-I in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients was significantly correlated with the angiographic CAD burden, and with the increased baseline cTn-I levels, the specificity of this cardiac biomarker increases to predict more advanced angiographic CAD.

The assessment of CAD in ESRD is challenging [8]. We included patients with or without baseline elevation of cTn-I and excluded patients with known underlying CAD. Our study's most important finding is that despite baseline elevation in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients, cTn-I is still reliably associated with the presence and severity of coronary stenosis. Baseline cTn-I was elevated in 84% and above the 99th percentile URL in 20% of the study population, similar to the previously reported elevation of cTn-I in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients [9]. Baseline cTn-I in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients predicted severe CAD with a specificity of 0.95 and an overall accuracy of 0.72. The specificity increased dramatically with increased baseline cTn-I. Therefore, the higher the baseline cTn-I values, the more likely the presentation is due to more advanced CAD. This was in line with previous studies showing that patients presenting with altered cTn are at high risk of coronary stenosis [10], and baseline cTn-I are rarely elevated without evidence of CAD in hemodialysis patients [11]. Moreover, a previous study showed that not only a negative cTn-I identifies patients at low risk of MI and 30-day cardiac mortality, but also those with cTn-I levels at or above the 99th percentile had a 2-fold increased risk of MI and cardiac death at one year [12]. In our study, patients with baseline cTn-I above the 99th percentile had a high test accuracy to indicate more advanced CAD. Therefore, earlier cardiac workup and more strict risk management might be suggested, given that hemodialysis patients with MI suffer dismal long-term survival [13, 14].

Our study adds to the growing literature demonstrating the diagnostic power of cTn-I cardiac for predicting the severity of CAD in hemodialysis patients. Our findings should help clarify the challenging clinical problem of interpreting the significance of the symptomatic rise of cTn-I when there is an existing elevation of cTn-I in hemodialysis patients. We show a low false-positive elevation of cTn-I to predict advanced CAD. Various risk stratification models that are routinely used in clinical practice have been shown to improve clinical outcomes and reduce the financial burden on the healthcare system. Improving our ability to forecast risk, especially in a high-risk population like hemodialysis patients, has tangible benefits. Therefore, our results suggest the potential value of including baseline cTn measurements to the existing scoring systems for risk stratification of patients hospitalized for suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

The pathophysiology behind cTn-I elevations in hemodialysis patients is not fully understood [15, 16]. The elevation of cardiac biomarkers is predictive of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, suggesting true underlying cardiac pathology [5, 7, 17]. Several studies have implicated epicardial CAD as a potentially major cause of increased cTn-I in hemodialysis patients[17, 18]. Other cardiac pathologies like microvascular dysfunction, diffuse CAD, vascular calcification, and arteriosclerosis can potentially explain the chronic enzyme elevation [8, 19]. Results from our study support this evidence by showing that the severity of coronary stenosis is associated with higher baseline cTn-I.

Concerning CAD risk factors, we noted, unsurprisingly, a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and peripheral artery diseases in hemodialysis patients with severe CAD. Hypertension was present in most hemodialysis patients (91%) regardless of their CAD status. This was similar to previous reports documenting hypertension as high as 86% in chronic hemodialysis patients.[20, 21] Likewise, smoking prevalence was equally high in all groups. We demonstrate that more CAD risk factors are associated with an increased risk of obstructive CAD in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, optimal medical management for CAD risk factors in hemodialysis patients is essential. Very few clinical trials have investigated outcomes of conservative strategy compared to invasive strategy in coronary disease in patients with advanced kidney disease [22, 23]. However, none of these studies have differentiated the outcomes in hemodialysis patients with or without cTn-I elevation.

We recognize some limitations in our study. The retrospective design, the majority of the study population, consisted of African Americans, who share a disproportionately higher prevalence of ESRD and are overall understudied; this can affect the generalizability of the results. There may be selection bias as hemodialysis patients with no measured baseline cTn-I level were automatically excluded, and the study was limited to hospitalized patients. Also, there were no cardiac structural and functional correlations with the baseline elevation of cTn-I, focusing only on the association with the angiographic CAD burden. Lastly, the study was not designed to evaluate the prognostic value of elevated baseline cTn-I.

The evaluation of CAD in hemodialysis patients with elevated baseline cTn-I is challenging. Clinical judgment remains a critical component for assessing the asymptomatic elevation of baseline cTn-I in hemodialysis patients when they present with a rise in serum cTn-I levels and symptoms suggestive of ACS. Along with traditional CAD risk factors, baseline cTn-I is predictive of advanced CAD and can be incorporated into existing scoring systems for risk stratification of hemodialysis patients hospitalized for suspected ACS. These results can also suggest the potential utilization of baseline cTn-I to identify the cohort with more advanced CAD who would likely derive benefit from an early aggressive management strategy before the onset of symptoms. Ultimately, well-conducted clinical trials are needed for a more optimal evaluation of cTn’s and treatment strategies of CAD in this group of patients.

cTn-I: cardiac troponin I; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; HD: hemodialysis; CAD: coronary artery disease; LoD: limit of detection limit; URL: upper reference limit; ACS: acute coronary syndrome; MI: myocardial infarction; AUC: area under the curve; CAD: coronary artery disease; ROC: receiver operating characteristic; SD: standard deviation; SEM: standard error of the mean.

Acknowledgment

None

Author contributions

MT: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, and writing the original draft. AT: formal analysis and writing the original draft. OD: formal analysis and draft review & editing. MA: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, and writing the original draft. YA: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, and writing the original draft. DW: Supervision, interpretation of data, and draft review & editing. All authors approved this version to be published.

Funding

None

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol (1710000950) was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Detroit Medical Center. The institutional review board (IRB), IRB00000325 M1-Medical adult committee, of Wayne State University and Detroit Medical Center approved the study (IRB no. 110717M1X) under the name "Predicting model for performing cardiac catheterization in patients with end-stage renal disease presenting with acute on chronic Troponin I elevation”. The need for informed consent was waived from the ethics committee and the IRB of Wayne State University and Detroit Medical Center given the retrospective nature of the analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Bragg-Gresham J, Balkrishnan R, et al. US Renal Data System 2017 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2018;71:A7.
Tong J, Liu M, Li H, Luo Z, Zhong X, Huang J, et al. Mortality and associated risk factors in dialysis patients with cardiovascular disease. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2016;41:479–87. doi:10.1159/000443449.
Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent st-segment elevation: Task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the european society of cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2016;37:267–315.
Aviles RJ, Askari AT, Lindahl B, Wallentin L, Jia G, Magnus Ohman E, et al. Troponin T levels in patients with acute coronary syndromes, with or without renal dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:2047–52.
Apple FS, Murakami MAM, Pearce LA, Herzog CA. Predictive value of cardiac troponin I and T for subsequent death in end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 2002;106:2941–5.
Michos ED, Wilson LM, Yeh HC, Berger Z, Suarez-Cuervo C, Stacy SR, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac troponin in patients with chronic kidney disease without suspected acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2014;161:491–501.
Khan NA, Hemmelgarn BR, Tonelli M, Thompson CR, Levin A. Prognostic value of troponin T and I among asymptomatic patients with end-stage renal disease: A meta-analysis. Circulation. 2005;112:3088–96.
Poli FE, Gulsin GS, McCann GP, Burton JO, Graham-Brown MP. The assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with end-stage renal disease. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2019;12:721–34. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfz088.
Tarapan T, Musikatavorn K, Phairatwet P, Takkavatakarn K, Susantitaphong P, Eiam-Ong S, et al. High sensitivity Troponin-I levels in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2019;41:393–400.
Ballocca F, D’Ascenzo F, Moretti C, Diletti R, Budano C, Palazzuoli A, et al. High sensitive TROponin levels in patients with chest pain and kidney disease: A multicenter registry — the TROPIC study. Cardiol J. 2017;24:139–50. doi:10.5603/CJ.a2017.0025.
Donnino MW. Prevalence of Elevated Troponin I in End-stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Hemodialysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:979–81. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2004.03.022.
Miller-Hodges E, Anand A, Shah ASV, Chapman AR, Gallacher P, Lee KK, et al. High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Risk Stratification of Patients with Renal Impairment Presenting with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation. 2018;137:425–35.
Herzog CA. Acute myocardial infarction in patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 1999;56:S130–3.
Banerjee D, Perrett C, Banerjee A. Troponins, Acute Coronary Syndrome and Renal Disease: From Acute Kidney Injury Through End-stage Kidney Disease. Eur Cardiol Rev. 2019;14:187–90. doi:10.15420/ecr.2019.28.2.
Lauer MS. Cardiac troponins and renal failure: The evolution of a clinical test. Circulation. 2005;112:3036–7.
Freda BJ, Tang WHW, Van Lente F, Peacock WF, Francis GS. Cardiac troponins in renal insufficiency: Review and clinical implications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002;40:2065–71.
DeFilippi C, Wasserman S, Rosanio S, Tiblier E, Sperger H, Tocchi M, et al. Cardiac Troponin T and C-Reactive Protein for Predicting Prognosis, Coronary Atherosclerosis, and Cardiomyopathy in Patients Undergoing Long-term Hemodialysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;290:353–9.
Sharma R, Gaze DC, Pellerin D, Mehta RL, Gregson H, Streather CP, et al. Cardiac structural and functional abnormalities in end stage renal disease patients with elevated cardiac troponin T. Heart. 2006;92:804–9.
Hirose K, Chikamori T, Hida S, Tanaka N, Yamashita J, Igarashi Y, et al. Application of pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Cardiol. 2018;71:52–8. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.05.007.
Agarwal R, Nissenson AR, Batlle D, Coyne DW, Trout JR, Warnock DG. Prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension in chronic hemodialysis patients in the United States. Am J Med. 2003;115:291–7.
Longenecker JC, Coresh J, Powe NR, Levey AS, Fink NE, Martin A, et al. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in dialysis patients compared with the general population: the CHOICE Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:1918–27. doi:10.1097/01.asn.0000019641.41496.1e.
Chernin G, Chen S, Ozan O, Liu M, Haberman D, Perlman G, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Does Not Lower Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Nephrol. 2019;50:465–72. doi:10.1159/000503916.
Bangalore S, Maron DJ, O’Brien SM, Fleg JL, Kretov EI, Briguori C, et al. Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1608–18. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915925.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Chronic Elevation of Troponin I Predicts the Extent of Coronary Artery Disease in Hemodialysis Patients Presenting with Acute Enzyme Elevation

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Figures

Background

Materials And Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1