Preparation of nematodes and actinomycetes
M. incognita were obtained from infected tomato plants based on Kihika et al. [20]. Root pieces with galls were uprooted and washed with running water to remove the soil. Nematode eggs were selected, under a dissecting microscope, with a 300-mesh sieve in a culture plate containing sterile water, then placed in dark conditions at 27 °C ± 2 °C for 2–5 days. Hatched juveniles (J2s) were collected for subsequent nematicidal activity assay and pot experiment.
The actinomycetes S. albogriseolus DN41 and S. fimicarius D153 were isolated from soil samples obtained from tomato roots infested with M. incognita in Yunnan Province, China. The strains DN41 and D153 were cultured in sterile liquid MB medium at 28 °C and 180 rpm for 7 days [21]. The cultures were then filtered with a 0.22-μm membrane and the filtrates were stored at 4 °C for subsequent use.
Nematicidal activity assay
The nematicidal activity of culture filtrates, extracts, and dialysates against M. incognita were measured according to the modified method of Park et al. [22]. Freshly hatched J2s were added to a 16-well plate (200 J2s in 20 μL) and treated with 1 mL test samples. Sterile water served as control. Every treatment had three replicates and was repeated three times. Plates were placed in an incubator at 25 °C ± 1.0 °C. The number of dead juveniles was counted after 12, 24, and 48 h. Nematodes were considered dead if their bodies were straightened and could not move upon contact with a fine needle, as observed under a microscope. Correction mortality was calculated as follows: Correction mortality (%) = (Dtr – Dc) / (DT – Dc) × 100, where Dtr is the death number in the treatment group, Dc is the death number under control conditions, and DT is total death number.
Extraction of active metabolites
The culture filtrates of the two Streptomyces strains were extracted with ethyl acetate firstly and raffinate phase were extracted with n-butanol sequentially. The ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and aqueous phase extracts were dissolved in methanol and diluted to a 5 % methanol aqueous solution. The final concentration of each sample was adjusted to 1 mg mL-1 for the nematicidal activity test.
Culture filtrates (1 mL) with nematicidal activity were added to 2 mL centrifugal tubes, then heated 1 h in a water bath at 37 °C, 47 °C, 57 °C, 67 °C, 77 °C, 87 °C, and 97 °C, respectively. The nematicidal activity of each sample was tested after heating.
The culture filtrates were eluted with XAD-16 resin (Amberlite, USA) to remove non-polar compounds. Eluates were placed into pretreated dialysis bags (Spectrumlabs, USA) with a molecular weight cut-off at 1000 Da and 8000–10 000 Da, respectively, and dialyzed for 24–48 h. The dialysis buffer was replaced every 3–6 h. The dialysates were freeze-dried. Parts of the dialysates were diluted with deionized water to a concentration of 1 mg mL-1 for the nematicidal activity test.
Determination of chemical characteristics
Each active dialysate solution (1 mL) was transferred to a 2-mL centrifugal tube, to which 1 μL of 20 mg mL-1 proteinase-K was added for hydrolysis, 2 h at 37 °C. The respective nematicidal activity of hydrolysates was then tested.
To identify the chemical components and characteristics of active dialysates, the following reactions were conducted according to the methods from Kong [23]: the ninhydrin reaction to identify amino acids, biuret reaction and ammonium sulfate precipitation test to identify peptides and proteins, Fehling’s solution and Keller-Kiliani reaction to identify sugar, ferric chloride reaction to identify phenols, potassium ferricyanide-ferric chloride reaction to identify aromatic amine, lead acetate precipitation to identify tannins, hydroxamic acid iron test to identify lactones, thin layer chromatography (TLC) to compare the standards of gallic acid and catechinic acid, and with heated chloroform to identify carcass as well as triterpenoids and their glycosides. An organic elemental analyser (Vorio EL, Germany) was used to determinate the molecular formula of active metabolite substances.
Pot experiment
The pot experiment was performed in a controlled greenhouse environment following the modified method of Hu [24]. Each plastic pot was filled with 150 g of soil and 3-week-old Zhongza9 tomato seedlings (Jingdian Seeds Company, Yunnan, China) were transplanted. After a week, 500 newly hatched J2s were inoculated per pot. The respective culture filtrates of the two strains were inoculated to pots at different doses, namely 30 mL pot-1, 100 mL pot-1, and 180 mL pot-1. The negative control consisted in plants grown in untreated soil, while the positive control corresponded to soil with 2.5 g pot-1 of 0.5 % avermectin. Each treatment had five replicates and was repeated three times. Pots were cultured in a greenhouse at 27 ± 2 °C and watered daily.
After 30 days, plants were uprooted and 10g rhizosphere soil samples were collected from each pot. Juveniles were extracted by modified Baermann funnel technique from soil samples, roots with galls were rinsed with sterilized water and cut 5g root from each plant and placed in a culture plate containing sterile water. The nematode populations in per 1g soil and root were calculated under a dissecting microscope after setting aside for 24h at room temperature. The inhibition ration in per 1g soil and root, biocontrol efficiency and growth condition of plant were used to measure the biocontrol potentials of two strains.
Inhibition ration was estimated with the following formula: Inhibition ration (%) = (NPtr – NPc) / NPc× 100%, where NPtr is the nematode populations in per 1g soil or root of the treatment group, NPc is the nematode populations in per 1g soil under control conditions. Biocontrol efficiency was estimated with the following formula: Biocontrol efficiency (%) = (GIc – GIt) / GIc × 100, where GIc is the gall index under negative control conditions, and GIt is the gall index in the treatment group [25]. The gall index was measured according to a ten-point scale [26]. Moreover, the growth condition of plant was measured with plant height (cm), shoot weight (g), and root weight (g).
Statistical analysis
Data from the experiments were tested using a one-way analysis of variance, and significant differences were analyzed using SPSS software 26.0, the means of the treatments were compared with Duncan’s multiple-range test (p < 0.05).