In Fig. 2, the XRD pattern of the milled LCD screen powder is presented. As may be observed, no specific diffraction peaks are exhibited, indicating an amorphous material. This result is expected, since the main component of the LCD screens is silicon [28], combined with small amounts of different metallic oxides, such as indium, REE and tin (not detectable by XRD due to the detection limit of the diffractometer).
To confirm the presence of rare earth elements (REE) in the milled and sieved LCD powder, SEM-EDS qualitative elemental analysis were carried out. The results are shown in Fig. 3, where the qualitative chemical distributions of different elements are shown. silicon, aluminum, some REE, indium, tin and iron may be observed. In addition, all the RE elements are uniformly distributed in the small particles. As can be appreciated, the elements with the highest concentrations are silicon, aluminum and oxygen, probably as oxides compounds (SiO2 and Al2O3), whereas the REE are concentrated in the smallest particles. Moreover, the fine particle size ensures the homogeneity of the sample and the percentage of the rare earth elements that can be recovered [29]. For this reason, the powder sieved at − 325 mesh (44 µm) was selected for the leaching study.
The results of the chemical analysis obtained by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP-OES) show the presence of rare earths, such as Pr (24 mg/kg), Gd (93 mg/kg), Er (477 mg/kg) and others elements, such as In (2422 mg/kg), Sn (835 mg/kg), Fe (2827 mg/kg) and Zn (9 mg/kg). According to the structural and chemical characterization (SEM-EDS and ICP), the LCD screen waste is composed of a mixture of oxides of Si, Al, Fe, and small amounts of oxides of Gd, In, Pr and Er. It is important to note that these materials are in sufficient quantities to justify their separation [30].
To select the adequate experimental conditions for selectively separating Gd and Pr from the other elements, a thermodynamic analysis using the Hydra-Medusa software [21] was performed, this analysis shows that Gd(III) and Fe(III) form soluble species Gd2(P2O7)2+ and Fe(P2O7)- with the pyrophosphate ion (P207)4- up to pH 8. Furthermore, these ions precipitate as hydroxides in alkaline solutions (above pH 8). Species distribution diagrams are constructed from the logarithm of the reaction equilibrium constant (k) of the reagents [31]. However, praseodymium ion (Pr(III)) has not reported its value of k, but considering that the log k values for the REE close to Pr are similar (Nd3+ = 20, Sm3+ = 20.2, Eu3+ = 20.3, Gd3+=20.5) [32], it is possible to infer that the behavior of this element with PPi is similar. This analysis helped to establish the adequate leaching conditions: pH values between 4 and 6, room temperature (25 °C), assisted with ultrasound in order to improve the dissolution process [25, 33].
After applying the ultrasonic assisted leaching process for 60 min at room temperature, a solid residue was obtained (leach residue), which was analyzed by means of XRD (Fig. 4). As can be appreciated in Fig. 4 (a), the leach residue consisted of an amorphous material, together with small amount of crystalline Fe, which is identified as a peak near to 2-theta of 44°. Due to the presence of metallic iron, the residue was subjected to a magnetic separation, obtaining a magnetic and a non-magnetic solid. Both solids were independently analyzed by XRD (Figs. 4b and 4c). As can be observed, the non-magnetic residue (Fig. 4b) shows an XRD pattern typical of an amorphous material, attributed to silica base material, which was not affected by the leach. In contrast, the magnetic residue (Fig. 4c) is a crystalline iron matrix, probably with small amounts of other metals (gadolinium, praseodymium or similar elements), since a slight displacement of the diffraction peak is detected from its theoretical position at 2-theta of 44°. At the same Fig. 4, the three residues (combined leach, magnetic and non-magnetic), were qualitatively characterized by SEM, using back-scattered electrons (BSE). As can be observed, the powders are composed by irregular and polygonal particles. In addition, there are no differences in contrast in each residue, which indicates that the residues contain a homogenous distribution of atoms along the particles. However, comparing the different residues, the magnetic residue (Fig. 4c) appears brighter, which may be ascribed to the presence of compounds that contain atoms with greater atomic number, such as REE.
To characterize their physical behavior, the magnetic hysteresis loops of each residue were acquired and are presented in Fig. 5. In this figure, it can be observed that the magnetic residue presents a saturation magnetization of 120 emu/g, attributed to the presence of an iron alloy with undefined composition, in good agreement with the XRD pattern show in Fig. 4(c). It is known that, pure iron shows a specific saturation magnetization near to 217 emu/g, therefore, the reduced magnetization value corresponds to iron, containing very low concentrations of materials that possesses slight magnetization, in accordance with the XRD patterns, since no other phases were detected.
The non-magnetic residue shows ferrimagnetic behavior, with a very low specific saturation magnetization of approximately 0.08 emu/g, attributed to the presence of small amounts of ferrimagnetic materials as oxides, although these was not observed in XRD pattern due to the detection limit of the analysis equipment.
In addition, the magnetic hysteresis loop of the combined leach residue shows ferrimagnetic behavior, with a specific saturation magnetization around 0.19 emu/g. This confirms mostly amorphous silica and aluminum oxides, together with small quantities of ferrimagnetic materials, as iron and RE metals and/or oxides.
The chemical composition of the leach liquor and the solid residues (magnetic and non-magnetic) were quantified by ICP; the results are shown in Table 1. According to these results, the magnetic material (0.3 g) is composed mainly of Fe, Pr and Gd, which corresponds to 94.5%, 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, of the total amount of each element in the LCD screens; this represents an important concentration of these elements, which is higher leaching efficiency comparing with conventional leaching [34]. On the other hand, 98.6% of the In, 73.9% of the Sn and 84.34% of the Er remained in the non-magnetic solid (2.58 g). As for the leach liquor, it contained appreciable percentages of Er (12.0%), Sn (24.6%) and Zn (91.2%).
Table 1
Results of the ICP analysis of the leach liquor, the magnetic and non-magnetic residues.
Element | Non-magnetic residue | Magnetic residue | Leach liquor |
mg/Kg | % extrac. | mg/Kg | % extrac. | mg/Kg | % extrac. |
Pr | 3 | 13 | 21 | 87 | 0 | 0 |
Gd | 2 | 2 | 78 | 85 | 11 | 12 |
Er | 449 | 84 | 20 | 4 | 64 | 12 |
In | 1749 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 1 |
Sn | 542 | 74 | 11 | 2 | 180 | 25 |
Fe | 84 | 4 | 2089 | 94 | 37 | 2 |
Zn | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 91 |
It is worth to mention that when the leaching process is carried out without PPi, the separation of Gd and Pr was not achieved, and these elements were not leached. In the same way, if the leaching is performed without ultrasound, a magnetic residue is not produced; therefore, the ultrasound radiation promotes the selective separation of Gd and Pr from others RRE, as magnetic materials and the leaching agent keep the soluble state of the REE.
As the magnetic residue shown a selective separation of Gd and Pr, together with iron, an elemental mapping was performed by means of SEM-EDS analysis, which is shown in Fig. 6. In this figure, it can be observed the presence of a homogeneous distribution of Fe, Gd and Pr, confirming the concentration of these elements into the magnetic residue.
The formation of an iron base alloy containing rare earth elements, as Gd and Pr, is an interesting result itself, and it can be ascribed to the of the effect ultrasound during the leaching process. It is well-known that the ultrasound manages to produce mechanical effects, such as micro jets and shock waves, which cause microscopic turbulence in the solution and high-speed collisions between the solids [35]. These effects are difficult to achieve with conventional mechanical agitation [26]. According to some authors [35–36], sonochemistry or ultrasonic irradiation of water produces the free radicals H· and OH· that can combine to produce H2O2, which is a strong oxidant. [35]:
The presence of H2 and H2O2, promote chemical and physical effects since they can act as strong reducing agents, as follows: