Socio-demographic factors associated with Psychoactive Substance Abuse
After bivariate analysis, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with all the socio-demographic variables significantly associated with the outcome variable. Crude Odds Ratio (COR) of the bivariate analysis is also displayed in Table 3. The socio-demographic variables which showed significant associations were age, sex, income, religion and year of study. Taking those variables to the Multiple Logistic Regression analysis results showed that age, sex and years of study of the respondents were found to be significantly associated with psychoactive substance abuse. Male students were two times more likely to abuse psychoactive substances than females (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 2.34, 95% confidence interval, CI [1.22, 4.51]; P = 0.000). Older age participants had more than twenty times of abusing psychoactive substances compared to younger ones (Adjusted Odds Ratio(AOR) = 21.93, 95% confidence interval CI[16.19; 33.11]; P = 0.000). Similarly, participants, who were within the age range of 20 to 24, were six times more abused psychoactive substances than younger ones (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 6.91, 95% confidence interval, CI[1.43; 33.31]; P = 0.000). On the other hand, the study years of the respondents had significantly associated with psychoactive substance abuse. That is, students with five and above study years had nearly six times more psychoactive substance abuse psychoactive when compared to freshman (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 5.71, 95% confidence interval, CI[2.41–13.52]; P = 0.000) (Table 3).
Table 3
Logistic Regression analysis on socio-demographic factors predicting intention to quit substance abuse of the participants (n = 392)
Socio-demographic factors | Category | PSA [%(N)] | COR(95% CI) | AOR(95% CI) | p-value |
Age | 15–19 | 8.3% (2) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
20–24 | 44.1% (145) | 8.67(2.01–37.47) | 6.91 (1.43–33.31) | 0.016 |
25–29 | 71.8% (28) | 28.0(5.62-139.63) | 21.93(16.19; 33.11) | 0.000* |
Sex | Female | 28.1% (18) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Male | 47.9% (157) | 2.35(1.31–4.22) | 2.34(1.22–4.51) | 0.011* |
Year of study | 1st year | 19.4% (13) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
2nd year | 38.2% (26) | 2.57 (1.18–5.60) | 1.91(0.85–4.32) | 0.118 |
3rd year | 45.7% (48) | 3.51 (1.71–7.17) | 2.74 (1.29–5.81) | 0.009 |
4th year | 56.8% (54) | 5.47 (2.64–11.34) | 3.65(1.71–7.87) | 0.001 |
5th year & above | 59.6% (34) | 6.14 (2.75–13.72) | 5.71(2.41–13.52) | 0.000* |
Constant= -3.89, Wald = 20.29, Reference = 1.00, PSA = Psychoactive Substance Abuse |
Factors Associated with intention to quit substance abuse (Psychoative substance use)
Attitude towards psychoactive substance abuse significantly predicted the study student’s intention to quit psychoactive substance abuse (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 1.81, 95% confidence interval, CI [1.11, 2.96], P = 0.018). Student’s with a positive attitude to quit psychoactive substance abuse had almost two times the chance of quitting it than those students with negative attitude ones. On the other hand, subjective norms of the participants had a significant association with intention to quit psychoactive substance abuse (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 2.09, 95%confidence interval, CI [1.26; 3.47], P = 0.004). Respondents with supportive subjective norms to quitting psychoactive substance abuse were more than two times likely to intended quitting it than those respondents with unsupportive subjective norms. Besides, the participants’ intentions to quit psychoactive substance abuse were also significantly associated with positive Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC). Respondents who had positive PBC were six times more likely to quit psychoactive substance abuse (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 6.16, 95%confidence intervals, CI [3.75, 10.14], P = 0.000) when compared with those respondents with negative PBC (Table 5).
Table 5
Multiple Logistic Regression analysis on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) constructs predicting the study participant’s intention to quit substance abuse (n = 392)
TPB constructs | Category | Intention to quit SA (%) | Crude Odds Ratio(COR)[95% CI] | Adjusted Odds Ratio(AOR)[95% CI] | p-value |
Yes [N (%)] | No [N (%)] |
Attitude towards quitting PSA | Below mean | 125(67.6) | 60(32.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Above mean | 160(77.3) | 47(22.7) | 2.15(1.35,3.78) | 1.81(1.11–2.96) | 0.018* |
Subjective norm to quitting PSA | Below mean | 86(64.7) | 47(35.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Above mean | 199(76.8) | 60(23.2) | 3.01(0.09,6.99) | 2.09(1.26–3.47) | 0.004* |
PBC to quitting PSA | Below mean | 77(51.3) | 73(48.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Above mean | 208(86.0) | 34(14.0) | 4.33(2.33,10.25) | 6.16(3.75–10.14) | 0.000* |
Constant= -2.41, Wald = 81.30, Reference = 1.00, SA = Substance Abuse, PBC = Perceived Behavioral Control |
Figure |
In this study, the current prevalence rate for overall psychoactive abuse among undergraduate students was 44.6%. This finding is similar to previous studies conducted among Debremarkos and Hawassa universities (35.5%); which are situated in southern and North-west of Ethiopia, respectively [17, 18]. However, the psychoactive abuse prevalence of this study is lower than the studies done among students of Haramaya (62.4%) and Diredawa (60%) universities, which are located in South-Eastern and Eastern parts of Ethiopia [19, 20].
In this study, 15.4%, 22.9%, and 1.1% of students were alcohol, Khat, and Cigarette abusers, respectively. This is finding is lower than previous researchers conducted among undergraduate students of Hawassa university [alcohol (40.8%), cigarette abusers (11.9%)], Diredawa university [alcohol (60%), khat (59.9%) and tobacco (56.5%)], Debremarkos [khat (28.5%), alcohol (33.8%) and cigarette smoking (10%)], and Haramaya university [Khat (41.0%), alcohol drinking (50.2%), smoked cigarettes (10.8%) (17–20). However, the study’s magnitude of Khat abuse prevalence is similar to the previous study done among Hawassa University students (khat (20.3%) [17].
This study found that male undergraduate students were two times more likely to abuse psychoactive substances than females. This finding is supported by previous researchers [17, 18, 20]. On the other hand, the study showed that older age participants had more than twenty times of odds of abusing psychoactive substances compared to younger ones; which is supported by a study done in Nigerian University students [6]. Moreover, this study reported that compared to first-year students, year two, year three, year four and year five and above students had almost two, three, four, and six times, respectively, significant odds of psychoactive substance abuse. This shows that the rate of psychoactive substance abuse increases as the student’s year of study increases. The result is supported by a study done among Haramaya University students [20]. However, this finding is contradicted by studies done among Sao Paulo University students [25] which indicated that a significant magnitude of psychoactive abuse was observed among first-year students. This difference could have resulted from cultural differences.
In this study, the constructs of the theory of planned behavior were found as significant predictors of the study participants’ intentions to quit Psychoactive Substance Abuse (PSA). That is students with a positive attitude to quit PSA were almost two times more likely to quit PSA than those students with negative attitude ones. This finding is similar to studies done in the UK and South Africa [21, 22]. This implies that changing attitude serves as a baseline for making the intention of the students to quit psychoactive substance abuse successfully. Moreover, students with a negative attitude toward quitting PSA experience difficulty to quit PSA.
On the other hand, the study found that undergraduate students, who reported supportive subjective norms to quit psychoactive substance abuse, had more than two times odds of intention to quit PSA than those students with unsupportive subjective norms, which is supported by previous researches done in developed countries [21, 22, 23]. This indicates that unless students develop effective or supportive subjective norms to quitting PSA, their effort to quit PSA would not be effective. Furthermore, in this study, undergraduate students with poor Perceived Behavior Control (PBC) were six times less likely to quit PSA compared to those students who had better PBC. This is similar to previous studies done among the USA, UK, Norway, and South African undergraduate students [21, 22, 23, 24]. This result shows that, as one helps PSA students to increase PBC, their likelihood to quit PSA would be possible.