Intersecting Systemic and Personal Barriers to Accessing Social Services: Qualitative Interviews in Northern California

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-200471/v1

Download PDF

Research article

Intersecting Systemic and Personal Barriers to Accessing Social Services: Qualitative Interviews in Northern California

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-200471/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background. Addressing social risks in the clinical setting can increase patient confidence in the availability of community resources and may contribute to the development of a therapeutic alliance which has been correlated with treatment adherence and improved quality of life in mental health contexts. It is not well understood what barriers patients face when trying to connect to community resources that help address social risks.

Methods. This is a qualitative assessment of patient-reported barriers to accessing and using social needs assistance programs. We conducted over 100 in-depth interviews with individuals in Northern California who participated in a navigation and referral program to help address their social needs and describe a unique framework for understanding how policies and systems intersect with an individual's personal life circumstances.

Results. Individuals described two distinct domains of barriers: 1) systems-level barriers that were linked to the inequitable distribution of and access to resources, and 2) personal-level barriers that focused on unique limitations experienced by each patient and impacted the way that they accessed services in their communities. While these barriers often overlapped or manifested in similar outcomes, this distinction was key because the systems barriers were not things that individuals could control or overcome through their own initiative or by increasing individual capacity.

Conclusions. Respondents describe intersecting systemic and personal barriers that compound patients’ challenges to getting their social needs met; this includes both a picture of the inequitable distribution of and access to social services and a profile of the limitations created by individual life histories. These results speak to the need for structural changes to improve adequacy, availability, and accessibility of social needs resources. These findings highlight the need for advocacy to address systems barriers, especially the stigma that is faced by people who struggle with a variety of health and social issues, and investment in incentives to strengthen relationships between health care settings and social service agencies.

Health Economics & Outcomes Research

Infectious Diseases

Health Policy

social determinants of health

qualitative patient-reported interviews

clinical navigation services for addressing social needs

health and social service systems

population health

Attending to the upstream and downstream impacts of social determinants of health in clinical settings is a critical component of improving the overall health and well-being of patients¹. Most recently, the global COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted how social risks like housing instability, food instability, and access to healthcare impact exposure, testing, severity, and adequate treatment for coronavirus infection². An assessment of programs designed to identify and support patients with unaddressed social needs have found that addressing social needs can lead to clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes like blood pressure and LDL- cholesterol³. More importantly, studies have found that addressing these social drivers ofhealth in the clinical setting can increase patient confidence in the availability of community resources³ and may contribute to the development of a therapeutic alliance which has been correlated with treatment adherence and improved quality of life in mental health contexts⁴. Health care organizations, especially primary and ambulatory care clinics, are increasingly adopting social needs screening and linkages to community-based and social service assistance programs to address social needs as a part of their core services. These programs typically involve baseline screening for social risks such as food insecurity, housing instability, lack of transportation, and utilities support with referral to programs that can help address identified needs. Referrals often link patients to programs outside a healthcare facility such as food pantries, utilities shutoff protections, or housing assistance programs, though in some settings they refer to assistance programs on-site, such as clinic-based food pantries or medical-legal partnerships. A previous paper described patient experiences with a screening and referral program, which provided key insights into how interactions with these programs impact patients both in terms of appropriateness of resource referrals and the establishment of a caring, therapeutic alliance⁵. However, that paper was unable to explore in depth the barriers that patients face when trying to connect to community resources.

We know that patients experience considerable barriers to accessing health-related services. For example, the American Hospital Association has laid out barriers to ensuring access to quality health care in vulnerable communities, including “limited federal funding, restrictive federal regulations, and a lack of collaboration and buy-in from community stakeholders” and indicates that “the most important resource may be hospital-community partnerships”⁶. Furthermore, disconnected relationships have been identified and described between clinical-community partnerships⁷, and collaborative clinical-community partnerships are required to address patient social needs⁸. More work needs to be conducted to identify and describe barriers to accessing social needs-related services, especially when those needs are identified in a health care setting. To fill this gap and help to strengthen clinical-community partnerships, this paper is a deep dive into patient-reported barriers to accessing and using the social needs-related resources to which they are referred by a program embedded in a safety net primary care clinic. This analysis is based on over 100 in-depth interviews with individuals in Northern California who participated in a program embedded in a county run primary care clinic to help address their social needs. We propose a framework for understanding how policies and systems intersect with an individual's personal life circumstances based on the findings from these in-depth interviews. These intersecting barriers create a complex web that combine in ways that compound patients’ challenges to getting their social needs met. Better understanding the type and range of barriers individuals face opens the door for better assessment of these barriers and more targeted support to help overcome those barriers. These findings also highlight the need for advocacy to reduce the systems barriers, especially the stigma that is faced by people who struggle with a variety of health and social issues and seeking assistance. These insights will help guide the design of policies and programs that are better able to address barriers patients experience when trying to seek assistance for social needs.

Interviewees participated in an intervention that was a collaboration between Contra Costa Health System (CCHS) and the nonprofit organization Health Leads. West County Health Center (WCHC) is one of 11 health clinics run by CCHS to serve as safety net clinics for the county’s most vulnerable residents. In 2018, WCHC provided more than 140,000 patient visits to the community across a variety of services including primary care, women’s health and specialty services. The intervention pilot embedded trained volunteer patient advocates in a large primary care clinic to help patients access community resources⁹. The Health Leads volunteer advocate model is well-documented^3,5,10. Patients are referred to

advocates based on responses to a paper screening tool developed by Health Leads to assess social needs¹¹. Advocates conducted phone or in-person needs assessments and helped patients access resources. After initial encounters, advocates were expected to follow-up via phone, text, email or in person to determine if patients successfully accessed resources, needed help addressing barriers, and had additional needs. A full description of our sampling strategy, recruitment, data collection and analysis procedures for the interview data has been published previously⁵. Selection criteria included: 1) enrolled in an intervention that is designed to screen for essential social needs and connect individuals to services between June 2014- April 2016, 2) had at least one closed need during that time interval (indicating that the advocate had completed their work with the patient, and either successfully or not successfully met the identified needs). We excluded patients who did not speak English or Spanish and who were under 18 years of age. Recruitment was designed to include respondents with key demographics similar to those in the Health Leads program¹².

We implemented a stratified sampling plan and included quotas based on two characteristics: 1) 50% of sample with > 1 successfully met needs, and 2) 30% Spanish speaking, defined as patient’s preferred language. We also prioritized three additional characteristics: 1) date of case closure, prioritizing more recently served patients to reduce recall bias, 2) number of social needs met, ensuring inclusion of patients with multiple needs, and 3) gender. Recruitment letters were sent starting with individuals who had the most recent experiences with the program in order to reduce recall bias. We followed informed consent protocols to ensure that participants understood the project and voluntarily consented to participate. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via phone between July 1 and September 30, 2016 and averaged 15–30 minutes. A full description of analysis procedures is described previously⁵.

Key Results

We sent recruitment letters to 275 patients, resulting in interviews with 102 individuals, for a 37% response rate. Our population was 62% female. Thirty-eight percent (38%) were between 50–65 years, and 35% were 30–49 years old. Per recruitment goals, 70% of the interviews were conducted in English and 30% were conducted in Spanish. A full description of the recruited and interviewed sample has been previously published5. One overarching finding was that barriers clustered around two key domains: 1) systems-level barriers that were linked to the inequitable distribution of and access to resources, and 2) personal (individual)-level barriers that focused on unique limitations experienced by each patient who engaged with the Health Leads program and impacted the way that they accessed services in their communities. While these barriers often overlapped or manifested in similar outcomes, this distinction was key because the systems barriers were not things that individuals could control or overcome through their own initiative or by increasing individual capacity. Systems-level barriers were commonly cited as the reason patients did not access the services.

Table 1. Characteristics of interviewed individuals (n=102)

Table 2

Systems-level barriers to accessing resources, themes with supporting quotes
Theme	Supporting Quotes
Limited availability of necessary resource	They know their clients need housing and all they basically got is like the counselors do the same thing there.They go online, they look what's out there and they give their clients a stack of paper to call these numbers.But you call these numbers and there's really literally nothing available, there really isn't.People call and say "I'm looking for some housing" and they say what kind of income do you have?Oh, I don't have any income, or people got Social Security, I mean what do people expect?You know what I mean?They do have shelters, if people are really that hard up for a place to stay there are shelters out there.There's the Richmond shelter and a couple other ones that provide a bed and a couple meals and even a place to shower, come down to it. Male, English, No success
	Housing was a little bit of a disappointment.But I don't think it was the fault of them, I think it's the fault of the Bay Area. Male, English, No success
	Housing is very tricky...I had to opt for some sort of temporary, like a summer situation where I'm renting right now.But I haven't really figured out the housing from that list.I did go and apply to get on a list for like disabled housing, but that didn't really do much, because the lady did tell me "our list is pretty long and we only have how many units."She recommended applying for a lot of places and then getting on as many waiting lists as possible, but it seemed like it was a long time, you know?Yeah, I didn't get housing through there.It was mainly at a certain point I just realized I've got to do something, and I opted for like a summer sublet situation where I'm just renting a room for the summer, and then I'm not sure. Female, English, No success
Limited accessibility of the necessary resource	every time I called them nobody ever answered the phone so I had no idea when I could go up there.She didn't give me any times to go up there, like if they have open pantries or whatever.There was no like specification.So nobody ever answered the phone there so I was just like whatever.I didn't really call back, because I don't think I have any other pantries that are really close to me.I'm not sure, but I mean now I could really use it because I don't have food stamps anymore. Female, English, No success
	I don't get around that well and the one [food pantry] I go to is really pretty far for me to walk.My only transportation is either my feet or a bicycle or public transportation out here.That's not convenient to these places because unfortunately I have to walk someplace to get a bus to take it there. P7: Male, English, No success
	For us it’s really expensive because we do not know Martinez and there’s no one that can take us, so we had to take the train to McArthur and from there at McArthur to Concord and from Concord to Martinez, like that. And we spent $56 on the fare. Female, Spanish, No success
Strict program criteria	They was saying I had too much money and I went to the Salvation Army in Richmond.They said I had too much money in the household.And then when I tried to explain the situation and whatever it was, they didn't even want to go through all of that, so I just said forget it. Female, English, No success
Strict program criteria	I don't qualify for food stamps, I don't qualify for SSI, I'm in a loophole where I don't qualify for anything but I don't get nothing...I can't work.I have a seizure disorder, I'm 40 years old.I have a seizure disorder that's very bad, that keeps me from working.I have a memory disorder.I can't drive, I can't be by myself.I stay busy 24/7 and I'm on a lot of medication.But because of my age, it's hard for me to get help. Female, English, No success
Complicated application processes	It's like you go to a place and you got to wait and then like you say, wait in line, and you got to fill out this paperwork and come back next week and see if you qualify.You got to play their little game with them...They say you got to wait for them to see if they accept you and approve it before they turn around and help you out. Male, English, No success
Complicated application processes	The only thing, I'm going through that list now, the Social Security, I'm finished with that.I haven't turned in the application yet though, because I went online to see what else they needed.There's more information I got to put on there for the doctor's part.But they were very helpful.It's just a long process....Not just that, but also some places won't tell you they're accepting applications, you have to actually walk in.Because I had to walk into one that was down in Richmond so I've got to walk into the other ones too, to make sure.They don't tell you anything.You have a list and you call them, but they probably want you to just come there. Female, English, No success
Stigma associated with the necessary resource	No, I did not check the Albany pool, although a classmate of mine at Contra Costa College, she said, "Oh yeah, at the Albany pool they have a special group for low income people."A group?It's not like they plug you into a regular swimming class and no one knows about your low income except the clerk in the office.You know? (laughs) Female, English, Success
Stigma associated with the necessary resource	And it does sound like a good amount of money, but no, my children said no. “No, mom, maybe other people who have a greater need than you can receive it.” For that reason, I did not do it. Because my children are supporting my husband and I with that. Female, Spanish, Success
Lack of fluency in English/access to interpreter	Particularly English is my second language and I'm not comfortable to ask any questions about anyone. Female, English, No success
	Sometimes in clinic or in the beginning they ask me if I need translator. Sometimes the translator, when they speak, I can't understand well what they're saying in French. I say sometimes okay, I can't understand. I try to understand, to talk to the person. Because their French is sometimes too difficult for me to understand. Female, English, Success
Immigration status and legal policies	And I went to the module that’s in the middle of the hospital and they contacted me there and asked me for my social and I told them that no, I was an undocumented person. At the end they told me they could not make ther service available to me because it was for people who had documents. Female, Spanish, No success
Immigration status and legal policies	So I told them that and they told me that I should go to a lawyer, that maybe, that because the whole I time I was working with a social that the government could give me help for unemployment or for retirement. And I tell you, I was with the unión for 10 years, for 21 years. But it’s very difficult until you have papers, maybe that help will come later… Male, Spanish, Success

Table 2 lists themes described by patients along with individual quotes illustrating each theme, including the following:

Limited availability

for a number of common social needs there were often not enough resources available. For example, housing is a common need that was often unavailable, especially in the Bay Area in Northern California, due to the limited options for safe and affordable housing.

Limited accessibility

services were often difficult to access due to either distance or challenges getting through via phone or online. For individuals with transportation or mobility challenges, they described difficulty physically accessing services either because they could not get the transportation they needed to get to the service, or once there, could not gain access to the building due to mobility challenges. Individuals who were employed described difficulty accessing services outside of work hours.

Strict program criteria

ineligibility for the service or resource because of income, health status, insurance status, lack of necessary documentation or identification, citizenship status, age or another program participation was a common barrier that patients encountered. An example of this is becoming ineligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)c upon receiving disability benefits. Or, for instance, if an individual’s current income did not meet program requirements, they were ineligible for services. Respondents described feeling caught in a hole where they could not afford basic needs, for instance, but were also ineligible from getting assistance to help with those needs. Prior to June 1, 2019, this was a very common barrier for many patients. Fortunately, starting June 1, 2019 in CA, people receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) can also apply for and receive CalFresh (SNAP) without impacting their SSI amount.

Complicated application processes

SNAP is a strong example of this, because it often includes a lengthy application, difficult questions, and multiple steps to complete.

Stigma

perceptions of stigma associated with the necessary resource often kept respondents from accessing the resource. Respondents described feeling embarrassed to use some services due to the fact that those who access particular programs may be seen as low-income, incapable, or handicapped.

Lack of fluency in English and access to an interpreter

Language difficulties impacted how individuals could access resources; some respondents described feeling uncomfortable asking questions in English, particularly if English was their second language. Others described lack of adequate interpreter or translators which impacted how they could access services.

Immigration status and legal policies

this, coupled with lack of trust in institutions, impacted how individuals could access services. Services that require proof of citizenship are not only inaccessible to undocumented individuals but discouraged use of services by citizenswith undocumented family members. Personal-level barriers were described by patients as preventing them from accessing the services or support they requested or were offered by Health Leads. The most common themes are illustrated in quotes shown in Table 3, including the following:

Table 3

Personal-level barriers to accessing services, themes with supporting quotes
Theme	Supporting Quotes
Physical and mental health challenges	I still need help, not as far as the papers, but I need help because right now what's going on with me - I guess my disability has run out and so now, because I'm an injured worker, I've already started filing for the Social Security Disability, but I need to be finding me a job that can work around my injury.Because my injury is with my hand, I lost like 48 percent of the use of my hands and my arms, and I was just retrained for the Dragon program, I need help with finding resources as far as the type of job I can work that doesn't go against my restrictions. Female, English, no success
	I really was not expecting anything because I was not right in my head.Female, English, Success
	It's still the same, still going through it.I haven't been able to work because of the arthritis I got so it really messes me up.I try to do little things here and there to try and keep my body active, but it hurts doing those things.I can only do certain little things I can, and then after a minute it just hurts me and everything else like that, so I can only limit myself to what I can do.I've been talking to a lot of people, employers, and they're like "we can't hire you in your condition.When you get better, come back when you get better and everything else."But it's been two years and it hasn't been better yet, so it's kind of frustrating. Male, English, Success
Social isolation, and lack of social support	Oh, she listened and she gave me information after I told her about my case and stuff, and she said "oh, you probably qualify for this and that," so she gave me the information and she mailed me some papers in the mail.But like I said, it's hard for me to get help and I live here by myself plus my friend being at work, it's mainly through the week that I need the services and stuff.And I can't make it after work, they be closed. Female, English, No success
Social isolation, and lack of social support	I don't have a driver's license....I have to wait when my daughter in law or my son, when they are available, but everybody is working. Saturday as you know, the county offices are closed, but the food pantries are open, so that is good. Female, English, Success
Lack of technology resources and computer illiteracy	I get food stamps, but I don't get the money assistance because I don't want to be one of those guys that sucks off the government, I want to find a job, I want to make my own way through this life, you know what I mean.. She gave me the Web address, but unfortunately because I'm so low on money, I'm just barely able to afford my phone so I get the lowest possible data plan possible so I run out of high speed Internet real quick, and a lot of the Web pages I try to load for doing applications just seem to halt for some reason... Male, English, No success
Lack of technology resources and computer illiteracy	I checked out some of those ones, because I'm computer illiterate and some places where I could go to, just to sit down, just to get peace of mind and kind of learn how to get on the internet and stuff like that.That was very helpful for me because I had never been online before.Someone was trying to teach me a long time, I want to say 2011, but as they were teaching me, they fell off so I just didn't even pursue it.Because when I would ask people, they would tell me, and I'm more was a hands on person when it comes to stuff like that.By her giving me that information I was able to go to the library and just get online and kind of breeze through places for rent and who was renting and what's not, jobs and stuff like that.And it was really cool to get on the Internet, to go to the library. Female, English, no success
Financial limitations	I am a senior on very little income.I did use that some years back, 15, I don't know, and it worked for me.But the YMCA is a business and they're in the business of making money.So I did call them when I was looking for swimming lessons and they said they no longer do that.Because I have to have a membership, there's no waiver for the membership which in my budget is beyond my ability. Female, English, Success
Financial limitations	The only thing that didn't work out with me was that I wanted to become a citizen, and she gave me the phone number for that and kept calling all those numbers, but there was nothing, I didn't get anything.I didn't have the kind of money, it's about a thousand dollars to get to the citizenship things.I was trying to get some help there, and then I tried to call that girl, but she told me she was going to a different place or something, and I didn't take any more help from there. Female, English, Success
Competing Priorities	Because when you're dealing with emotional problems with doing practical things, if there's one more person leaning on you to get it done, it's not helpful for somebody like me.I don't know what the answer is to getting them to get it done - extreme consequences like losing Medicaid.Obviously I was willing to lose food stamps for two months rather than turn around and get the paperwork done. Female, English, No success
	Well, my car broke down so I'm waiting to get my car fixed, because I haven't been able to do anything lately.My catalytic converter went out, and it's really expensive and so I'm just waiting to get enough money.It's sitting right in my driveway, stuck right in front of my front door.So I'm trying to get up the money to get that fixed.And then I can go out and do all the things that I want to do. Male, English, No success
	I remember telling them about some of my bills, they were past due and I wanted to see if they could help me, especially the water bill at that time...I knew I was going to need them, definitely, but not at that point.I was in the hospital probably every day.Blood work, blood pressure check up, MRI, so I didn't have time really to contact them or go to the clinic and look for them... Male, English, No success

Physical and mental health challenges

Individuals often described the ways that limitations imposed by health conditions posed a considerable barrier to getting their social needs met. This includes coping with symptoms of mental illness that made it difficult to engage with service organizations, chronic medical conditions like arthritis that causes severe pain, or acute medical conditions like injuries which made it difficult to find and access services to meet social needs.

Social isolation and lack of social support

Respondents described how living alone and/or lacking support from friends and family hampered their ability to access services. For instance, those without a driver’s license described feeling dependent on others to be able to access services. This barrier often interacted with physical health challenges since individuals with pain or limited mobility were dependent on others to accompany them places in order to access services.

Lack of technology resources and computer illiteracy

Respondents without technology resources or who are computer illiterate described challenges to accessing services that were only accessible via the Internet.

Financial limitations

Respondents described having inadequate finances for the requested resource. For respondents with little income, they described challenges to accessing services that had financial costs associated with them, including issues requiring legal aid, or physical activity programs to help with chronic or acute pain or injuries.

Competing priorities

Respondents were often dealing with multiple personal- and systems-level barriers simultaneously and respondents reported that their need was not a high priority in comparison to other events or tasks that they were addressing. Sometimes this was coupled with a lack of confidence that the resource would meet needs given past lived experiences or pressing new concerns. These comments also included the perception that the individual costs associated (time, effort) were too high to justify the anticipated reward, even when the reward was significant.

Our findings also indicated that there is a strong interrelationship between the systems and personal barriers patients encountered when presented with Health Leads resource referrals or attempting to access them. For example, a person with mobility issues (a personal barrier) might cite the distance of services from their home and limited public transportation as a challenge (a systems barrier):

“Well, my car broke down so I'm waiting to get my car fixed, because I haven't been able to do anything lately. My catalytic converter went out, and it's really expensive and so I'm just waiting to get enough money. It's sitting right in my driveway, stuck right in front of my front door. So I'm trying to get up the money to get that fixed. And then I can go out and do all the things that I want to do.” (Male, English, No success).

Other respondents describe health-related barriers that speak to the complexity of everyday life that can be difficult to navigate without personal resources like social support or financial resources:

“I remember telling them about some of my bills, they were past due and I wanted to see if they could help me, especially the water bill at that time...I knew I was going to need them, definitely, but not at that point. I was in the hospital probably every day. Blood work, blood pressure check up, MRI, so I didn't have time really to contact them or go to the clinic and look for them...” Male, English, No success

Some of the respondents possessed behavioral, cognitive or developmental disabilities, and some described experiencing memory problems, social anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorders within the interview which made it difficult to work to access services:

“Because when you're dealing with emotional problems with doing practical things, if there's one more person leaning on you to get it done, it's not helpful for somebody like me. I don't know what the answer is to getting them to get it done - extreme consequences like losing Medicaid. Obviously I was willing to lose food stamps for two months rather than turn around and get the paperwork done.” (Female, English, No success)

For some, the need to access services to address social risks represented a loss of dignity. For others, stigmatized feelings were combined with a feeling of not wanting to “burden” the healthcare system or to take away resources from “more needy” patients/people.

“And it does sound like a good amount of money, but no, my children said no. “No, mom, maybe other people who have a greater need than you can receive it.” For that reason, I did not do it. Because my children are supporting my husband and I with that.” Female, Spanish, Success

Sometimes interviewees lacked the capacity to articulate why they were unable to access resources. In other cases, respondents expressed confusion about the rules and regulations governing their benefits or who can access benefits from the organizations they were referred to, often large bureaucracies such as local or federal housing programs, county social services agencies, and public utilities.

Our study found that there were two interwoven yet distinct domains of barriers. Systems barriers were pervasive and included adequacy and accessibility issues along with perceived issues of stigma and complex application and eligibility processes. Personal barriers included a host of problems taking priority over or complicating the ability for patients to access services to meet their needs including medical concerns, social isolation or lack of social support, fear of discrimination, or lack of technology literacy. Personal-level barriers compounded their difficulties accessing resources. Some resources—especially those related to legal aid, citizenship, and adult education —appear to have costs to patients, putting them out of reach for patients with little or no income. Patients reported physical health limitations or mental health conditions like depression that made meeting daily obligations challenging. Many of the interviewed patients often expressed the barriers they faced in ways that sounded like issues of prioritization: doing what was required to access resources—making phone calls, completing applications, going to new agencies—simply do not rise to the top of the list of things important to patients’ or their families’ well-being. Respondents described that demands of daily living are so challenging that mounting any extra effort seemed too difficult, if not impossible. Another interpretation of some of the patients’ descriptions speak to matters of self-efficacy or confidence. Patients were not certain that they could even do what the advocates advised, or if they did succeed, they expressed a lack of confidence that the resource would address their needs. While these problems may be relatively uncommon in the population overall, among the target audience for Health Leads they appear frequently.

With this in mind, a key finding form our analysis indicates that any program staff or volunteers hoping to engage patients struggling with personal barriers may benefit from additional training, triaging clients into special protocols for goal setting, action planning and monitoring. Patients may need more time with an advocate to overcome these barriers in order to successfully approach and resolve the resource need.

Our findings contribute substantially to reports from other studies assessing barriers to receiving clinical or social services. Similar to our findings, those studies report cultural, socioeconomic, and legal barriers^13,14 as well as attitudinal barriers such as not wanting to involve outsiders in personal problems, not seeing the need for services, availability of services, language barriers or concerns about cultural appropriateness¹⁵. Other studies identifying barriers to accessing health and social services have reported high rates of self-reported access issues, and have identified that those reporting access issues were more likely to be socially and economically vulnerable or suffering from mental health conditions indicating that those who have the hardest time accessing services may be the most in need^16,17. Studies identifying how barriers to clinical and social services can be reduced use targeted social support interventions and specific navigation models to promote patient-centered health improvements¹⁸ as well as strategies to evaluate local resources to develop partnerships and disease prevention interventions^19,20. Most studies raise the need to better understand “the relationship between perceived barriers to accessing services and dissatisfaction with services”¹⁵ in order to promote health equity in our communities.

These results contribute substantially to the literature by describing the relationships between system- and personal-level barriers to accessing services among individuals experiencing social risks and engaged in an intervention to access services in their communities. Respondents describe intersecting systemic and personal barriers that combine in ways that compound patients’ challenges to getting their social needs met; this includes both a picture of the inequitable distribution of and access to social services and a profile of the limitations created by individual life histories. These findings also provide a framework for addressing both systemic and personal-level barriers to accessing social services in communicatees in northern California. Overall, our results speak to the need for structural changes to improve adequacy, availability, and accessibility of social needs resources. More intentional investments are needed to better understand how to address the deep institutional, systemic, and personal issues that respondents describe. Based on the findings above, we recommend the following:

More investment in organizations focusing on building hospital/clinic-community partnerships in scalable ways. We need organizations committed to strengthen partnerships focused on providing whole person care including assessing the quality and quantity of local resources and investing in local networks and relationships. Some examples include organizations like 2-1-1 systems help promote the collaboration between public utility companies, housing organizations, food banks, and legal services (among others)²¹, or Community Connect, Contra Costa County’s Whole Person Care Pilot program under the 1115 Waiver²². This program utilizes a multidisciplinary team that includes case managers from both Health and Social Services agencies to provide extended social needs case management services through a relationship-based model that is trauma-informed and employs motivational-interviewing techniques to develop client prioritized care plans to connect individuals to resources in their communities and tracks patient-level outcomes over time to understand impact on utilization and overall health.
Better understanding of the competing priorities that make accessing services a low or negligent priority for some respondents. Results indicate that typically fewer than half of those who screen positive for social risk factors are interested in receiving assistance to help address identified risks^23,24. More analysis needs should be conducted to better understand if other priorities are more urgent in an individual’s current circumstances, or if there is a combination of barriers, perspectives, and experiences at play. Projects addressing this specifically are currently being led by researchers at UCSF, with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Kaiser Permanente^25,26.
Improved clinical incentives enabling program staff to engage with patients struggling with systems- or personal-level barriers to accessing social services. In this analysis, we describe a high-touch program that screens individuals for social needs, connects those who screen positive to services in their communities, and a system for longitudinal follow-up to better understand resolution of reported social needs. These programs take time and investment to operate successfully, and this can be difficult, or nearly impossible, in already overloaded clinical environments. Optimizing navigation programs (like the program that respondents in this paper participated in) requires continued investment in program staff and the time and space needed to build trusting relationships. Creating economic incentives for prevention and upstream investments in health encourage health plans and integrated health networks to invest in social interventions²⁷ which will enable program staff to improve care delivery for those struggling with social needs.

Interviews, although asked in as supportive a manner as possible, were posed by strangers with no relationship to the patient. Asking patients to explain their internal thought processes in this context may make it hard for patients to be forthcoming; there may be embarrassment about not following through, a sentiment that patients expressed by blaming themselves for not making the effort or following their advocate’s suggestions. In addition, this study was limitedto English and Spanish speakers. We were only able to speak with individuals who spoke English or Spanish, therefore we do not know if individuals who don’t speak either of these languages have more or different barriers. Other limitations include recruitment at a single health clinic in northern California, and a sample limited to participants who were reachable by telephone and consented to study participation.

Interviewers asked patients about anything that prevented them from accessing services or anything that the Health Leads advocates could have done to remove those barriers. What emerged included both a picture of the inequitable distribution of and access to social services and a profile of the limitations created by individual life histories. While the program these individuals participated in made efforts to help address the social needs of individuals struggling with health issues, it was difficult to overcome the complex interrelationship of personal and systemic barriers. Understanding the range of barriers individuals face when trying to access resources for social needs calls for the need for more targeted support to help overcome those barriers. These findings also highlight the need for advocacy to address the systems barriers, especially the stigma that is faced by people who struggle with a variety of health and social issues, and investment in incentives to strengthen relationships between health care organizations and social service agencies.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Per IRB review process conducted by the Group Health Human Subjects Review Office (reference #2016), this project did not meet the definition of human subject research per federal regulations (45 CFR 46), and this project did not require IRB review.

Consent for publication

All authors and participants have provided consent for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to HIPAA considerations but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and with permission of participants in the study.

Competing interests

The authors of this article do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Funding

The pilot and evaluation were funded by the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

Authors' contributions

HP participated in study design, data analysis, interpretation and manuscript development. SC participated in study design, data collection, data analysis and data interpretation. MC participated in data analysis and data interpretation. MC participated in data interpretation. SL participated in study design and data interpretation. CH participated in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation and manuscript development. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We want to express our appreciation to all the patients that participated in the interviews for sharing their insights and experiences with us. We also acknowledge our colleagues at Contra Costa Health Services and Health Leads for their input into our data collection efforts and the development of this manuscript—Rohan Radhakrishna, MD; Concepcion Trevino James, MA; Tiombe F Mashama, HEd, MPA; Martin Lynch; Lisa Diemoz, MPH; Abigail Kroch, MPH PhD; Damon Francis, MD; and Fabiola Gutierrez.

Gottlieb LM, Wing H, Adler NE. A Systematic Review of Interventions on Patients' Social and Economic Needs. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Nov;53(5):719-729. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Review. PubMed PMID: 28688725.
Mohta NS, Prewitt E, Gordon L, Lee T. COVID-19 and the Future of Care Delivery. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery 2020; 03. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.20.0131
Berkowitz SA, Hulberg AC, Standish S, Reznor G, Atlas SJ. Addressing Unmet Basic Resource Needs as Part of Chronic Cardiometabolic Disease Management. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):244-252. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7691. PubMed PMID: 27942709; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6020679.
Wu A et al. The Baltimore Community-Based Organizations Neighborhood Network: Enhancing Capacity Together (CONNECT) Cluster RCT. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019 Aug;57(2):e31-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
Hsu C et al. Patient Perspectives on Addressing Social Needs in Primary Care Using a Screening and Resource Referral Intervention. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2019 Dec 2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05397-6.
Bhatt J et al. Ensuring Access to Quality Health Care in Vulnerable Communities. Academic Medicine. 2018 Sep;93(9):1271-1275. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002254.
Valaitis R, Cleghorn L, Ploeg J, Risdon C, Mangin D, Dolovich L, Agarwal G, Oliver D, Gaber J, Chung H. Disconnected relationships between primary care and community-based health and social services and system navigation for older adults: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Family Practice (2020) 21:69 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01143-8.
Phillips J, Richard A, Mayer K, Shilkaitis M, Fogg L, Vondracek H. Integrating the Social Determinants of Health into Nursing Practice: Nurses’ Perspectives. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2020; 52:5, 497–505.
Garg A, Jack B, Zuckerman B. Addressing the social determinants of health within the patient- centered medical home: lessons from pediatrics. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2001-2. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.1471
Berkowitz SA, Hulberg AC, Placzek H, Dangora A, Gomez J, Standish S, Atlas SJ. Mechanisms Associated with Clinical Improvement in Interventions That Address Health-Related Social Needs: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Popul Health Manag. 2018 Dec 18. PubMed PMID: 30562141.
Health Leads. The Health Leads Screening Toolkit. In: Social Needs Screening Toolkit. Boston, MA. 2018. https://healthleadsusa.org/resources/the-health-leads-screening-toolkit/. Accessed June 19 2019.
Gentles SJ, Charles C, Ploeg J, McKibbon K. Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report. 2015;20(11):1772-89.
O’Neal et al. Intersections of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender: Reframing Knowledge Surrounding Barriers to Social Services Among Latina Intimate Partner Violence Victims. Violence. Against Women. 2017 Apr;23(5):643-665. doi: 10.1177/1077801216646223. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
Alderwick H, Gottlieb LM. Meanings and Misunderstandings: A Social Determinants of Health Lexicon for Health Care Systems. Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):407-419. doi: 10.1111/1468- 0009.12390. Epub 2019 May 8. PubMed PMID: 31069864; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6554506.
Greenwood N et al. Barriers to access and minority ethnic carers' satisfaction with social care services in the community: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):64-78. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12116. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
Barker B et al. Barriers to health and social services for street-involved youth in a Canadian setting. Journal of Public Health Policy. 2015 Aug;36(3):350-63. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2015.8. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
Wang L et al.Inability to access health and social services associated with mental health among people who inject drugs in a Canadian setting. Drug Alcohol Dependence. 2016 Nov 1;168:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.631. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Lim J. Barriers to cancer care, perceived social support,
and patient navigation services for Koreanbreast cancer patients. Social Work in Health Care. 2015;54(1):47-64. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2014.964446.
Deeds B et al. The Role of Community Resource Assessments in the Development of 15 Adolescent Health Community-Researcher Partnerships. Progress in Community Health Partnerships. 2008 Spring;2(1):31-9. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2008.0010.
Gottlieb LM, Francis DE, Beck AF. Uses and Misuses of Patient- and Neighborhood-level Social Determinants of Health Data. Perm J. 2018;22:18-078. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-078. PubMed PMID: 30227912; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6141653.
2-1-1 San Diego. Accessed at: https://211sandiego.org/. Accessed August 2019.
Community Connect Whole Person Care. Accessed at: https://cchealth.org/care/. Accessed on August 27, 2019.
Fox CK, Cairns N, Sunni M, Turnberg GL, Gross AC. Addressing Food Insecurity in a Pediatric Weight Management Clinic: A Pilot Intervention. J Pediatr Health Care 2016;30:e11-5.
Swavely D, Whyte V, Steiner JF, Freeman SL. Complexities of Addressing Food Insecurity in an Urban Population. Population health management 2018;00:1-8.
UCSF SIREN. Improving Patient Interest in Social Risks Screening and Assistance Interventions. Accessed at: https://sirenetwork.ucsf.edu/sites/sirenetwork.ucsf.edu/files/SIREN%20Research%20Grants%2 0CFP%202019.pdf. Accessed August 2019.
The Gravity Project. A National Collaborative to Advance Interoperable Social Risk and Protective Factors Documentation. Accessed at: https://sirenetwork.ucsf.edu/TheGravityProject. Accessed in August 2019.
Solomon L, Kanter M. Health Care Steps Up to Social Determinants of Health: Current Context. Perm J. 2018; 22: 18-139. Published online 2018 Oct 22. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-139 PMCID: PMC6207436. Accessed online March 2020.

Download PDF

Review #1 received at journal
23 Feb, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
11 Feb, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
08 Feb, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
08 Feb, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
03 Feb, 2021
Editor invited by journal
30 Jan, 2021
First submitted to journal
13 Dec, 2020

You are reading this latest preprint version

Intersecting Systemic and Personal Barriers to Accessing Social Services: Qualitative Interviews in Northern California

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Design And Participants

Key Results

Conclusions

Limitations

Key Findings

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1