Study setting
This study was conducted in South Kivu, Eastern DRC, in 32 health areas (HA), including 16 HA in Ibanda Health Zone (IHZ), an urban area, and 16 HA in Kabare Health Zone (KHZ), a rural one. IHZ and KHZ were selected by simple random sampling from the 3 Health Zones of Bukavu urban city (Kadutu, Bagira, Ibanda) and 5 surrounding rural areas of Bukavu (Nyantende, Walungu, Kabare, Katana, Miti-Murhesa), respectively. Each of these 2 selected Health Zones encompasses 16 HA.
The IHZ is located in the municipality of Ibanda, city of Bukavu, in the South Kivu province of DRC. Bounded on the north by Lake Kivu and on the east by Rwanda, IHZ is an area with mountainous relief, clayey soil, grassy vegetation and a tropical highland climate. At the last census in 2018, it had a recorded population of 452,608 with a population density of 32 per km². Infants < 24 months of age were estimated at 9,053. The main activities are small-scale trading and administration. Secondary activities are subsistence agriculture, small livestock farming and artisanal fishing. The staple food is cassava, cereals (maize, rice and sorghum), other tubers (taro, sweet and white potatoes) and bananas. These foods are generally served with vegetables, fish, beans and meat, which helps to balance the family dish. On average, two to three meals are consumed per day [19].
KHZ is located in the Kabare administrative zone of South Kivu province in the DRC. It is situated 17km from the city of Bukavu. It is an area with high plains and hills at elevations between 900 and 1900m, with a tropical highland climate. At the last census in 2018, it had a recorded population of 213,882 with a very high population density of 856 per km². Infants under 24 months of age were estimated at 17,111. The population of this area is devoted to agriculture, livestock and small-scale trade. Bananas, cassava, taro, sweet and white potatoes, corn and sugar cane are the main crops grown there. However, the soil is not very fertile, and most of the population of the area leaves the fields to sell labor in the city of Bukavu [20].
Study design, population and sample
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in August 2019 in 32 HA among mother-infant pair. The sample size was calculated using Emergency Nutrition Assessment (ENA) 2011 software. The variable used to calculate the sample size was the South Kivu exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months rate, estimated to 51% according DRC Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2017-2018 [21]. The variable "exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months" was considered since it gives a largest sample size compared to the other IYCF practices. Aiming at an absolute precision of 5% at the 95% confidence level, further assuming a design effect of 2.0 and allowing for 10% refusals and incomplete questionnaires, the required minimum sample size was 920, equivalent to 460 in each Health Zone. Sampling was systematic and proportional to the population (infants) size for each HA.
In each HA, a complete list of all households was compiled and all the households were serially numbered. To get the sampling interval, the total number of households in a HA was divided by the required sample size. The first household was then randomly selected by picking any number within the sample interval. Subsequent selections were made by adding the sampling interval to the selected number in order to locate the next household to visit. If the selected household did not have a target respondent, then next household was selected using the systematic sampling procedure. This process continued until the required sample size was obtained. In each household, only one eligible participant was surveyed using simple random sampling.
Data collection procedure and tools
Data were collected by using face-to-face interview during house-to-house visit from mothers who had children under 24 months using structured questionnaire. The questionnaire contained the information on sociodemographic characteristics of participants, infant feeding practices and anthropometry. To determine household socioeconomic status, we used wealth index from modern household assets [22-25].
Ten health extension workers and one public health professional were recruited as data collector and supervisor respectively. For data quality control, the questionnaire was first developed in French and translated to local language (Swahili and Mashi language) and then back-translated to French by an independent translator for consistency. Training was given to health extension workers and supervisor for 2 days. The questionnaire was pre-tested in 25 (5%) of mothers in IHZ and 25 (5%) of mothers in KHZ, which was not included in actual study, to assess the content and approach of the questionnaire. To assure the quality of the data, the supervisor and investigator closely reviewed the data collection technique on daily basis, reviewed the filled questionnaire for completeness and returned any incomplete questionnaire to the data collectors for correction. There was also debriefing every day.
Assessment of IYCF Practices
WHO has defined 15 indicators (8 core and 7 optional) to assess IYCF practices (Table 1). In this study, we assess IYCF practices using all 8 core and 3 out of the 7 optional feeding practices (children ever breastfed, continued breastfeeding at 2 years, and bottle feeding). Optimal feeding practice was assessed based on compliance to WHO recommended practices for each indicator. All indicators were assessed based on a 24-h recall method.
In accordance with the WHO rating on IYCF practices, the early initiation of breastfeeding prevalence of 0–29% was considered as poor, 30–49% as fair, 50–89% as good and 90–100% as very good. Exclusive breastfeeding prevalence of 0–11% was considered as poor, 12–49% as fair, 50–89% as good and 90–100% as very good. Timely initiation of complementary feeding prevalence of 0–59% was considered as poor, 60–79% as fair, 80–94% as good and 95–100% as very good [26].
Four core IYCF indicators were used to define whether complementary feeding practice was appropri
Study setting
This study was conducted in South Kivu, Eastern DRC, in 32 health areas (HA), including 16 HA in Ibanda Health Zone (IHZ), an urban area, and 16 HA in Kabare Health Zone (KHZ), a rural one. IHZ and KHZ were selected by simple random sampling from the 3 Health Zones of Bukavu urban city (Kadutu, Bagira, Ibanda) and 5 surrounding rural areas of Bukavu (Nyantende, Walungu, Kabare, Katana, Miti-Murhesa), respectively. Each of these 2 selected Health Zones encompasses 16 HA.
The IHZ is located in the municipality of Ibanda, city of Bukavu, in the South Kivu province of DRC. Bounded on the north by Lake Kivu and on the east by Rwanda, IHZ is an area with mountainous relief, clayey soil, grassy vegetation and a tropical highland climate. At the last census in 2018, it had a recorded population of 452,608 with a population density of 32 per km². Infants < 24 months of age were estimated at 9,053. The main activities are small-scale trading and administration. Secondary activities are subsistence agriculture, small livestock farming and artisanal fishing. The staple food is cassava, cereals (maize, rice and sorghum), other tubers (taro, sweet and white potatoes) and bananas. These foods are generally served with vegetables, fish, beans and meat, which helps to balance the family dish. On average, two to three meals are consumed per day [19].
KHZ is located in the Kabare administrative zone of South Kivu province in the DRC. It is situated 17km from the city of Bukavu. It is an area with high plains and hills at elevations between 900 and 1900m, with a tropical highland climate. At the last census in 2018, it had a recorded population of 213,882 with a very high population density of 856 per km². Infants under 24 months of age were estimated at 17,111. The population of this area is devoted to agriculture, livestock and small-scale trade. Bananas, cassava, taro, sweet and white potatoes, corn and sugar cane are the main crops grown there. However, the soil is not very fertile, and most of the population of the area leaves the fields to sell labor in the city of Bukavu [20].
Study design, population and sample
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in August 2019 in 32 HA among mother-infant pair. The sample size was calculated using Emergency Nutrition Assessment (ENA) 2011 software. The variable used to calculate the sample size was the South Kivu exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months rate, estimated to 51% according DRC Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2017-2018 [21]. The variable "exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months" was considered since it gives a largest sample size compared to the other IYCF practices. Aiming at an absolute precision of 5% at the 95% confidence level, further assuming a design effect of 2.0 and allowing for 10% refusals and incomplete questionnaires, the required minimum sample size was 920, equivalent to 460 in each Health Zone. Sampling was systematic and proportional to the population (infants) size for each HA.
In each HA, a complete list of all households was compiled and all the households were serially numbered. To get the sampling interval, the total number of households in a HA was divided by the required sample size. The first household was then randomly selected by picking any number within the sample interval. Subsequent selections were made by adding the sampling interval to the selected number in order to locate the next household to visit. If the selected household did not have a target respondent, then next household was selected using the systematic sampling procedure. This process continued until the required sample size was obtained. In each household, only one eligible participant was surveyed using simple random sampling.
Data collection procedure and tools
Data were collected by using face-to-face interview during house-to-house visit from mothers who had children under 24 months using structured questionnaire. The questionnaire contained the information on sociodemographic characteristics of participants, infant feeding practices and anthropometry. To determine household socioeconomic status, we used wealth index from modern household assets [22-25].
Ten health extension workers and one public health professional were recruited as data collector and supervisor respectively. For data quality control, the questionnaire was first developed in French and translated to local language (Swahili and Mashi language) and then back-translated to French by an independent translator for consistency. Training was given to health extension workers and supervisor for 2 days. The questionnaire was pre-tested in 25 (5%) of mothers in IHZ and 25 (5%) of mothers in KHZ, which was not included in actual study, to assess the content and approach of the questionnaire. To assure the quality of the data, the supervisor and investigator closely reviewed the data collection technique on daily basis, reviewed the filled questionnaire for completeness and returned any incomplete questionnaire to the data collectors for correction. There was also debriefing every day.
Assessment of IYCF Practices
WHO has defined 15 indicators (8 core and 7 optional) to assess IYCF practices (Table 1). In this study, we assess IYCF practices using all 8 core and 3 out of the 7 optional feeding practices (children ever breastfed, continued breastfeeding at 2 years, and bottle feeding). Optimal feeding practice was assessed based on compliance to WHO recommended practices for each indicator. All indicators were assessed based on a 24-h recall method.
In accordance with the WHO rating on IYCF practices, the early initiation of breastfeeding prevalence of 0–29% was considered as poor, 30–49% as fair, 50–89% as good and 90–100% as very good. Exclusive breastfeeding prevalence of 0–11% was considered as poor, 12–49% as fair, 50–89% as good and 90–100% as very good. Timely initiation of complementary feeding prevalence of 0–59% was considered as poor, 60–79% as fair, 80–94% as good and 95–100% as very good [26].
Four core IYCF indicators were used to define whether complementary feeding practice was appropriate or inappropriate: timely initiation of complementary feeding, minimum dietary diversity, minimum meal frequency and minimum acceptable diet. We defined as appropriate if the mother responded correctly to all four indicators, and inappropriate if at least one indicator was not correctly fulfilled.
Nutritional status assessment
The anthropometric indicators, comprising weight-for-age (WAZ), length-for-age (LAZ), weight-for-length (WLZ), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and the presence or not of bilateral pitting edema were determined according to standard procedures described by WHO [27, 28]. Underweight was defined by WAZ < –2 according to the 2006 WHO growth standards in children aged 0–59 months; stunting by LAZ < –2; wasting by WLZ < –2 or MUAC < 125 mm, and overweight by WLZ > +2 [28]. Undernutrition was defined as wasting and/or stunting and/or underweight [29].
Statistical data analyses
Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS for Windows version 25 (SPSS Inc. Version 25.0, Chicago, Illinois). Characteristics of mothers and infants were summarized as mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables with a normal distribution, or as median and range for continuous variables with a non-normal distribution, and as number or percentages for categorical variables. Normality of continuous variables was explored visually (Q-Q plots and histogram) and numerically (Shapiro-Wilk and Kolomogorov-Smirnov tests). For categorical variables, we compared proportions using the chi-square or Fischer exact test; for continuous variables, medians were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. WHO Anthro plus 2011 version 1.0.4 (WHO, Geneva, Switzerland) was used to assess anthropometric z-scores with WHO 2006 reference. The age, gender, presence or not of bilateral pitting edema, and anthropometric measurements of infants were imported into WHO Anthro plus software, which then calculated WAZ, LAZ and WLZ and identified outliers: < - 6 and > 5 for WAZ, < - 6 and > 6 for LAZ and < - 5 and > 5 for WLZ. These values were excluded. Finally, this software assessed the infant’s nutritional status according to z-scores, MUAC, and the presence or not of bilateral pitting edema.
To study the factors associated with inappropriate complementary feeding practice, we conducted univariable and multiple logistic regression analyzes. The variables were imported into the multiple regression model on the basis of a value p≤0.25 and/or on the basis of biological plausibility. The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals were used to measure the association between the variables and inappropriate complementary feeding practice.
ate or inappropriate: timely initiation of complementary feeding, minimum dietary diversity, minimum meal frequency and minimum acceptable diet. We defined as appropriate if the mother responded correctly to all four indicators, and inappropriate if at least one indicator was not correctly fulfilled.
Nutritional status assessment
The anthropometric indicators, comprising weight-for-age (WAZ), length-for-age (LAZ), weight-for-length (WLZ), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and the presence or not of bilateral pitting edema were determined according to standard procedures described by WHO [27, 28]. Underweight was defined by WAZ < –2 according to the 2006 WHO growth standards in children aged 0–59 months; stunting by LAZ < –2; wasting by WLZ < –2 or MUAC < 125 mm, and overweight by WLZ > +2 [28]. Undernutrition was defined as wasting and/or stunting and/or underweight [29].
Statistical data analyses
Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS for Windows version 25 (SPSS Inc. Version 25.0, Chicago, Illinois). Characteristics of mothers and infants were summarized as mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables with a normal distribution, or as median and range for continuous variables with a non-normal distribution, and as number or percentages for categorical variables. Normality of continuous variables was explored visually (Q-Q plots and histogram) and numerically (Shapiro-Wilk and Kolomogorov-Smirnov tests). For categorical variables, we compared proportions using the chi-square or Fischer exact test; for continuous variables, medians were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. WHO Anthro plus 2011 version 1.0.4 (WHO, Geneva, Switzerland) was used to assess anthropometric z-scores with WHO 2006 reference. The age, gender, presence or not of bilateral pitting edema, and anthropometric measurements of infants were imported into WHO Anthro plus software, which then calculated WAZ, LAZ and WLZ and identified outliers: < - 6 and > 5 for WAZ, < - 6 and > 6 for LAZ and < - 5 and > 5 for WLZ. These values were excluded. Finally, this software assessed the infant’s nutritional status according to z-scores, MUAC, and the presence or not of bilateral pitting edema.
To study the factors associated with inappropriate complementary feeding practice, we conducted univariable and multiple logistic regression analyzes. The variables were imported into the multiple regression model on the basis of a value p≤0.25 and/or on the basis of biological plausibility. The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals were used to measure the association between the variables and inappropriate complementary feeding practice.