70 people finally participated in the study (30 female / 40 male), with an average age of 21(3) and 22(4) and a BMI of 22.05(3.5) and 21.9(2.6) kg/m2 for women and men respectively. During the second evaluation of fitness test, four women and one man had constraints which prevented them from being involved. The characteristics of the participants at the beginning and at the end of the study are reported in Table 2. Significant favorable changes were observed in all variables except the BI for both sexes, % body fat in women and WHR in men.
Table 2. Anthropometric parameters, fruit and vegetables consumption and exercise time before and after the intervention.
FVC (# of portions)
|
Women n= 30
|
Men n= 40
|
Before
|
After
|
p-value
|
Before
|
After
|
p-value
|
1.3 (1.1)
|
2.0 (0.9)
|
0.011
|
1.3 (0.9)
|
1.8 (1.0)
|
0.017
|
Exercise time (min)
|
40.4 (50.6)
|
146.0 (65.4)
|
0.000
|
75.8 (71.0)
|
162.3 (58.8)
|
0.000
|
Weight (kg)
|
54.4 (8.8)
|
57.4 (8.5)
|
0.000
|
63.2 (8.2)
|
68.5 (8.6)
|
0.000
|
BMI (Kg/m2)
|
22.1(3.5)
|
23.1(3.2)
|
0.001
|
22.0 (2.7)
|
23.7 (2.8)
|
0.000
|
Body fat (%)
|
31.3 (3.6)
|
30.6(2.1)
|
0.217
|
18.9 (4.4)
|
20.0 (3.7)
|
0.016
|
WHR
|
0.7 (0.1)
|
0.8 (0.1)
|
0.047
|
0.8 (0.1)
|
0.8 (0.1)
|
0.502
|
HGST (Kg/f)
|
23.9 (3.9)
|
25.8 (4.6)
|
0.001
|
35.2 (6.0)
|
41.7 (6.3)
|
0.000
|
BI
|
78.0 (21.0)
|
73.2 (32.7)
|
0.381
|
73.9 (30.7)
|
71.0 (23.6)
|
0.241
|
For the comparison of means, before and after the educational intervention, the student's t-test was applied for paired samples. A significance of 5% was used.
FVC, Fruits and vegetables consumption.
Data are mean and Standard Deviation (SD).
The results obtained show that, on average, both men and women had a normal BMI. However, women showed high values (>30%) for % body fat, while men had acceptable values (≤20%). Both, men and women did not reach the percentage of strength (>85%) referenced for their age and sex and the WHR showed that women were at the upper limit of reference, while men were below it.
Regarding physical condition, the BI showed that women had a physical status classified as "good" while men were classified in the "average" category. Exercise time increased after the intervention in both women and men; however, only 26% of men complied with the recommendations of physical activity of the WHO. The average for all men was of 68 minutes per week (45.3% of the recommended level). After the intervention, 42% of participants already fulfilled the recommendation, raising the average physical activity to 98 minutes per week (65.3% of the recommended level). Likewise, before the intervention, only 20% of women complied with the physical activity recommendations and the average for this group was of 54 minutes per week (36% of the recommended level). After the intervention, 29% of them already fulfilled the recommendation, raising the average physical activity to 77 minutes per week (51.3% of the recommended level) (Fig. 1).
Regarding the consumption of fruit and vegetables, the average consumption at the beginning of the study for all participants was 1.3 portions and at the end, 2.0 and 1.8 for men and women, respectively. This reflects an increase in consumption of 53% and 38.4% respectively. Despite this, after the intervention, only 12% of women and 14% of men consumed the 5 servings recommended by WHO (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Changes in exercise time per week and in the consumption of fruit in men and women.
* p<0.01 *** p<0.0001.
Students who followed at least one of the WHO recommendations noted some physical and emotional changes. In women there was improvement in the perception of physical and mood well-being. 28% of female respondents said they felt an increase in energy, 16% an improvement in their physical condition, 15% noticed some loss of weight, 14% improved digestion, 7% the appearance of the skin, 4% increased concentration and 3% in the quality of sleep. Additionally, 5% reported a decrease in stress. The men reported improvement in the perception of physical and mood well-being. 30% of male respondents said they felt an increase in energy and 22% an improvement in their physical condition, 8% in their digestion, 9% in their strength, 4% in their concentration, 3% in sleep quality, 10% noticed an increase in muscle mass, 5% in weight increase and 4% reported a decrease in stress.
The data were subjected to a PCA by sex. Bartlett's sphericity test showed that there were differences between the variables (p<0.001 for women and men), which allowed the PCA to be performed.
Three main components had eigen values greater than 1.0, which were used for subsequent analysis. These components explained 66.9% and 64.4% of the variance for women and men respectively (Table 3). Variables with a factor load >0.4 were considered a good contribution to the component.
Table 3. Total variance explained by the components
|
Women
|
Men
|
|
EXC
|
FV
|
FV and EXC
|
BC
|
FV and EXC
|
HGST
|
Eigen value
|
2.326
|
1.251
|
1.107
|
1.883
|
1.608
|
1.019
|
Variability (%)
|
33.233
|
17.874
|
15.809
|
26.907
|
22.971
|
14.551
|
% accumulated
|
33.233
|
51.107
|
66.916
|
26.907
|
49.878
|
64.430
|
Data are mean and SD.
FVC, Fruits and vegetables consumption; EXC, exercise time; BC, Body Composition.
For women, the first component explains the greater variance (33.23%), where BMI (34.78%), % body fat (23.6%) and exercise (15%) contributed positively to the component. In the second component, those who contributed the most in a positive way were fruit consumption (24.8%) and BI (36%), HWR contribution was (22.3%) in a negative way. For women, the first component was related to exercise time, the second with fruit consumption and the third with both. As for men, the first component was related to body composition, the second with fruit consumption and exercise time, and the third with HGST. In the third component, fruit consumption and exercise time (49.6% and 20.4% respectively) contributed positively (Table 4).
Table 4. Correlation matrix between variables and components obtained
|
Women
|
Men
|
|
EXC
|
FV
|
FV and EXC
|
BC
|
FV and EXC
|
HGST
|
FVC
|
-0.004
|
0.557
|
0.741
|
-0.080
|
0.459
|
-0.212
|
EXC (min)
|
0.599
|
0.092
|
0.476
|
-0.014
|
0.600
|
0.142
|
BMI (Kg/m2)
|
0.900
|
-0.161
|
-0.235
|
0.872
|
0.208
|
-0.212
|
Body fat (%)
|
0.742
|
0.340
|
-0.177
|
0.856
|
-0.214
|
-0.340
|
HWR
|
0.552
|
-0.529
|
0.307
|
0.605
|
0.193
|
0.628
|
HGST (Kg/f)
|
0.550
|
0.245
|
-0.200
|
-0.134
|
0.606
|
-0.566
|
BI
|
-0.004
|
0.672
|
-0.331
|
0.015
|
0.738
|
0.278
|
Data are mean and SD.
FVC, Fruits and vegetables consumption; EXC, exercise time.
For men, the first component contributed to 26.9% of the total variance explained, with the variables that most contributed to the component in a positive way being the BMI (40.4%), the fat % (19.8%) and the HWR (19.5%). In the second component were BI (33.8%), HGST (22.9%) and year (22.4%). In the third component, those that contributed the most were HWR (38.7%) in a positive way and HGST (31.5%) in a negative way. The first component was related to body composition, the second to exercise and fruit consumption and the third to HGST.
In the factorial plans constituted by components 1 and 2 for women and men, it was observed that in women there was a direct relationship between the consumption of fruit and vegetables and the BI after the intervention (the higher the consumption of fruit the more the BI improves), independent of body composition (BMI, HWR, % body fat) and HGST (Fig. 2).
For men, fruit and vegetables consumption and exercise showed a direct relationship with the BI and the HGST (higher consumption of fruit and exercise time improves HGST and BI), independent of body composition (BMI, HWR, % body fat) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 Factorial drawings of axes 1 and 2. A Women, B Men. F, fruit; V, vegetables.