NC1 induces necrosis in vitro and in vivo.
3-cycloheptyl-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)6-methoxy-7-methyl-1,3-dihydroindole-2-one (NC1; Fig. 1A), but not its inactive stereoisomer (NC1i), reduced the metabolic activity of human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells in a dose- and time-dependent fashion (Fig. 1B, C), as it induced cell killing, as indicated by the release of lactate dehydrogenase into the culture medium (Fig. 1D). Tetrazolium conversion assays revealed the IC50 of NC1 to be below 15 nM for nine of the ten human cancer cell lines tested. In contrast, NC1 failed to kill non-transformed IMR-90 fibroblasts and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), even at a concentration of 10 µM (Fig. 1E).
NC1 caused ballooning of MCF-7 cells (Fig. 1F), which became translucent in phase contrast microscopy, accompanied by an increase in nuclear diameter as well as by the formation of Hoechst 33342-positive chromatin clumps adjacent to the nuclear envelope (Fig. 1F, G). This contrasted with the appearance of MCF-7 cells succumbing to TNF, which induced apoptosis-associated morphological alterations such as chromatin condensation and cellular shrinkage (18) (Fig. 1F, G). Transmission electron microscopy confirmed the necrotic appearance of NC1-treated cells, manifesting a prominent swelling of cytoplasmic organelles, extranuclear vacuolization, peripheral chromatin condensation and plasma membrane rupture (Fig. 1H, I).
Cytochrome c and cathepsin L, which are usually sequestered within mitochondria or lysosomes, respectively, diffusely distributed throughout the cytoplasm upon NC1 treatment, as assessed by immunofluorescence microscopy upon staining with specific antibodies (Fig. 1J-L). Thus, we hypothesized that NC1 would induce both mitochondrial membrane permeabilization (MMP) and lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP). MMP was confirmed by staining NC1-treated MCF-7 cells with the mitochondrial transmembrane potential (Δψm)-sensitive fluorophore tetramethyl rhodamine methylester (TMRM), and LMP on MCF-7 cells succumbing to NC1 was corroborated by means of Lysotracker red staining. Thus, NC1 caused a drastic time-dependent reduction in Δψm and lysosomal membrane integrity (Fig. 1M). Altogether, these results indicate that NC1 stimulates the necrotic demise of human cancer cells.
We investigated the capacity of NC1 to induce necrotic cell death in vivo, in human cancers xenotransplanted in immunodeficient nu/nu mice. Intravenous injections or oral gavage of NC1 consistently reduced the growth of both PC3 and MCF-7 xenografts (Fig. 2A-C). Histochemical analyses of NC1-treated tumors revealed a massive necrotic response, featuring isolated swollen nuclei in tissues that were highly infiltrated by macrophages (Fig. 2D). Thus, NC1 can induce therapeutic necrosis of human cancer xenografts in vivo.
Molecular mechanisms of NC1-induced necrosis.
Next, we aimed at further characterizing the necrotic cell death subroutine triggered by NC1. In vivo live cell imaging analysis observed the ballooning of MCF7 cells upon NC1 treatment, and the rupture of plasma membrane is the hallmark of this NC1-induced cell death (Fig. 3A and Movie 1). These data suggest MCF7 cells upon NC1 treatment likely undergo necrosis rather than apoptosis. Contrarily to TNF induced caspase activation, NC1 failed to activate the cleavage of neither caspase-7 nor Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), two biochemical events displaying caspase activity associated with the execution of apoptosis in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 3B). Two necrotic markers, CyPA and HMGB1, were released from NC1-treated or tBH/zVAD cells into the extracellular medium (Fig. 3B). Both the broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk and the autophagy inhibitor Chloroquine (CQ) and 3-methyladenine (3-MA) failed to inhibit NC1-induced necrosis, suggesting that NC1-induced necrosis is different from apoptosis and autophagic cell death (Fig. 3C). Genetic depletion of the pro-apoptotic factors BAX and BAK by specific siRNAs was unable to rescue NC1-induced cell death (Fig. 3D). While the transfection-enforced overexpression of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2 successfully prevented TNF-induced apoptosis, it failed to protect cells from NC1-induced killing (Fig. 3E). Along similar lines, a TNFR1-blocking antibody failed to prevent NC1 induced necrosis in MCF7 cells (Fig. 3F), suggesting that NC1-induced cell death is independent of TNF signaling pathway. Together, all these data demonstrate that NC1-mediated cell death is different from apoptosis.
Several regulated necrosis pathways have been recently characterized, including necroptosis, ferroptosis and pyroptosis. Necroptosis requires the activation and translocation of receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinases RIPK1 and RIPK3 from the plasma membrane to cytosol 9–18, where Mixed lineage kinase like (MLKL) protein is phosphorylated by the RIPK1-RIPK3 complex and activated to execute necrosis in a caspase independent manner14,16. Ferroptosis is characterized by iron-dependent accumulation of oxidized polyunsaturated fatty acid-containing phospholipids on the plasma membrane, which is negatively regulated by the phospholipid hydroperoxide-reducing enzyme glutathione peoxidase 4 (GPX4) and coenzyme Q10 catalyzing enzyme ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) in parallel systems. Pyroptosis is marked by activation of inflammation-activated caspase-1 and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated caspase-11/4/522,23, and cleavage of pyroptosis executioner, the pore-forming protein gasdermin D (GSDMD) 24,25.
We used chemical approaches to define NC1 induced necrosis. The necroptosis inhibitor NSA, ferroptosis inhibitor Ferrostain-1, iron chelator desferrioxamine (DFO) and Liproxstatin-1, pyroptosis inhibitor z-YVAD all failed to inhibit NC1-induced necrosis (Fig. 4A), indicating that NC1-induced necrosis is different from necroptosis, ferroptosis and pyroptosis. In addition, PARP inhibitor Olaparib failed to inhibit NC1-induced cell death, while it effectively blocked MNNG-mediated parthonatos (Fig. 4B). In line with this observation, suppression of MLKL by CRISPR/Cas9 was unable to antagonize NC1 induced cell death as demonstrated by cell viability, suggesting that NC1-induced cell death is different from necroptosis (Fig. 4C and 4D). Loss of GSDMD did not block NC1-induced cell death as well, suggesting that NC1-induced cell death is different from pyroptosis (Fig. 4E and 4F). Moreover, suppression of ACSL4 failed to block NC1-induced cell death, although ACSL4 defficiency dramatically rescued RSL3-induced ferroptosis as reported (Fig. 4G and 4H). Taken together, these data suggest that NC1-induced necrosis represents a previous undescribed cell death other than apoptosis, autophagy, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis and parthonatos.
Mitochondria is important for NC1-induced necrosis.
To further decipher the mechanism of NC1-induced necrosis, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was executed. Functional analysis of RNA seq data identified a large proportion of the altered genes important for oxidative phosphorylation (Fig. 5A and 5B). The mitochondrial transmembrane potential (∆ᴪm) dissipates upon NC1 treatment, which occurs prior to loss of plasma membrane integrity. ∆ᴪm was examined during NC1-induced necrosis and we found that loss of ∆ᴪm occurred before the plasma membrane rupture (Fig. 5C), suggesting that mitochondrial permeability transition likely contributes to NC1-induced necrosis. Therefore, we next investigated if mitochondria participate in NC1-induced necrosis, we generated mitochondria-deficient cells as previously reported32 and observed that mitochondria-deficient cells were resistant to NC1-induced necrosis, suggesting that mitochondria are involved in NC1-induced necrosis (Fig. 5D). As we demonstrated, inhibition of mitochondria fission partially suppressed the cytotoxicity of NC1 (Fig. 5E). Importantly, genetic targeting of cyclophilin D blocked NC1-induced killing (Fig. 5F). Moreover, Cyclosporin A (CsA), which attenuates mitochondrial permeability transition, dramatically blocked NC1-induced cell death (Fig. 5G). Together, these data suggest the important role of mitochondria in NC1-induced cytotoxicity.
NC1 provoked a rapid increase in the production of ROS in sensitive MCF-7 cells, as detected by flow cytometry upon staining with the ROS-sensitive dye 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA) (Fig. 6A). The ROS production is largely from the mitochondria, as we observed robust increase in MitoSOX-sensitive mitochondrial ROS but no increase in BODIPY-sensitive lipid ROS production (Fig. 6B and 6C). ROS production correlates with cellular sensitivity to NC1, since we observed no obvious general ROS or mitochondria ROS production in NC1-insensitive U2OS and MEF cells (Fig. 6D-6F). To test this hypothesis, we treated 6 cancer cell lines as well as normal cell lines with NC1, and compared their ROS production and sensitivity to NC1 (Fig. 6G and 6H). Four cell lines including one prostate cancer cell line PC-3, and three human breast cancer cell lines MB468, MCF-7 and HCC1143 highly sensitive to NC1, exhibited high ROS production at the basal levels (Fig. 6G and 6H). In cancer cells that are insensitive to NC1, including lung cancer cell line A549 and osteosarcoma cell line U2OS, their basal ROS levels were much lower (Fig. 6G and 6H). These data suggest that the basal ROS levels in the cancer cell lines likely correlate with their sensitivity to NC1.
Further, we investigate if mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays a role in NC1 induced necrosis. Two mitochondrial ROS driven necrosis inhibitors Necro-X2 and Necro-X5 both blunted NC1 cytotoxicity (Fig. 6I). All these data suggested that ROS production is likely involved in NC1-induced necrosis.
Immunogenic cell death induced by NC1
Immunogenic cell death (ICD) induced by anthracyclines is characterized by the exposure of calreticulin (CRT) on the cell surface, the release of ATP during the blebbing phase of apoptosis, as well as the release of HMGB1 from the nucleus via the permeabilized plasma membrane 35. NC1 was capable of inducing these hallmarks on PC3 prostate cancer cells as efficiently as did the anthracyline, mitoxanthrone (MTX) (Fig. 7A-7C). This phenomenon was accompanied by an endoplasmic reticulum stress response (as illustrated by the phosphorylation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor, eIF2α) (Fig. 7D). NC1 and MTX both were equivalent in inducing the ICD hallmarks in murine MCA205 fibrosarcoma cells, although through distinct signal transduction pathways (Fig. 7E-7G). NC1-induced CRT exposure, ATP and HMGB1 release were dramatically inhibited by cyclosporinA and necroX5 (Fig. 7E-7G). Conversely, MTX-induced CRT exposure and HMGB1 release were only partially suppressed by Z-VAD-fmk (Fig. 7E-7G). In accordance with the in vitro data, NC1-killed MCA205 cells were able to elicit a protective anticancer immune response when they were injected subcutaneously into histocompatible, immunocompetent C57Bl/6 mice (Fig. 7H). In conclusion, NC1 can induce a type of cell death that bears biochemical and functional hallmarks of ICD.