A 51-year-old male patient residing in Guizhou Province, China returned from Wuhan, China on January 22, 2020 where there had been an outbreak of COVID–19 pneumonia. He presented the 5 years of history of hypertension but denied the history of arthritis, hyperthyroidism, tuberculosis, autoimmune disease and other chronic diseases. He was admitted to Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital on January 29, 2020 with high fever for 8 days, additional clinical symptoms included dry cough, malaise and pronounced tiredness. On admission, physical examinations revealed a temperature of 37.8℃ , no evidence of lymphadenopathy, or physical signs suggestive of leukemia and hyperthyroidism. Detailed systemic examinations revealed no abnormalities in cardiovascular, or abdominal systems. Laboratory data included the mildly abnormal of blood routine examination and other inflammation parameters such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin–6 (IL–6) and ESR, normal live and renal function parameter (Table 1); Arterial blood gas analysis was as follows: pH, 7.418; PO2, 71(oxygen Index 173); PCO2, 42mmHg on room air. Chest computed tomography(CT) showed the feature of multiple ground glass opacification in both lower lobes (Figure 1). Considering his epidemiological history traveled to Wuhan and sign of fever and dry cough, the nucleic acid assay of COVID–19 of throat swab was tested on January 29 and 30, 2020. Combined the twice positive results of nucleic acid assay of COVID–19, his symptoms and laboratory data, the COVID–19 pneumonia was confirmed on January 31, 2020 according to the diagnostic criteria for COVID–19 pneumonia.
After admission, main treatments included that moxifloxacin, oseltamivir, γ-interferon and the Lotus antipyretic granules. As to February 02, 2020, he still had the signs of intermittent fever and dry cough, therefore, the anti-virus drug, Lopinavir and Ritonavir Tablets, the methylprednisolone were given. Up to February 14, 2020, although patient’s symptoms of malaise and pronounced tiredness were significantly improved, he still had the dry cough and intermittent fever. For centralized management to COVID–19 patients, he was transferred to Jiangjunshan Hospital (The Fixed Hospital for COVID–19 patients in Guizhou Province, China). Laboratory data examined after transferring indicated the count of leukocyte and lymphopenia decreased, while IL–6 and CRP and ESR increased, and the mildly abnormal liver function (Table 2), Arterial blood gas analysis was as follows: pH, 7.41 PO2, 78(oxygen Index 270); PCO2, 42 mmHg on room air (Table 4). The chest CT showed the streaky or coarse reticular pattern opacities, and lesions in both lower lobes were improved comparing to that scanned before (Figure 2). Treatments with moxifloxacin and oseltamivir were replaced with the anti-virus drug, Arbido.
Up to February 21, 2020, the sign of dry cough and fever significantly removed. The examination of chest CT showed the lesions in both lower lobes significantly improved (Figure 3), and the assay of blood sample indicated all parameters of inflammation were normal except ESR (Table
3) tested on February 25, 2020. Also both the nucleic acid assay of throat swab of virus of COVID–19 tested on February 22 and 24, 2020 were negative, all which indicated this patient recovered from COVID–19.
However, the ESR gradually increased after admission, and reached at 120 mm/h on February 22, 2020, to figure out the possible reasons increasing the ESR in this case, we tested the related parameters of tumor, inflammation, tuberculosis, rheumatic diseases, autoimmune diseases, hyperthyroidism and anemia, results showed there were no evidences indicated the increasing of ESR resulted from these possible factors (Table 4). With the improvement of patient’s condition, we stopped the use of all anti-virus on February 24,2020, patients situation was stable from February 24, 2020 to March 01, 2020, and the patient was discharged and entered the period of medical observation on March 1, 2020, the examination of ESR on February 28 and 29, 2020 still reached to 120 mm/h and 118mm/h respectively (Figure 4), therefore we excluded the increasing of ESR resulted from the negative effect of drugs, but the exact cause of ESR increased in this case is unclear.