Exendin-4 normalizes the T2D-induced impairment of neurological recovery after stroke in association with the normalization of glycemia and insulin resistance
To detect any potential effects of T2D and Ex-4 on stroke recovery in T2D mice and potentially correlate this effect with histological outcomes, the experiment was terminated at 8 weeks after tMCAO (time when the Non-T2D mice fully recovered forepaw grip strength after stroke).
There was no difference between the forepaw grip strength in Non-T2D and T2D mice before tMCAO (data not shown). At day 3 post-tMCAO, stroke decreased forepaw grip strength approximately by 40% (pre-tMCAO levels are indicated by the dashed line on Fig. 2a) in both Non-T2D and T2D mice (Fig. 2a). The two-way repeated measures ANOVA analysis revealed that during the recovery time (3 days − 8 weeks), forepaw grip strength significantly increased in all mice (main effect – time, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2a). However, the grip strength was significantly greater in Non-T2D vs. T2D-Ve mice (main effect – T2D, p < 0.0001) and a significant interaction (p = 0.0496) between time and T2D was recorded (Fig. 2a). These results show that T2D significantly worsened the grip strength recovery. The grip strength in T2D-Ex-4 mice was significantly greater vs. T2D-Ve mice (main effect – Ex-4 treatment, p < 0.0001) and here too, a significant interaction between time and treatment (p = 0.0008, Fig. 2a) was recorded, indicating that Ex-4 significantly improved the grip strength in the recovery phase in T2D mice. Later, post-hoc statistical tests showed that Non-T2D mice fully recovered forepaw strength by 8 weeks reaching the pre-tMCAO levels (Fig. 2a), while in T2D-Ve mice the forepaw strength stayed significantly lower (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2a) than in Non-T2D mice. Remarkably, T2D mice treated with Ex-4 showed a significant increase in grip strength vs. untreated T2D-Ve mice already from 3 weeks after stroke (p = 0.0101 Fig. 2a) and onwards, and fully recovered their forepaw grip strength by week 8. These differences in grip strength recovery were not determined by the differences in stroke severity, since no difference in ischemic volume was recorded between any of the groups (Fig. 2e-f).
T2D-Ve mice significantly and rapidly decreased body weight after tMCAO (and the substitution of HFD with SD) and from 1–2 weeks after stroke we could not observe any difference in body weight between the groups (Fig. 2b). As expected, fasted levels of blood glucose in T2D mice were significantly higher than in Non-T2D mice before tMCAO (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2c). After tMCAO and the change from HFD to SD, blood glucose significantly decreased in the T2D-Ve group at both 4 (pre-tMCAO vs. 4 weeks post-tMCAO, p < 0.0001) and 8 weeks (4 weeks post-tMCAO vs. 8 weeks post-tMCAO, p < 0.0001) but still remained significantly higher vs. Non-T2D mice both at 4 weeks post-tMCAO (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2c) and at 8 weeks (p = 0.0043), although at this time-point the mean glucose levels in T2D-Ve mice decreased below the diabetic threshold of 7mmol/L (Fig. 2c). In T2D mice treated with Ex-4, fasted blood glucose of ≈ 6 mmol/L was reached already at 4 weeks after tMCAO, although still significantly higher than the Non-T2D mice (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2c) and was completely normalized (< 5.6 mmol/L) at 8 weeks after tMCAO (Fig. 2c). We also evaluated insulin sensitivity in all groups before stroke and at 4 and 8 weeks post-tMCAO. Non-T2D mice maintained normal insulin sensitivity throughout the experiment and T2D-Ve mice remained insulin resistant (Fig. 2d). However, the T2D mice treated with Ex-4 showed improved insulin sensitivity already at 4 weeks post-tMCAO compared to T2D-Ve mice (p < 0.0001, Fig. 2d), and then reached the levels of Non-T2D mice at 8 weeks after tMCAO (Fig. 2d).
In summary, these results show that despite normalization of body weight shortly (2 weeks) after tMCAO, during a large part of the post-stroke recovery phase (at least for 4 weeks) T2D-Ve mice remained hyperglycemic and for the entire recovery phase (8 weeks) they were insulin resistant. Ex-4 treatment in T2D mice normalized hyperglycemia already 4 weeks after tMCAO and gradually improved insulin sensitivity at 4 and 8 weeks post-tMCAO. We conclude that the poststroke decrease in body weight does not correlate with improvement of recovery in T2D. On the contrary, the impaired poststroke neurological recovery in T2D mice is associated with hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, and Ex-4 treatment improves stroke recovery by normalizing these parameters.
Improved neurological recovery by Exendin-4 in T2D mice correlates with normalization of T2D-induced atrophy of GABAergic parvalbumin + interneurons, reduced inflammation and improved vascular remodeling and fibrotic scar formation
Stroke similarly decreased (≈ 60%) the number of surviving PV + interneurons in the ipsilateral striatum, in all experimental groups (Fig. 3a). We have previously shown that shortly (2 weeks) after stroke the soma volume of PV + interneurons is decreased in the peri-infarct region of the striatum and, while in Non-T2D mice the soma volume recovers back to normal within 6 weeks after stroke, this atrophy persists in T2D (42). In the present study, potential differences in stroke-induced atrophy of PV + interneurons were also assessed by measuring the soma volume of these neurons in the contralateral and ipsilateral peri-infarct striatum. The results in Fig. 3b show a substantial atrophy of PV + interneuron soma volume in the ipsilateral peri-infarct striatum of T2D-Ve mice compared to the corresponding region in Non-T2D mice (p = 0.005) and compared to its own contralateral striatum (p = 0.0026), at 8 weeks after stroke. In Ex-4-treated T2D mice, no differences were detected in the soma volume of PV + interneurons in the ipsilateral-peri-infarct striatum vs Non-T2D mice or vs. its own contralateral striatum (Fig. 3b), indicating that the Ex-4 treatment reversed PV + interneuron atrophy. To quantify potential differences in basal activation of PV + interneurons between the groups, we quantified the number of cFos/PV double-positive neurons in the peri-infarct striatum. A fraction of PV + interneurons was activated in both contra- and ipsilateral striatum, without differences between the groups (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
To assess potential changes in the neuroinflammatory response after stroke, we quantified Iba-1 + and CD68 + microglia cells in the contralateral and ipsilateral striatum at 8 weeks post-tMCAO. The total density of Iba-1 + microglia in the ipsilateral versus respective contralateral striatum was significantly increased after stroke similarly in all groups, indicating persistent neuroinflammation at 8 weeks post-tMCAO without any additional effects of diabetes or Ex-4 treatment (Fig. 4a). However, when we evaluated density of Iba-1 + microglia specifically in infarct-adjacent areas (termed ROI, see Methods), we recorded a significant effect of Ex-4 in reducing Iba-1 + cell density in these regions (p = 0.0017 for non-T2D vs. T2D-Ex-4, and a strong trend p = 0.0605 for T2D-Ve vs T2D-Ex-4) (Fig. 4b). Microglia/macrophage activation (number of CD68 + cells) was also reduced by Ex-4 (p = 0.0105 non-T2D vs. T2D-Ex-4 and p = 0.0595 T2D-Ve vs T2D-Ex-4) (Fig. 4c).
To assess any impact of T2D and Ex-4 treatment on vascular remodeling after stroke, CD31 + vessel density and maturity were examined. Striatal vessel density in the infarct area was increased in all groups compared to the respective contralateral striatum (contra vs ipsi: p < 0.0001 for non-T2D, p = 0,0001 for T2D-Ve and p < 0.0001 for T2D-Ex-4) (Fig. 5b). T2D-Ve mice, however, had a significantly reduced ipsilateral striatal vessel density vs non-T2D mice (p = 0.0001), which was restored by Ex-4 treatment (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5b). Notably, Ex-4 treatment increased vessel density in T2D mice to even slightly above non-T2D levels (p = 0.0475) (Fig. 5b). A similar pattern was found for the coverage of vessels by pericytes, an indicator of vessel maturity. In fact, the coverage of CD31 + vessels by CD13 + pericytes was increased by stroke in all groups, when comparing the ipsilateral vs contralateral striatum (contra vs ipsi: p < 0.0001 for non-T2D, T2D-Ve and T2D-Ex-4) (Fig. 5c). However, pericyte coverage in the ipsilateral striatum was reduced in T2D mice when comparing T2D-Ve vs non-T2D mice (p < 0.0001) and normalized by Ex-4 treatment (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5c), indicating improved vascular remodeling and pericyte recruitment.
Similarly, the total pericyte density was increased after stroke in all groups when comparing the ipsilateral vs contralateral striatum (contra vs ipsi: p < 0.0001 for non-T2D, p = 0.0076 for T2D-Ve and p < 0.0001 for T2D-Ex-4) (Fig. 5d). The total density of CD13 + pericytes in the ipsilateral striatum was reduced in T2D-Ve vs non-T2D mice (p < 0.0001) and increased by Ex-4 treatment (p < 0.0001 T2D-Ve vs T2D-Ex-4) (Fig. 5d). Changes in CD13 + pericyte density between T2D-Ve vs non-T2D mice and the restorative effect of Ex-4 were observed for both perivascular and parenchymal pericytes, as indicated by the density of parenchymal pericytes in the ipsilateral striatum, an indicator of the fibrotic scar formation after stroke (p = 0.0061 non-T2D vs T2D-Ve, p = 0.0301 T2D-Ve vs T2D-Ex-4) (Fig. 5e). There were no differences between groups in the contralateral striatum for all analyses (Fig. 5b-d).
We also assessed potential changes in the early phase of stroke-induced neurogenesis by quantifying neuroblasts (DCX+) and early post-mitotic neurons (Calretinin+/NeuN-) (46) in the striatum 8 weeks after tMCAO. The number of DCX + cells was increased in ipsilateral vs. contralateral striatum in all groups, while no differences between ipsilateral vs. contralateral striatum were found for the number of Calretinin+/NeuN- cells (data not shown). We did not record any significant differences between the groups, for both of the assessed cell types (Additional file 1: Figure S3a,b).
Overall, these results suggest that T2D impairs recovery of forepaw grip strength during 8 weeks after stroke in association with a substantial atrophy of PV + interneurons and reduced vascular remodeling and fibrotic scar formation, and that this effect is counteracted by Ex-4 treatment. Ex-4 also reduced neuroinflammation, however we could not correlate this effect with improved neurological recovery since no differences in Iba-1 + and CD68 + microglia cells were observed between non-T2D and T2D-Ve mice.
Exendin-4 marginally improved neurological recovery after stroke in non-T2D mice
The next step in our study was to investigate the potential efficacy of Ex-4 to improve neurological recovery after stroke in non-T2D mice. In order to detect any potential effects of Ex-4 on stroke recovery in non-T2D mice and potentially correlate this effect with histological outcomes, the experiment was terminated at 6 weeks after tMCAO (time when the Ex-4-treated mice fully recovered forepaw grip strength after stroke). The two-way repeated measures ANOVA analyses showed a significant time effect (p < 0.0001) (both groups improved grip strength over time) and no significant treatment/Ex-4 effect (Fig. 6a). However, a significant interaction between time and Ex-4 treatment was still found (p = 0.0069, Fig. 6a), showing that the difference in grip strength between the groups was increasing over time. This indicates a positive effect of Ex-4 on neurological recovery that we interpret as minor in comparison with the effect obtained in the T2D study (Fig. 2a).
Histological/quantitative assessments of stroke volume (Fig. 6b), PV + interneuron volume (Fig. 6c), neuroinflammation (Fig. 6d, e), CD31 + vessel density (Fig. 6f), coverage of vessels by pericytes (Fig. 6g) and CD13 + pericyte density (Fig. 6h) did not reveal any significant effects of Ex-4 treatment. However, despite the mice being normoglycemic, we could detect a significant increase of plasma insulin levels in the Ex-4-treated group (Fig. 6i).