Several studies have demonstrated that the cytotoxic activity of antigen-specific CTLs can be evaluated by a reduction in cell-associated luciferase activity in various types of murine tumor cell lines (Fu et al., 2010; Olivo Pimentel et al., 2020). Our previous report showed that fLuc-B16-F10 cell viability was slightly impaired by in vitro cultured splenocytes derived from B16-F10-bearing mice (Nishizawa et al., 2021). From this result, we speculated that the target cell death was caused by the in vitro activated splenocytes, but we were uncertain whether the lowered target cell proliferation was due to the specific effect of the splenocyte-derived CTLs. Using purified splenic CD8 T cells as a source of CTLs, we demonstrated that the bioluminescence signal was lowered by cocultured CD8 T cells with melanoma cells compared with coculture-free CD8 T cells, suggesting that the melanoma-reactive effector CD8 cells differentiated in vitro impaired target cell proliferation.
Despite this useful and simple method for measuring target cell viability, some issues must be addressed. First, the sensitivity of measuring cell viability is low compared with previously reported CTL assays. A study regarding B16 cell survival by fluorescence time-lapse imaging reported a reduction in cell viability to approximately 10% during 4 h of coculturing with CTLs (Qi et al., 2019). Our experimental protocol with B16-F10 did not cause a dramatic decrease in the luminescence level even after 40 h of adding activated CD8 cells, suggesting that the efficacy of CTL cytotoxicity is low. The difference in the effect of CTL may be due to the lesser number of injected cells, the number of sites, and the repeat of injection compared with the previous report, which compromised the extent of the acquired immunity against melanoma cells. Alternatively, the B16 cells in the previous report may have higher immunogenicity and cause an accelerated CTL differentiation, which is possibly not identical to the B16-F10 in our study. Regarding CTL activity levels, a previous coculture study reported much less CTL cytotoxicity in colon and lung carcinoma cells (Olivo Pimentel et al., 2020), suggesting that the extent of antigen-specific CTLs may vary depending on cell type. Second, we detected a certain extent of a nonspecific effect on cell proliferation in LLC cells by adding of the responder cells. We speculate that the change in cell density in culture wells due to the addition of responder cells may have affected cell viability. To accurately assess CTL activity, each experimental setting, including conditions of cell injection in vivo and coculture in vitro, must be optimized.
Among the various methods that have been established for evaluating CTL activity, the bioluminescence-based assay is suitable for detecting cell viability, as it causes minimal cell damage even after repeated measurements. The fLuc-B16-F10 cells showed a significant reduction in luminescence signals with A23187 over 3 µM or puromycin over 2 µM, which are confirmed to be drug-dependent cell death by other methods (Schlapbach and Fontana, 1997; Glass-Marmor et al., 1999), suggesting that the luminescence value accurately reflects the survival rate. Notably, because this method does not directly reflect cell death but rather the activity of the remaining live cells, it is unsuitable for quantifying CTL activity. This method, when combined with other quantitative methods, is extremely useful for experiments analyzing temporal changes in CTL activities, such as comparative studies on the effects of immunomodulatory drugs and cells.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the modified luciferase-based CTL assay protocol established in this study enabled us to monitor cell viability chronologically with high reproducibility. The luciferase-based method can be used to investigate CTL activity against poorly immunogenic tumor cells, such as B16-F10.