2.1 Grouping and drug administration
Three-month-old adult male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (250 ± 50 g, n=59) were obtained from Dalian Medical University. This work was permitted by the Animal Experiments Ethical Committee of Dalian Medical University (AEE19087). The rats were placed in rearing cages (50 cm × 30 cm × 20 cm). The temperature of the rearing environment was 21 ± 1°C, the humidity was 40%-70%, and the rearing environment was dry, clean, and ventilated. The rats were exposed to a 12 h/12 h constant light/dark cycle. The rats were provided normal food and water (n=4 rats/cage). All the rats were adapted to the rearing environment for a week. The experimental rats were divided into nine groups (n=6-8 rats/group). The groups included the control group (C), three drug treatment only groups (C+Baclofen, C+CGP55845, and C+Spadin), the CUS group, and three drug intervention groups (CUS+Baclofen, CUS+CGP55845, CUS+Spadin, and CUS+Citalopram). The chronic unpredictable stress treatments were performed according to a previously described modified protocol (Ge et al. 2020; Katz et al. 1981; Yue et al. 2018). The model group was subjected to one kind of stimulation per day for 27 days, and none of the stimuli appeared twice on two consecutive days. The types of stimulation included restraint (30 min), fasting (24 h), water deprivation (24 h), warm water swimming (15 min, 31℃), warm water swimming (15 min, 31℃), cold water swimming (10 min, 18℃), social isolation (24 h), wet mattress + 30° inclined cage (24 h), tail suspension (1 centimeter from the root of the tail, 10 min), and continuous overnight lighting. After the establishment of the depression model, the open field tests and sugar preference tests were used to test the depression-like behavior. The rats without chronic unpredictable stress treatments were tested at the same time. In addition, The drug administration was performed for 4 weeks, during which the chronic stress stimulation was carried out. The route of administration was intraperitoneal injection. The rats without drug treatments were given to the corresponding volume of physiological saline solution (vehicle). The dosages of the intervention drugs were based on the references and pilot study. The dosage of the GABAB R agonist (baclofen, Target Mol Company) was 3 mg/kg/d, the dosage of the GABAB R antagonist (CGP55845, APExBIO Company, USA) was 0.1 mg/kg/d, the dosage of the TREK-1 blocker (spadin, APExBIO Company, USA) was 0.1 mg/kg/d, and the dosage of the positive control drug, a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (citalopram, MedChem Express, USA), was 5 mg/kg/d.
2.2 Open field test (OFT)
A SuperMaze V2.0 animal behavior video analysis system (Shanghai Xinruan Technology Co., Ltd.) was used to evaluate the behavior of the rats in the open field test. The autonomous behavior and exploratory behavior of the rats in the novel environment were recorded and analyzed. The rat was placed in the center of the box (50 cm × 50 cm × 40 cm), and video was recorded for 5 min. The inner wall of the box was black, and the bottom surface was divided into a lattice containing 25 squares (10 cm × 10 cm per square) for analysis. The light was approximately 40 lx. The background noise of the laboratory was below 65 dB. The total time spent and the total distance moved at the central region of the open field were analyzed for each rat. To avoid the influence of odor, 75% alcohol was used to clean the cages after each test was performed.
2.3 Sucrose preference test (SPT)
The sucrose preference test is the most commonly used assessment method for the symptoms of depression (Höflich et al. 2019; Tao et al. 2019). A sucrose preference test was performed to evaluate the anhedonia level (Liu et al. 2018; Tao et al. 2019). During the adaptation period, the rats were provided 2 bottles of 1% sucrose solution on the first day. On the second day, the rats were provided 1 bottle of water and 1 bottle of 1% sucrose solution. The positions of the two bottles were switched after 12 hours. The rats were provided 2 bottles of water on the third day. One day after the sucrose adaptation period, a sucrose preference tests were conducted. All rats were provided 1 bottle of water and 1 bottle of 1% sucrose solution. After 12 hours, the positions of the two bottles were switched. The consumption volumes of the rats were measured for 24 hours. The sucrose preference value was evaluated according to the following formula (Wang et al. 2019): Sucrose preference=sucrose consumption/[sucrose consumption + water consumption] × 100%.
2.4 Western blotting
Hippocampal samples were isolated according to The Brain Atlas by using a brain mold. The hippocampal protein was extracted according to the instructions of the Ketyl Total Protein Extraction Kit (Nanjing Kaiji Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd). The target protein concentration was evaluated by using the BCA Protein Content Detection Kit (Cat: KGPBCA, Nanjing Kaiji Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd.). Denatured protein (30 μg/well) was loaded into a 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate gel and measured by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Afterwards, the target proteins were transferred onto polyvinyl difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The PVDF membranes were incubated with 5% skim milk for 2 h at 37°C. After that, the PVDF membranes were immunoblotted with the following antibodies: GABAB R-Ab (primary antibody, 1:5000, Abcam Co., Ltd.), TREK-1-Ab (primary antibody, 1:1000, BioVision), and GAPDH-Ab (primary antibody, 1:1000, ImmunoWay Company). Tris-buffered saline containing Tween 20 (TBST) was used to wash the membranes (10 min × 3); afterward, the membranes were placed in an incubation box with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibody (anti-goat IgG/HRP, 1:5000, ZSJQ-BIO Company, Beijing, China; anti-mouse, IgG/HR, 1:5000, ZSJQ-BIO Company, Beijing, China) at room temperature for 2 h. Subsequently, the membranes were washed in TBST (10 min × 3), and Bio-Rad analysis software (Hercules, CA, USA) was used to measure the signal intensities of the protein bands. TREK-1 and GABAB R protein expression was normalized to GAPDH (n=5/group).
2.5 Statistics
In the present study, SPSS 23.0 (Aramonk, NY, USA) was used. All data are presented as the means ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA was used for comparison of samples among multiple groups. Differences between two groups were analysed using Student's t-tests. To evaluate the possible interaction effect of chronic unpredictable stress and drug treatments on depressive-like behavior and GABAB R and TREK-1 protein expression among rats, two-way ANOVA was used. p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The double-blind method was used in this study.