Characteristics of patients
A total of 26 patients with cholecystitis were enrolled in the analysis. Diagnostic criteria for acute cholecystitis were implemented according to the Tokyo guidelines (TG18) base on clinical symptoms and auxiliary examination [6]. Patients with acute cholecystitis were divided into three groups according to cholecystolithiasis (Group A, n = 7), cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones (Group B, n = 7), and cholecystolithiasis, common bile duct stones and acute pancreatitis (Group C, n = 4). Patients with chronic cholecystitis and cholecystolithiasis (Group D, n = 8) were included as the control group. The general characteristics and clinical parameters of the four groups are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of gender, age and previous hypertension. Compared with control group, patients in the acute cholecystitis group were more likely to have higher WBC, TBil, ALT, GGT and body temperature levels, which were associated with an acute inflammatory response (Group A) or acute cholangitis (Group B and C). Consequently, further analysis of bile samples from these four groups of patients was performed.
Table 1
Characteristics of patients with cholecystitis
Characteristic
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
p valve
|
Patients, n
|
7
|
7
|
4
|
8
|
-
|
Female, n (%)
|
3 (42.9%)
|
5 (71.4%)
|
2 (50%)
|
5 (62.5%)
|
0.476
|
Age (years)
|
80.57 ± 7.21
|
70.00 ± 10.31
|
72.25 ± 12.92
|
68.75 ± 3.69
|
0.058
|
WBC (109/L)
|
10.50 ± 2.98
|
9.16 ± 3.85
|
11.03 ± 5.03
|
5.30 ± 1.28
|
0.014
|
TBil (µmol/L)
|
37.99 ± 22.65
|
44.91 ± 22.89
|
100.25 ± 53.60
|
17.11 ± 7.76
|
<0.001
|
ALT (U/L)
|
61.24 ± 59.54
|
252.08 ± 271.64
|
413.25 ± 490.55
|
14.03 ± 4.12
|
0.035
|
GGT (U/L)
|
133.29 ± 161.67
|
387.86 ± 403.87
|
506.50 ± 398.60
|
25.95 ± 8.40
|
0.021
|
AST (U/L)
|
108.71 ± 157.89
|
495.14 ± 617.92
|
408.50 ± 281.01
|
20.39 ± 5.56
|
0.056
|
Body temperature (°C)
|
37.94 ± 1.20
|
37.97 ± 1.03
|
37.32 ± 1.45
|
36.56 ± 0.52
|
0.045
|
Previous hypertension
n (%)
|
4 (57.1%)
|
2 (28.6%)
|
2 (50%)
|
3 (37.5%)
|
0.751
|
WBC: white blood cell; TBil: total bilirubin; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; GGT: gamma glutamyl transpeptidase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; -: no relevant information. |
The Distribution And Diversity Of The Bile Microbiome
16S rDNA gene sequencing was employed for bacterial identification. Raw reads averaged 82,552, 84,974, 84,361 and 84,854 per sample in Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. After quality filtering, an average of 76,549, 79,125, 75,535 and 77,478 high-quality sequence tags were respectively obtained. We used SILVA (Release 138) and the NT-16S database to classify sequences.
As shown in Fig. 1a, Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum in the whole population (Group A, B C and D). Compared with control Group D (mean relative abundance of 3.07%), Firmicutes was more abundant in acute cholecystitis Groups A, B and C (mean relative abundance of 18.70%, 7.72% and 24.70%, respectively). In contrast, Chloroflexi was more abundant in Group D (1.69%) than in patient Groups A, B and C (less than 0.01%). Significantly, there was an increasing trend in the abundance of Actinobacteriota, Fusobacteriota and Verrucomicrobiota in each A, B and C patient group compared to those in Group D.
At the genus level (Fig. 1b), Burkholderia was significantly abundant in the bile samples of the control group (mean relative abundance of 41.24%) compared with those of the acute cholecystitis Groups A, B and C (mean relative abundance of 13.19%, 11.08% and 1.09%, respectively). In contrast, Escherichia and Aeromonas were more abundant in acute cholecystitis Groups A, B and C (20.10%, 49.14% and 33.44% for Escherichia and 15.17%, 14.51% and 6.92% for Aeromonas, respectively) than in the control group (11.73% for Escherichia and 0.01% for Aeromonas). In addition, the abundance of Klebsiella and Enterococcus were highest in Group A (12.7% and 12.92%, respectively), and Clostridium was highest in Group C (22.77%). All data showed significant differences in the bile microbiome between patients with acute and chronic cholecystitis.
Comparison Of The Bile Microbiome In The Four Groups
Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) (weighted UniFrac distance) and principal component analysis (PCA) were employed to study the differences among the four groups of bile specimens (Fig. 2a, b). We noticed that microbial communities obtained from the bile of patients with chronic cholecystitis controls (Group D) clustered separately from those obtained from the bile of acute cholecystitis patients (Group A, B and C). However, there were no significant differences among acute cholecystitis patients in Groups A, B and C.
The operational taxonomic unit (OTU)-based microbial diversity was also estimated, and we visualized the similarities among the samples. Venn diagrams showed that 37 OTUs overlapped in all groups, while 100 OTUs appeared in the control group and Group A, 90 OTUs appeared in the control group and Group B, and 101 OTUs overlapped in the control group and Group C (Fig. 2). 2c). In addition, the exclusive OTUs of the control, Groups A, B and C were 542, 314, 530 and 260, respectively. The total OTUs were 713, 592, 836 and 498, respectively. This result showed that the biliary microbiota significantly differed among the four groups at the genus level, indicating a correlation between the microbiome and biliary tract diseases.
Differential Bacteria In Biliary Microbiota (Acute Cholecystitis Patients Versus Chronic Cholecystitis Controls)
The composition of the biliary microbiota significantly differed between acute cholecystitis patients (Groups A, B and C) and chronic cholecystitis controls (Group D). At the genus level, we observed that Burkholderia, Bradyrhizobium, Phreatobacter and Comamonas levels were significantly higher in chronic cholecystitis controls than in acute cholecystitis patients (Fig. 3). Similarly, the family levels of Burkholderiaceae, Bradyrhizobiaceae, Rhizobiales and Lactobacillaceae, the order levels of Burkholderiales and Rhizobiales, and the class levels of Alphaproteobacteria were significantly higher in chronic cholecystitis controls versus acute cholecystitis patients (Fig. 3).