In this study we show that both circulating total and HMW adiponectin are associated with markers of inflammation in a cohort of 70 untreated subjects with newly diagnosed RA. Moreover, plasma adiponectin levels were also associated with several CXCR3- and CCR2-binding chemokines.
Adiponectin is an adipokine whose levels are elevated in both plasma and synovial fluid of subjects with RA (13, 14). Despite being traditionally considered as anti-inflammatory (33), adiponectin has been demonstrated to induce pro-inflammatory responses in different cells known to play a role in RA pathophysiology (16, 18, 19). Nevertheless, it remains a matter of debate whether adiponectin levels are associated with markers of disease activity in subjects with RA (22-28). Recently, a meta-analysis of eleven studies showed that circulating total adiponectin levels were not associated with disease activity in subjects with RA, assessed as DAS28 and CRP levels (22). However, most of the studies included in the meta-analysis were performed in cohorts of subjects with established RA, where both the treatment and the long-term disease could have affected the results. In fact, DMARDs and glucocorticoids have an impact on both circulating adiponectin (28-30) and chemokine levels (34-37) which precludes the use of treated subjects in studies of association between levels of adiponectin and clinical markers or chemokines. To overcome this hurdle, we selected a cohort of 70 treatment-naïve subjects with newly diagnosed RA.
A previous study has investigated whether adiponectin associated with markers of disease activity in an untreated, newly diagnosed RA cohort and found no association (28). However, the study was performed in a small cohort of 40 subjects and, based on the effect size found in our analyses, was underpowered to detect an association between adiponectin levels and markers of RA activity. Our cohort of 70 subjects with untreated, newly-diagnosed RA showed that circulating levels of total adiponectin were associated with CRP and ESR. Adiponectin levels were also associated with both DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR, but not with SJC, TJC nor CDAI. As DAS28 index includes CRP or ESR in its formula, there is reason to believe that the association between DAS28 and adiponectin was mainly driven by CRP and ESR.
We have also screened 15 chemokines in the plasma of 70 subjects with untreated RA and found that CXCL10, CXCL9 and CCL2 were positively associated with total adiponectin levels. CXCL10 and CXCL9 share the same receptor, CXCR3, which is predominantly expressed by activated T cells and regulates cell activation and trafficking (38). Notably, in a subgroup of our cohort, it has been previously shown that plasma CXCL10 levels are positively associated with multiple disease activity markers of RA, such as DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR, CRP and ESR (31). The same study also showed that circulating CXCL9 was associated with ESR. CCL2 has been reported as strongly related to the future incidence of RA in healthy women from the Nurses’ Health Studies, particularly within the following 5 years (39). Moreover, circulating CCL2 levels are elevated in subjects with RA compared to healthy controls and this increase precedes the onset of RA (6). Histological examination of RA synovia has also revealed extensive CCL2 expression (40). Hence, our results show that adiponectin levels associated with chemokines which are closely linked to the pathophysiology and activity of RA.
Adiponectin circulates in blood in three different forms, whereof the HMW seems to be the form mediating the metabolic effects (9, 10). To determine whether HMW adiponectin was also the form exerting inflammatory functions involved in RA pathophysiology, we measured total and HMW adiponectin in our cohort of subjects with untreated newly diagnoses RA. Both total and HMW adiponectin associated positively with DAS28, CRP and ESR. This result might suggest that the HMW form drives the association between adiponectin and markers of inflammation in treatment-naïve subjects suffering from RA. HMW was also associated with CXCL9 but not with CXCL10 or CCL2, as total adiponectin did. Based on the effect size of the analyses, our cohort is probably underpowered to detect a significant association between those chemokines and HMW adiponectin. Another possible explanation is that the association of total adiponectin with CXCL10 and CCL2 is mediated by another adiponectin form. However, one naturally arising limitation of the current study is that no measurement of LMW or MMW adiponectin was performed due to lack of commercial products available to measure them. Without the assessment of all circulating forms of adiponectin it is hard to draw a clear conclusion on the associations of the predominant form with markers of inflammation and plasma chemokines.
This is an exploratory study with its limitations. First of all, the above-mentioned lack of measurement of plasma LMW and MMW adiponectin. Moreover, a bigger cohort of subjects with untreated RA is needed to confirm the association between adiponectin and markers of inflammation and chemokines. Data on the follow-up of subjects with RA would also give information on how treatment affects adiponectin levels, whether higher baseline adiponectin associates with a worse prognosis and whether its levels are an indicator of treatment outcomes.
In conclusion, by studying a clinically well characterized cohort of subjects with newly diagnosed untreated RA, we have shown an association between circulating adiponectin and markers of inflammation and pro-inflammatory chemokines involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Our results support the hypothesis that adiponectin might be a pro-inflammatory factor involved in the development of RA.