Renal growth in infants is affected by various endogenous and exogenous factors; among which nutrition is the most important. It governs the growth and size of kidneys in neonates and when not adequately provided can adversely affect kidney function. In Pakistan, where malnutrition is one of the major health problems, nutrition is usually provided to the infants by feeding them on breast milk or formula milk. (16) Human milk is considered the best source of nutrition for infants as it promotes brain and body growth, modulates intestinal function, and strengthens infant’s immune system and provides many maternal benefits as well. But it may not be available or suitable in all circumstances. Also, the proteins present in the mother’s milk decrease after the first month postpartum. To overcome this, formula milks have been designed which try to meet the infants’ nutritional requirements as adequately as possible. Commercially produced fortified milk often contains the proteins and nutrients which are required for optimum growth and development of infant. Therefore, relying solely on breast milk may lead to inadequate growth of kidneys in infants. (17) But whether human milk or artificial milk is more beneficial for kidney growth in infants is still controversial.
The growth of kidneys in infants is evaluated by measuring renal volume which is the most important parameter in assessing kidney function. It is usually measured via ultrasound, an invariable and reliable method to measure kidney dimensions. (16) Measuring kidney volume in infancy is important as several studies have suggested that poor kidney growth in infants is associated with the development of hypertension and various kidney diseases later in life. It also increases the risk of developing cardiovascular problems in such individuals, which is the major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. (6) In the present study we assessed kidney function by measuring renal volume in infants and tried to compare the size of kidney in breastfed and formula milk-fed infants.
Of the 80 infants included in our study, 55% were male and 45% were female with a male to female ratio of 1.2. Mean age of the infants was 8.9 months and mean body weight was 7.6 kg. This is in contrast to a study conducted by Schmidt et al. (11) in which the mean body weight of infants was around 3.6 kg.
For the right kidney, mean dimensions were 5.28 cm, 2.73 cm, and 2.56 cm for length, width, and depth respectively. In comparison, mean renal dimensions for the left kidney were 5.38 cm, 2.82 cm, and 2.42 cm for length, width, and depth, respectively. Mean renal volume was 21.99 cm3 for the right kidney and 23.39 cm3 for the left kidney. Mean kidney volume in our study was comparable to that noted by Schmidt et al. (11) Mean total renal volume (mean of the sum of volumes of both kidneys) was 45.38 cm3 and relative kidney volume (total kidney volume divided by infant weight) was 6.12 cm3/kg. This is also comparable to the readings recorded by Schmidt et al. (11) ranging from 6.8 to 7.6 cm3/kg in breast-fed and formula-fed infants. In our study, male patients had greater relative kidney volume than female patients.
Due to the non-normality of our data, Mann-Whitney U test was performed. Mean rank was greater in the breast-fed infants as compared to artificially fed infants. But no statistically significant relationship was found between the feeding type and relative kidney volume in our study participants. Past studies offer conflicting evidence as well. Studies conducted by Miliku et al. (6) and Schmidt et al. (11) showed that shorter duration of breastfeeding was related to a smaller combined kidney volumes. In another study conducted by Voortman et al. (18) longer breastfeeding duration was associated with larger kidney volume and an increased estimated glomerular filtration rate in infants. But in a study conducted by Ece. Et al (16), increased renal growth was reported in artificially-fed versus breast-fed healthy infants. Thus, until now, conflicting evidence exists in the medical literature regarding the role of type of infant nutrition on breast feeding. Much more medical evidence is needed to conclusively define the role of infant feeding on renal growth. Our study and its findings are a new and unique addition to this growing pool of medical evidence regarding effect of infant nutrition on kidney growth.
Limitations of our study include its low sample size. Our study was a single center study. Patients were not followed later on to reassess for continued kidney growth past infancy. Renal function markers like creatinine levels were not done because of limited resources. For the future, we believe that a multicenter study, with a large sample size and one that follows kidney growth into well past infancy, will be able to effectively elucidate the effect of breastfeeding/artificial feeding on kidney function of individuals in infancy and then in adulthood.