Study design
This was a cross-sectional study using quantitative methods.
Study setting
The study was done in Reach One Touch One Ministries (ROTOM) Health Center- Mukono, Central Uganda. ROTOM was established in 2003 as a non-denominational Christian ministry dedicated to meeting the spiritual, social, physical and psychological needs of the elderly and their dependents so they may live dignified, independent and hopeful lives and has grown today to become the leading organization meeting the needs of the elderly people in Uganda. ROTOM health center is located 15 kilometers north-east of Mukono town. Mukono is a District, with a total area of 2,986.47 Square kilometers, lying in the Central region of Uganda, located 21Kms East of Kampala City and sharing borders with the Buikwe District in the East, Kayunga along River Sezibwa in the North, Luwero in the North West, Kampala and Wakiso in South West, Tanzania - Lake Victoria in the South with the Islands of Buvuma District.
Approximately 1000 older persons do access health services in ROTOM health center-Mukono. Adults 50 years and above are eligible to attend ROTOM Health Center. About 915 of the older persons currently have sponsorship, managed through the center, and do not have to pay for services. This group resides in the rural areas of Mukono District. The second category of older adults are those without sponsorship, who come from surrounding districts of Kayunga, Buikwe, Wakiso and Luweero to seek health services at the center. While Mukono is a multiethnic town, majority of people who attend ROTOM Health Center speak Luganda. The center is open for 24 hours for all the days of the week, and it averagely receives 15 older clients per day who attend for various needs. These services include general outpatient and inpatient care, medical outreach and screening, home visits, home safety, hygiene and sanitation drive, fellowships for seniors, food and income enhancement and chronic care services. Specific days are designated for special activities such as fellowships, distribution of food and non-food items, home visitations and sanitation drives. Emergencies are not seen at ROTOM health center and patients self-refer to the medical service. ROTOM is therefore, not a standard PHC service as it serves the older adult population. It is however, important to note that, while older persons can access these various services in ROTOM health center-Mukono, there are limited screening and care services for dementia. The staff that run the health facility include a manager/medical officer in-charge, clinical officer, monitoring and evaluation officer, four community nurses, a facility-based nurse, laboratory technician, pharmacist assistant and eight formal caregivers who support the older persons who have no caregivers during daycare activities.
Study population
The target population was adults 50 years and older attending ROTOM Health Center with their accompanying caregivers. The inclusion criteria were adults 50 years and older attending ROTOM Health Center-Mukono during the study period. Those who screened positive for pseudodementia were excluded from the study.
Sample size
A sample size of 271 was used in the study. This was determined using Kish Leslie formula (1960) for estimating prevalence in cross-sectional studies. The parameters used in sample size estimation were: 95% level of confidence, 5% level of precision and proportion of dementia of 20% [4].
Sampling procedure
Consecutive sampling was used. Every adult 50 years and older that presented to ROTOM health center-Mukono with their accompanying caregivers were included in the study.
Data collection instruments
All participants were screened for pseudodementia due to depression, using the Geriatrics Depression Scale (GDS) before they were subjected to dementia assessment. The informed consent form was translated from English to Luganda, which is the language all study participants understand. It was written in plain Luganda by a registered nurse who understands and has regular interactions with the elderly.
Data was collected using a combination of questionnaires: The Early Dementia Questionnaire (EDQ) and Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (DKAS).
The prevalence of dementia was determined using the EDQ. This tool has been used and validated in primary care settings of Malaysia. It uses the symptoms of dementia, with 20 questions. These include: memory symptoms, concentration, physical symptoms, emotions, sleep disturbances and symptoms such as confusion and awareness of outsiders about changing behaviour. Scoring of the EDQ was done through a Likert Scale response ranging from 0-3. The score 0 describes never, 1 seldom, 2 sometimes and 3 always. The minimum score was 0 and the maximum 60.
To determine severity of symptoms, the scores were based on the symptoms a patient had in a week for the past 2 years. A score of 0-7 indicates a patient was normal and a score of 8 or more shows the patient had dementia. This cut-off point of 8 was based on the fact that eight of 20 questions of dementia symptoms are identified as early symptoms of dementia.
Knowledge of dementia was determined using the DKAS which provides a valid and reliable measure of knowledge characteristics of diverse populations [14].
The DKAS comprises statements about the syndrome that are factually correct or incorrect, which were developed on the basis of a literature review and international Delphi study with dementia experts. Respondents answer on a modified Likert scale with five response options: false, probably false, probably true, true, don’t know. Preliminary study identified four hypothesized components/subscales within the measure that have been defined as Causes and Characteristics (dementia pathology and terminal course), Communication and Behaviour (how a person with dementia engages with the world), Care Considerations (dementia symptoms relevant to the provision of care), and Risks and Health Promotion (risk factors and conditions that are associated with or mistaken for dementia) [15].
However, in this study, 5 subscales/indicators of dementia knowledge were used: The knowledge of risks factors, onset, progression/symptoms, and screening and treatment pathways. To determine the knowledge of dementia, a statement about syndromes that are factually correct was used on a set of 30 questions, with a response of either true or false.
Data collection procedure
Data was collected from 01/04/2022 to 15/05/2022. The study questionnaires were administered by trained research assistants who are employees of ROTOM health center and hold diploma in nursing. A total of 267 questionnaires were answered by a dyad of older adults and their caregivers. The caregiver was either a spouse, a child (above 18 years), or other close relative. A total of 260 caregivers that accompany the participants were interviewed. This was to ensure completion of questionnaires, especially by caregivers of older adults who might be experiencing memory loss. Interviews took a maximum of 30 minutes. Each filled questionnaire was cross-checked for completeness before the interview was terminated and clarifications sought. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Data Analysis
Data was entered on EpiData version 3.1, exported and stored on Microsoft Excel 2010. A dataset from 264 completed questionnaires was presented in excel format for analysis. 3 observations with missing data were dropped. Data was exported to SPSS version 12.0.
Descriptive statistics were computed and summarized using frequencies (for categorical variables) and medians (for numerical variables) with their respective inter-quartile ranges. Prevalence was calculated to assess the magnitude of dementia.
Bivariate and multivariable analysis using logistic regression were done to determine factors associated with probable dementia. Variables with p-values < 0.2 were considered for multivariable analysis. The variables in the final multivariable model were significant when p< 0.05. The measure of association was reported as prevalence ratio (PR) with corresponding 95% CI p-value. We used PR instead of odds ratio because the prevalence of the outcome is common (>10%). Using odds ratios would under estimate the measure of effect (prevalence ratio) in the sample.
The knowledge of dementia was described using descriptive statistics. All the correct responses were coded=1 and false responses were coded=0. It was expected that if a person passed all the responses, the total score would be 30. All the scores per study IDs were summed up to get the total score for each subject. The median score of 19 was then identified. Participants below median score were categorized as having less than optimal knowledge and those above were categorized as having optimal knowledge.
Participants’ overall knowledge was categorized using modified Bloom’s cut-off point, as good if the score was between 80 and 100% (19–30 points), moderate if the score was between 50 and 79% (10–18 points), and poor if the score was less than 50% (< 10 points).