Design, Carbon Emission and Economic Analysis of a Cogeneration System for Garments Group of Industries

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2208409/v1

Cogeneration is the most efficient and reliable energy supply technology which is being utilized worldwide in individual industries but not in a group of industries. This paper presents a study which has been carried out to check the feasibility and economic viability of Combined Heat and Power Plant (CHP) in a group of industries of garments zone. Heat and power forms of energy are required in existing system. Electricity is supplied by the state grid while heat in the form of steam is generated by the industries individually by diesel fuel fired boiler. Power (electricity) and heat (steam) required in the garments zone (Group of Industries) is 700 kWh/hr and 2100 kg/hr respectively. To fulfill this requirement, CHP and steam distribution system has been designed in this study. Internal rate of return (IRR) has been calculated for different scenario. An industrialist in existing system spends Rs. 3.4/ kg steam and Rs. 6.5/kWh power. By replacing the existing system by the proposed system, IRR is 12% if the industrialist spends the same amount for next ten years to pay for proposed system. If the industrialist paid the same amount with an annual increase of 10% per year (which is actually happening in India) on diesel and electricity for the next ten years, there would be an IRR of 15% even when the steam is provided by the proposed system at Rs. 2.9/ kg. CO₂ emissions are reduced by 85 Tonnes per year as compared to the existing system. The proposed system, therefore, is not only economically viable but also save the environment.

Cogeneration

steam distribution system

internal rate of return

In the present industrial scenario, most of the Indian industries are not using efficient and advanced technologies in energy utilization and generation. Conventional energy sources are depleting regularly. Energy saving in existing industries is more valuable than new extra energy generation.Combined heat and power plant (CHP) is a proven and energy efficient technology in energy generation and utilization. This technology has been already inducted in India by various individual industries like sugar (Kamete and Gangavati 2009; 11. Premalatha et al. 2008), cement (Verma and Srinivas 2015; Verma et al. 2017), paper (Delgado et al.2013; Gambini et al.2019) and textile (Gohul et al. 2012; Sommani et al.2020; Tang and Mohanty 1996) industries but not being utilized for group of industries. This technology may be more powerful tool for energy saving in a group of industries. This thought drovethe authorsto do valuable research in a group of industries.

Indian garments industries have lot of potential to improve efficiency in energy utilization. Garments industries require two forms of energy - heat and power. Steam generation and utilization process as well as Electricity supply (distribution) in these industries is very inefficient.This study has beenbeing carried out to assess the feasibility of cogeneration system inan industrial area ora

group of industries and to analyze the economic viability of cogeneration system in comparison to existing system of garments zone of Sitapura industrial area. This study will be beneficial for other industrial sites of Jaipur and other cities as well. Using the proposed system, the garments industries will not only be able to minimize the cost of production but also make the optimum use of energy in an eco-friendly manner. If this technology would be utilized by all industrial zone in India than a lot of pressure of power requirement on state grids would be reduced. Gap between demand and supply of power would also be reduced which was 12% in India in the year 2010 (Goyal 2001).

The garments zone of Sitapura industrial area (SIA) is located in southern part of Jaipur, Rajasthan state of India. There are twelve different zones in Sitapura industrial area. The garments zone has been selected for this study because of three main reasons - its sufficient and continuous heat requirement; suitable heat to power ratio; and higher potential for improvement in energy efficiency. Garments zone of SIA comprises a hundred and fifty industrial units. Only forty-three of them have been engaged for working. Remaining 107 are just the industrial plots and no units have been set up there till the data was collected. Data has been collected from these operational forty-three industries only.

2.1 Process description and energy consumption pattern of industries

General processes of garments industries are washing, sewing, pressing etc.Sewing machines and power presses are used in the garment industries which consume energy in the form of electricity and/ or heat respectively. Electricity (power) is supplied by the state grid while heat in the form of steam is generated by the industries individually by diesel fuel fired boiler or electric boiler. There are some other machines and devices like hydro machines (which create wrinkles), washing machines, and lighting equipments which consume electricity.

2.2 Existing Energy Scenario

Total power and heat requirement of garments zone was calculated for existing energy scenario. Quantityof steam required by individual industry was calculated by the number of steam presses in that industry and steam consumption per press. Required power was evaluated by monthly electricity bills of electricity consumption. Average monthly electricity consumption was considered. In some small-scale industries, required heat is produced by electricity so that heating electricity consumption is deducted from total electricity consumption. Electricity consumption except heating is calculated finally. Total heat requirement of garments zone is 700 kWh / hrs.

In summers, air cooling load is also there but that load is very less in comparison to complete power load due to a smaller number of air conditioners in the industries. It is assumed that the total number of working days in a whole year is three hundred and fifty, as per data collected from industries on the basis of confirmation from management of the industries. Heat requirement is calculated according to the number of steam presses in the industries. Steam consumption in a steam press is 3.5 kg/ hr. Heat (steam) requirement is 2100 kg/hr. existing energy scenario has been shown in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1

Existing Energy Scenario
Sr. No	Detail	Requirements	Remarks
1	Total heat requirement in the system	2100kg/hour (steam)	Generated individually by industries
2	Steam supplied at Pr. & Temp.	3 kg/cm²&160 ⁰C	Superheated steam
3	Total power requirement in the system	700 kWh/hour	Supplied by grid
4	Heat to Power Ratio	2.31:1	Existing system

2.3 Heat to Power Ratio

Heat to power ratio is a dimensionless quantity. This is very important factor which decides the type of prime mover to be used in the cogeneration plant. Total heat requirement is 2100 kg per hour. It is assumed that plant is operated for 350 days, or 8400 hrs in a year. Power presses are operated only for 18 hours a day and other machines are operated round the clock.

Total power required in the garments zone is 505.220 MWh per month.

Power requirement = 505220 / (30×24) = 700 kWh/hr

Steam requirements = (2100 kg/hr.) × (664.7 K Cal / kg) / (860 K Cal/kWh) = 1623 kWh/h

Heat to Power ratio = 1623/700 = 2.3,

Heat /Power = 2.31:1

3. Design of Combined Heat and Power Plant (CHP) and Steam Distribution System (SDS) for garment zone of Sitapura Industrial Area

Combined Heat and Power plant and steam distribution system was designed for heat and power requirement of existing system. Design of piping system for distribution of steam comprises selection of pipe material, calculation of the diameter of main pipe and distributaries, and heat and pressure loss estimation. Design of CHP considers selection of prime mover and specification of prime mover and other parallel devices

3.1 Design of steam distribution system

3.1.1 Selection of Pipe material

Material used for pipes should have properties like, low emissivity, less cost and easy availability for desired steam flow. Steel pipe was selected because of these properties. (CO_GEN, N. G. B. 2007)

3.1.2 Pipe length and diameter of distributaries

Diameter of pipe can be calculated by this formula: M = ρ A V = ρ π (d ² /4) v … (3.1)

d = {4 M / (3.14 ρ × v)} ^1/2 ………(3.2)

M = Mass flow rate (kg/hr)

ρ = density of steam (kg/cubic meter)

V = velocity of steam (meter / second)

A = cross sectional area (sq. meter) this pipe is circular so cross-sectional area A = π d ²/4

Diameter of distributaries is calculated from Eq. 3.2 but calculated diameter is not available in the market so nearest possible diameter is selected. Mass flow rate is also changed due to modification in diameter of distributaries. Total modified mass flow rate is 2250 kg/hr.

3.1.3 Length and Diameter of Main Pipe

Length of pipe is 1100 meters as per map and optimum path of zone. Actual steam flow rate 2250 kg/hr after modified diameter of distributaries without losses in main pipe.

M = 2250 kg/hr.

V = 30 m/sec.(CO_GEN, N. G. B. 2007)

ρ = 1/.3594 kg/m ³ at supplied (from CHP) condition of steam

D = 9.766 cm standard pipe size available is 10.23 cm (CO_GEN, N. G. B. 2007) After considering losses modified diameter of main pipe is calculated.

Fitting losses (leakage of steam) are also to be considered those are 15% of supplied steam (CO_GEN, N. G. B. 2007). Total steam is to be supplied at {2250 + 15% fitting losses (leakage losses)} = 2550 kg/hr. Modified diameter is d = 10.47 cm

Standard diameter is 11.59 cm which is final. Steam flow rate through this pipe is 2600 kg /hr steam would be supplied 2600 kg /hour according to modified standard diameter available.

3.1.4 Heat and Pressure loss

Steam is supplied to individual industries by the main pipe of dia. 11.59 cm and length 1100 m during this flow heat and pressure losses occur. Maximum Pressure loss in steam flow is (.5 kg /cm²)/200-meter pipe length [5]. It is assumed that the total pressure loss in this steam distribution system (including distributaries) is 3 kg/cm². It is also assumed that supplied steam temperature is 200 ^o C. Steam is supplied to industries or extracted from steam turbine at 6 kg/cm² pressure and 200⁰ C.

Supplied steam (from CHP) should have following specification

Supplied temperature: 200 ⁰C

Supplied pressure: 6 kg/cm²

Supplied mass flow rate: 2600 kg/hr

3.2 Design of CHP Plant

3.2.1 Selection of prime mover for combined heat and power plant (CHP)

Prime mover is selected on the basis of heat to power ratio. Heat to power ratio for existing system is 2.31:1. Best possible prime mover for existing system is extracting condensing steam turbine because this turbine works in the range of heat to power ratio 2–10:1 (Williams 1978; Bamatov and Bamatov 2019).

3.2.2 Specification of prime mover and parallel devices

Existing system requirements and supplied steam data is already analyzed in previous sections. This requirement is fulfilled by supply of 2600 kg/hr steam at 6 kg /cm² pressure and 200⁰ C temperatures so the same quantity has to be extracted from turbine. It was asked to different manufacturers of steam generator and extracting steam turbine, what the most suitable specifications of boiler and extracting steam turbine are available for the above requirements.

The CHP used in proposed system have following specifications.

Steam turbine and boiler specification of proposed CHP (Atmaca 2010 ; Bamatov and Bamatov 2019) has been shown in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 and Different designed parameter of CHP and designed CHP has been shown in Table 3.3 and Fig. 3.1

Table 3.1

Specification of steam turbine and condenser
Sr. No.	Description	Specification and quantity
1	Type	Multi stage extraction condensing steam turbine
	Capacity	900 kW
2	Net electrical power	710 kW
3	Steam condition at inlet of turbine	42 kg/cm², 430 ^o C
4	Steam flow through turbine	5800 kg/hr.
5	Extraction of steam	2600 kg/hr @ 6.0 kg/cm² and 200 ^o C
6	Condenser pressure	0.10 kg/cm²
7	condenser and ejector system	3.0 TPH

Table 3.2

Boiler specification (Natural gas fired boiler)
Sr. No.	Description	Quantity
1	Steam capacity	6.5 TPH
2	Pressure	44 kg/cm²
3	Temperature	435 ^o C
4	Actual steam requirement at max. load	6050 kg/hr.

Table 3.3

Different Design Parameters of CHP
Sr. No.	Designed parameter	Quantity
1	Length of main pipe	1100 meter
2	Diameter of main pipe	11.59 cm
3	Actual mass flow rate	2600 kg/hour
4	Pressure and temperature of supplied steam	6 kg /cm², 200⁰ C
5	Steam turbine capacity Extraction Steam Turbine	1 MW
6	Boiler Capacity Gas fired (85% efficiency)	6.5 TPH
7	Input Fuel Required (Natural gas)	421 SCM/hour

4.1 Existing System Economic Analysis

Assumptions

*It is assumed that plants of garments zone are operated for 8400 hours/year (350 days/year).

*Steam requirement in industries is 18 hrs. a day.

* It is also assumed that total steam is generated by diesel fired boilers.

4.1.1 Running cost of the existing system is cost of power and heat required by the zone

Total electricity (power) required in a year = 700*8400 kWh /year = 5880 MWh /year

Price of electricity purchased from grid is at the rate = Rs 6.50 / kWh

Cost of power required (cost of electricity consumption by garment zone) per year = Rs 38.22 million

Total heat required for a year = 2100*18*350 = 13.23 million kg Steam = 8793.981 million KCal.

(664.7 K Cal/kg calorific value of steam at 3 kg/ cm² pressure and 160⁰ c temperature)

Calorific value of diesel = 10667 K Cal / kg [10].

Specific gravity of diesel = 0.85 [10]

Boiler efficiency = 85%,

Price of diesel is Rs 39 /liter

Quantity of diesel consumption in a year in liter with 85% efficiency of boiler and 0.85 is specific gravity of diesel

= 1.141 million liter /year

Price of diesel is Rs 39/ liter [11] so total cost of fuel required in a year = 1.141*39

Cost of heat required (steam generation) for garments zone in a year = Rs 44.501 million

This is the cost of diesel for generation of steam in a year by garments zone of industrial area

4.2 Proposed System Economic Analysis (CHP)

Assumption

* Fuel supplied for CHP system is natural gas.

* Loan interest is @ 12%

* Life of CHP 15 years [12] but IRR is calculated for ten years only

4.2.1 Fixed cost

Fixed cost = land cost of the plant + cost of infrastructure of the plant + cost of the CHP plant and its installation + cost of the piping system for distribution of steam

4.2.2 Variable cost

Variable cost = cost of fuel required to operate the CHP plant + O&M cost + interest over the loan amount.

Cost of fuel supplied to CHP

Quantity of natural gas required for CHP

= 419 SCM/hour = 419*8400 = 3.519 million SCM/year

Price of natural gas = Rs 15.92 / SCM [10] Total fuel cost = Rs 56 million/year

O&M cost: This is the operation and maintenance cost of the plant. = Rs 1.5 /kWh [9]

Thus, total O&M cost is Rs 8.82 million per year.

Total loan taken from the bank is Rs 79.5 million this loan amount is to be paid in six installments. Rate of interest on loan amount is 12%.Existing and proposed system economicanalysis has been shown in Table 4.1 and Table 4.2.

Table 4.1

Existing system energy and economic analysis
Sr. No.	Description	Quantity
1	Total power required in a year	5880 MWh
2	Total heat required in a year	8793.981 million Kcal
3	Quantity of diesel required for steam generation in a year	1.141 million liter
4	Cost of power required in a year	Rs 38.22 million
5	Cost of heat required in a year	Rs 44.501 million

Table 4.2

Proposed system economic analysis
Sr. No.	Type of cost	Description	Quantity
1	Fixed cost	Plant land cost	Rs 45 million
2		Plant building cost	Rs 10 million
3		Plant cost	Rs 20 million
4		Piping cost of steam distribution	Rs 4.5 million
6	Variable cost	Cost of fuel required to operate the CHP plant.	Rs 56 million/year
7		O&M cost	Rs 8.82 million per year
8		Rate of interest over the loan amount	12%

4.3 Internal Rate of Return of proposed system

IRR is calculated for different conditions

1. When electricity is sold at the same price as they purchased in existing system and steam is sold at the price at which it is generated in existing system and it is constant for coming 10 years.

2. IRR is calculated for same case as in condition first except constant prices for ten years but prices are varied at the rate of 10% as these varies in last ten years.

3. Price of steam sold is calculated for 15% IRR of the proposed system when second condition is followed.

4. IRR is calculated for different prices of steam sold to garments zone and remaining conditions are same. Rate of return is calculated at different prices in between Rs 2.3 to Rs 3.1/ kg steam with 10% increment in steam sold price/year.

Efficiency of CHP is always higher than separate generation of power so the emission of carbon in the environment should be reduced in the CHP. Quantity of carbon emission by existing and proposed system has been compared in this analysis. Important parameter of different fuel regarding emission of carbon has been shown in Table 6.1

Table 5.1

Different Parameters of Diesel, Electricity, and Natural Gas 8. (Herold 2003; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1996; Zhai 2018)
Sr. No.	Fuel and Energy Source	NCV	EF	Total Emission
1	Diesel	43 T J/kT diesel	74.8 T CO₂ /T J	3216.4 T CO₂ /kT diesel
2	Electricity	0.8033 T CO₂/MWh of power generation by coal
3	Natural gas	48 T J /Kt	56.1 T CO₂/T J	2688 T CO₂/ kT

5.1 Carbon Emission in Existing System

5.1.1 Carbon Emission Through Diesel

Diesel consumption in a year = 1141051.8 kg/year

= 1.141 kT/year

Total emission = 1.141*3216.4 T CO₂/year

= 3669.91 T CO₂ /year

5.1.2 Carbon Emission through Electricity

Electricity consumption in a year = 5880000 kWh/year

= 5880 MWh/year

Total emission = 5880 *0.8 T CO₂/ year

= 4704 T CO₂/year

Total emission of carbon in existing system = 3669.9 + 4704 T CO₂/year

= 8373.90 T CO₂/year

5.2 Carbon Emission from Proposed System

Natural gas

Total consumption of Natural gas = 3519600 SCM of calorific value 10000 kcal/SCM

= 3081961.47 kg

= 3.081 kT

1kg Natural Gas = 1.142 SCM (conversion factor)

Carbon emission per kT Natural Gas = 2688 T CO₂

Total emission of carbon in proposed system = 8284.3 T CO₂ / year

5.3 Total Saving of Carbon Emission

Total saving of carbon emission when Natural Gas is used in proposed system

Total emission of carbon in existing system = 8373.9 T CO₂ /year

Total emission of carbon in proposed system = 8284.3 T CO₂ /year

Total reduction in (saving) carbon emission = 89.59 T CO₂ /year

If cost carbon saving is 12$ /T CO₂

If price dollar is Rs 60 than carbon saving cost is Rs 720 / T CO₂ [10]

Total cost of carbon saving = 89.59*720

= Rs 64505 /Year

It is already known that CHP is highly successful technology in individual industry to generate power and heat simultaneously from a single energy source. Same result is also proved in this study that CHP is having a very good return for whole garments zone of Sitapura industrial area that can be viewed in the form of IRR values for different conditions.

IRR values at different conditions have been shown in Table 5.1.

Effect of different steam sold prices on IRR of proposed system can observed in Fig. 7.1. IRR values are calculated in between Rs 2.30/kg steam to Rs 3.10/kg steam and system is not feasible below Rs 2.3 steam. Variation of IRR with these prices has been shown in Table 5.1

Less amount of carbon is emitted in proposed system due to power and steam generation through single source (Natural Gas). In existing system carbon is emitted through required power generation and steam generation (diesel). Detail of carbon emission reduction by induction of CHP has been shown in Table 5.3.

This condition is favorable to CHP so it can be implemented in any industrial area where sufficient heat to power ratio is there. Induction of CHP plant is highly appreciable and economical.

As it is known from map that density of industries in garments zone is very less about 30% even than it is favorable to CHP. Zone is fully dense than results would be highly appreciable and efficiency of plant shall increase due to reduction of heat and pressure losses.

Table 5.1

IRR values at different conditions
Sr. No.	Condition	IRR
1	Electricity and steam are sold to industrialist at the same price as they purchased and produced in existing system respectively. (In existing system, it is Rs 3.4/kg steam.)	12.08%
2	If the proposed system follows condition 1st and increment in expenditure and revenue is @ 10% per year	24.07%

Table 5.2

IRR values at different prices of steam
Sr. No.	Price of steam sold (Rs)	IRR	Sr. No.	Price of steam sold (Rs)	IRR
1	2.3	-0.14	6	2.70	10.5
2	2.35	1.37	7	2.80	12.79
3	2.40	2.81	8	2.90	15
4	2.50	5.54	9	3.00	17.12
5	2.60	8.09	10	3.10	19.18

Less amount of carbon is emitted in proposed system due to power and steam generation through single source (Natural Gas). In existing system carbon is emitted through required power generation and steam generation (diesel). Detail of carbon emission reduction by induction of CHP has been shown in Table 4.3.

Table 5.3

Carbon Emission Reductions
Sr. No.	Description	Mode	Quantity
1	Carbon Emission in Existing System	Through Steam generation by diesel	3669.9 T CO₂/year []
2	Carbon Emission in Existing System	Through Electricity	4704 T CO₂/year
3	Total Emission in Existing System		8373.90 T CO₂/year
4	Carbon Emission in Proposed System	Through Natural Gas as fuel	8284.3 T CO₂ /year
5	Net Saving of Carbon Emission Proposed System (Natural Gas)		(8373.9.90- 8284.3.67) T CO₂ /year = 85.59 T CO₂ /year

This study has been carried out to assess the economic viability and feasibility of cogeneration system for a group of industries in comparison to existing system of garments zone of Sitapura industrial area. This proposed system is not feasible for steam sold price below Rs. 1.4/kg but having a best performance at steam sold price Rs. 2.9 /kg in comparison to steam price Rs. 3.4/kg in existing system. Proposed system also emits 85 tones less CO₂ in comparison to existing system. It has been proved that CHP is energy efficient economically viable technology in group of industries and this case study also proves a step forward to achieving the goal of energy efficiency and sufficiency along with curving the menace of environment deterioration. It is recommended replacing existing system by proposed system in group of industries of garments zone of other industrial areas. This specific steady may be carried out for other sectors of industries also.

I declare that the work I have produced is original, and all rights to it belong to me.

Atmaca, M. U. S. T. A. F. A. (2010). Efficiency analysis of combined cogeneration systems with steam and gas turbines. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 33(4), 360-369.
Bamatov, I. M., & Bamatov, D. M. (2019, December). Individual components for combined heat and power distillation to produce electricity. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1399, No. 3, p. 033026). IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1399/3/033026
CO_GEN, N. G. B. (2007). Bureau of energy efficiency.
Delgado, M. S., Bernad, E. C., & Palacín, J. I. G. (2013). Cogeneration process modelling in a paper factory. Procedia Engineering, 63, 966-972. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.284
Gambini, M., Vellini, M., Stilo, T., Manno, M., & Bellocchi, S. (2019). High-Efficiency cogeneration systems: The case of the paper Industry in Italy. Energies, 12(3), 335.; doi:10.3390/en12030335
Gohul, M., Ali, A. M. S., Raju, T. G., Saravanan, M. R., & Pasupathy, A. (2012). Implementation of cogeneration technique in textile industry for energy conservation. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(5), 1421-1427.
Goyal Alok (2001) Combined heat and power potential in Indian industries. Energy Technology News issue 2 and 3.
Herold, A. (2003). Comparison of CO2 emission factors for fuels used in Greenhouse Gas Inventories and consequences for monitoring and reporting under the EC emissions trading scheme. ETC/ACC technical paper, 10, 2003.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1996). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC.
Kamate, S. C., & Gangavati, P. B. (2009). Cogeneration in sugar industries: technology options and performance parameters—a review. Cogeneration and Distributed Generation Journal, 24(4), 6-33. doi: 10.1080/15453660909595148
Premalatha, M., Priya, S. S., & Sivaramakrishnan, V. (2008). Efficient cogeneration scheme for sugar industry. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, vol.67, pp.239-242 March 2008.
Sommani, P., Krittametaporn, T., & Lothongkum, A. W. (2020, April). Cogeneration system for energy saving and CO2 emission reduction: A case study of textile factory. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 778, No. 1, p. 012151). IOP Publishing.doi:10.1088/1757-899X/778/1/012151
Tang, O., & Mohanty, B. (1996). Industrial energy efficiency improvement through cogeneration: A case study of the textile industry in Thailand. Energy, 21(12), 1169-1178.https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(96)00065-5
Varma, G. P., & Srinivas, T. (2015). Design and analysis of a cogeneration plant using heat recovery of a cement factory. Case studies in thermal engineering, 5, 24-31.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2014.12.002
Verma Neha, Shrivastava Shrishti, Patro Saudamini (2017) Cogeneration Opportunities In Indian Small Scale Industries, Indian J. Sci. Res. 14 (2): 318-322.
Williams, R. H. (1978). Industrial cogeneration. Annual Review of Energy, 3(1), 313-356. 0362-1626/78/1010-03 1 3$01.00
Zhai, Y. (2018, July). Application of Cogeneration Technology Based on Energy Environment System Engineering. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 170, No. 4, p. 042005). IOP Publishing. doi :10.1088/1755-1315/170/4/04200

No competing interests reported.

AppendixA.docx

Design, Carbon Emission and Economic Analysis of a Cogeneration System for Garments Group of Industries

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Garments Zone Of Sitapura Industrial Area