1 Squillaro T, Peluso G, Galderisi U. Clinical Trials With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Update. Cell Transplantation 2015;25(5):829-848.
2 Yan L, Munzer SR, Richardson JL. What is stemness? Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences 2009;40(4):312-320.
3 Shinya Y, Hisashi M, Maki I et al. Cartilage Repair With Autologous Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation: Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Cartilage 2014;5(4):196-202.
4 Hashimoto Y, Nishida Y, Takahashi S et al. Transplantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells under arthroscopic surgery with microfracture versus microfracture alone for articular cartilage lesions in the knee: A multicenter prospective randomized control clinical trial. Regenerative therapy 2019;11:106-113.
5 Erin C, Fei G, Maosong Q et al. Differential efficacy of human mesenchymal stem cells based on source of origin. Journal of Immunology 2014;193(9):4381-4390.
6 Tuli R, Seghatoleslami MR, Tuli S et al. A simple, high-yield method for obtaining multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells from trabecular bone. Molecular biotechnology 2003;23(1):37-49.
7 Jiang Y, Cai Y, Zhang W et al. Human Cartilage-Derived Progenitor Cells From Committed Chondrocytes for Efficient Cartilage Repair and Regeneration. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2016;5(6):733-744.
8 Sotiropoulou PA, Perez SA, Maria S et al. Characterization of the optimal culture conditions for clinical scale production of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2010;24(2):462-471.
9 Li C, Wu X, Tong J et al. Comparative analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue under xeno-free conditions for cell therapy. Stem Cell Research & Therapy 2015;6(1):55.
10 Antebi B, Rodriguez LA, Walker KP et al. Short-term physiological hypoxia potentiates the therapeutic function of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Research & Therapy 2018;9(1):265.
11 Ning T, Zhang K, Heng BC et al. Diverse Effects of Pulsed Electrical Stimulations on Cells – with a Focus on Chondrocytes and Cartilage Regeneration. European cells & materials 2019;38:79-93.
12 Bai F, Gusbeth C, Frey W et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields trigger cell differentiation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 2017;1859(5):651-661.
13 Morotomi-Yano K, Uemura Y, Katsuki S et al. Activation of the JNK pathway by nanosecond pulsed electric fields. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2011;408(3):471-476.
14 Semenov I, Xiao S, Pakhomov AG. Primary pathways of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization by nanosecond pulsed electric field. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 2013;1828(3):981-989.
15 Rohmah MK, Lyrawati D, Yano K. Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) Induce Socs1 and Socs3 but not Socs2 Gene Expressions in Hela S3 Cells. Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya 2015;28(3):163-169.
16 Chopinet L, Rols M-P. Nanosecond electric pulses: a mini-review of the present state of the art. Bioelectrochemistry 2015;103:2-6.
17 He L, Xiao D, Feng J et al. Induction of apoptosis of liver cancer cells by nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs). Medical Oncology 2017;34(2):24.
18 Wu S, Wang Y, Guo J et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields as a novel drug free therapy for breast cancer: An in vivo study. Cancer Letters 2013;343(2):268-274.
19 Zou H, ., Gan XL, Linghu LJ et al. Intense nanosecond pulsed electric fields promote cancer cell apoptosis through centrosome-dependent pathway involving reduced level of PLK1. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2012;119(2):S658-S658.
20 Zhang K, Guo J, Ge Z et al. Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) Regulate Phenotypes of Chondrocytes through Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Pathway. Scientific Reports 2014;4:5836.
21 Ning T, Guo J, Zhang K et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields enhanced chondrogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells via JNK/CREB-STAT3 signaling pathway. Stem cell research & therapy 2019;10(1):45.
22 Baek S, Quan X, Kim S et al. Electromagnetic fields mediate efficient cell reprogramming into a pluripotent state. ACS Nano 2014;8(10):10125-10138.
23 Wang J, Guo J, Wu S et al. Synergistic effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields combined with low concentration of gemcitabine on human oral squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. PLoS One 2012;7(8):e43213.
24 Tsai C-C, Su P-F, Huang Y-F et al. Oct4 and Nanog Directly Regulate Dnmt1 to Maintain Self-Renewal and Undifferentiated State in Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Molecular Cell 2012;47(2):169-182.
25 Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement.8(4):315-317.
26 Yuin-Han L, Qiang W, Joon-Lin C et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genetics 2006;38(4):431-440.
27 Dor Y, Cedar H. Principles of DNA methylation and their implications for biology and medicine. Lancet 2018;392(10149):777-786.
28 Bhutani N, Brady JJ, Damian M et al. Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature 2010;463(7284):1042-1047.
29 Ning T, Zhang K, Heng BC et al. Diverse Effects of Pulsed Electrical Stimulation on Cells - with a Focus on Chondrocytes and Cartilage Regeneration. European Cells & Materials 2019.
30 Gianulis EC, Labib C, Saulis G et al. Selective susceptibility to nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) across different human cell types. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS 2016;74(9):1-14.
31 Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K et al. Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4. Cell 1998;95(3):379-391.
32 Looijenga LHJ, Hans S, Leeuw HPJC, De et al. POU5F1 (OCT3/4) identifies cells with pluripotent potential in human germ cell tumors. Cancer Research 2003;63(9):2244.
33 Ming LT, Nan WY, Min GX et al. Effects of ectopic Nanog and Oct4 overexpression on mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells & Development 2009;18(7):1013-1022.
34 Hyslop L, Stojkovic M, Armstrong L et al. Downregulation of NANOG induces differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to extraembryonic lineages. Stem Cells 2005;23(8):1035-1043.
35 Kusuyama J, Hwan SC, Ohnishi T et al. 10. Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) Stimulation Helps to Maintain the Differentiation Potency of Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Induction in Nanog Protein Transcript Levels and Phosphorylation. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2016;30(8):S4.
36 Ding H, Chen S, Yin JH et al. Continuous hypoxia regulates the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in a time-dependent manner. Molecular Medicine Reports 2014;10(4):2184-2190.
37 Han S-M, Han S-H, Coh Y-R et al. Enhanced proliferation and differentiation of Oct4- and Sox2-overexpressing human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells. Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2014;46(6):e101-e101.
38 Marta G, Jochen U. From skin to the treatment of diseases--the possibilities of iPS cell research in dermatology. Experimental Dermatology 2011;20(6):523-528.
39 Cowan CA, Jocelyn A, Melton DA et al. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells. Science 2005;309(5739):1369-1373.
40 Freberg C, Dahl J, S, Collas P. Epigenetic reprogramming of OCT4 and NANOG regulatory regions by embryonal carcinoma cell extract. Molecular Biology of the Cell 2007;18(5):1543-1553.
41 Simonsson S, Gurdon J. DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Nature Cell Biology 2004;6(10):984-990.
42 Zhao L, Yu Y, Deng C. Protein and mRNA expression of Shh, Smo and Gli1 and inhibition by cyclopamine in hepatocytes of rats with chronic fluorosis. Toxicology Letters;225(2):318-324.
43 Jing-Yu L, Min-Tie P, Ryutaro H et al. Synergistic function of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in the methylation of Oct4 and Nanog. Molecular & Cellular Biology 2007;27(24):8748-8759.
44 Liu Y, Mukhopadhyay P, Pisano MM et al. Repression of Zeb1 and hypoxia cause sequential mesenchymal‐to‐epithelial transition and induction of aid, Oct4, and Dnmt1, leading to immortalization and multipotential reprogramming of fibroblasts in spheres. Stem Cells 2013;31(7):1350-1362.
45 Sen GL, Reuter JA, Webster DE et al. DNMT1 maintains progenitor function in self-renewing somatic tissue. Nature 2010;463(7280):563.
46 Loh YH, Wu Q, Chew JL et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2006;38(4):431-440.
47 Mikkelsen TS, Jacob H, Xiaolan Z et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 2008;454(7200):49.
48 Danwei H, Kenji O, René M et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nature Biotechnology 2008;26(11):1269-1275.
49 Shi Y, Desponts C, Do JT et al. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with Small-Molecule Compounds. Cell Stem Cell 2008;3(5):568-574.
50 Zhu X, Chen F, Lu K et al. PPARgamma preservation via promoter demethylation alleviates osteoarthritis in mice. Ann Rheum Dis 2019.