Plant materials and treatment methods
In this study, pear leaves, petals and receptacles were collected from the Horticultural Research Base of Northwest A&F University in Yangling, Shaanxi, China. The Red, Half Red and Green leaves of ‘Zaosu’ (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.), ‘Red Zaosu’ (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.), ‘2 hao’ (Inter specific Pyrus hybrid), ‘7 hao’ (Inter specific Pyrus hybrid), ‘Cuiguan’ (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai.) were collected from the upper, middle and lower phyllotaxis of their branches respectively in mid-May. ‘Zaosu’, ‘Red Zaosu’ petals and ‘Red Zaosu’ receptacles of four different stages were collected from prophase to full bloom. All samples were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80℃. Moreover, 'Palacer' (Pyrus communis L.) and ‘Zaosu’ fruitlets grown in Meixian, Shaanxi, China, were selected for transient transformation to verify the function of PbLAC4-like and PbMYB26. Nicotiana benthamiana seedlings that had six leaves were used for dual luciferase activity assay.
The details of plant materials
‘Zaosu’ was identified formally by the Institute of Fruit Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. ‘Red Zaosu’, ‘2 hao’ and ‘7 hao’ were identified formally by our lab, while ‘Red Zaosu’ was a spontaneous bud sport of the ‘Zaosu’, ‘2 hao’ and ‘7 hao’ were the hybrid offspring of Pyrus pyrifolia, ‘Cuiguan’ was identified formally by Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences. These materials have been deposited in a publicly available herbarium. They were stored in the Pear Variety Resource Nursery of Northwest A&F University. The permissions were obtained to cultivate all the plants used in the study.
DNA and RNA extraction and purification
The total RNA was extracted using an RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentration and quality were tested using Multiskan GO (Thermo, MA, USA). The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China).
Sequence analysis of LAC
The protein sequences of LAC from Arabidopsis thaliana, Litchi chinensis, and Pyrus bretschneideri were used to construct a phylogenetic tree in the MEGA 5.0 software by Neighbor–Joining method and JTT+G model. Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicate analyses. The protein sequences were aligned using DNAMAN. The GenBank accessions of related protein are listed in Additional file 3: Table S1.
Expression analysis using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
The primers for selected genes and PbActin (an internal control) were designed on NCBI web pages and were synthesized by AuGCT Biotech Company (Beijing, China). The primers are listed in Additional file 4: Table S2. The qRT-PCR reactions were performed on an Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus; TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transcript levels of three biological replicates were analyzed using the cycle threshold (2−ΔΔCt) method.
Determination of the anthocyanin content
The extraction and quantification of anthocyanin were performed using a previously reported method, with slight modifications [54]. The anthocyanin was extracted using homogenizing method with polyphenol extracting solution, which consisted of 50% methanol, 48% water and 2% formic acid at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered by 0.22 μm organic filter for the determination of anthocyanin by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Anthocyanin was analyzed using a LC-20A Liquid Chromatograph equipped with a diode array detector (Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). An Inertsil ODS-3 column (5.0 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, GL Sciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used in the separation. Solvent A consisted of 10% formic acid (HPLC grade, purity: 88%) and 90% water, and solvent B was 10% formic acid (HPLC grade, purity: 88%) dissolved in acetonitrile (HPLC grade, purity: 99.9%). The gradient elution procedure was 92% solvent A (0 min), 60% solvent A (10 min), 92% solvent A (24 min). The flow rate was 1.0 mL min−1 at 30°C. Simultaneous monitoring was performed at 520 nm for anthocyanin (cyanidin-3-galactoside). Peaks were identified by a comparison of retention times and UV spectra with anthocyanin standard. The concentrations of anthocyanin in three biological replicates were determined according to the peak areas and calibration curves that were made with different concentrations of anthocyanin standard. The standard was obtained from Yuanye Bio-Technology (Shanghai, China).
Transient overexpression assay in pear fruitlet peel
The transient overexpression method referred to previous studies [16, 17]. The complete coding sequences (CDS) of PbLAC4-like and PbMYB26 were amplified by PCR from ‘Red Zaosu’ cDNA and then fused into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of pGreenⅡ 0029-62SK vector respectively to form 62SK-PbLAC4-like and 62SK-PbMYB26 plasmids. The CDS of GUS was PCR-amplified from pBI121 and then inserted into the MCS of pGreenⅡ 0029-62SK vector to form 62SK-GUS plasmid that as a control Empty. The primers for amplifying the sequences are described in Additional file 5: Table S3. The infusion vectors were transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105, and incubated in Luria-Bertani medium. After the activation of Agrobacterium, they were suspended with resuspension (10 μmol/L MES, 10 μmol/L MgCl2, pH=5.6, and 200 μmol/L AS) and cultured in dark for 3 hours at room temperature, and then the OD600 was adjusted to 0.6. The 62SK-GUS and 62SK-PbLAC4-like bacterial solutions were injected into 'Palacer' fruitlet peel with faded color after bagging. The 62SK-GUS and 62SK-PbMYB26 bacterial solutions were injected into 'Zausu' fruitlet peel. Each treatment consisted of 3 biological replicates and each biological replicate contained 5 fruitlets. Three days after injection, pericarp at the injection site was collected for quantitative analysis, and the phenotypic was analyzed ten days after injection. To prove the feasibility of this transformation method, GUS staining was performed on the transient GUS sites according to the previous method [55].
Crude enzyme extraction and PbLAC4-like protein activity assay
The crude enzyme was extracted by homogenizing the powder with polyvinylpyrrolidone (10% of the leaf by weight) and 2mL extracting solution which consisted of 0.02 M citrate buffer (pH 5.0), 0.02 M anhydrous calcium chloride, 0.005 M Dithiothreitol, 0.01 M thiourea. The homogenate was centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000 rpm and 4℃, and then the supernatant was collected after passing the PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) as the crude enzyme.
The PbLAC4-like protein activity assay was performed according to the method of Zhang et al. [30] with minor changes. The enzyme was added to the 200 μL 0.2 M citrate buffer (pH 4.0) with 0.2 mM anthocyanin standard sample. The mixture was incubated for 30 minutes at 42℃. The reaction was terminated with 0.1 M hydrochloric methanol solution. The content of anthocyanin was measured by HPLC. The PbLAC4-like protein activity was expressed as the degradation of 1 μmol anthocyanin per minute at 42℃.
Prokaryotic expression of the PbLAC4-like
Prokaryotic expression of the PbLAC4-like was carried out according to the method of Kampatsikas et al. [56] with slight modifications. The CDS of PbLAC4-like was PCR-amplified and cloned into the pET-28a (+) vector. The primers are listed in Additional file 5: Table S3. The resulting construct was transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3). The E. coli BL21 (DE3) was cultured in 2×YT medium with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) at 37℃ until its OD600 value was 0.6. Then 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside and 0.5 mM CuSO4 were added for protein induction. The expression culture was shaken for 8 hours at 28℃, centrifuged at 4℃, and the supernatant was discarded. The precipitation was suspended with 0.02 M citrate buffer (pH 5.0) for ultrasonic crushing. The broken expression culture was centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4℃, and the supernatant was taken for enzyme activity assay.
Yeast one-hybrid assay
The PbLAC4-like promoter sequence was cloned into the bait vector pAbAi, and the CDS of PbMYB26 was inserted into the prey vector pGADT7. The primers used to amplify the PbLAC4-like promoter and the CDS of PbMYB26 are listed in Additional file 5: Table S3. The pAbAi-bait vector was digested by BbsI and transferred into yeast strain Y1HGOLD to construct the bait yeast strain. To determine the minimum aureobasidin A (AbA) inhibitory concentration of the bait yeast strain, the bait yeast strain was cultured on the SD/-Ura medium containing 50-200 ng ml-1 AbA. Then, transferring the prey plasmid into the bait yeast strain and culturing it on the SD/-Leu medium containing the minimum AbA inhibitory concentration that was screened out before to verify the interaction.
Dual luciferase assay in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves
To assay the effect of PbMYB26 on PbLAC4-like, the promoter of PbLAC4-like was amplified and inserted into the MCS of pGreenII 0800-LUC double-reporter plasmid as reporter. The effector plasmid was constructed by inserting the CDS of PbMYB26 into the MCS of pGreenⅡ 0029-62SK vector. The related primers are listed in Additional file 5: Table S3. Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing reporter plasmid and effector plasmid was injected into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves at a ratio of 1 to 4. The empty pGreenⅡ 0029-62SK plasmid and pGreenII 0800-LUC-proPbLAC4-like plasmid were injected into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves in the same proportion as control. After injection, Nicotiana benthamiana was cultured in dark for 12 hours and then cultured under the light. The activity of LUC and REN was measured three days after injection using a dual LUC assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and an Infinite M200pro Full Wavelength Multifunctional Enzyme Standard Instrument (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland). Five biological repeats were included for each treatment.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was conducted to determine the significant differences among the data. The correlation analysis among the date was carried out by SPSS 20 software. Each value represents the mean ± SEM of three biological replicates. Figures were made using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA).