3.1 Soil humus composition
In different particle-size fractionation, the highest C content of humus (FA, HA and HM) were found in 200-50 μm fraction, and the lower content were found in 50-0.1 μm fraction (Fig. 1 a-c). Compared with MF treatment, the FA and HM C content in 2000-200 μm and 50-0.1 μm fractions were significantly (p<0.05) improved with organic material application (RF and OM) treatments (Fig. 1 a and c), whereas the improvement of HA C content in 200-50 μm fraction was not significantly difference (Fig. 1 b). The results indicated that the FA, HA and HM C content in >2000 μm and 2000-50 μm fractions with MF, RF and OM treatments were significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of CK treatment. Particle-size fractions and fertilizer treatments were significantly (p<0.05) influence on the distribution of humus components (FA, HA and HM), but their interaction effect on HA C content was not significantly difference (p>0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1 Two-way ANOVA analysis of soil humus, cbhI, and GH48 gene abundance in the five soil particle-size fractions and fertilizer treatments
|
Particle-size fractions
|
Fertilizer
|
Particle-size fractions × Fertilizer
|
F
|
P
|
F
|
P
|
F
|
P
|
FA
|
86.52
|
<0.001
|
84.26
|
<0.001
|
3.56
|
<0.001
|
HA
|
91.67
|
<0.001
|
61.58
|
<0.001
|
1.62
|
0.135
|
HM
|
80.47
|
<0.001
|
70.24
|
<0.001
|
3.27
|
<0.001
|
Rice season
|
cbhI abundance
|
84.26
|
<0.001
|
72.04
|
<0.001
|
4.63
|
<0.001
|
GH48 abundance
|
12.35
|
0.146
|
14.17
|
0.185
|
0.86
|
0.362
|
Note: FA: fulvic acid, HA: humic acid, HM: humin.
The data in bold indicated the parameter was not significantly affected by soil particle-size fractions, fertilizer treatments or their interaction (P < 0.05).
3.2 CPMAS solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy
The effects of different fertilizer treatments on relative abundance of different C groups of FA in particle-size fractions were showed in Table 2. The results showed that alkyl C and oalkyl C groups in >2000 μm and 2000-50 μm fractions were higher than that of the other fractions (Table 2). However, carboxylic C was most abundant in 50-2 μm and 2-0.1 μm fractions, which resulted in an ultimately higher ARO% of the FA in these particle-size fractions. Aliphatic C was most abundant in >2000 μm and 200-50 μm fractions, which resulted in an ultimately higher AL% of the FA in these particle-size fractions. There was no obvious significantly (p>0.05) difference in the proportion of aromatic C group among the five fractions and fertilizer treatments. The Alkyl/o-alkyl of FA in 200-50 μm and 50-2 μm fractions were lower than (p<0.05) that of the other fractions.
The results indicated that order of relative abundance of different C groups of HA in particle-size fractions were following alkyl C>o-alkyl C>aromatic C, and the lowest relative abundance of C groups of HA in particle-size fractions was carboxylic C (Table 2). Meanwhile, this result showed that there has higher ARO% and lower AL% of HA in 200-50 μm fraction. And the alkyl/o-alkyl of HA was lowest in 200-50 μm fraction and higher in 50-2 μm and 2-0.1 μm fractions with RF, MF and OM treatments.
Table 2 Contribution of the different humus C types, aromaticity (ARO%), alphaticity (AL%) and alkyl/o-alkyl ratio determined by CPMAS 13C NMR of FA and HA in soil particle-size fractions under different fertilizer treatments
Particle-size fractions
|
Treatments
|
0-45 ppm
|
45-95 ppm
|
95-165 ppm
|
165-200 ppm
|
ARO%
|
AL%
|
Alkyl/o-alkyl
|
Alkyl C
|
O-alkyl C
|
Aromatic C
|
Carboxylic C
|
FA
|
﹥2000 μm
|
MF
|
26.7
|
30.7
|
22.6
|
17.5
|
28.25
|
71.75
|
0.87
|
RF
|
30.6
|
26.5
|
20.9
|
18.3
|
26.79
|
73.21
|
1.15
|
OM
|
32.5
|
28.4
|
20.4
|
18.7
|
25.09
|
74.91
|
1.14
|
CK
|
38.6
|
18.5
|
21.5
|
16.3
|
27.35
|
72.65
|
2.09
|
2000-200 μm
|
MF
|
18.5
|
14.2
|
23.1
|
40.5
|
41.40
|
58.60
|
1.30
|
RF
|
20.1
|
19.4
|
22.1
|
36.7
|
35.88
|
64.12
|
1.04
|
OM
|
20.6
|
20.3
|
22.6
|
35.4
|
35.59
|
64.41
|
1.01
|
CK
|
21.8
|
16.7
|
20.7
|
38.7
|
34.97
|
65.03
|
1.31
|
200-50 μm
|
MF
|
28.6
|
28.5
|
25.3
|
18.7
|
30.70
|
69.30
|
1.00
|
RF
|
29.2
|
31.7
|
24.3
|
17.6
|
28.52
|
71.48
|
0.92
|
OM
|
29.6
|
32.4
|
24.7
|
17.1
|
28.49
|
71.51
|
0.91
|
CK
|
27.4
|
30.3
|
23.5
|
18.2
|
28.94
|
71.06
|
0.90
|
50-2 μm
|
MF
|
14.5
|
21.6
|
26.4
|
42.3
|
42.24
|
57.76
|
0.67
|
RF
|
14.1
|
20.7
|
25.1
|
45.7
|
41.90
|
58.10
|
0.68
|
OM
|
13.6
|
21.2
|
25.6
|
46.8
|
42.38
|
57.62
|
0.64
|
CK
|
15.2
|
20.1
|
18.9
|
51.6
|
34.87
|
65.13
|
0.76
|
2-0.1 μm
|
MF
|
26.5
|
12.1
|
31.6
|
40.7
|
45.01
|
54.99
|
2.19
|
RF
|
27.1
|
16.6
|
29.4
|
38.2
|
40.22
|
59.78
|
1.63
|
OM
|
27.8
|
17.5
|
31.1
|
36.5
|
40.71
|
59.29
|
1.59
|
CK
|
24.7
|
14.4
|
28.7
|
42.6
|
42.33
|
57.67
|
1.72
|
HA
|
﹥2000 μm
|
MF
|
46.7
|
33.4
|
25.4
|
12.7
|
24.08
|
75.92
|
1.40
|
RF
|
44.5
|
31.8
|
27.6
|
13.1
|
26.56
|
73.44
|
1.40
|
OM
|
41.8
|
31.1
|
28.7
|
13.6
|
28.25
|
71.75
|
1.34
|
CK
|
50.7
|
32.5
|
23.6
|
10.5
|
22.10
|
77.90
|
1.56
|
2000-200 μm
|
MF
|
34.7
|
29.3
|
25.3
|
13.1
|
28.33
|
71.67
|
1.18
|
RF
|
32.2
|
30.6
|
28.0
|
13.6
|
30.84
|
69.16
|
1.05
|
OM
|
31.5
|
31.2
|
28.6
|
14.2
|
31.33
|
68.67
|
1.01
|
CK
|
33.6
|
31.5
|
27.2
|
11.4
|
29.47
|
70.53
|
1.07
|
200-50 μm
|
MF
|
23.5
|
28.7
|
33.7
|
15.6
|
39.23
|
60.77
|
0.82
|
RF
|
25.2
|
29.6
|
32.8
|
14.6
|
37.44
|
62.56
|
0.85
|
OM
|
25.8
|
30.2
|
31.7
|
15.1
|
36.15
|
63.85
|
0.85
|
CK
|
24.6
|
27.6
|
34.5
|
13.7
|
39.79
|
60.21
|
0.89
|
50-2 μm
|
MF
|
40.3
|
30.5
|
23.7
|
14.5
|
25.08
|
74.92
|
1.32
|
RF
|
42.6
|
28.8
|
25.1
|
13.1
|
26.01
|
73.99
|
1.48
|
OM
|
43.5
|
29.6
|
25.6
|
13.8
|
25.94
|
74.06
|
1.47
|
CK
|
45.8
|
27.6
|
21.6
|
10.5
|
22.74
|
77.26
|
1.66
|
2-0.1 μm
|
MF
|
40.2
|
30.2
|
26.1
|
12.7
|
27.05
|
72.95
|
1.33
|
RF
|
42.7
|
31.2
|
23.5
|
11.6
|
24.13
|
75.87
|
1.37
|
OM
|
43.5
|
32.5
|
24.3
|
10.1
|
24.23
|
75.77
|
1.34
|
CK
|
41.6
|
28.8
|
21.7
|
14.9
|
23.56
|
76.44
|
1.44
|
MF: chemical fertilizer alone; RF: rice straw residue and chemical fertilizer; OM: 30% organic manure and 70% chemical fertilizer; CK: without fertilizer input as control.
3.3 cbhI and GH48 gene abundance
The range of abundance of cbhI gene were 1.01-9.12×107 copies g-1 soil with all fertilizer treatments (Fig. 2). The cbhI abundance were significantly impacted by particle-size fractions and fertilizer treatments individually and interactively (P<0.001; Table 1). Although the lowest cbhI abundance were observed in 2-0.1 μm fraction, the cbhI abundance in 2000-2 μm fraction were relatively higher (p<0.05) than those in the other fractions. The abundance of cbhI gene in different particle-size fractions with MF, RF and OM treatments were higher than that of CK treatment. Furthermore, the abundance of cbhI gene in different particle-size fractions with RF and OM treatments were significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of MF and CK treatments.
The range of abundance of GH48 gene were 1.35-13.52×106 copies g-1 soil with all fertilizer treatments, which were about ten times lower than that of abundance of cbhI gene (Fig. 3). Both particle-size fractions and fertilizer treatment individually affect GH48 abundance but the interactively effect was not significantly (Table 1). The results showed that GH48 abundance in 200-50 μm fraction were relatively higher (p<0.05) than those in the other fractions. And the abundance of GH48 gene in different particle-size fractions with MF, RF and OM treatments were higher than that of CK treatment. Furthermore, the abundance of GH48 gene in >2000 μm, 2000-200 μm and 200-50 μm fractions with RF and OM treatments were significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of MF and CK treatments. However, there were no significantly differences (p>0.05) in the abundance of GH48 gene in 20-5 μm fraction with MF, RF, OM and CK treatments.
3.4 Correlation analysis
There has significantly positive correlation between β-glucosidase and β-cellobiohydrolase activities with cbhI and GH48 abundance (p<0.01) (Table 3). Meanwhile, the abundance of GH48 were significantly correlated with soil properties (SOC, total N, and C/N) and soil humus components (FA, HA and HM) (p<0.01). And the abundance of cbhI were significantly correlated with soil C/N, FA and HA (p<0.01) (Table 3).
Meanwhile, the results indicated that there was no relationship between alkyl C and aromatic C of FA with cbhI and GH48 abundance (p>0.05) (Table 4). Interestingly, C groups like o-alkyl C (p<0.01) and AL% of FA (p<0.05) were positively correlated with cbhI and GH48 abundance, however, ARO% were negatively correlated with cbhI and GH48 abundance (p<0.05). The results showed that both cbhI and GH48 abundance were negatively correlated with alkyl C, AL%, alkyl/o-alkyl of HA (p<0.05), but cbhI and GH48 abundance were positively correlated with ARO% (p<0.05) (Table 4).
Table 3 Correlation coefficients between soil nutrient, humic substances, enzyme activity and cbhI and GH48 abundance in different particle-size fractions under different fertilizer treatments
|
SOC
|
Total N
|
C/N
|
FA
|
HA
|
HM
|
β-glucosidase
|
β-cellobiohydrolase
|
GH48
|
cbhI
|
0.625*
|
ns
|
0.803**
|
0.785*
|
0.758*
|
0.547
|
0.782*
|
0.796*
|
0.807**
|
GH48
|
0.874**
|
0.506*
|
0.612*
|
0.891**
|
0.816**
|
0.806**
|
0.893**
|
0.851**
|
|
Note: SOC: soil organic carbon; FA: fulvic acid, HA: humic acid, HM: humin.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. ns indicated no significant relationship were detected.
Table 4 Correlation coefficients between chemical composition of C groups of FA and HA with cbhI and GH48 abundance in different particle-size fractions under different fertilizer treatments
|
Alkyl C
|
O-alkyl C
|
Aromatic C
|
Carboxylic C
|
ARO%
|
AL%
|
Alkyl/O-alkyl
|
FA
|
cbhI
|
ns
|
0.702**
|
ns
|
ns
|
-0.527*
|
0.548*
|
-0.586*
|
GH48
|
ns
|
0.736**
|
ns
|
-0.514*
|
-0.536*
|
0.573*
|
ns
|
HA
|
cbhI
|
-0.735**
|
ns
|
0.568*
|
0.572*
|
0.608*
|
-0.607*
|
-0.705**
|
GH48
|
-0.612*
|
ns
|
0.545*
|
ns
|
0.614*
|
-0.593*
|
-0.613*
|
Note: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. ns indicated no significant relationship were detected.