Our multi-centered prospective study suggests that cerebral microbleed numbers greater than 5 are an independent predictor of short- or long-term functional outcomes. Furthermore, we found that only with high levels of inflammation, CMB numbers greater than 5 could predict the post-stroke outcomes.
There are many studies on large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke and CSVD markers. The current consensus is that CSVD and LAA share the same risk factors(5, 30), such as diabetes and hypertension. Some studies also suggest that CSVD markers, such as WMH, participate in the pathophysiology of stroke and cause stroke recurrence(5) and poststroke cognitive decline(31); atherosclerosis of the large arteries is also involved in the pathogenesis of cerebral small vessel damage, such as CMB: chronic cerebral hypoperfusion due to chronic narrowing of the middle cerebral or basilar arteries damages the blood-brain barrier and causes microbleeds(5). However, there are few studies on the long-term and short-term prognosis of participants with LAA and CSVD markers, and the contribution of CSVD to LAA is rarely addressed.
The current study still found that total score was associated with stroke recurrence and cognitive decline(32), our study on cerebral small vessel damage markers in LAA stroke participants found that total score grade was not associated with 3-month mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, extracranial hemorrhage, and BI, as well as 3-month and 1-year outcomes in stroke participants. Also, we examined the relationships between 6 CSVD markers and the outcomes of LAA stroke one by one, WMH, BS, EPVS, BA, or lacune had no impact on stroke outcomes. Although the good association between WMH, EPVS, and lacune and LAA stroke has been reported(5), our data showed no association between these markers of CSVD and stroke outcomes. But we found a specific correlation between CMB and functional outcomes of stroke. A pooled analysis showed that CMB is associated with hemorrhage and not with the recurrence of stroke(14), but our data suggest that the presence or absence of CMB is not associated with functional outcomes of cerebral infarction, but the presence of more than 5 CMBs is associated with short-term and long-term functional stroke outcomes, which is noteworthy and seems to indicate that CMB numbers greater than 5 starts to affect large vessel lesions. Furthermore, CMB pathology detected by MRI(33) or postmortem studies(34) includes arteriolar, capillary, or venous damage, and BS represents medullary vein damage(35, 36); in our study, we found that no association between BS and poststroke outcomes, and this finding suggests that arteriolar rather than venous damages are associated with poor outcomes in the large artery disease. This is the first demonstration that CMB especially arteriolar damage is an independent predictor of short-term and long-term outcomes in LAA stroke participants.
CMB and other imaging markers can be considered as the inflammation of the vessel wall or endothelial membrane(37–39), and CMB represents small vessel damages(40); this is also similar to the current ideas(41–43). Because of the close relationship between inflammation and small vessel injury(8), we also investigated the relationship between inflammation and CMB and found that NLR (> 3) or CRP (> 3) played a predictive role in LAA stroke participants only at certain levels of CMBs (i.e. > 5).
NLR or CRP both are useful markers for systemic inflammation(9, 44). NLR consists mainly of neutrophils and lymphocytes, both of which are involved in the systemic inflammatory response, especially in the initiation phase(44). CRP is mainly derived from hepatocytes that require IL-6 involvement to be produced, and is mainly involved in the acute phase of inflammation or infection(45). Both of them are well studied and proved to be associated with stroke recurrence(9, 46), re-bleeding(47), functional outcomes(9, 48), and poststroke infections(49, 50).
Therefore, we believe that inflammation is an important mechanism of cerebral infarction and take part in the whole process of the disease, therefore, our results suggest that high levels of inflammation (NLR > 3; CRP > 3) cause persistent damage on the base of small artery injury (CMB > 5), which contributes to the poor prognosis of LAA stroke.
Meanwhile, we found no significant differences in hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and alcohol consumption history or even age and gender in the population, and the consistency of these important risk factors for CSVD and LAA stroke supports the predicting role of CSVD imaging markers or, more precisely, CMB in stroke. The consistency of these factors reflects the intrinsic stability of our population, i.e. the fact that these measures are stable in this situation, rather than the fact that similar indicators are not significant for the prognosis.
There are some limitations in the present study. Firstly, the present cohort study was conducted in 3 stroke centers. Secondly, there are many earlier cerebrovascular imaging markers such as subcortical infarcts that are not included in the study. Thirdly, only BI, NIHSS, and mRS scores were used to evaluate functional outcomes of stroke participants. No other measures, such as advanced cognitive function, were used.