Effects of brisk walking on blood pressure in the Chinese Han occupational population with a sedentary lifestyle: A baseline control trial

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-23564/v1

Download PDF

Research

Effects of brisk walking on blood pressure in the Chinese Han occupational population with a sedentary lifestyle: A baseline control trial

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-23564/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Physical activity has proven to be effective in improving blood pressure (BP), but research on the beneficial exercise volume for BP control is limited. We assessed the intervention effects of walking on BP in the Chinese Han occupational population with a sedentary lifestyle to explore the appropriate exercise volume needed for BP control.

Methods: A total of 802 subjects were recruited from enterprises and institutions for our study. This study was designed as an intervention study for a baseline control trial. All participants received a 3-month open and prescription pedometer-assisted self-monitoring walking intervention. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the association between physical activity and changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP. We divided the effective step counts into five levels: 4000-<6000 (level 1), 6000-<8000 (level 2), 8000-<10000 (level 3), 10000-12000 (level 4), and >12000 (level 5) steps/day for statistical analysis to evaluate the exercise intervention efficiency.

Results: Data of 688 participants who completed the study were analyzed. After 3 months, SBP and DBP decreased by 1.9 and 2.0 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.05). Taking level 5 (>12000 steps/day) as reference, SBP can be better controlled at levels 1-4: level 1 had the best effect (-6.05 mmHg, P=0.007), followed by level 2 (-3.54 mmHg, P=0.006), showing a significant dose-effect relationship between exercise and SBP. Furthermore, the effective step count of 6000-<8000 steps/day was better in controlling SBP in males (-4.26 mmHg, P = 0.014), while 4000-<6000 steps/day had a better effect on females (-6.86 mmHg, P = 0.037). The significant dose-effect relationship was only observed in the 36-50 age group. However, no significant dose-effect relationship between exercise and DBP.

Conclusions: Brisk walking can effectively control BP in the Chinese Han occupational population with a sedentary lifestyle. There was a significant dose-effect relationship between exercise and SBP with differences in sex and age.

Trial registration: ChiCTR-OOh-16010229. Registered 5 January 2017 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=17362.

Physical Medicine & Rehab

Nutrition & Dietetics

brisk walking

effective steps

blood pressure

occupational population

sedentary

exercise

physical activity

The prevalence of hypertension is increasing yearly. It is estimated that the number of patients with hypertension worldwide may increase to 1.5 billion by 2025 (an increase of nearly 15–20%)^[1]. According to the Chinese Hypertension Survey, from 2012 to 2015, about 244.5 million Chinese people aged ≥ 18 years suffered from hypertension, and the prevalence rate is generally increasing^[2]. Hypertension, especially elevated SBP, is the most important risk factor for disability and death worldwide, causing approximately 9 million deaths each year^[3–5]. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, mainly hypertension, have become a major economic burden worldwide^{[5, 6]}. However, hypertension is the most preventable risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases^[7].

Physical inactivity is one of the top 10 risk factors for death worldwide^[8] and is an important risk factor for hypertension^{[9, 10]}. Multiple studies have shown that increasing physical activity can significantly reduce SBP and DBP^{[11, 12]}, thereby significantly reducing the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with hypertension and improving the quality of life and reducing the burden of disease in these patients^{[4, 13, 14]}. Beneficial effects of exercise on health are certain, and the physical activity guidelines in different countries put forward different exercise recommendations for different health purposes^[15–17]. For healthy people, to maintain their health, they should aim for at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise every day and accumulate at least 150 minutes of exercise per week. For better health benefits or to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases, 300 minutes of moderate or 150 minutes of vigorous exercise per week are recommended. For patients with hypertension, the European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension guidelines^[1] recommend 5–7 days of exercise per week, with at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per day. This equates to brisk walking for at least 3,000 step counts per day (i.e., at least 100 steps per minute and a walking duration of at least 30 minutes)^[18]. The guidelines do not explicitly recommend whether a larger amount of exercise is more beneficial to health or the upper limit of the amount of exercise needed, especially for cardiovascular health.

Although the effects of increasing physical activity and/or physical exercise on BP and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease have been proven, there is limited research on the appropriate exercise volume required for the prevention and control of hypertension in different ethnic groups/sexes/different ages/different occupations, and further studies are therefore needed. This study will discuss the appropriate amount of exercise required for the prevention and control of hypertension in the Chinese Han office occupational population to provide a scientific basis for exercise intervention in BP management in the Chinese population.

Participants

A total of 802 subjects were recruited from enterprises and institutions for our study, including 398 males and 404 females. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) full-time employees, 2) aged 18–65 years and 3) a sedentary lifestyle (sitting for more than 6 hours per day). The exclusion criteria included the following: 1) Poor blood pressure (BP) control (systolic > 180 mmHg and/or diastolic > 110 mmHg); 2) A clearly diagnosed history of serious bone and joint diseases; 3) A history of spinal or limb surgery or fractures within the last 3 months; 4) Serious dysfunction or organic diseases of the heart, liver or kidney; 5) A known HIV history or active hepatitis B/C infection or an uncontrolled active systemic infection; and 6)Pregnant or lactating women.

This trial program received clinical research ethics approval from the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee and was registered at the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (Registration no. ChiCTR-OOh-16010229). All participants were informed on the purpose, content, and risks of the study and provided written informed consent prior to participation in the trial.

Study design

This study was designed as an intervention study for a baseline control trial. All participants received a 3-month open and prescription pedometer-assisted self-monitoring walking intervention and one-time dietary education on BP management prior to intervention^[19].

Measurements and procedures

All participants underwent outcome measurements at baseline and at the end of the study period.

BP was measured with the right arm using a mercury sphygmomanometer that was calibrated regularly, according to the procedures of 2010 Chinese Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension^[20]. Before BP measurements, subjects were asked to sit quietly for at least 10 minutes with no physical activity for 3 hours before the test and no smoking or caffeine for 30 minutes before the test. All subjects had to repeat the measurement three times, with the interval between each measurement being for at least 60 seconds, and the average of the three measurements was used as the BP value. BP is read in mmHg.

General physical examination indicators

Height, body weight (BW), and waist circumference (WC) were measured using standard methods. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m²) = body weight (kg)/height (m)². Body fat mass was measured using the MC-180 body composition analyzer (Tanita co., Japan). Body fat percentage (BF%) = body fat mass (kg)/body weight (kg) × 100%. The body composition analyzer was calibrated before each use.

Physical activity level (PAL): Prior to any exercise intervention (i.e., at baseline), participants' PALs were assessed based on their exercise habits over the last six months and were graded on three levels. PAL1: No or very low exercise; PAL2: Moderate or above intensity exercise, accumulating less than 30 minutes per day, less than 3 days per week; PAL3: Moderate or above intensity exercise, accumulating for more than 30 minutes every day, at least 3 days per week.

Walking steps and its evaluation: The recommended exercise time in this study protocol was 30–80 minutes per day; the steps volume accumulated with the step frequency of 100–150 steps per minute was recorded as "effective steps.” Thus, the effective steps volume should be 3000–12000 steps per day for recommended amount. The walking volume was expressed by means of step counts recorded by a prescription pedometer in this study^[19]; therefore, the participants wore the pedometer every day throughout the intervention period. Finally, according to the execution of the exercise intervention programs in the participants during the trial, we divided the amount of effective step counts into five levels: 4000- < 6000 (level 1), 6000- < 8000 (level 2), 8000- < 10000 (level 3), 10000–12000 (level 4), and > 12000 (level 5) steps/day for statistical analysis to evaluate and verify the exercise intervention efficacy.

Brisk walking intervention program

We developed exercise plans for subjects according to the PAL assessed at baseline. The exercise intervention program involves the following seven elements, including exercise type (brisk walking), exercise intensity (moderate), exercise duration (at least 10 minutes/bout, daily cumulative exercise time 30–80 minutes), exercise frequency (5–7 days/week), exercise execution time period (6: 00–23: 00), exercise timing (such as avoiding morning exercise in hypertensive patients as much as possible), and precautions during exercise. All participants' exercise program was a 30-day cycle with a gradual increase in the exercise intensity (walking speed) and/or exercise duration (walking length). In the first month, the walking program was set according to the baseline PAL, and in the second to third month, the exercise was gradually increased according to the completion of the previous month. Walking is an aerobic exercise with moderate walking speed of 80–90 m/min for females (4.0-4.5 MET) and 90–100 m/min for males (4.5-5.0 MET)^[21]. This study used the previously established "Internet +" assisted exercise and nutrition health management technology platform and prescription pedometer to monitor and guide participants' exercise^[19].

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS version 23.0 (IBM SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) and R version 3.6.1 (R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https: //www.R-project.org/, 2019) were used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Data that were normally distributed (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD). Independent sample t-test was used for comparison between the two groups, and paired sample t-test was used for comparison between before and after intervention in the same group. Participants were divided into three age groups: 18–35 (group 1), 36–50 (group 2), and 51–65 (group 3) for analysis. Comparisons among age groups 1, 2, and 3 were made using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s honest significant difference test. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the associations between accelerometer-measured physical activity and changes in SBP and DBP, and the models were further adjusted for sex, age, baseline PAL, BMI, WC, BF%, changes in BW, pre SBP/pre DBP. Additionally, sex- and age-specific estimates were obtained by physical activity and changes in SBP and DBP with sex and age.

Characteristics and exercise performance of the subjects

A total of 802 subjects were included in this study, of whom 688 subjects completed the study, including 331 males and 357 females. The average age of the subjects was 37.0 ± 9.9 years. There were no significant differences in age between males and females (P = 0.54). Demographic characteristics of subjects are shown in Table 1. Differences between males and females in height, BW, BMI, WC, and BF% were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Table 1

General demographic characteristics of subjects
	Total Group (n = 688)	Males (n = 331)	Females (n = 357)	P value ^a
Age(cm)	37.0 ± 9.9	36.7 ± 9.6	37.2 ± 10.1	0.54
Height(cm)	166.2 ± 8.0	172.5 ± 5.5	160.4 ± 5.0	༜0.001
BW ( kg)	66.5 ± 13.9	74.9 ± 12.4	58.7 ± 10.2	༜0.001
BMI(kg/m²)	23.9 ± 3.9	25.1 ± 3.7	22.8 ± 3.8	༜0.001
WC(cm)	82.9 ± 11.8	88.8 ± 10.6	77.4 ± 10.1	༜0.001
BF%(%)	27.1 ± 6.8	24.2 ± 5.4	29.6 ± 6.8	༜0.001
Data are expressed as mean ± SD; ^a comparisons between males and females.
BW: Body weight; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; BF%, body fat percentage.

Among the 688 subjects who completed the exercise intervention, the effective step count was 4004 steps per day for the least active subject and 19,765 steps per day for the most active subject. The exercise volume status of all subjects during the test is shown in Fig. 1. The percentage of participants with effective step counts of 4000- < 6000, 6000- <8000, 8000- <10000, 10000–12000, and > 12000 steps/day was 3%, 11%, 25%, 34%, and 27%, respectively.

Effect of physical activity on BP in all subjects and in different sexes

As shown in Table 2, the SBP/DBP before intervention was 117.1 ± 14.0/76.5 ± 11.1 mmHg in the full sample, 122.8 ± 12.7 /80.3 ± 10.7 mmHg in males, and 112.5 ± 13.5/ 73.2 ± 10.2 mmHg in females. After 3 months of intervention, SBP/DBP was significantly reduced on average 1.9/2.0 ± 9.0 mmHg (P < 0.001) in the full sample, 1.7 ± 10.4 mmHg (P = 0.003)/2.3 ± 9.1 mmHg (P < 0.001) in males, and 2.1 ± 11.0/1.6 ± 9.0 mmHg (P < 0.001) in females, with no significant difference between sexes (P > 0.05).

Table 2

Changes in blood pressure of subjects after intervention.
	Time	Total group(N = 688)		Males(N = 331)		Females(N = 357)		Difference in gender, Mean (95% CI)	Between gender, p-value
	Time	M ± SD	within group p-value	M ± SD	within group p-value	M ± SD	within group p-value	Difference in gender, Mean (95% CI)	Between gender, p-value
SBP(mmHg)	Baseline	117.1 ± 14.0		122.6 ± 12.5		112.1 ± 13.5
SBP(mmHg)	Δ M3	-1.9 ± 10.7	༜0.001	-1.7 ± 10.4	0.003	-2.1 ± 11.0	༜0.001	0.4(-1.2,2.0)	0.63
DBP(mmHg)	Baseline	76.5 ± 11.1		80.4 ± 10.7		72.9 ± 10.2
DBP(mmHg)	Δ M3	-2.0 ± 9.0	༜0.001	-2.3 ± 9.1	༜0.001	-1.6 ± 9.0	0.001	-0.7(-2.0,0.7)	0.31
SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure;ΔM3,change at month 3.

Relationship between the amount of physical activity and change in BP

As shown in Table 3, multiple linear regression models were used to analyze the relationship between the volume of exercise and the changes in SBP and DBP, adjusting for factors such as sex, age, baseline PAL, BMI, WC, BF%, BW, and SBP or DBP before the intervention. The results showed a significant dose-effect between the effective steps and the changes in SBP. Taking level 5 as a reference for all participants, SBP at level 1 decreased the most in level 1 (-6.05 mmHg, 95%CI: 10.42 to -1.68, P = 0.007), followed by level 2 (-3.54 mmHg, 95%CI: 6.05 to -1.03, P = 0.006), level 3 (-2.27 mmHg, 95%CI: 4.29 to -0.24, P = 0.028), and level 4 (-2.08 mmHg, 95%CI: 3.96 to -0.21, P = 0.029). In males, SBP decreased more significantly at level 2 (-4.26 mmHg, 95%CI: 7.64 to -0.89, P = 0.014); in females, SBP also decreased the most at level 1 (-6.86 mmHg, 95%CI: 13.3 to -0.43, P = 0.037). There was no significant dose-effect between the effective steps and changes in DBP.

Table 3

Relationship between blood pressure changes and physical activity of all subjects and subjects of different genders.
Effective steps ^a	Total group (N = 688)				Males (N = 331)				Females (N = 357)
Effective steps ^a	ΔSBP ^b	p-value	ΔDBP ^c	p-value	ΔSBP ^b	p-value	ΔDBP ^c	p-value	ΔSBP ^b	p-value	ΔDBP ^c	p-value
Level 1 versus 5	-6.05(-10.42,-1.68)	0.007	-2.22(-6.05,1.61)	0.256	-5.60(-11.72,0.51)	0.074	-0.31(-5.58,4.96)	0.909	-6.86(-13.3,-0.43)	0.037	-3.74(-9.46,1.99)	0.202
Level 2 versus 5	-3.54(-6.05,-1.03)	0.006	-1.58(-3.76,0.61)	0.158	-4.26(-7.64,-0.89)	0.014	-1.15(-4.03,1.73)	0.435	-2.55(-6.36,1.26)	0.190	-1.97(-5.34,1.39)	0.251
Level 3 versus 5	-2.27(-4.29,-0.24)	0.028	-0.09(-1.86,1.68)	0.918	-1.34(-4.27,1.59)	0.372	1.45(-1.06,3.95)	0.258	-2.81(-5.72,0.1)	0.060	-1.11(-3.7,1.48)	0.403
Level 4 versus 5	-2.08(-3.96,-0.21)	0.029	0.05(-1.58,1.69)	0.949	-2.32(-4.94,0.29)	0.083	-0.46(-2.7,1.77)	0.685	-1.67(-4.41,1.06)	0.231	0.24(-2.19,2.68)	0.845
Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the associations between accelerometer-measured physical activity and changes in SBP/DBP.
a Effective steps, Level 1,4000-<6000 Steps/d;Level 2༌6000-<8000 Steps/d༛ Level 3༌8000-<10000 Steps/d༛Level 4༌10000–12000 Steps/d༛ Level 5༌more than12000 Steps/d ( as the reference exercise).
bΔSBP systolic blood pressure difference in mmHg (95% confidence interval).
cΔDBP diastolic blood pressure difference in mmHg (95% confidence interval).

Effects of physical activity on BP in different age groups

To understand whether the effect of exercise in controlling BP varies with age, participants were further divided into three age groups (18–35, 36–50, and 51–65 years) for analysis. As shown in Table 4, the SBP of the participants in each age group before the intervention was 114.2 ± 12.5, 118.6 ± 14.6, and 123.9 ± 14.6 mmHg, respectively. After 3 months, the SBP decreased by 1.4 ± 10.0, 2.0 ± 11.1 and 3.8 ± 11.5 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.05), with no significant difference among the three groups (P = 0.191). At baseline, the DBP of the subjects in each age group were 74.2 ± 10.4, 78.4 ± 11.4, and 79.5 ± 11.0 mmHg, respectively. After 3 months, the DBP decreased by 1.2 ± 8.7, 2.2 ± 9.2, and 4.4 ± 9.2 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.05), which showed that the reduction of DBP in subjects aged 51–65 was significantly greater than those aged 18–35 and 36–50 (P < 0.05).

Table 4

changes in blood pressure of subjects in different age groups after intervention
		Age group 1(N = 330)	Age group 2 (N = 277)	Age group 3 (N = 81)	F	^ P-value
SBP(mmHg)	Baseline	114.2 ± 12.5	118.6 ± 14.6	123.9 ± 14.6
	Δ M3	-1.4 ± 10.0	-2.0 ± 11.1	-3. 8 ± 11.5	1.67	0.191
	# P-value	0.014	0.003	0.004
DBP(mmHg)	Baseline	74.2 ± 10.4	78.4 ± 11.4	79.5 ± 11.0
	Δ M3	-1.2 ± 8.7^a	-2.2 ± 9.2^a	-4.4 ± 9.2^b	4.44	0.012
	#P-value	0.014	༜0.001	༜0.001
SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; ΔM3, change at month 3.
Age group 1 is for subjects aged 18–35 age group; Age group 2 is for subjects aged 36–50 age group; Age group 3 is for subjects aged 51–65 age group.
The blood pressure changes among the three age groups were analyzed by ANOVA, and different letters in the same transverse line indicated significant differences, P < 0.05.

As shown in Table 5, the results of multiple linear regression models showed that the relationship between the effective steps and the changes in SBP varied with age. This significant dose-effect was only seen in the 36–50 years age group. Taking level 5 as a reference, the effective steps at level 1 and level 2 can reduce SBP more, decreasing by 6.76 mmHg (P = 0.039) and 4.93 mmHg (P = 0.022) respectively. In addition, there was no significant dose-effect between the effective steps and the changes in DBP.

Table 5

Relationship between changes in blood pressure and exercise in subjects of different ages
Effective steps ^a	Age group 1(N = 330)				Age group 2 (N = 277)				Age group 3 (N = 81)
Effective steps ^a	ΔSBP ^b	p-value	ΔDBP ^c	p-value	ΔSBP ^b	p-value	ΔDBP ^c	p-value	ΔSBP ^b	p-value	ΔDBP ^c	p-value
Level 1 versus 5	-3.90(-10.64,2.83)	0.257	-2.02(-8,3.96)	0.508	-6.76(-13.16,-0.36)	0.039	-0.72(-6.5,5.06)	0.808	-12.71(-28.56,3.14)	0.121	-8.92(-21.05,3.22)	0.155
Level 2 versus 5	-2.74(-6.31,0.84)	0.134	-1.45(-4.6,1.7)	0.369	-4.93(-9.13,-0.72)	0.022	-1.67(-5.44,2.09)	0.384	-3.24(-10.94,4.47)	0.413	-2.05(-7.88,3.77)	0.493
Level 3 versus 5	-1.04(-4.1,2.03)	0.508	0.24(-2.45,2.94)	0.859	-3.43(-6.65,-0.21)	0.038	-0.02(-2.91,2.86)	0.986	-2.60(-8.45,3.25)	0.386	-0.19(-4.71,4.32)	0.933
Level 4 versus 5	-2.24(-5.14,0.67)	0.132	-0.07(-2.64,2.5)	0.958	-1.63(-4.47,1.21)	0.263	0.37(-2.18,2.91)	0.779	-1.61(-7.73,4.5)	0.607	-1.60(-6.18,2.98)	0.496
Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the associations between accelerometer-measured physical activity and changes in SBP/DBP.
a Effective steps, Level 1,4000-<6000 Steps/d;Level 2༌6000-<8000 Steps/d༛ Level 3༌8000-<10000 Steps/d༛Level 4༌10000–12000 Steps/d༛ Level 5༌more than12000 Steps/d.
Age group 1 is for subjects aged 18–35 age group; Age group 2 is for subjects aged 36–50 age group; Age group 3 is for subjects aged 51–65 age group.
bΔSBP systolic blood pressure difference in mmHg (95% confidence interval).
cΔDBP diastolic blood pressure difference in mmHg (95% confidence interval).

Our study showed that moderate-intensity aerobic exercise in the form of brisk walking 4000-12,000 steps per day (pace of 80–100 m/min) can effectively control BP in the Chinese Han occupational population with a sedentary lifestyle. There was a significant dose-effect relationship between the effective steps and changes in SBP, which showed that a lower volume of exercise (4000–8000 steps/day) had a better effect on SBP control. However, there was no significant dose-effect relationship between the effective step count and DBP.

A sedentary lifestyle or physical inactivity can have adverse effects on health^{[6, 22, 23]}; excessive occupational sitting significantly increases the health risks of office workers^{[24, 25]}. For most people, it is very difficult to change their routine habits; however, because walking is an essential form of activity in our daily life, walking-based vigorous activity or brisk walking would be the easiest way to conduct an exercise intervention and promote adherence to moderate-intensity exercise, which would be suitable for almost all sedentary or physically inactive people. All participants were encouraged to change their original sedentary lifestyle to increase their PAL and implement different exercise interventions according to the physical activity guidelines as well as their current/original PALs. For 5–7 days a week, the cumulative exercise time is 30–80 minutes per day and the recommended intensity (in step frequency) is 100–150 steps/minute, both of which should then be gradually increased. During the intervention, participants had better exercise compliance and higher exercise enthusiasm. The 4000–12000 steps/day count accounted for 73% of participants, indicating that most participants were able to walk adhering to the recommendations of the exercise intervention program, but 27% of the participants exceeded the recommended amount. Therefore, whether walking more that excess of the plan is more beneficial to control BP will be also discussed in the following.

The effects of brisk walking on BP of people with a sedentary lifestyle were positive. After 3 months of brisk walking, participants showed significant improvements in BP (SBP and DBP decreased by an average of 1.9 and 2.0 mmHg respectively), with no significant difference between sexes. The effects of exercise on BP in this study were similar to those found by Mandini et al.^[26]. Moreover, there were no age differences in the improvement on SBP (P = 0.191), but a significant age difference was seen for DBP (P = 0.012), showing that the controlling of DBP was significantly better in the 51–65 age group (-4.4 ± 9.2 mmHg) than in the 18–35 (-1.2 ± 8.7 mmHg) and 36–50 (-2.2 ± 9.2 mmHg) age groups. Thus, brisk walking may have a greater impact on DBP in the elderly. This phenomenon may be due to the high basal BP in elderly participants; it may also be due to the increase in the vascular sympathetic activity with increasing age, which also has a stronger effect with exercise, showing that BP drops more significantly after exercise^{[27, 28]}. Thus, brisk walking is beneficial for BP control regardless of sex and age.

Our study compared and analyzed whether the amount of exercise recommended by the program has a better effect on BP control. In order to understand the effectiveness and appropriate amount of exercise required to control BP in a sedentary Chinese Han office population, multiple linear regression models were used to analyze the relationship between exercise and SBP/DBP changes. The model was adjusted for sex, age, baseline PAL, BMI, WC, BF rate, BW, and pre-intervention SBP and DBP. Due to the regression model involving high-order interactions and in order to better understand the relationship between exercise and BP, we took level 5 (effective step count > 12000 steps/day) as reference, which is beyond the physical activity recommendations. Our study showed that there was a significant dose-effect relationship between brisk walking and SBP but no significant differences in DBP. The beneficial effects of vigorous walking on SBP showed that the lower amount of exercise (i.e., effective step counts 4000–12000 steps/day) had a better effect on BP control than that of step count of > 12000 steps/day (P < 0.05). Thus, walking more than the recommended amount showed no additional benefits for BP control. Additionally, walking between 4000- <6000 steps/day showed the best effect in controlling BP, followed by 6000- <8000 steps/day. This result is similar to that reported in a systematic review by Cornelissen et al.,^[29] i.e., 30–45 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per day (equivalent to 3000 to 7000 steps/day of brisk walking) is better for controlling BP than a larger amount.

Interestingly, our study found sex and age differences in the significant dose-effect relationship between brisk walking and SBP. For males, 6000–8000 steps/day was better for SBP control (-4.26 mmHg, P = 0.014), whereas in females, 4000–6000 steps/day showed the best effect (-6.86 mmHg, P = 0.037). In both sexes, however, increasing the amount of exercise did not lead to better SBP control; in contrast, the dose-effect was only found in the 36–50 age group and was mainly seen in the two lower levels (4000-<6000 and 6000-<8000 steps/day). The results of the dose-effect relationship between the other two age groups are uncertain and need to be further studied.

However, there were several limitations in this study. Our study is based on a large amount of previous research that exercise can improve BP levels, so we did not set a control group when designing the intervention study but rather included all subjects in the brisk walking intervention. In addition, participants did not perform the exercise strictly in accordance with the recommended amount by the exercise intervention program and had blindly increased the amount of exercise, resulting in a relatively small percentage of participants performing 4000-<6000 steps/day.

This study also has several practical implications in BP management in the Chinese occupational population; it provides evidence for the appropriate amount of exercise for controlling BP among the occupational population with a sedentary lifestyle in China and guides populations of different sexes and age groups to exercise reasonably to control BP.

In summary, exercise in the form of brisk walking could effectively improve BP in a Chinese Han occupational population with a sedentary lifestyle. There was a significant dose-effect relationship between exercise and SBP, and a lower exercise volume had a better effect on controlling SBP. Different sexes and age groups have different amounts of exercise needed to effectively control BP. The effective step counts of 6000- <8000 steps/day had better effect on males and those of 4000- <6000 steps/day had better effect on females. In the 36–50 years age group, 4000- <8000 steps/day had better BP control effect, while the appropriate amount of exercise needed for other age groups need to be further studied. Thus, differences in age, sex, and baseline PAL may require different amounts of exercise to effectively control BP. Therefore, the above factors should be evaluated prior to exercise interventions and should be personalized to be effective as well as to ensure that appropriate exercise programs for BP control are implemented.

BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; BW: body weight; WC: waist circumference; BMI: body mass index; BF: body fat; PAL: physical activity level.

Ethics approval and consent to participate:

This trial received clinical research ethics approval from the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee and was registered at the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (Registration no. ChiCTR-OOh-16010229).

Consent for publication:

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials:

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding:

This study was Supported by the National key research and development program (2016YFD0400603) and the National Science and Technology Supporting Project ( 2013BAI06B05) from Ministry of Science and Technology of China. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ contribution:

CCQ conceptualized the intervention design and contributed to funding acquisition, and contributed to the development of the trial methodology and guided the implementation. YYX, XL and GCC performed the data collection. YYX and WYF carried out the statistical analyses. YYX interpreted the data and drafted manuscript which was reviewed by CCQ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements:

We thank research staffs for their contributions to this work and all subjects for their support and cooperation to this study.

[1] Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018,39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.

[2] Wang Z, Chen Z, Zhang L, et al. Status of Hypertension in China: Results From the China Hypertension Survey, 2012-2015[J]. Circulation, 2018,137(22):2344-2356. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032380.

[3] Forouzanfar M H, Liu P, Roth G A, et al. Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990-2015[J]. JAMA, 2017,317(2):165. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19043.

[4] Ettehad D M, Emdin C A H, Kiran A P, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet, The, 2016,387(10022):957-967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8.

[5] GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2018,392(10159):1923-1994. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6.

[6] Lee I, Shiroma E J, Lobelo F, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy[J]. The Lancet, 2012,380(9838):219-229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.

[7] Pescatello L S, MacDonald H V, Lamberti L, et al. Exercise for Hypertension: A Prescription Update Integrating Existing Recommendations with Emerging Research[J]. Current Hypertension Reports, 2015,17(11). doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0600-y.

[8] Geneva, WHO. WHO's work on physical activity[R].2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity.

[9] Lee P H, Wong F K. The association between time spent in sedentary behaviors and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Sports Med, 2015,45(6):867-880. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0322-y.

[10] Al Tunaiji H, Davis J C, Mansournia M A, et al. Population attributable fraction of leading non-communicable cardiovascular diseases due to leisure-time physical inactivity: a systematic review[J]. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 2019,5(1):e512. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000512.

[11] Murtagh E M, Nichols L, Mohammed M A, et al. The effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2015,72:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.041.

[12] Börjesson M, Onerup A, Lundqvist S, et al. Physical activity and exercise lower blood pressure in individuals with hypertension: narrative review of 27 RCTs[J]. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2016,50(6):356-361. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095786.

[13] O'Donnell M J, Chin S L, Rangarajan S, et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study[J]. Lancet, 2016,388(10046):761-775. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30506-2.

[14] Rapsomaniki E D, Timmis A P, George J P, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people[J]. Lancet, The, 2014,383(9932):1899-1911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60685-1.

[15] Department Of Disease Control, Ministry Of Health PRC . Chinese Adult Physical Activity Guide[in Chinese][M]. People's Medical Publishing House, 2011.

[16] Geneva, WHO. Global recommendations on physical activity for health[J]. 2010. https://www.who.int/ncds/prevention/physical-activity/guidelines-global-recommendations-for-health/en/.

[17] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . The second edition of the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans[Z]. 2018. https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf.

[18] Marshall S J, Levy S S, Tudor-Locke C E, et al. Translating Physical Activity Recommendations into a Pedometer-Based Step Goal[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009,36(5):410-415. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.021.

[19] Yu Y, Lv Y, Yao B, et al. A novel prescription pedometer-assisted walking intervention and weight management for Chinese occupational population[J]. Plos One, 2018,13(1):e190848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190848.

[20] Liu L S. 2010 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension[in Chinese][J]. Chinese Journal of Hypertension, 2011,19(08):701-743. doi：10.16439/j.cnki.1673-7245.2011.08.009.

[21] Ainsworth B E, Haskell W L, Herrmann S D, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values[J]. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2011,43(8):1575-1581. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12.

[22] Medina C, Janssen I, Barquera S, et al. Occupational and leisure time physical inactivity and the risk of type II diabetes and hypertension among Mexican adults: A prospective cohort study[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018,8(1):5399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23553-6.

[23] Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F. An Estimation of the Worldwide Epidemiologic Burden of Physical Inactivity-Related Ischemic Heart Disease[J]. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10557-019-06926-5.

[24] van Uffelen J G Z, Wong J, Chau J Y, et al. Occupational Sitting and Health Risks[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010,39(4):379-388. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024.

[25] Ihira H, Sawada N, Yamaji T, et al. Occupational sitting time and subsequent risk of cancer: The Japan Public Health Center‐based Prospective Study[J]. Cancer Science, 2020,111(3):974-984. doi: 10.1111/cas.14304.

[26] Mandini S, Conconi F, Mori E, et al. Walking and hypertension: greater reductions in subjects with higher baseline systolic blood pressure following six months of guided walking[J]. PeerJ, 2018,6:e5471. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5471.

[27] Li J, Chen C, Liu T, et al. Exercise prevents hypertension and disrupts the correlation between vascular sympathetic activity and age-related increase in blood pressure in SHRs[J]. American Journal of Hypertension, 2019,32(11):1091-1100. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz115.

[28] Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies[J]. Lancet, 2002,360(9349):1903-1913. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11911-8.

[29] Cornelissen V A, Smart N A. Exercise Training for Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis[J]. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2013,2(1):e004473. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.004473.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Effects of brisk walking on blood pressure in the Chinese Han occupational population with a sedentary lifestyle: A baseline control trial

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Participants

Study design

Measurements and procedures

General physical examination indicators

Brisk walking intervention program

Statistical analysis

Results

Characteristics and exercise performance of the subjects

Effect of physical activity on BP in all subjects and in different sexes

Relationship between the amount of physical activity and change in BP

Effects of physical activity on BP in different age groups

Discussion

Conclusions

List of Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1