In the present study, we showed that orally administered CAM suppressed the progression of dissected aortic aneurysm, suppressed inflammatory reactions and induced anti-inflammatory reactions and collagen synthesis in the aortic wall. There has been anti-hypertensive drug and β blockade for prevention aortic enlarged AD. It has been reported losartan suppressed aortic enlargement and dissection in patients with Marfan Syndrome. Losartan, an angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) that has previously demonstrated TGF-β antagonism, has been studied [12] for AD to prevent aortic enlargement, therefore, there are no definitive drugs for AD.
The previous studies showed AD were induced by TGF-β antibodies injection with administration of Angiotensin II or a model of the combination with BAPN administration in mice [13-15]. In those models, the BAPN with Angiotensin II mice tended to develop aortic dissection, then we could induce the AD model by using BAPN and Angiotensin II to the wild mice for two weeks [16,17]. All mice could confirm the development of aorta dissection with aortic echography by two weeks, and then were gave Angiotensin II for the next two weeks for exposing them under high blood pressure for induction of dissected aortic aneurysm. To investigate whatever CAM might have suppressed the progression of induced dissected aortic aneurysm, we administered CAM orally.
It has been reported that CAM is not only a macrolide antibiotic but has anti-inflammatory property. Although, this mechanism has not been clear, CAM can suppress NF-kappa B activation, induction of MMPs and inflammatory cytokines. We have already reported that CAM prevents atherosclerotic aortic aneurysm formation in mice by suppression of NF-kappa B activation, inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory macrophages accumulation and MMP- 2 and -9 activation [7].
Some studies reported that cause of enlargement of dissected aortic aneurysm could be inflammatory cytokines activation including IL-6 [3,18], and decreasing TGF-β [6,19]. CAM redressed abnormalities of these cytokines and chemokines [20], so we thought that CAM might suppressed the enlargement of the dissected aortic aneurysm. In this study, increase of collagen and TGF-β were confirmed in dissected walls in CAM group, and the structures including alignment of collagen in the dissected vascular wall were more regular structures than in SAL group. Furthermore, α-SMA and α-actinin were confirmed around their collagen. The strength of the aortic wall is defined by the quantities of extracellular matrices, then collagen expression in the dissected wall might contribute to make the aortic wall strong [21-23].
Alpha-SMA expression is a hallmark of the mature myofibroblast and has proven to be a reliable marker for identifying vascular smooth muscle cells during vascular development and vascular diseases, and myofibroblasts during wound healing [25]. Non-muscle α-actinin is a cytoskeletal actin-binding protein and has a number of important functions such as maintenance of cell’s internal scaffold, provision of mechanical stability, locomotion, intracellular transport of organelles, as well as chromosome separation in mitosis and meiosis [26]. The phenotype of myofibroblast in expressing α-SMA and producing ECM compound is regulated by TGF-β and myofibroblasts which changed to smooth muscle-like cells express α-actinin [27-29]. Figure 6 showed that α-SMA and α-actinin positive cells were developed in the adventitia. The adventitia includes mainly fibroblast, then TGF-β binding to TGF-β receptor on the fibroblast leads the synthesis of ECM such as collagen. Schriefl and colleagues has reported that α-SMA appeared to be responsible for the newly produced collagen, which protected region of the dissected wall [30]. In this study, CAM induced TGF-β expression, which might induce fibroblast to myofibroblast. The expression of α-SMA and α-actinin was confirmed with a regular structure in the collagen. The development of the stromal cells including myofibroblasts with collagen in the media suggests increase the strength of the aortic wall. Thus, these phenomena might contribute suppress the enlargement of dissected aortic aneurysm.
Some limitations associated with the present study warrant mention. First, the CAM dose was lower than the previous studies [7]. We selected a dosage of 10 mg/kg/day in the present study. Though this dose was as high as that generally administered for antibiotic treatment clinically, we did not evaluate CAM dose in the aortic tissue and the blood, then further studies will be required to determine the most effective dosage with the fewest, mildest side effects. Second, the BAPN dose was also higher than in most previous reports [13,17]. Regarding BAPN dosage, although 150 mg/kg/day has been used in some reported studies, but used a dosage of 300 mg/kg/day because we wanted to promote the development of AD at the high rate. This dosage led to marked AD formation and a spectacularly higher rate of dissection than 150m mg/kg/day, so future studies may want to consider using a lower dosage of BAPN. Third, CAM was administered within two weeks after development of aortic dissection, then, it was unknown when CAM was started after aortic dissection development. Finally, because the part of the aorta used for protein analyses also contained part except aortic aneurysm, it may reflect not only aortic aneurysm.
In conclusion, our findings here suggest that CAM can prevent the progression of dissected aortic aneurysm via M2 macrophage accumulation and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 and TGF-β. Further investigations will be required in order to adapt clinical therapy of CAM for the prevention of dissected aortic aneurysm expansion.