First, we sought to confirm the model induction by assessing 1-hour continuous LFP recording and cell loss in the dorsal hippocampus. As it is illustrated in Fig. 2A, interictal epileptiform discharges were frequently seen during LFP accompanied by severe cell loss and ongoing neuronal degeneration in dorsal CA1 of kainic acid-treated animals (Fig. 2B). 2-DG could not exert any histological beneficial effects as it was injected long after kainic acid injection (see above). Hence, intrahippocampal kainic acid injection leads to frequent interictal epileptiform activity and severe cell loss, as well as neurons undergoing degeneration in dorsal CA1.
To assess the alterations of oscillatory activity following epilepsy induction, we evaluated PSD in dHPC during both baseline and anxiogenic conditions. Theta and gamma powers were significantly lower in the dorsal hippocampus of the epileptic animals meanwhile 2-DG failed to reverse decreased power in epileptic animals (Figs. 3A&C).
Further, theta power of BLA during baseline condition increased in epileptic and epileptic + 2-DG groups compared to control animals (Fig. 3B); in anxiogenic condition, however, high theta power was significantly lower in the epileptic group compared to control and epileptic + 2-DG groups (Fig. 3D). Nonetheless, BLA gamma power was not notably different between the groups, both in baseline and anxiogenic conditions (Fig. 3B&D). PSD assessment, therefore, indicates that dHPC powers decreases both in theta and gamma frequency bands in baseline and anxiogenic conditions in epileptic animals while BLA theta power is higher in epileptic animals only when they are immobile; in anxiogenic condition, BLA theta power decreases in epileptic animals and 2-DG can reverse it considerably.
Epilepsy induction altered coherence in dHPC-BLA circuit in anxiogenic condition
Having noted the altered power values in epileptic animals both in dHPC and BLA, we hypothesized that the connectivity between these two structures had changed. Our assessment of coherence in the dHPC-BLA circuit revealed no significant difference among the groups during the baseline condition. (Fig. 4A). However, in the anxiogenic condition in zero-maze apparatus, amazingly, theta coherence between dHPC and BLA was significantly higher in control groups compared to epileptic animals. 2-DG could not reset the decreased coherence in epileptic animals at theta frequency band. Likewise, coherence at the gamma band was significantly lower in epileptic animals while a rise was found in the epileptic + 2-DG group compared to the epileptic group (Fig. 4B). As a conclusion, the difference in coherence values between the groups was evident only when the animals were exposed to the anxiogenic condition. Only in the case of the gamma band, 2-DG could reverse decreased coherence in epileptic animals.
Coherence in dHPC-BLA circuit is correlated to anxiogenic condition.
As epileptic induction disrupted the connection between dHPC and BLA, we further evaluated its correlation with the anxiogenic condition. Our findings illustrated that the coherence values between dHPC and BLA at both theta and gamma frequencies were negatively correlated with the time in which animals exposed themselves to the anxiogenic condition in all three groups (Fig. 5). Moreover, the absolute value of the correlation in the theta band, although not significantly, was reduced in epileptic animals, while 2DG led to an increase in the correlation compared to the epileptic group. However, no noticeable changes in the correlation between coherence in the dHPC-BLA circuit with the anxiogenic condition were noted in the gamma band between the control and epileptic group; this correlation in the gamma band, however, was slightly elevated in the epileptic + 2-DG group. Therefore, coherence in the dHPC-BLA circuit is correlated to the spent time in the anxiogenic condition in the control and the epileptic group, even though it is weaker in epileptic animals. 2-DG reversed this weakened correlation.
Phase-phase coupling between dHPC and BLA was different in baseline and anxiogenic conditions.
We finally investigated altered functional connectivity between dHPC and BLA using phase-phase coupling analysis. First, our findings revealed that theta-gamma phase-locking (BLA gamma phase locked to dHPC theta phase) was disrupted in epileptic animals (Fig. 6B, see below). Moreover, in baseline condition, the phase-locking values were significantly lower in epileptic animals compared to controls only in 1:1, 1:4 and 1:25. 2-DG significantly reversed the alteration in only 1:4 (Fig. 6C). In the anxiogenic condition, however, in the points from 1:1 to 1:22, phase-locking was much stronger in control animals compared to the epileptic group. Interestingly, 2-DG could substantially increase phase-locking in many points (Fig. 6D). Hence, the dHPC theta phase regulates the BLA gamma phase both in baseline and anxiogenic conditions, but it is much stronger in the latter, indicating elevated dHPC-BLA connectivity in anxiety. The phase-locking was weaker in epileptic animals and 2-DG could reset it at many points.
Coherence and phase-locking values in the dHPC-BLA circuit were much higher in anxiogenic condition.
Apart from changes induced by epilepsy induction we reported, the differences in the LFP parameters within each group in anxiogenic condition compared to baseline could indicate the importance of dHPC-BLA circuit in anxiety-like behavior. Interestingly, in the anxiogenic condition, theta and gamma powers were significantly lower in the epileptic group, but not in control mice, compared to baseline. However, 2-DG could reverse the alterations induced by kainic acid treatment. dHPC-BLA circuit coherence and phase-locking, however, were substantially higher when the animals were in anxiogenic conditions compared to the baseline in all the experimental groups. This may suggest the importance of the dHPC-BLA circuit in anxiety-like behavior in mice (Table 1).
Table 1
Comparison of power, coherence and phase-locking between baseline and anxiogenic conditions within each experimental group.
Baseline condition
|
Anxiogenic condition
|
|
Control
|
Epileptic
|
Epileptic + 2-DG
|
dHPC Theta Power
|
0.0002 ±
0.0003
|
-0.0001 ± 3.794e-005
***
|
-0.0001 ± 5.362e-005
|
BLA Theta Power
|
2.455e-005 ± 4.020e-005
|
-0.0001 ± 5.321e-005
*
|
-9.061e-005 ± 6.859e-005
|
dHPC Gamma Power
|
-3.636e-006 ± 3.333e-006
|
-1.244e-006 ± 4.910e-007
**
|
-1.146e-007 ± 9.108e-007
|
BLA Gamma Power
|
-1.103e-006 ± 7.878e-007
|
-5.858e-007 ± 9.712e-007
|
2.660e-007 ± 7.816e-007
|
Theta Coherence
|
0.41 ± 0.05
***
|
0.30 ± 0.05
***
|
0.29 ± 0.05
***
|
Gamma Coherence
|
0.23 ± 0.08
**
|
0.16 ± 0.04
***
|
0.26 ± 0.06
***
|
Phase-locking
|
0.03 ± 008
**
|
0.01 ± 0.003
***
|
0.02 ± 0.005
***
|
dHPC theta and gamma powers as well as BLA theta power were lower in anxiogenic condition only in epileptic group and 2-DG could reverse the decreased powers. Theta and gamma coherence as well as phase-locking between dHPC and BLA were substantially higher in anxiogenic condition compared to baseline in all the three groups. Unpaired t-test was used to compare the values. The data are shown as the difference between means (anxiogenic values – baseline values) ± SEM. B: anxiogenic condition; A: baseline condition. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Our findings from simultaneous LPF recording during anxiety-like behavior, and histochemical staining indicate that intrahippocampal kainic acid injection leads to severe cell loss as well as generating frequent interictal epileptiform activity in the CA1 pyramidal cell layer endorsing epilepsy induction. Moreover, even 27 days after kainic acid injection, many neurons undergo a degeneration process. This severe cell loss and degeneration bring about profound alterations in the electrical properties of kainic acid injected dHPC as well as intact BLA. Moreover, the dHPC-BLA circuit is disrupted in epileptic animals, as was evidenced by decreased coherence in the circuit. This decrease in coherence is negatively correlated to the time in which mice expose themselves to anxiogenic conditions (body stretching posture). Furthermore, weakened theta-gamma phase-locking between dHPC and BLA is noted in the epileptic animals. Most interestingly, the alterations following epilepsy induction are outstanding only when the animals are exposed to the anxiogenic condition compared to baseline condition; this is true, especially in the case of coherence and phase-locking assessments. Moreover, the connectivity between dHPC and BLA is substantially higher when the animals are anxious regardless of the groups indicating the importance of dHPC-BLA circuit in anxiety-like behavior. Glycolysis inhibition by 2-DG can reverse many alterations induced by epilepsy induction including gamma coherence and theta-gamma phase-locking in dHPC-BLA circuit. Further, it increases BLA theta power when the epileptic animals are exposed to anxiogenic condition.
The decreased theta power in dHPC we reported here, both in baseline and anxiogenic conditions, is consistent with previous findings showing attenuated theta oscillations in kainic acid-treated CA123. Both hippocampal pyramidal neurons and interneurons have been reported to contribute to the generation of hippocampal theta oscillations; indeed, hippocampal theta rhythm is generated by the medial septum, nucleus incertus and entorhinal cortex and pyramidal neurons follow this rhythm41; in turn, the pyramidal neurons project back to the medial septum and help the maintenance of the theta rhythm42,43. The GABAergic interneurons play a crucial role in generating such coordination between the pyramidal neurons and theta generators44–46. Hence, such severe cell loss and ongoing degeneration in CA1 would lead to such decrement in theta power we noted. Hippocampal gamma oscillations, however, are generated more locally. Two possible mechanisms have been explained; both emphasize on pyramidal-interneuron interactions47,48, which are disrupted in the kainic acid-treated hippocampus as was evidenced by severe cell loss. Therefore, a gamma power decrement in CA1 is expected as we demonstrated. 2-DG was unable to reverse the decreased power as it was injected long after the cell loss.
Interestingly, kainic acid-treated animals revealed higher theta power in BLA in baseline condition compared to control and 2-DG treatment could not reverse it in epileptic animals. It is already known that the kainic acid-induced lesion does not spread out of the hippocampus at low doses like ours49,50. Hence, alterations in dHPC are likely to affect its connection with the other parts of the limbic formation including BLA. BLA receives information from somatosensory cortices and relays them to the hippocampus; the information, then, is evaluated by the hippocampus and sent back to BLA to affect behavior in response to various emotional stimuli29. This interconnection between BLA and dHPC is mediated by the entorhinal cortex51. When the animals are in the baseline condition, various somatosensory stimuli are sent to BLA and the dHPC to be evaluated; it is possible that due to attenuation of dHPC outputs to BLA following epilepsy induction by kainic acid, BLA puts an effort to maintain its cooperation with dHPC and, as a result, an increase is noted in BLA theta power as we showed here. Consistently, gamma power was not affected in BLA in epileptic mice as it is known that synchronizing rhythm within the limbic formation, dHPC and BLA included, is theta, not gamma rhythm52. When exposed to anxiogenic condition, however, we report that BLA theta power is lower in epileptic animals and 2-DG substantially resets the power. Indeed, theta power in BLA increased in anxiogenic condition compared to baseline in control animals while it decreased in the anxiogenic condition in epileptic animals. To address such disrupted power in both BLA and dHPC we evaluated coherence in the dHPC-BLA circuit. It has been reported that the LFP power is associated with low or high-activity of the mice rather their location (open arm or open arm) in elevated plus maze test53. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that a short time before deciding to avoid or approach to open arm in elevated plus maze, vHPC-BLA, but not dHPC-BLA circuit plays a role in the risk assessment54. Here, analyzing exactly the time in which the animals were anxious most, importance of dHPC-BLA circuit emerges (see below).
In the baseline condition, no altered theta coherence was noted in the circuit between the groups. Amazingly, theta coherence between dHPC and BLA was much stronger when the animals were anxious in control animals suggesting the importance of this circuit in anxiety-like behavior. This coherence was weaker in epileptic animals and 2-DG could not strengthen it. Here we could speculate that decreased theta power in both BLA and dHPC led to such weaker coherence between them in epileptic animals when they were exposed to the anxiogenic condition. Not only is the dHPC-BLA circuit regulated by cortical input, but it may be adjusted by other subcortical areas like median raphe nucleus (MRN). MRN outputs to dHPC have been reported to regulate anxiety behavior19,20. interestingly, stimulation of serotonergic projections from MRN to dHPC leads to an increase in BLA dopamine which plays a role in anxiety behavior20,32. disrupted MRN-dHPC connection following severe cell loss and deformation of dorsal CA1, hence, may be another mechanism leading to decreased coherence between dHPC and BLA.
In the epileptic group, gamma coherence diminished in the dHPC-BLA circuit in the anxiogenic condition and 2-DG could significantly reverse it. This is interesting because BLA gamma power was not affected by epilepsy induction. decreased dHPC gamma power did not lead to gamma coherence decrement in baseline condition; hence, disrupted dHPC theta power might have led to such a decrease in gamma coherence; moreover, 2-DG could reverse it probably by increasing BLA gamma power as we showed here. Addressing this speculation begs the question whether BLA gamma activity is regulated by dHPC theta oscillations. Theta-gamma phase locking has been shown to be a mechanism through which various regions cross-talk39. Moreover, medial prefrontal cortex theta phase regulates BLA firing leading to safety seeking of mice55. Here, we analyzed theta-gamma phase-locking between the two structures. It was amazing that the coupling was much stronger when the animals were anxious suggesting that the degree to which dHPC theta regulates BLA gamma, is an important factor in anxiety-like behavior; to explain more, decreased phase-locking between dHPC and BLA may lead to decreased gamma coherence we demonstrated here; Moreover, we report that coherence in the dHPC-BLA circuit is negatively correlated to spent time in anxiogenic condition. Consequently, decreased gamma coherence resulting from attenuated theta-gamma phase-locking in the dHPC-BLA circuit leads to more spent time in the anxiogenic condition in epileptic animals compared to control values.