Free Fatty Acid treatment induces lipid loading in MPCC and MPTC cultures.
In vitro models of fatty liver disease often involve inclusion of common dietary fatty acids, such as oleate and palmitate, in the culture media. Previous studies have demonstrated differences between oleate and palmitate in regard to their cytotoxicity, with palmitate showing greater toxicity that is reduced when it is used in combination with oleate 20. Based on these prior observations, steatosis was induced in MPCC cultures by treating with 0.5 mM FFA, which contained oleate and palmitate at a 2:1 ratio. Cells were treated with 0.5 FFA for 4 days. Lipid loading was assessed by high content imaging and quantification of BODIPY493/593 dye staining (Fig. 1A, B). For quantification, a threshold was set to identify lipid staining in hepatocytes, but not background autofluorescence (Fig. 1C). Following threshold establishment, lipid loading in the entire well was quantified (Fig. 1D). These data demonstrate the methods for identifying and quantifying lipid by high content imaging and show the ability of the MPCC model to respond to a steatogenic stimulus.
Treatment with FFA, High Glucose and Fructose (HGF), or a combination of both induce reversible hepatic steatosis in MPCC and MPTC.
Multiple dietary factors including consumption of a diet high in fat and sugar contribute to NAFLD development 1. To determine if media composition of fat and/or sugar plays a role in PHH steatosis induction and reversal MPCC or MPTC cultures were treated with either 0.5 mM FFA (FFA), 10g/L glucose + 1.0g/L fructose (HGF), or a combination of both (FFA + HGF) for 4 days, followed by either a return to control medium or continuation of steatotic media for an additional 3 days. In MPCC cultures, all media induced significant hepatic steatosis as compared to control wells (Fig. 2A-D, H-J). Wells treated with HGF developed less steatosis than those treated with FFA (Fig. 2B-C, H-I). Differences in the potency of the selected concentrations, as well as the distinct mechanisms by which each forcing agent induces steatosis (active lipogenesis vs. passive loading respectively) may underlie these discrepancies. When the MPCC cultures were treated with FFA + HGF the amount of lipid loading was additive (Fig. 2D, J) (NT area 8.15x105 ± 1.89x105, FFA 3.16x106 ± 1.66x105, HGF 2.06x106 ± 3.42x105, FFA + HGF 6.01x106 ± 2.30x105). In MPTC cultures, where primary human Kupffer cells were also included in the culture, FFA and HGF induced lipid loading to a larger extent than in MPCC cultures, which did not contain Kupffer cells. In control wells, and those treated with FFA + HGF, there was no significant difference between lipid loading with or without Kupffer cells. This may be due to saturated loading in the FFA + HGF treated wells, nearly the entire hepatocyte island was consumed by steatosis with this treatment (Fig. 2A-D, H-J). As in the MPCC cultures, the HGF treatment causes less hepatic steatosis as compared to the FFA (Fig. 2B-C, H-I) (NT area 1.51 x106 ± 8.98x104, FFA 4.69x106 ± 1.25x105, HGF 2.94x106 ± 1.77x105, FFA + HGF 5.72x106 ± 1.42x105).
In both MPCC and MPTC cultures, lipid loading was able to be at least partially reversed when cultures were switched to control media for 3 days post lipid loading. In MPCC cultures treated with FFA and HGF alone lipid loading was completely reversed equivalent to non-treated control levels (Fig. 2E-F, K-L). Wells treated with FFA + HGF, however, still retained a significant amount of lipid at the end of the wash-out period (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2G, M) (NT area 8.15x105 ± 1.89x105, FFA reversal 1.32x106 ± 4.91x104, HGF 7.93x105 ± 1.00x105, FFA + HGF 2.67x106 ± 3.27x105). When cultures contained Kupffer cells, both the FFA and FFA + HGF treated cultures had significant lipid remaining after change to control media (Fig. 2E-F, K-L). Additionally, the unloaded lipid content was significantly higher in MPTC cultures compared to MPCC (Fig. 2K-M). In MPTC cultures, only the cells treated with HGF completely reversed their lipid loading (Fig. 2F, L) (NT area 1.51 x106 ± 8.98x104, FFA reversal 2.77x106 ± 1.02x105, HGF 1.76x106 ± 1.27x105, FFA + HGF 3.82x106 ± 1.77x105). Still, the absolute amount of lipid remaining in the unloaded HGF treated was higher in MPTC cultures that MPCC. These studies show that both FFA and HGF can induce hepatic steatosis in MPCC and MPTC models. Additionally, the presence of resident immune cells, such as Kupffer cells, influence not only the amount of steatosis induced, but also the ability of the cells to clear the lipid once the steatotic forcing agent has been removed.
Treatment with ACC1/2 inhibitors prevents steatosis in MPCC.
In vitro drug screening is a useful initial step to identify lead compounds for liver steatosis reduction. ACC1/2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce hepatic steatosis in vivo 21–24. To determine if these findings could be recapitulated in MPCC, cultures were treated with FFA, and 3 different ACC1/2 inhibitors were used to either prevent hepatic steatosis or reverse existing steatosis. Control cells had little background lipid, which was greatly increased after FFA treatment (Ctrl lipid area 8.02 x104 ± 1.94x104, FFA 1.26 x106 ± 5.13x104) (Fig. 3A, B). To test steatosis prevention, treatment with ACC1/2 inhibitors Firsocostat (6.0 µM, 0.6 µM, and 0.06 µM), PF-05175157 (5.0 µM, 0.5 µM, and 0.05 µM), and MK-4074 (0.3 µM, 0.03 µM, 0.003 µM) was begun 72 hours prior to treatment with FFA and continued for an additional 4 days. For cells treated with FFA, all compounds showed an incomplete, but concentration dependent prevention of steatosis (Firsocostat (6.0 µM, 0.6 µM, and 0.06 µM) 3.51 x105 ± 9.09x104, 4.02x105 ± 1.19x105, 5.34 x105 ± 1.21 x105 respectively), (MK-4074( 0.3 µM, 0.03 µM, 0.003 µM) 1.54x106 ± 9.00x104, 1.06 x106 ± 1.85 x105, 6.63 x105 ± 1.61x105 respectively), (PF-05175157 (5.0 µM, 0.5 µM, and 0.05 µM) 1.54 x106 ± 1.58x105, 8.77x105 ± 1.89x105, 5.11x105 ± 1.30x105 respectively) (Fig. 3C-E, quantified in 3F). Of the compounds tested, Firsocostat showed the most complete prevention over the three concentrations that were tested. These data demonstrate the ability of the MPCC model to perform longer term screening assays for compounds that can prevent steatosis.
Established Steatosis Can Be Reversed By Acc1/2 Inhibitors
Drug based therapies for fatty liver disease may be used to treat established disease with or without concomitant dietary changes. To examine the ability of ACC1/2 inhibitors to reverse existing steatosis in MPCC, cultures were treated with FFA for 7 days followed by an additional three days of drug treatment. For this experiment, only the highest concentration of each compound (6.0 µM Firsocostat, 5.0 µM PF-05175157, and 0.3 µM MK-4074) was tested to maximize the effect. In these studies, dietary changes were simulated by either switching the cells to control media for the three-day treatment or continuing to treat with the ACC1/2 inhibitors in the steatotic media. In cells treated with control medium, minimal lipid loading was observed (Fig. 4A). In cells treated with FFA with continuous steatosis (Ctrl Lipid area = 2.16x105 ± 3.76x104, FFA = 9.29x10^5 ± 1.18x104), all compounds were able to remove some lipid as compared to wells treated with FFA alone (Firsocostat = 2.45x105 ± 4.89x104, MK-4074 = 3.50x105 ± 1.41x104, PF-05175157 = 6.99x105 ± 460). Additionally, lipid content in cells treated with Firsocostat and MK-4074 with continuous FFA was not significantly different compared to non-treated controls (Fig. 4B, quantified in Fig. 4D). When FFA was removed for three days, cells that were initially steatotic were able to return to NT control levels without any drug treatment (FFA removed = 2.40x105). When ACC1/2 inhibitors were added, lipid levels were further reduced to below control levels (Firsocostat = 9.54x103 ± 1.14x103, MK-4075 = 2.54x104 ± 5.15x103, PF-05175157 = 2.55x104 ± 2.79x103) (Fig. 4C, quantified in Fig. 4E). Finally, Firsocostat was selected to perform an 11-point concentration curve on PHH treated with FFA for 4 days, followed by 3 days of drug treatment in continuous FFA media. Firsocostat reversed lipid loading under continuous steatotic pressure in a concentration dependent manner (Fig. 5A). Data were normalized to no drug controls and a nonlinear fit of the log transformed concentrations was performed to obtain an EC50 for Firsocostat lipid reduction in MPCC (computed EC50 = 4.793 µM) (Fig. 5B). This concentration is similar to those shown to be efficacious in another 3D-cell culture model of fatty liver disease 25. These data show the ability of the MPCC model to screen compounds for steatosis reversal ability. These experiments also demonstrated the increased efficacy of lipid lowering drugs when a dietary change was simulated (return to control media) when FFA was used to induce steatosis.
Valproic Acid Induces Lipid Loading Alone And Exacerbates Existing Steatosis In Mpcc
Drug-induced metabolic dysfunction is another method by which liver steatosis is induced. Drug induced steatosis (DIS), a type of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), occurs when a drug impairs hepatic metabolism of fatty acids. In addition to causing new steatosis, DIS can also exacerbate underlying fatty liver disease 26. For example, valproic acid, a drug used in clinical practice, has been demonstrated to cause DIS. To evaluate whether the MPCC model can be used to screen for DIS, the ability of VPA to induce steatosis in the presence or absence of a fatty liver background was tested. When MPCC cultures were treated with VPA (0.39-12 µM) for 8 days under normal media conditions, VPA induced hepatic steatosis starting at 3.13 mM as compared to NT control (Fig. 6A, D). Concurrently, MPCC cultures were treated with VPA (0.39-12 µM) in the presence of 0.5 mM FFA or high glucose and fructose (HGF). On its own, treatment with 0.5mM FFA induced hepatic lipid loading as compared to NT controls (Fig. 6B, D). When VPA was added to FFA treated cultures lipid loading increased for all concentrations of VPA assessed as compared to both NT controls and FFA treatment alone (Fig. 6B, D). When VPA treatment was added to HGF treated cultures, VPA potentiated lipid loading began with the 0.78 mM treatment (Fig. 6C, D). When toxicity was testing using ATP, the TC50 were similar between media and only slightly lower in the FFA treated cells (95% CI for TC50: Ctrl 3.213–4.197 mM, FFA 2.162–2.945 mM, HGF 2.580–3.314) (Fig. 6E). Notably, the clinical Cmax for VPA is between 30–100 mg/mL (200–700 µmol/L) 27 which encompasses the lowest concentration tested here (0.39 mM) and is just below the second lowest concentration of VPA assessed here (0.78 mM). In these studies, these low concentration only showed DIS potential in the steatotic background. These studies show not only that the MPCC system is suitable for in vitro testing for DIS, but also that testing compounds for DIS in a fatty liver background may uncover a drug’s propensity to contribute to DIS that may not have been discovered under testing in a lean background.
Treatment with FFA, HGF, or a combination of both induces reversible changes in gene expression.
NAFLD and NASH have been shown to induce numerous gene changes. In order to assess gene changes induced by different steatotic media, samples were run on a PCR array targeting 84 genes implicated in human fatty liver disease. Cell lysates were collected and prepared for analysis from cells treated with FFA, HGF, or FFA + HGF for 4 days followed by either a return to control medium or continuation of steatotic media for an additional 3 days. The cut-off value used for significant expression was set as expressed fold changes of at least 2.0 (as compared to control media treatment) and a p-value of < 0.05. Volcano plots were used to identify changes in gene expression between control and treatment groups. When MPCC cultures were loaded with FFA, IGFBP-1, CYP7A1, and GCK were downregulated and FABP1, PDK4, ACSL5, CPT1A, and CD36 were upregulated (Fig. 7A). Treatment with HGF induced downregulation of FABP1, IGF1, and CYP2E1, and upregulation of FASN, PKLR, SCD, and SLC2A4 (Fig. 7B). Lastly, when MPCC cultures were treated with FFA + HGF, IGF1, PCK2, SLC2A2, SLC27A5, and CYP2E1 were downregulated, and SERPINE1, LDLR, SLC2A1, FASN, FABP5, ACLY (Fig. 7C). When genes with differential expression are assigned a group based on their function (as designated by the array manufacturer), genes involved in insulin signaling and cholesterol metabolism and transport were commonly down-regulated among all treatment groups and genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, and lipid metabolism and transport were commonly up-regulated. Differentially expressed gene groups in cells treated with a combination of FFA + HGF seemed to be a combination of those seen with FFA alone and HGF alone, however seemed to favor HGF induced changes (Fig. 8A). Hierarchical clustering supports this observation, showing that global gene expression levels from this array in cells treated with FFA + HGF more closely resemble those treated with HGF than FFA, suggesting the HGF effect is more dominant (Fig. 8B).
Gene expression in cells that were switched to control medium for 3 days largely resembled cells treated with control medium, corresponding with the lipid staining showing at least partial reversal of lipid loading. When MPCC cultures were treated with FFA followed by control medium no gene expression remained changed as compared to control (Fig. 7D). Cells treated with HGF followed by control medium retained more gene changes post reversal. In these cells IGFBP-1 was down-regulated and, GCK, SLC2A4, SCD, and CD36 were upregulated (Fig. 7E). When cells were treated with a combination of FFA + HGF, IGFBP-1 was down-regulated and CD36 remained up-regulated (Fig. 7F). Hierarchical clustering supports the observation that lipid loading, and related gene changes, are partially reversed upon switching back to control medium (Fig. 8B). Together these data demonstrate that treatment of MPCC cultures with steatotic inducers such as FFA, HGF or a combination of FFA and HGF elicit expression changes in genes relevant to human fatty liver disease. Furthermore, these data further support the observation that these changes are partially reversed when cultures are switched to control medium.