SRNS account fors 30% of the primary nephrotic syndrome in children, it is challenging due to that 30% − 50% of them gradually progress to ESRD within 10 years. This progress may be more rapid in patients with genetic background[11]. NUP nephropathy is identified as a rare monogenic cause of SRNS recently. Due to the limited cases reported previously, the association between clinical and genetic features remain unclear. Hence, the diagnosis of NUP nephropathy are mainly based on genetics analysis. In this study, we presented the clinical and genetic data of two Chinese children with early-onset SRNS. Three novel mutations in NUP genes (two in NUP107 and one in NUP93) were detected in these patients, thus expanding the variant spectrum of NUP nephropathy and raising concern about carrier screening and genetic counselling for their family members in the future. Furthermore, we summarized the clinical, pathologic and genetic features of 86 reported cases to explore the correlation between phenotype and genotype in NUP nephropathy.
NUP nephropathy was initially reported in 9 patients with NUP107 gene biallelic mutations by Miyake et al.[1]. The results from the in vitro assays showed that the p. D831A substitution weak the binding between NUP107 and NUP133. Although mutations in NUP nephropathy varied among the reported cases, founder mutations in some regions emerged gradually. The mutation c.2492A > C and c.1079-1083del in NUP107 had been identified as the founder mutations in East Asian[1–3], while c.1772G > T and c.1886A > G in NUP93 might be the founder mutations in Western Europe and Turkish respectively[8, 16]. Including our cases, East Asian race accounting for more than half of the reported cases with NUP nephropathy. A multicenter study in Korean revealed that NUP107 gene is one of the top 5 causative genes of SRNS or FSGS in pediatric patients[2]. However, as a novel genetic etiology of early-onset renal disease, it has not been given adequate attention at present. Current researches on genetic spectrum of renal disease in children did not include[21–24] or only include part of[11] NUP genes mutation detection. For the potential susceptibility of NUP nephropathy in Asians, NUP gene detection should be considered in gene panel of renal disease in Asia.
Both renal clinical and pathologic manifestations of NUP nephropathy are highly consistent that most patients suffered SRNS with FSGS in their early life. Apoptotic cells in the glomeruli and renal tubules cells were mentioned in some cases, which it might be the typical change of NUP nephropathy[1]. Small amount of immune complex deposition was observed in some cases but massive deposition of immune complex was reported in only one patient with IgA 4 + by immunofluorescence[19]. Two patients underwent repeated renal biopsy. One patient was found to have increased IgA deposition[19] and the other had pathological transformation from minimal change disease (MCD) to FSGS after 2 years[1], suggesting that performing renal biopsy at different time points may give different impressions of the pathological types. According to the limited reports, patients with NUP nephropathy were unresponsive to either steroids or immunosuppressants. Thus, it is recommended to perform genetic examination early in patients with SRNS or FSGS to avoid unnecessary long-term administration to steroids or immunosuppressants.
Rapidly progressive renal insufficiency, which it may be a result of treatment failure, is not uncommon and can increase the therapeutic difficulty for children with NUP nephropathy, especially in young children. Yet not all reported cases had ESRD. A girl presented SRNS at the age of 10 years and renal function remainded normal until the last follow-up at the age of 24 years, dissimilar from her sister who carried the same biallelic heterozygous mutation in NUP107 had SRNS at the age of 11 years but progressed to ESRD one year later[1]. The pathophysiology of renal function deterioration in NUP nephropathy has not yet been studied, thus further researches are required to clarify the interacting mechanisms. In progressed patients, the effect of renal transplantation were better than those without NUP gene mutation[3, 11]. Only 1 case suffered plasma exchange dependent recurrent NS after renal transplantation. Fortunately, his proteinuria disappeared after comprehensive treatment therapy including rituximab and PE[25].
Extra-renal manifestations have made the comprehensive management of children with NUP nephropathy even more challenging. This study concluded that the involvement of nervous system is common, but there are significant differences between different genomics. All of the patients who carried c.303G > A mutations in NUP107 had microcephaly, and most of them with concomitant global developmental delay or intellectual disability[9, 12, 13]. However, no extra-renal involvement was reported in patients with mutations of c.2492A > C and c.1079-1083del in NUP107, which they are considered as the founder mutations in East Asia[1, 11]. The differences mentioned above exhibit a potential correlation between phenotype and genotype. Besides, nearly one-third of the cases did not provide relevant information about the extra-renal involvement. Due to the high expression of NUP in vivo, systemic symptoms deserve further attention from physicians during disease course.