Plant material and study site
Seeds of peppermint were obtained commercially from Isla Sementes®, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. The experiment was conducted at the Plant Tissue Culture Laboratory of Paranaense University (UNIPAR), Umuarama, PR, Brazil. Analytical standards were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA.
In vitro elicitation
Peppermint seeds were disinfected for 1 min in 70% alcohol and for 10 min in 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in a laminar flow hood, according to the protocol of Trettel et al. (2018). Seeds were then inoculated in Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) supplemented with 30 g L− 1 sucrose and 6.5 g L− 1 agar. Before use in the experiment, the medium was adjusted to pH 5.8 and autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min. A total of 150 flasks were prepared, each with a total volume of 350 mL and containing 50 mL of culture medium and 3 peppermint seeds. Flasks were kept in a growth room at 25 ± 2°C and a light intensity of 72.02 µmol m− 2 s− 1 under a 24 h light photoperiod provided by light emitter diode (LED) lamps (model T8, 10 W) (Trettel et al. 2018). After 70 days of culture, shoots were used as explant donors.
At the end of the culture period, new 350 mL flasks were prepared by adding 50 mL of culture medium and one of the following four treatments: 50 µM salicylic acid, 200 mg L− 1 chitosan (degree of deacetylation of 75–85%), 25 µM copper sulphate (CuSO4) or an untreated control. Elicitor concentrations were based on previous studies (Trettel et al. 2018; Miclea et al. 2020). A nodal segment (1 cm) with two buds was then inoculated in each flask (Fig. 1a). Each treatment comprised 250 flasks, totalling 1000 plants. Shortly after preparation, samples were stored in a growth chamber for 90 days under the same conditions described above.
Growth Monitoring
Shoots and oxidised plants were counted after 30, 60 and 90 days of inoculation of the nodal segments. The fresh and dry weights (g) of the shoots and roots were determined after 90 days of inoculation. For dry weight determination, samples were oven-dried at 60°C for 3 days and then weighed on a precision digital scale. Shoot and primary root lengths (cm) were measured after 90 days of incubation using a calliper (Fig. 1c,d).
Determination Of Volatile Compounds
Volatile compounds were characterised by headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. First, 2 g of fresh peppermint leaves were harvested after 90 days of inoculation, added to 20 mL flasks, and incubated for 30 min at 120°C under intermittent stirring at 550 rpm (1 min on, followed by 10 s off). The temperature of the injection syringe was set at 130°C. Volatile compounds were determined using a 7890B Agilent gas chromatograph coupled to a 5977A Agilent mass spectrometer equipped with an HP-5MS UI capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm). The oven temperature was set at 60°C for 1 min, ramped to 250°C at 4°C min− 1, held for 2 min, ramped to 300°C at 15°C min− 1, and held for 1 min. Helium was used as carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL min− 1 and a constant pressure of 8,230 psi. The injector, transfer line, ionization source and quadrupole temperatures were 250, 280, 230 and 150°C, respectively. The mass spectral detection system was operated in scan mode in the range of 40–550 m/z. Individual compounds were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with the Wiley spectral database (http://www.sisweb.com/software/ms/wiley.htm) and by comparison of their retention indices with those described by Adams (2017).
Determination Of Antioxidant Activity
Antioxidant, reducing sugar, flavonoid, anthocyanin and enzyme activity analyses were performed using 96-well flat-bottom ELISA microplates. The absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV-Vis SpectraMax Plus®) equipped with SoftMax Pro 6.5.1 software. Three biological repeats were analysed in triplicate. Results are presented in graphs, as mean and standard deviation (n = 3) per treatment.
The antioxidant activity was analysed in 100 mg samples of fresh leaves collected at the end of the experiment (90 days after inoculation). Leaves were ground in liquid nitrogen and maintained at − 80°C until analysis. Four methods were used to assess antioxidant activity, namely total phenolic quantification, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH•) assay, β-carotene/linoleic acid co-oxidation, and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay. All procedures were performed in the absence of light. Extracts were prepared by mixing ground leaves in 50% methanol and 70% acetone, except for the β-carotene method, whose procedures are detailed below. After preparation, samples were kept at rest for 2 h and centrifuged at 8,000 × g. The supernatant was collected and used as the crude extract (Waterhouse 2002).
Total phenolics were determined using 10% Folin–Ciocalteu solution and 4% sodium carbonate (Larrauri et al. 1997). Readings were taken at 750 nm. Results are expressed in milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per 100 g of sample. Quantification was performed against a standard curve of gallic acid (0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mg mL− 1), given by the equation y = 0.2708 − 0.0994x, with R2 = 0.99.
The DPPH• assay, which is based on the loss of absorbance of a DPPH• solution (60 µM), was performed according to Rufino et al. (2009). Readings (515 nm) were taken every 30 min until stabilisation. Results are expressed as the free radical scavenging (FRS) percentage, calculated using Eq. (1):
$$\text{F}\text{R}\text{S} = ({A}_{\text{c}}-{A}_{\text{s}})÷{A}_{\text{c}}\times 100$$
1
where Ac is the absorbance of the control and As is the absorbance of the sample.
The β-carotene/linoleic acid co-oxidation assay was performed according to Mattos et al. (2009). Samples were mixed with ethanol, stirred for 1 h in a shaker, incubated for 20 min in an ultrasonic bath, and centrifuged at 8,000 × g to collect the supernatant. This procedure was repeated twice. The β-carotene/linoleic acid emulsion was prepared by mixing 20 µL of linoleic acid, 265 µL of Tween 40, 25 µL of β-carotene solution (20 mg mL− 1) and 0.5 mL of chloroform. Two readings were taken at 470 nm, one at time zero and the other after 120 min of reaction. Results were calculated using Eq. (2):
$$\text{A}\text{A} = [1-({A}_{\text{i}\text{c}}-{A}_{\text{f}\text{c}}) / ({A}_{\text{i}\text{s}}-{A}_{\text{f}\text{s}}\left)\right]\times 100$$
2
where AA is the antioxidant activity (%), Aic is the initial absorbance of the control, Afc is the final absorbance of the control, Ais is the initial absorbance of the sample, and Afs is the final absorbance of the sample.
For the FRAP assay, the FRAP reagent was prepared by mixing sodium acetate buffer (0.3 M, pH 3.6), iron chloride (20 mM), and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (10 mM) (Rufino et al. 2006). Readings were taken at 595 nm. Results are expressed in milligrams of Trolox equivalents (TE) per 100 g of sample, determined against a standard curve (0, 160, 320, 480, 640, 800, 1600 µmol L− 1 Trolox), given by the equation y = 0.3904x − 0.0548, with R2 = 0.9962 (Rodríguez-Bonilla et al. 2017).
Determination Of Yellow Flavonoids And Anthocyanins
For the determination of yellow flavonoids and anthocyanins, 100 mg of fresh leaves were mixed with an ethanol–HCl solution (1.5 M) and centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 10 min, according to Francis (1982). The supernatant was collected and used as the crude extract. Reactions were read at 535 nm for anthocyanin quantification and 374 nm for flavonoid quantification. The results are expressed in mg 100 g− 1 sample, calculated using a dilution factor of 500 (Eqs. 3 and 4):
$$\text{A}\text{n}\text{t}\text{h}\text{o}\text{c}\text{y}\text{a}\text{n}\text{i}\text{n}\text{s}= {(\text{A}\text{b}\text{s}\text{o}\text{r}\text{b}\text{a}\text{n}\text{c}\text{e}}_{535} \times \text{D}\text{i}\text{l}\text{u}\text{t}\text{i}\text{o}\text{n} \text{f}\text{a}\text{c}\text{t}\text{o}\text{r})÷98.2$$
3
$$\text{F}\text{l}\text{a}\text{v}\text{o}\text{n}\text{o}\text{i}\text{d}\text{s}= {(\text{A}\text{b}\text{s}\text{o}\text{r}\text{b}\text{a}\text{n}\text{c}\text{e}}_{374} \times \text{D}\text{i}\text{l}\text{u}\text{t}\text{i}\text{o}\text{n} \text{f}\text{a}\text{c}\text{t}\text{o}\text{r})÷76.6$$
4
Determination Of Reducing Sugars
The extract was prepared using 100 mg of fresh leaves and 80% ethanol, according to Santos et al. (2017). The material was incubated at 75°C for 10 min and centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 15 min. Subsequently, reducing sugars were measured by the method proposed by Maldonade et al. (2013), based on the reaction with 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid. Readings were taken at 490 nm. Results are expressed in milligrams of reducing sugars per gram of sample. Quantification was performed using a standard curve of glucose (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.0, 1.6 and 2.0 g L− 1) (y = 0.672x − 0.4675, R2 = 0.97).
Determination Of Phenylalanine Ammonia-lyase (Pal) Activity
Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL; EC 4.3.1.24) activity was measured using 100 mg of fresh leaves in phosphate buffer pH 6.0, according to Redman et al. (1999) and Umesha (2006). The reaction medium was prepared using 100 µL of 0.5 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) and 100 µL of 6 µM l-phenylalanine. The calibration curve (y = 0.0397x + 0.0506, R2 = 0.97) was constructed using six concentrations of trans-cinnamic acid (0, 3.32, 6.65, 10.0, 13.32 and 20.0 µL mL− 1). Absorbance readings were taken at 490 nm. Results are expressed as mg trans-cinnamic acid g− 1 sample.
Statistical analysis
Data on the number of shoots and the number of oxidised shoots at 30, 60 and 90 days of in vitro culture were converted to percentages and plotted as graphs using Microsoft Excel. Data on the chemical composition and chemical classes were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) using the Kaiser criterion using Statistica 7 software (StatSoft 2020).
The experiment had a completely randomised design. Plant growth, biochemical activity, antioxidant potential and enzyme activity data were analysed for normality by the Shapiro–Wilk test (p < 0.05) and subjected to analysis of variance by the F-test (p < 0.05). Means were compared by Tukey's test and Skott-knott test (p < 0.05) using Sisvar® 5.6 software (Ferreira 2011).