Generation of SIK1-MT mice and animal usage
We produced single guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting the SIK1 gene and mRNA of Cas9 using the MEGAscript T3 Transcription Kit (Thermo Scientific) by following the manufacturer's protocol. For the sgRNA vector construction, annealing oligo DNAs (Oligo#1, Table S1) were cloned into pCG-SapI [18]. sgRNA was prepared by in vitro transcription using PCR amplified fragment prepared by PCR with primers (Oligo#2) using pCG-SapI-gRNA as a template. Cas9 mRNA was prepared by in vitro transcription using pFNLCas9A95.
Electroporation of mRNAs to the fertilized eggs from C57BL/6JmsSlc mice (Japan SLC inc) was performed by following the TAKE method [19]. The poring pulse was set to voltage: 40 V, pulse width: 3 ms, pulse interval: 50 ms, and the number of pulses: 4. The transfer pulse was set to voltage: 5 V, pulse width: 50 ms, pulse interval: 50 ms, and the number of pulses: ±5. After the electroporation, embryos were transferred to the oviducts of pseudo pregnant mothers and kept until natural delivery. Fourteen pups were obtained and the indel mutations were screened by genomic PCR and Sanger sequencing with a primer set (Oligo#3). A male mouse having 8 bp deletion that caused a frameshift in the C-terminal region of the SIK1 protein was isolated and backcrossed with C57Bl/6J mice for more than six generations. The genotyping of the mice was performed by genomic PCR using primer pairs (Oligo#3), followed by the digestion of unmatched PCR products by T7 endonuclease I (New England Biolabs).
Risperidone treatments
To investigate the pharmacological effects of risperidone on the physiological characteristics of neurons and behavior of the SIK1-MT mice, we injected risperidone (0.05mg/kg BW in saline, i.p.) to mice one hour before the experiments [20]. Injected mice were returned to their home cage until further experimental procedures. Saline-injected (n=9) and risperidone-injected (n=9) two-week-old male were used for electrophysiological experiments. Saline-injected (n=10) and risperidone-injected (n=9) two-month-old male were used for behavioral tests.
Construction of plasmids
Wild-type mouse brain was lysed with TRIzol RNA Isolation Reagents (Thermo Fisher) and RNA was purified by the standard phenol/chloroform extraction or with an RNA purification column, RNA Nucleospin RNA plus (Thermo Fisher). cDNA of SIK1 was obtained by standard RT-PCR using a random hexamer mixture and a primer set for SIK1 (Oligo#4, Table S1). PCR amplicon was subcloned into pCR-Blunt TOPO vector (pCR-SIK1) and confirmed the sequence of SIK1 cDNA. pCR-SIK1 was subjected to the mutagenesis and introduced the 8-bp deletion using a primer pair (Oligo #5) to construct pCR-SIK1mt. cDNAs of SIK1 and SIK1-MT were cloned into pCAGGS vector (pCAGGS-SIK1 and pCAGGS-SIK1mt, respectively). For the overexpression of SIK1 variants, we made cDNAs of SIK1 fused with Venus YFP [21] at N-terminal of SIK1. Venus YFP was amplified by PCR using a set of primers (Oligo #6) and inserted Venus cDNA amplicon into pCR-SIK1 using In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara).
Cell Culture
HEK-293T cells (8 X 104) were plated on 24-well dishes a day before the transfection. They were transfected with 2 µg of pCAGGS-Venus-SIK1-WT, SIK1-MT, or -Q614X using polyethylenimine. Forty-eight hours after transfection, they were incubated with Forskolin (10 mg/mL) and IBMX (3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 18 mg/mL) or with control vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide). After three hours the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 4% sucrose in PBS followed by three times washing with PBS. Cells were counterstained with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and washed three times with PBS. The cells were mounted on a slide glass with slow fade gold antifade reagent (Thermo Fisher). Fluorescence images were taken by a confocal laser-scanning microscope (TCS SP8; Leica Microsystems).
Quantification of SIK1-MT mRNA levels
To quantify the expression levels of mRNA of the SIK1-MT, we utilized a sequencing-based quantification method [22]. First, we amplified PCR products using cDNA from wild-type or SIK1-MT mice using a primer set (Oligo #7). PCR products were also prepared using pCAGGS-SIK1 plasmid or a mixture of pCAGGS-SIK1 and pCAGGS-SIK1mt at 1:1 or 1:0.5 ratio as templates. PCR amplicons from plasmids were used as standards for quantitative estimation. The PCR amplicons were subjected to Sanger sequencing and the fluorescent data from the sequences around the sgRNA target site were analyzed by the EditR program [23]. The ratio between wild-type and mutant sequences was calculated in each nucleotide and converted into a vector. The expression level (EL) was calculated by the following formula.
Here, represent vectors obtained by the calculation using data from samples from brain cDNA, pCAGGS-SIK1, and a mixture pCAGGS-SIK1 and pCAGGS-SIK1mt at 1:1 ratio (100% MT). We also calculated the expression level using the PCR product from another mixture of pCAGGS-SIK1 and pCAGGS-SIK1mt at 1:0.5 ratio (50% MT). Most of the EI distributed zero to one and a value close to one indicate that the expression level of the SIK1mt is similar to that of the wild-type SIK1.
Histology
Histological analysis was followed by previous procedures [24, 25]. Briefly, under deep anesthesia, two months old mice were perfused transcardially with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Fifty-μm-thick coronal sections were prepared with a sliding microtome (REM-700, Yamato Kohki Industrial). The sections were washed with PBS, blocked with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% Triton-X100 and 10% of normal donkey serum and incubated with mouse anti-parvalbumin (1:2000, Sigma), rat anti-somatostatin (1:200, Merck Millipore), or rabbit anti-Satb2 antibody (1:200, Abcam). After overnight incubation with primary antibodies, the brain sections were washed with PBS containing 0.1% Triton-X100 and incubated with Alexa 488-conjugated donkey antibody against rabbit IgG or Cy2-conjugated donkey antibody against mouse or rat IgG (Jackson immunoresearch), respectively, for 2-3 hours at room temperature. After further washing with PBS, brain sections were mounted on a slide glass, counterstained with DAPI, and coverslipped. Fluorescence images were taken with an all-in-one fluorescent microscope (BZ-X710, Keyence) and a confocal laser-scanning microscope (TCS SP8; Leica Microsystems).
Electrophysiology
Patch clamp recordings in acute brain slices were done as described previously [24]. Briefly, postnatal 14-19 day-old mouse brains were removed and placed immediately in ice-cold slicing artificial corticospinal fluid (ACSF, in mM: 85 NaCl, 75 sucrose, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 25 glucose, 0.5 CaCl2, and 4 MgCl2) saturated with 95% O2/5% CO2 for 2 min. The chilled brains were trimmed coronally with razor blades and placed in a vibratome chamber (Campden 7000smz). Three hundred fifty-μm-thick coronal sections were transferred to a recovery chamber filled with recording ACSF (in mM: 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 10 glucose, 2 CaCl2, and 2 MgCl2), followed by incubating at 32°C for 30 min, and then at room temperature for 30 min. In current-clamp experiments, pyramidal neurons were patched with glass pipettes (4-8 MΩ) filled with a potassium-based intra-cellular solution (ICS, in mM: 130 K Gluconate, 6 KCl, 10 HEPES, 1 EGTA, 2.5 MgCl2, 2 magnesium ATP, 0.5 sodium GTP, 10 phosphocreatine sodium, 290 mOsm) under microscopy (BX50WI, Olympus). Resting membrane potential was measured immediately after establishing whole-cell recording. Hyperpolarizing and depolarizing step pulses (700 ms) were applied to characterize neuronal firing property. Membrane potential at which the temporal rate of the potential reached to 10 mV/ms was defined as the action potential threshold. Postsynaptic responses were measured in voltage-clamp mode using cesium based ICS (in mM: 130 CsOH, 130 Gluconic acid, 6 CsCl, 10 HEPES, 1 EGTA, 2.5 MgCl2, 2 magnesium ATP, 0.5 sodium GTP, 10 phosphocreatine sodium, 290 mOsm). Miniature postsynaptic currents were recorded in the presence of 1 mM tetrodotoxin (Abcam). To record mEPSCs (Glutamatergic), cell membrane potential was held at -60 mV for three-minutes' recording and then cell membrane potential was shifted to 0 mV to record mIPSCs (GABAergic) from the same cell, for three minutes as well. E/I balance index was calculated by averaging (FreqmEPSC)/(FreqmEPSC+FreqmIPSC), where FreqmEPSC and FreqmIPSCrepresent the frequency of mEPSC and mIPSC, respectively. Evoked postsynaptic currents were triggered with 0.1 msec current injections by a nichrome-wire electrode placed at position 100-150 µm from the soma of neurons recorded. For recording evoked AMPA and NMDA-EPSC, 100 µM picrotoxin was added in bath solution with the holding potentials at -70 mV and 40 mV. We used 5 mM of QX-314 in the pipette solution to block sodium channel-mediated currents. To calculate the NMDA to AMPA ratio, the amplitude of NMDA current at 50 ms after the onset was divided by peak amplitude of AMPA current. Paired-Pulse ratio (PPR) was done holding the cell at -70 mV for excitatory PPR (ePPR) in presence of 100 μM picrotoxin. For inhibitory PPR (iPPR) the cells were held at 0mV in presence of 20 μM DNQX. All PPR experiments were done with (30, 50, 100, 200 ms) stimulation intervals. Access resistance was monitored throughout the recording, and cells with access resistance over 25 MΩ were rejected. All data were acquired at 10kHz with an EPC10 double amplifier (HEKA) operated by Patch Master software (HEKA). Data analysis was performed with the Mini Analysis Program (Synaptosoft) and custom made programs of Igor Pro (WaveMetrics).
Behavioral studies
Two to three-month-old male heterozygote SIK1-MT (n=8) and the littermate wild-type mice (n=9) were used in all behavioral experiments except for . All experiments and analyses were performed blindly to the genotype and pharmacological treatment.
Open Field Tests
Each mouse was placed in the corner of the open field apparatus (50 × 50 × 40 cm). The apparatus was surrounded by a sound-attenuating white chest and illuminated at approximately 100 lux. Subject behaviors were recorded from the above of the apparatus using a CCD camera (WAT-902B; Watec, Yamagata, Japan). Analog images were converted to digital images (720 × 480 pixels) using Monster HD264 (SKNET, Yokohama, Japan). The video frame rate was 30 frames per second (fps). The test lasted 30 min. We measured the travel distance, time spent in the center area (25 × 25 cm), vertical activity (rearing and leaning), and grooming. Part of the behavioral parameters, such as the travel distance and time spent in the center area, were analyzed using idTracker [26] and custom made programs run on MATLAB. Other parameters were analyzed by a trained observer.
Elevated plus-maze test
The elevated plus maze consisted of two open arms (25 × 5 cm) and two closed arms of the same size with 15-cm high walls made of transparent plastic. The maze was arranged in a manner such that arms of the same type were opposite each other, connected by a central area (5 × 5 cm), and the entire maze was elevated to a height of 50 cm above the floor. To keep the mice from falling over, the open arms were surrounded by a 3-mm high edge. The animals were placed individually in the center of the maze, facing a closed arm. Mouse behaviors were recorded during a 5-min test period using a web camera (HD Webcam C615; Logicool, Tokyo, Japan). The video images (640 × 480 pixels) were recorded at 30 fps and analyzed using idTracker. The number of entries into the open arms was analyzed.
Marble burying test
Each mouse was placed into an arena (25 × 25 × 31 cm) filled with 5-cm-deep wood chip bedding (CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan) and habituated to the test arena and bedding for 10 min. After the habituation period, mice were returned to the transfer cage, and 16 small blue glass marbles (12.5 mm diameter) were placed evenly spaced in five rows of four. The subject mouse was again placed into the arena containing the sixteen marbles. After 10 min, the subject was removed from the arena, and the number of buried marbles (defined as at least two-thirds covered) was counted.
Sociability and Social Novelty Tests
The apparatus was a rectangular, three-chambered box. The chamber was 20 × 40 × 25 cm and the dividing walls were made from transparent Plexiglas, with small openings (5 × 3 cm) allowing access into each chamber. The mouse was placed in the central chamber and allowed to explore the whole chamber for 10 min (the doorways into the two side chambers were opened). The two side chambers contained an inverted empty small black wire cup. A clear glass cylinder was placed on top of the inverted cup to prevent lifting or climbing on top. Following the habituation period, mice were placed back into the central chamber, and the doorways into the two side chambers were closed. In the sociability test, an unfamiliar male mouse (stranger 1, S1) that had no prior contact to the subject mouse was placed in one of the two cups, and then the doorways were unblocked. The location of S1 in the left or right side chambers was systematically alternated between trials. The subject behaviors were recorded for 10 min using a CCD camera. After the sociability test, the subject mouse was again confined in the central chamber. In the social novelty preference test, a second unfamiliar male mouse (stranger 2, S2) was enclosed in the cup that had been empty (E) during the sociability test, and the doorways were again unblocked. The stranger mice were at least two weeks younger than the subject mice and had previously been habituated to placement in the small wire cup. In both tests, the amount of time that the subject head was within a 2-cm distance of the wire cup was measured as “time spent around the cup”.
Recording ultrasonic vocalization
Ultrasonic vocalization (USV) was recorded using a USB-microphone (Ultramic 250, Dodotronic) with a recording software (SEA, Sound emission analyzer, The Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali). P5-P14 mouse was separated from the mother and placed in a recording styrofoam box containing beddings. The number of USV in 10 minutes was counted by an observer, who has no information on the genotype of the subjects.
Sample size and Statistical analysis
Samples sizes were determined based on established practice and our previous experience in respective assays. The number of independent samples (e.g., neurons) is indicated on the graphs and the numbers of animals indicated in the figure legends. All values represent the average of independent experiments ± SEM. The variance among the analyzed samples was similar. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t-test (for two groups) or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test (for multiple groups). Statistical analysis was performed by custom-written R scripts, MATLAB (Mathworks), or Prism 6.0 (Graphpad Software Inc.). Statistical significance is indicated by asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). All data are expressed as means ± SEM. All the values were described in Supplementary information (Table S2).