Predicting neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with acute disorders of consciousness (DOCs) is challenging1–3, and clinicians continue to question complex connection impairments of the ascending arousal network (AAN) in comatose patients2,4. Unfortunately, current clinical and radiological tools are not reliable for detecting consciousness or predicting recovery in those with either severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)5, cardiac arrest3,6,7, or stroke7,8. To this end, multiple clinical and radiological tests have been proposed for assessing patients with DOCs, including bedside behavioral assessment9, electroencephalography (EEG)10, task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)11, resting-state-fMRI (rsfMRI)6,7,12, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)1,2,7,8,13, and different combinations of these approaches5,12,14. In the absence of reliable prognostic tests, the clinician’s judgment, experience, and communication skills may influence a family’s decision about life-sustaining therapy and lead to premature care decisions before a patient’s prognosis becomes clear14. In this regard, investigations have focused on diagnostic tests that might objectify this initial prediction assessment of consciousness outcome2,4,6,7.
The AAN is an essential component of human consciousness and is formed by a group of subcortical pathways connecting the rostral brainstem tegmentum to the hypothalamus, thalamus, and basal forebrain2,13. It has been described that DOCs after TBI, cardiac arrest, or stroke are related to axonal injury within the AAN1,13,15. Additionally, clinical and electrophysiological evaluations are insufficient and might be biased by sedation or any clinical condition, such as aphasia16. Accordingly, there is uncertainty concerning long-term effects in a broad spectrum of cognitive, behavioral, and functional impairments16. Overall, more specialized tests derived from MRI may be able to better characterize microstructural disturbances.
Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) imaging utilizes a gradient-echo imaging sequence with parameters sensitive to the oxygen state of hemoglobin, which is used as contrast to delineate regional brain activity17. BOLD imaging allows for the analysis of both task-based fMRI and rsfMRI. rsfMRI itself can be used for studying different resting-state neural networks (RSNs) to establish functional connectivity in patients with a DOC12. On the other hand, DTI uses anisotropic diffusion to estimate the organization of brain tissue. Additionally, structural analysis of white matter (WM) with DTI techniques, including diffusion tensor tractography (DTT), has allowed physicians to scrutinize the anatomy of the AAN1,8,13,15,18, revealing the structural connectivity of this network1,19. Both tools can be employed to determine ascending and descending structural and functional connectivity between AAN brainstem nuclei and many different cortical areas12. Nevertheless, the exact biological nature of the structural and functional injury that leads to a DOC remains uncertain. Multiple efforts to elucidate the origin of impaired consciousness have led to the proposition of a compromised state for multiple cortical and subcortical areas and networks that may be involved in this process, including the brainstem20, thalamus6,21, hypothalamus1, frontal basal cortex1,4,5,13, and other association areas in the parietal lobe6. However, varying impairment in these areas may induce any DOC regardless of the etiology of the injury. In this regard, the aim of the present study was to analyze a combination of structural and functional information of the AAN obtained from both DTI and BOLD acquisitions to determine whether early acquisition of DTI and BOLD techniques for analysis of structural and functional connectivity of the AAN can predict neurological outcomes in terms of consciousness in patients with DOCs after TBI, cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA), or stroke.