Prevalence&nbsp;of&nbsp;Toxoplasma&nbsp;gondii&nbsp;infection&nbsp;among&nbsp;small&nbsp;mammals&nbsp;in&nbsp;Tatarstan,&nbsp;Russian&nbsp;Federation

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-244441/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection among small mammals in Tatarstan, Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-244441/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Toxoplasma gondii is a zoonotic parasite with a wide host range that includes humans, domestic animals and wild animals. Small mammals serve as intermediate hosts for T. gondii and may contribute to the persistence of this parasite in the environment. Mass mortality in wild animals and deaths in rare endemic species make the study of this parasite of growing importance. In this study, T. gondii infection prevalence was evaluated in brain tissues from 474 small mammals captured at 26 trapping points in urban and rural areas of Tatarstan, Russian Federation. Nested PCR was used to detect the T. gondii B1 gene in the samples. Overall, 40/474 samples (8.44 %) showed B1 gene positivity. T. gondii infection among the wild small mammals trapped in the rural area was significantly higher as a whole than that of the urban area as a whole. Multivariate logistical regression analysis also showed that the trapping area (rural or urban) significantly contributed to T. gondii positivity. Vegetation in the trapping points, small mammal species, sex, age or distance from the trapping points to the nearest human settlements did not significantly affect T. gondii positivity in the sampled small mammals.

General Microbiology

Parasitology

Small Animal Medicine

Toxoplasma gondii

small mammals

urban/rural areas

Tatarstan

Russian Federation

Toxoplasma gondii is one of the most wide-spread parasites in the world. With its broad-host-range, it infects almost all mammals and birds including humans, domestic animals and wild animals. Although toxoplasmosis in humans and domestic animals is not usually symptomatic¹, mass mortality in wild animals and deaths in rare endemic species have been reported^2–7. Hence, attempts to understand the prevalence of T. gondii in wild animals are warranted. In a study conducted in Panama City, it was reported that T. gondii prevalence among small mammals was higher than in humans and birds from the same area⁸. Cats, the definitive hosts for T. gondii, shed huge numbers of environmentally-resistant oocysts in their feces, and small mammals are more frequently preyed upon by domestic cats than other intermediate hosts⁹. Therefore, it is important to understand the status of T. gondii prevalence among wild small mammals to understand the local situation for T. gondii distribution.

Tatarstan, Russian Federation is located on the East European Plain in the middle reaches of the Volga River (Fig. 1A). In this area, the Volga-Kama Nature Reserve in Tatarstan contains approximately a quarter of the World’s animal species¹⁰. Understanding the situation regarding infectious pathogens among wild animals in Tatarstan is therefore worthwhile. We have previously reported the high seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in humans, cats and domestic animals in Tatarstan, including in the capital city, Kazan^11,12. However, very little is known about T. gondii prevalence among wild animals. Thus, in this study, we investigated T. gondii infection prevalence among wild small mammals in the Tatarstan.

T. gondii prevalence among small mammals in Tatarstan, Russian Federation

To assess the prevalence of T. gondii among small mammals in Tatarstan, Russian Federation, we captured 474 of these animals at 26 trapping places (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S1) and detected the T. gondii B1 gene in brain DNA from them using nested PCR. Altogether, 40/474 (8.44 %, 95% confidence interval; CI: [6.16–11.4]) of the brain samples from the small mammals showed T. gondii B1 gene positivity (Table 1). We found that 13.56 % (24/176) and 5.37 % (16/298) of the small mammals trapped in the rural and urban areas showed T. gondii positivity, respectively, 16.66 % (2/12) and 8.35 % (38/455) of the individuals trapped in fields and forests, respectively, were positive, and 6.04 % (9/149) and 4.16 % (6/144) were male and female, respectively. T. gondii positivity among their ages was 8.77 % (5/57) for juveniles (aged 0–2 months), 3.94 % (5/127) for mature adults (aged 3–6 months), and 6.17 % (10/162) for adults (aged > 6 months). Positivity among the small mammal species was 7.95 % (24/302) for Myodes glareolus (hereafter called My. glareolus), 12.50 % (1/8) for Apodemus agrarius, 11.29 % (14/124) for A. uralensis, and 9.09 % (1/11) for A. flavicollis. Although five Microtus arvalis (hereafter called Mi. arvalis), 13 Sorex araneus, and one Dryomys nitedula were also examined, no individuals showed T. gondii positivity. The distances from the trapping points to the nearest human settlements varied by 170–3890 m. As shown in Fig. 2, unlike reports from other regions¹³, no clear correlation was found between proximity to human settlements and high infection rates.

Table 1

*T. gondii* prevalence in small mammals trapped in Tatarstan, Russian Federation.
Category			Examined	Positive	Negative	Prevalence (%)	95% CI
Area	Urban	Kazan city	294	15	279	7.95	5.26–11.74
		Naberezhnye Chelny city	3	1	2	33.33	1.76–87.46
		Unknown	1	0	1	0	0–94.54
	Rural	Vysokogorsky district	22	1	21	4.54	0.24–24.88
		Pestrechinsky district	17	3	15	17.64	4.67–44.2
		Laishevsky district	16	3	13	18.75	4.97–46.3
		Mamadyshsky district	40	5	35	12.5	4.7–27.6
		Yelabuzhsky district	14	1	13	7.14	0.37–35 − 8
		Nizhnekamsky district	37	6	31	16.21	6.77–32.68
		Tukayevsky district	25	5	20	20	7.6–41.3
		Unknown	5	0	5	0	0–53.7
Vegetation	Urban	Forest	294	15	279	7.95	5.26–11.74
		Field	3	1	2	33.33	1.76–87.46
		Unknown	1	0	1	0	0–94.54
	Rural	Forest	161	23	138	14.29	9.45–20.87
		Field	9	1	8	11.11	0.58–49.33
		Unknown	6	0	6	0	0–48.32
Sex	Male		149	9	140	6.04	2.97–11.5
	Female		144	6	138	4.16	1.7–9.24
	Unknown		181	25	156	13.81	9.3–19.9
Species	Myodes glareolus		302	24	278	7.95	5.26–11.74
	Apodemus uralensis		124	14	110	11.29	6.54–18.53
	Apodemus agrarius		8	1	7	12.5	0.65–53.32
	Microtus arvalis		5	0	5	0	0–53.7
	Sorex araneus		13	0	13	0	0–28.34
	Apodemus flavicollis		11	1	10	9.09	0.47–42.88
	Dryomys nitedula		1	0	1	0	0–94.54
	Unknown		8	0	8	0	0–40.23
Age	Juveniles 0–2 months old		57	5	52	8.77	3.27–20.04
	Mature adult 3–6 months old		127	5	122	3.94	1.45–9.4
	Adult older than 6 months old		162	10	152	6.17	3.16–11.37
	Unknown		128	20	108	15.62	10–23.34
Total			474	40	434	8.44	6.16–11.4

Risk factors for T. gondii infection

We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to separately validate the following as risk factors for T. gondii infection: trapping point area (urban or rural), vegetation (forest or field), small mammal species type (alien or non-alien species), age (0–2 months-old juveniles, 3–6 months-old adults or ≧ 6 months–old), sex (male or female) and distance from the trapping point to the nearest human settlement. In the classification of small mammal species, small mammal species were classified as alien (A. agrarius, A. uralensis, A. flavicollis, Mi. arvalis) and non-alien (M. glareolus, S. araneus, D. nitedula)¹⁴. The forward selection procedure generated a model that included area, vegetation and the type of small mammal species that best fitted the data (Model 3, Supplementary Table S2). Other factors such as age, sex and distance from trapping points to the nearest human settlements were not included in the model. In this best fitted model, the only significant factor was the area, with neither vegetation nor species deemed significant (Table 2). The model identified rural area as a risk factor (Fig. 3). The actual observed prevalence of T. gondii infection was also significantly higher in the rural area than the urban area (Fig. 3).

Table 2

Risk factors for *T. gondii* infection
Predictor	Odds ratio (95% CI)	p
Area	3.92 (1.90–8.40)	< 0.001
Vegetation	-	0.138
Species	-	0.054

In this study, we surveyed T. gondii infection among small mammals in Tatarstan, Russian Federation. The overall T. gondii prevalence in these small mammals was 8.44 %. In several European countries (France, Czech Republic, Sweden and Switzerland) the prevalence of T. gondii among wild small mammals living in rural forests was 3–7 %, which is not dissimilar to our results^13,15. Using logistical regression analysis, we found that the trapping area (rural/urban), but not the vegetation in the trapping spots, species, sex, age or distance from the trapping points to the nearest human settlements, significantly contributed to the prevalence of T. gondii among the small mammals. This result is reinforced by the fact that T. gondii infection prevalence among the small mammals trapped in the rural area was significantly higher statistically than that in the urban area.

Although the reason why small mammals in the rural area were more frequently infected with T. gondii is unknown, the ranging behavior of wild small mammals in the urban and rural areas might differ, thereby affecting the possibility of their exposure to T. gondii oocysts. Each small mammal species has a different habitat and range^17–21. However, in this study, similar species were captured in rural and urban areas (Supplement Fig. S1). In this study, species-specific behavior cannot explain the higher prevalence of T. gondii infections in the rural-captured small mammals. If small mammals in rural areas have a bigger ranging behavior than those in urban areas it could result in more frequent exposure to T. gondii. However, it is not yet known whether the ranging behavior of the same small mammal species in rural and urban areas differs. It will therefore be necessary to investigate the behavior of each small mammal species living in such areas.

T. gondii infection in small mammals might also depend on the defecation habits of stray and free-ranging domestic cats in urban and rural areas. It was reported in France that the cat feces density in rural areas is higher than that in urban areas²². A similar situation may also exist in Tatarstan. In the present study, T. gondii infection was confirmed in a small mammal captured in a rural area 3.8 km from the nearest human settlement. T. gondii-infected rodents were also found 2.5 km from the nearest human settlement in a rural area of London, UK²³. In rural areas, the home-range size of free-ranging domestic cats is wider than that in urban areas^8–13. Thus, it is possible that in the rural areas of the Tatarstan, Russian Federation, stray or free-ranging domestic cats deeply invade the forests and spread T. gondii oocysts in their fecal droppings.

In addition to oocyst dissemination by cats, the methods used for garbage disposal in urban and rural areas might also affect T. gondii infection prevalence among wild animals. Unauthorized small-scale garbage collection sites are used in the rural forests of the Tatarstan, which both free-ranging domestic cats and wild animals can freely access. Hence, cysts contained in meat-derived food waste might be an infection source in these rural areas.

In this study, we show that T. gondii infection among wild small mammals in the rural area is, as a whole, significantly higher than in the urban area as a whole, regardless of the former being a greater distance from human activity zones. Therefore, further research is needed to clarify the source and route of T. gondii transmission in wild animals.

Study area and sampling

Small mammals (murid rodents and shrews) were captured using mouse-type snap traps in Tatarstan, Russian Federation (Fig. 1, Table S1). Area type (urban or rural), vegetation (forest or field) and distance from trapping points to the nearest human settlement were recorded. The distinction between forest and field was made based on the UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s criteria^24,25. Each administrative division in the Tatarstan was defined to be urban or rural by the Federal Service of State Statistics of Russian Federation²⁶. Based on these criteria, Kazan city and Naberezhnye Chelny city are classified as urban districts and Vysokogorsky district, Yelabuzhsky district, Laishevsky district, Mamadyshsky district, Nizhnekamsky district, Pestrechinsky district and Tukayevsky district are classified as rural districts. Small mammals were captured during the spring and fall periods of 2016 and 2017. Fifty traps were placed in a line every 5 m in one place. Traps were baited and left for one night. Animal suffering was minimized as snap traps cause rapid death in murid rodents and shrews. Each captured small mammal’s species, age, and sex were morphologically identified using a reference guide²⁷, and the animals were then stored at − 20°C until their brains were isolated.

Ethics

All experiments were performed in compliance with relevant Russian and Japanese and institutional laws and guidelines and were approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and the Animal Research Committee of Gifu University (Permit Nos. MU 3.1.1029-01, and 17060, respectively). Study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org).

DNA extraction and PCR

Brain tissue samples were prepared as described previously¹². Brain samples stored at − 20°С were transferred to a − 86°С deep freezer. Each deep-frozen whole brain sample was homogenized in 1 ml of a 0.9% saline solution. Total DNA was extracted from the brain tissues of each small mammal using a Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Nested PCR was performed with the Takara PCR Amplification Kit (Takara Bio Inc., Foster City, California, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primer sets and PCR conditions used to detect the B1 gene from T. gondii were those described previously¹².

Mapping

Spatial referencing of the sampling sites was conducted using global positioning system navigation with a Garmin eTrex 10 device. Visualization of cartographic data and measurements of the distances from the trapping points to the nearest human settlements were performed using QGIS 3.12 software²⁸. Geodetic coordinates were projected into planar rectangular coordinates in the Universal Transverse Mercator projection on the WGS-84 ellipsoid (Universal Transverse Mercator, zone 39N). The overview map of the European part of Russia was made in the Lambert Conformal Conic Projection. Map coordinates are represented as geodetic coordinates (WGS-84, degrees and minutes north latitude and east longitude). To visualize thematic objects (administrative boundaries, forests, agricultural lands, and water bodies), a set of vector data layers, NextGIS (Russia), was used.

Dataset and statistical analyses

Multivariate logistic regression was performed using the R statistical software package (version 3.6.3)²⁹ to assess the trapping point area (urban or rural), vegetation (forest or field), small mammal species type (alien or non-alien species), age (0–2 months-old juveniles, 3–6 months-old adults or ≧ 6 months old), sex (male or female) and distance from trapping points to the nearest human settlements as risk factors for PCR positivity. According to previous reports^14–18, four species, Mi. arvalis, A. flavicollis, A. agrarius, A. uralensis, and three species, My. glareolus, S. araneus and D. nitedula are considered alien and non-alien species, respectively. Quantitative data were replaced with 0 or 1 dummy variables, and age data were replaced by 0, 1 and 2 for juveniles, adults and elders, respectively. Multicollinearity of the explanatory variables was evaluated using Spearman’s coefficient³⁰ calculated using dplyr, FSA and psych packages^31–33. None of the Spearman’s coefficients were > 0.6. To find the best fit model, a forward selection procedure was used. Predictive performance and model fitting were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC) and corrected Akaike's information criterion (AICc) with Akaike weight (Wi). AICc and Wi were calculated using the MuMIN package³⁴, and the AUC was calculated using the R pROC package³⁵. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The delta method was used to compute the standard errors for the predicted probabilities based on the multinomial logit function³⁶. T. gondii prevalence confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated based on 468/474 samples (6 samples were excluded from analysis because they lacked information).

Data Availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 19-34-90024, and in part by the Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (18fk0108010j0003 and 19fk0108047h0003), and the Joint Research Program of the Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University. We thank Sandra Cheesman, PhD, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript

Author information

Contributions

N.D.S., Y.T., E.A.S. designed the experiments, investigated, analyzed and validated the data, and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. O.V.N., M.N.M., Y.N.D., A.N.B., G.Sh.I., V.B.Z., N.I.K., R.F.S., G.R.S., G.M.A., K.S.K., T.S., K.K. provided resources, and collected and curated the data. N.D.S., Y.T., E.A.S. acquired the funding for the experiments, administrated the project, wrote and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuhiro Takashima.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Tenter, A. M., Heckeroth, A. R. & Weiss, L. M. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans [published correction appears in Int. J. Parasitol. 31, 217 – 20(2001)]. Int. J. Parasitol. 30, 1217–1258. doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00124-7 (2000).
Tokiwa, T. et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in Amami spiny rat on Amami-Oshima Island, Japan. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.06.001 (2019).
Conrad, P. A. et al. Transmission of Toxoplasma: Clues from the study of sea otters as sentinels of Toxoplasma gondii flow into the marine environment. Int. J. Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.002 (2005).
Loss, S. R., Will, T. & Marra, P. P. The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2380 (2013).
Howe, L., Hunter, S., Burrows, E. & Roe, W. Four cases of fatal toxoplasmosis in three species of endemic New Zealand birds. Avian Dis. https://doi.org/10.1637/10625-080413-Case.1 (2014).
Work, T. M., Massey, J. G., Lindsay, D. S. & Dubey, J. P. Toxoplasmosis in three species of native and introduced Hawaiian birds. J. Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.2307/3285558 (2002).
Honnold, S. P., Braun, R., Scott, D. P., Sreekumar, C. & Dubey, J. P. Toxoplasmosis in a Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi). J. Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-469R (2005).
Quintero-Nunez, R. et al. Transmission of Toxoplasma gondii in Panama City, Panama: A five-year prospective cohort study of children, cats, rodents, birds, and soil. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 53, 458–468 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.458 (1995).
Krauze-Gryz, D., Żmihorski, M. & Gryz, J. Annual variation in prey composition of domestic cats in rural and urban environment. Urban Ecosyst. 20, 945–952 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0634-1 (2017).
Red Book of the Republic of Tatarstan: animals, plants, mushrooms / Ministry of Forestry of the Republic of Tatarstan [and others; editor-in-chief: Nazirov A.A.]. – 3rd edition. -Kazan: Ideal-press,759p. (2016).
Shuralev, E. A. et al. Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in goats, cats and humans in Russia. Parasitol. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2017.10.014 (2018).
Shamaev, N. D. et al. Seroprevalence and B1 gene genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in farmed European mink in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia. Parasitol. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2020.102067 (2020).
Gotteland, C. et al. Species or local environment, what determines the infection of rodents by Toxoplasma gondii? Parasitology. doi:10.1017/S0031182013001522 (2014).
Khlyap, L. A., Warshavsky, A. A. & Bobrov, V. V. Diversity of alien mammal species in different regions of Russia. Russ. J. Biol. Invasions. https://doi.org/10.1134/s2075111711040059 (2011).
Galeh, T. M. et al. Global Status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00461 (2020).
Tolkachev, O. V. A study on the migrations of murine rodents in urban environments. Russ J Ecol. 47, 399–404 https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413616040147 (2016).
Vukićević-Radić, O., Matic, R., Kataranovski, D. & Stamenković, S. Spatial organization and home range of Apodemus flavicollis and A. agrarius on Mt. Avala, Serbia. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 52, 81–96 (2006).
Musser, G. G. & Carleton, M. D. Superfamily Muroidea. In Mammal Species of the World a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. eds.pp. 894–1531. (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore., 2005).
Andreychev, A. V. & Kiyaykina, O. S. Homing in the forest dormouse (Dryomys nitedula, Rodentia, Gliridae). Zoologicheskiĭ zhurnal. 99, 698–705 https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044513420060033 (2020).
Mitter, G., Sumasgutner, P. & Gamauf, A. Niche-partitioning of three Apodemus species (Mammalia: Murinae) in an urban environment. Annalen Des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B Für Botanik Und Zoologie, 117, 37–46(2015). Retrieved December 17, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43922306.
Dwużnik, D. et al. Comparison of helminth community of Apodemus agrarius and Apodemus flavicollis between urban and suburban populations of mice. Parasitol. Res. 116, 2995–3006 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-017-5609-5 (2017).
Knapp, J. et al. Rural and urban distribution of wild and domestic carnivore stools in the context of Echinococcus multilocularis environmental exposure. Int. J. Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.05.007 (2018).
Thomasson, D. et al. Prevalence and co-infection of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in Apodemus sylvaticus in an area relatively free of cats. Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182011000904 (2011).
FAO. 2012a. FRA 2015 terms and definitions. Rome (available at ).
FAO. 2016b. FAOSTAT3. Glossary (available at http:// faostat3.fao.org/mes/glossary/E).
"OK 033- 2013. All-Russian Classifier of Territories of Municipal Formations" (Volume 1. Central Federal District) (approved by Order of Rosstandart dated 14.06.2013 N 159-st) (taking into account Changes 1/2013 – 418/2020).
Pavlinov, I. Y., Kruskop, K. S. V., Warsawsky, A. A. & Borissenko, A. V. Terrestrial Mammals of Russia: A reference guide. Sci. Press. Moscow: KMK 2002, p 298.
Development Team, Q. G. I. S. 2020. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. (available at http://qgis.osgeo.org).
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 72–101 (1904).
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.7.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr (2018).
Revelle, W. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R package version 2.0.9, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych (2020).
Ogle, D. H., Wheeler, P. & Dinno, A. FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis. R package version 0.8.30, https://github.com/droglenc/FSA (2020).
Bartoń, K. & MuMIn Multi-model inference. R package, version 0.12.2. http://r-forge.r-project.org/pro-jects/mumin/ (2009).
Robin, X. et al. pROC: An open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 (2011).
Liu, X. Mixed-effects multinomial logit model for nominal outcomes. Methods and Applications of Longitudinal Data Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-801342-7.00011-3 (2016).

No competing interests reported.

Supplemetaryinformation1.pdf

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
05 Sep, 2021
Reviews received at journal
11 Aug, 2021
Reviewers agreed at journal
11 Aug, 2021
Reviews received at journal
28 Jun, 2021
Reviewers agreed at journal
07 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
05 May, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
29 Apr, 2021
Editor invited by journal
04 Mar, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
04 Mar, 2021
First submitted to journal
15 Feb, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection among small mammals in Tatarstan, Russian Federation

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Results

Discussion

Methods

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1