A total of 70 nests of IGS were recorded in 35 distinct quadrants in plantations during the study period (Fig Ⅰ). IGS was found to use five tree species in exotic tree plantations for nest construction. Nests were found on Eucalyptus spp. (73%), Alnus nepalensis (17%), Prunus ceresoides (6%), Pinus patula (3%) and Eleaocarpus tuberculatus (1%) (Χ2 = 127.57, df = 4, p < 0.0001). The nests were cup-shaped (31%), globular (25%), messy (25%) or flat (17%) (Χ2 = 2.914, df = 3, p < 0.05) and were made up of twigs and leaves. Eucalyptus leaves was the most used nest material (47% of nests), followed by twigs (20%) and shola tree leaves (5%) (Χ2 = 58.508, df = 4, p < 0.0001). Over 31% of the nests faced northeast (between 22.5° and 67.5°), followed by east (17%) between 67.5° and 112.5° (Χ2 = 18.257, df = 7, p-value < 0.01).
IGS built nests on tall trees (34.8m ± 1.8, n = 70), and nests were typically located high up on the trees (26.9m ± 1.4, n = 70). We found variation in the heights of the trees used (range 10m to 60m), as well as the nest heights (range 8m to 50m). Overall, however, the tree height influenced the nest height across all tree species (R2 = 0.79, F(1, 68) = 258.9, p < 0.0001) (Fig ⅠⅠ).
Acacia mearnsii (not used by IGS for nesting) was more abundant in nest quadrants (6.94 ± 1.55) than random quadrants (4.19 ± 0.50) (W = 2488.5, p < 0.01). The mean number of Eucalyptus trees around nest trees (5 ± 0.57) was not significantly higher than around random trees (4.82 ± 0.35) (W = 3387.5, p = 0.7956). Pinus patula was more abundant in random quadrants (0.94 ± 0.25) than in nest quadrants (0.91 ± 0.56) (W = 3335, p-value < 0.05). Nest quadrants had a density of shola trees (4 ± 0.92) that was not significantly different from the random quadrants (3.54 ± 0.44) (W = 2869.5, p-value = 0.7325).
At the landscape level, we found that nest trees were predominantly located near shola forest patches (509m ± 103, W = 4695, p < 0.001), and away from agricultural fields (1601m ± 208, W = 1605, p < 0.0001). Lower mean temperature was recorded in nest quadrants compared to random quadrants (W = 5815, p < 0.0001). Nest quadrants had higher precipitation than random quadrants (W = 2312.5, p < 0.001). Nest quadrants had lower aspect values (east-facing slopes) than random quadrants (W = 5076.5, p < 0.0001) (Fig ⅠⅠⅠ). Distance to land cover classes (shola and agriculture), topography (slope and aspect) and climate (mean temperature and mean precipitation) were included in the full model (AIC = 149.02 ). The model receiving the best support included distance to shola, mean temperature and aspect (AIC = 145.77) (Table I).
There has been no prior study on the nesting behaviour of IGS in the Palani Hills, and this is the first report of them using exotic timber plantations at a landscape level for nesting. Our survey also quantified habitat characteristics of nest sites of IGS. Interpreting these results requires caution since the design of this study was not intended to test habitat selection. We did not study other habitats used by IGS, such as shola forests. Our results showed that the studied exotic timber plantations were a novel nesting habitat for IGS. Large Eucalyptus trees were a key structural element, which can allow squirrels to climb higher in the canopy, staying out of the reach of terrestrial predators. The relatively strong Eucalyptus trees could also provide good support for building a large nest. This is in agreement with studies that have found that IGS primarily prefer mature trees (Datta and Goyal 1996; Pradhan et al. 2017), which provide nest-building resources (Pradhan et al. 2017). It was evident that IGS did not construct nests only in the topmost canopy. This might be to provide some nest concealment from avian predators (Pradhan et al. 2017). Twigs and leaves of Eucalyptus were significant contributors to the IGS nests. A report of a single IGS nest on Eucalyptus in Satpura Tiger Reserve found that 231 E. globulus twigs were used in the nest wall (Kumbhar et al. 2012). Although we did not observe IGS using any part of Eucalyptus for feeding, on multiple occasions, they were found eating the seeds and flowers of Acacia mearnsii, which is the dominant tree species in the nest quadrants. Most of the nests were east-facing, probably to provide the best thermal environment as the sunlight can reach nests earlier in the morning. Previous studies on IGS nests in Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha and Satpura Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh reported similar results (Kumbhar et al. 2012; Nayak and Patra 2015). Although studies on habitat use by IGS in exotic plantations are scarce, there are reports of IGS nesting (Kanoje 2008) and feeding in teak stands (Baskaran et al. 2011). These suggest that IGS might be able to occupy monoculture plantations, though it is likely that the limited food choices in these plantations are only overcome by foraging in adjoining forests. IGS can easily move to the surrounding forest matrix for food (Borges 2015), although details of their movement and feeding behaviour need to be studied in detail. The nest trees in this study were located predominantly near shola forest patches with high structural complexity, and it is likely that these forest patches offer forage diversity, relatively fewer predation risks and more favourable microclimatic conditions than the more open, exposed monoculture plantations. Most of the located nests were found away from the agricultural fields (always associated with settlements in Palani Hills), suggesting they are actively avoiding human disturbances. An occupancy survey at Kalakad–Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve similarly reported that IGS actively avoid human disturbances (Srinivas et al. 2008).
Our findings suggest that IGS is able to survive to some extent in largely monoculture timber plantations, but only when these are contiguous with intact rainforests and away from human disturbance. It is necessary to carry out intensive ecological studies on occurrence and behaviour of, and habitat use by IGS in timber plantations and the surrounding forest matrix to determine the adaptability of the species to modified habitats. Till we have a clearer understanding of how endemics like the IGS use modified landscapes, we suggest that managers proceed gradually when replacing exotic timber plantations with native species. It is important to guarantee the availability of mature forest patches or trees for the secure nesting of such arboreal mammals. It might be possible to somewhat mitigate the negative impacts of monoculture stands by increasing their habitat quality with measures such as planting diverse native understory vegetation. Such measures will increase the structural heterogeneity of these exotic timber plantations, which will benefit not just arboreal mammals, but other native taxa as well.