Wireless Subscribers with AODV Routing Protocol Simulated on Mobile Ad-hoc Networks utilized Ad-hoc on-Demand Distance Vector

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2478764/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Wireless Subscribers with AODV Routing Protocol Simulated on Mobile Ad-hoc Networks utilized Ad-hoc on-Demand Distance Vector

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2478764/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

February 24, 2023. Research Square has withdrawn several other preprints by this author for substantial overlap with published works by other authors.

Editorial notes are used to provide important context regarding the topic of a preprint or to alert readers to potential issues concerning that preprint or a downstream publication associated with it. For more information on editorial notes, see our Editorial Policies.

Impromptu steering calculation has been a center issue in exploration of Ad-Hoc organizations. To manage different directing convention issues on an impromptu organization like unfortunate legitimacy and huge control above, this paper groups and thinks about specially appointed network steering conventions through the OPNET reproduction instrument and spotlights on testing two directing conventions' exhibition specifically, table-driven and on-request steering convention. The DSDV Destination Sequenced Distance Vector steering convention is the most utilized table-driven directing convention, while AODV (Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector) and DSR (Dynamic source directing) directing conventions are the most utilized on request directing conventions. The presentation of these three conventions are recreated with an assortment of bundle conveyance proportion, normal start to finish delays, and directing burdens are likewise been broke down and looked at utilizing changed development speed (from 0 to 25 m/s) and a consistent bitrate source traffic model. The outcomes got from 20 organization hubs dispersed haphazardly showed that the on-request directing convention is the most ideal choice for a high portability climate.

Systems and Networking

Mobile Ad-Hoc Network

AODV

Distance Vector

OPNET Modeler.

A versatile self-coordinating remote multi-jump network is known as an Ad Hoc organization. It doesn't require framework that is fixed to help likewise every one of the organization's hubs are portable which can be kept up with powerfully with different associations of the hub. Network hubs can move anyplace, likewise be turned here and there whenever, all of which will change the geography of the organization without warning. Two end-clients who can't convey straightforwardly can involve different hubs for parcel sending. Each portable hub might go about as a switch and a host simultaneously. Due to the Ad Hoc organization's elements, the customary directing conventions, (for example, distance vector and connection state) are not relevant. Many steering conventions have been recommended for the Ad Hoc organization and might be isolated into two classes: proactive, receptive, and cross breed directing conventions. Moreover, one more name for the earlier steering convention is the table-driven directing convention can be given in [1–2]. In this steering convention, every hub has a steering table that contains data about how to go to different hubs. At the point when a topological change in the network is distinguished, the hub communicates an update message to the organization, so the steering table of the hub that gets the update message will be refreshed to guarantee that steering data is predictable, immediately, and right, so the geography of the organization can be precisely reflected in the steering table. At the point when a message is sent from a source hub, It can get the objective hub's appearance course right away, so the deferral of this directing convention is little, yet the above of the steering convention is enormous. At the point when information should be moved, on-request steering (responsive directing convention) looks for a course, in this steering convention, the hub doesn't have to keep up with modern and right directing data. At the point when a message is shipped off an objective hub, the source hub starts an organization course search and tracks down the fitting way. When thought about to the earlier steering convention, the responsive directing convention has a lower above and a more drawn-out datagram transmission inertness than other cross breed steering strategies that integrate the advantages of both the earlier and responsive directing conventions [3–4]. The attributes of impromptu directing calculations set forward unique prerequisites, the turn of events, and examination of steering convention that progressively turned into a problem area [5–6]. As a rule, many articles been endeavored to recreate proactive and responsive conventions and investigate their exhibition. Scientific techniques confronted trouble since conventions like DSR, DSDV, and AODV were muddled and have been set in different ways of getting elite execution in various situations [7–8]. Over the most recent couple of years, many exploration establishments have progressively proposed different specially appointed directing conventions, like DSDV, AODV, DSR, OLSR, MAODV, FSR, and so forth. In [9–10] introduced an examination among LAR and OLSR directing conventions utilizing a MATLAB test system to identify fires in the timberland, The outcomes showed that LAR was more productive in the recognition of fires and utilized less energy than OLSR. In [11–13] presents an examination among DSR and AODV steering conventions applying TCP and UDP traffic sources in a portability model, the outcome showed that AODV has higher versatility than DSR. Writing [14–16] utilizes MATLAB to contrast DSDV execution and WRP (Wireless Routing Protocol) and OLSR (Optimized Connect State Routing) conventions regarding throughput, above, and bundle conveyance proportion. the recreation result showed that DSDV would do well to execution than WRP while the presentation of the OLSR convention was awesome among other conventions. Writing [17]-[19] reproduce different directing conventions in impromptu organizations, which has specific reference importance for the exploration of impromptu organization steering conventions, however they didn't direct flat correlation and far-reaching investigation of various directing conventions. In [20]-[22] reenacted and analyzed a few on-request steering conventions, in any case, the presentation pointers utilized didn't reflect completely the acknowledgment of directing convention objectives, and the effect of the number of correspondence source hubs on steering execution were not as expected considered. In [23–25] proposed a better AODV convention, to further develop the course revelation and nearby fix to lay out new courses. The course fix capability was improved, the fruitful conveyance pace of parcels lessens, the start to finish postponement of hubs, and diminishes directing Above. In any case, not all hubs in the organization have two-way connects, and nobody way interfaces have been examined. In [26–28] proposed a superior DSR convention by setting a reinforcement course, so course reproduction can be successfully kept away from, the bundle transmission achievement rate is improved, the normal start to finish delay was altogether decreased, and the directing above was likewise decreased. Nonetheless, because of the arrangement of backup courses of action, the directing space above was expanded, furthermore, the improvement of organization execution was generally restricted. In [29–31] analyzed conventions (AOMDV, LAMR, LAR, and AODV) with various times and velocities, the reproduction results showed that AOMDV gives the best presentation eventually to-end deferral and parcel conveyance proportion. In this paper three significant impromptu directing conventions to be specific (DSR, AODV, what's more, DSDV) have been assessed [32–33], the exhibition is examined and thought about utilizing speed parcel conveyance capability, delay, also, steering load carrying out OPNET reproduction stage, this study might act as inspiration for additional exploration towards working on existing shows or growing new ones to settle the difficulties looked by MANETs.

Directing conventions work at the organization layer, and different conventions have been created to interface a source hub to an objective hub (for example DSR, AODV, DSDV, OLSR, and so forth.). A few significant bits of writing work on the examination of MANET steering conventions are explored in this work, considering the future bearings of specialists too in this space.

In [34] have looked at and investigated four directing conventions, which are OLSR, DSDV, AODV and DSR under various circumstances. Conventions were recreated utilizing NS3. AODV had the most elevated normal get rate and the most noteworthy typical parcels got, as indicated by their acquired outcomes. The most elevated power was viewed as consumed by DSR. The DSDV convention was found to utilize minimal measure of force and to have the most reduced bundle get rate and normal parcels got.

In [35] have looked at two primary kinds of MANET proactive steering conventions DSDV (Destination Sequence Distance Vector) and FSR (Fisheye State Routing) and two the notable responsive conventions AODV and DSR (Dynamic Source Routing) under different reenactment situations sent in a territory area of 500m*500m for various hubs 5, 10, and 30 hubs separately. The responsive sort's AODV convention beats the other directing conventions regarding throughput and normal start to finish delay, while the receptive kind's DSR outflanks the other steering conventions with regards to bundle conveyance proportion. As the organization expansions in size, receptive conventions especially the AODV steering convention become more prevailing in all exhibition classifications until the end of the conventions, while parcel size has little effect. The creators planned to show the steering conventions' exhibition in certifiable MANET applications later.

In [36] have led a near investigation of AODV, DSDV, and DSR conventions to follow execution measurements incorporate start to finish delay, parcel conveyance proportion, and throughput under various information rates. The organization situation was laid out inside landscape of 500m*500m for 50 hubs. The recreation discoveries demonstrate the way that AODV can be utilized in low-postpone networks, while DSR might be utilized in limited networks where higher throughput and PDR are necessities. As future work, the creators have recommended exhibiting the benefits and burdens of other open steering conventions and proposed a new directing convention for MANETs that will tackle the issues of existing steering conventions.

In [37] have concentrated on three steering conventions that were assessed for conduct and execution examination in the metropolitan climate. The NS2 test system was utilized to test proactive, receptive, and half-breed conventions. The proactive OLSR convention accomplished the most noteworthy decrease in above, while the AODV responsive methodology performed better as far as move rate at the TCP level. Also, the cross-breed convention ZRP yielded the best outcomes as far as idleness decrease and conveyance rate increment.

In [38] have thought about and dissected QoS boundaries for various intelligent directing conventions AODV, DSR (Dynamic Source Routing), and TORA (Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm) while considering variable hub thickness in the MANET organization. network load, retransmission endeavors, start to finish delay, media access postponement, throughput, and different measurements are used while surveying hub thickness and variant of IEEE 802.11g WLAN standard utilizing OPNET modeler 14.5 in landscape region 1000m*1000m to 25, 50, 75 and 100 hubs. As far as media access delay, load, start to finish delay, information drop retry, and retransmission endeavors, AODV beats different conventions. Nonetheless, DSR had been beating the opposition as far as throughput and traffic steering. Thus, the end exhibits that every convention works diversely in various conditions since boundaries have been changed in different circumstances. Because of our recreation results, we can infer that AODV beats the opposition.

In [39] have worried about the presentation assessment of receptive steering conventions, like AODV, as well as proactive directing conventions, including DSDV and OLSR. The conventions execution has been researched in territory areas of 100m*100m, 200m*200m, 300m*300m, 500m*500m, and 1000m*1000m separately for hubs populaces equivalent to 20, 30, 50 70 and 100 hubs. Every convention's exhibition is assessed with QoS measurements, that incorporates bundle conveyance proportion, throughput, parcel misfortune, and start to finish delay. In each QoS boundary, OLSR beats AODV and DSDV, as per the recreation results. The creators credited their outcomes to the work of prevailing pruning approach addressed by the multipoint transfer (MPR) for parcels sending, with the goal that the bundle conveyance proportion and throughput ascend by expanding the quantity of hubs, reproduction region and reenactment speed. As a future work, creators mean to look at the effect of ecological factors on the presentation of the directing convention in a remote organization utilizing elective proliferation models as opposed to the Friis model.

In [40] have examined the energy utilization in MANET between the OLSR and ZRP conventions. The territory region of the reproduced situation was1000m*1000 m for 20 hubs. In view of the reproduction consequences of the ZRP and OLSR for energy utilization, creators figured out that the OLSR which represents the Proactive methodology has yielded an energy utilization not exactly that expected by the ZRP under similar reenactment boundaries, yet then again, they uncovered that if the objective hubs in ZRP are situated beyond the shipper hubs range region, the convention shows higher effectiveness for conveying parcels. This happens on the grounds that the ZRP utilizes the receptive component for this situation, where, the fruitful conveyance of bundles helps to keep away from back to back transmissions, thus energy utilization in ZRP is more effective than OLSR under the last option condition.

In [41] have assessed and looked at the presentation of two steering conventions, AODV and OLSR in the MANET organization. Creators have created network situation to show multiple times to utilizing different organization densities with number of hubs: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and the landscape region of the proposed situation was equivalent to 500 m*500 m. Creators have analyzed the effect of changing the quantity of hubs on convention execution by following assessment boundaries, like throughput, bundle conveyance proportion, and normal start to finish delay. The reenactment results demonstrate that the quantity of hubs or arrange size essentially affect steering convention execution, they demonstrated the AODV outflanks the OLSR in a few viewpoints, particularly concerning above and throughput.

In [42] have looked at the exhibition of the AODV and ZRP steering conventions with different hub speeds as indicated by different measurements like normal start to finish delay, throughput, line length and their dropped bundles. The territory region for the reproduced network situations were 2000m*2000m and 2500m*2500m for 70 and 80 hubs separately. The reproduction results showed that the proposed model utilizing AODV has decreased the defer time in contrast with the ZRP convention. Dynamic reception of various circumstances in AODV has expanded the throughput worth of the organization and diminished the line length when contrasted with the ZRP calculation. In correlation to the situation with the ZRP convention, the other situation that was applying the AODV has shown an addition in parcel drop count, and that implies the ZRP outflanks AODV in regard to this issue.

In [43] have meant to moderate the effect of organization traffic (FTP, E-Mail, and HTTPA discrete) on steering conventions (AODV, DSR and OSLR) in MANETs utilizing Optimized Network Engineering Tool (OPNET) form 14.5 organization test system. Creators wanted to follow the presentation measurements of throughput, postponement, and organization stacking to track down the most proficient and appropriate directing convention. The landscape region of the MANET network reenactment was chosen as 1500 m*1500 m for 100 hubs. Their outcomes demonstrate that the DSR convention has the biggest time delay contrasted with AODV and OLSR. In any case, throughput was respected the main basis in deciding in general execution when contrasted with detailed transmission capacity, since it is the genuine measure of information that hubs effectively get. OLSR has performed genuinely well in the reproduction concerning the general exhibition. At last, OLSR showed respectable productivity in managing high blockage and upgraded its scaling by effectively communicating parcels over profoundly dealt networks contrasted with DSR and AODV.

OPNET was used as a simulation software for ad hoc network routing protocol performance analysis, randomly placing 40 nodes as shown in Fig. 1 while the simulation parameters that were utilized. The MAC layer adopts Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) in the IEEE 802.11b media access control (MAC) protocol, and the transport layer adopts the UDP protocol [44–57].

The network is running for 10 days using OPNET to simulate the number of hops, route discovery time, and transceiver route on all and on nodes in the case of AODV analysis as mentioned below respectively.

This paper presents an assessment study for three significant impromptu directing conventions. Such review is expected to help network administrators and versatile application engineers in figuring out which specially appointed steering conventions calculation can help them in further developing the end-client experience. Following a speedy prologue to the standards of three run of the mill impromptu steering conventions, the three directing conventions are reenacted utilizing the organization reproduction stage OPNET. Under similar organization climate, changing the normal moving velocity of the hubs, counting the reenactment results, and contrasting the three steering conventions from the three presentation marks of bundle conveyance rate, normal start to finish delay, and directing above, It reasoned that the general execution of the on-request steering convention is superior to that of the proactive steering convention. The on-request directing convention is more reasonable for networks with medium-scale and higher versatility prerequisites, while the proactive steering convention is just appropriate for limited scope and low-portability necessities.

Funding: No funding was received for this work.

Availability of data and materials: No data sets were generated or analyzed in the present study.

Code availability: Present work was done using Optisystem tool.

Conflict of interest: The author declare that he has no conflict of interest.

S. R. Das, R. Casta, and S. A. Tx, "Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile, Ad hoc Networks”, The University of Texas at San Antonio.
Z. Liu, S. Shi, and X. Gu, "Research and Equilibrium Optimization of AODV Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Network”, in Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, Vol. 356 LNICST, pp. 227–235, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-69066-3-20.
Survey on Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR and DSDV in Manet”, Comput. Eng. Intell. Syst., May 2020, doi: 10.7176/CEIS/11-3-03.
F. Taha AL-Dhief, R. Chandren Muniyandi, and N. Sabri, "Performance Evaluation of LAR and OLSR Routing Protocols in Forest Fire Detection using Mobile Ad-Hoc Network”, Indian J. Sci. Technol., Vol. 9, No. 48, 2016, doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i48/99556.
U. Draz, T. Ali, S. Yasin, and A. Shaf, "Evaluation Based Analysis of Packet Delivery Ratio for AODV and DSR under UDP and TCP Environment”, 2018 Int. Conf. Comput. Math. Eng. Technol. Inven. Innov. Integr. Socioecon. Dev. iCoMET 2018- Proc., Vol. 2018,, No. 1, pp. 1–7, Jan., 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICOMET.2018.8346385.
S. Gupta, "Performance Comparison of Proactive Routing Protocols: OLSR”, Available Online at www.ijarcs.info International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science Performance Comparison of Proactive Routing Protocols: Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci., Vol. 6, No. November- December 2015, pp. 73–77, 2015.
T. H. Sureshbhai, M. Mahajan, and M. K. Rai, "An Investigational Analysis of DSDV, AODV and DSR Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc networks”, Proc. – 2nd Int. Conf. Intell. Circuits Syst. ICICS 2018, pp. 286–289, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICICS.2018.00064.
F. T. Al-Dhief, N. Sabri, M. S. Salim, S. Fouad, and S. A. Aljunid, "MANET Routing Protocols Evaluation: AODV, DSR and DSDV Perspective”, MATEC Web Conf., Vol. 150, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815006024.
A. A. Hashim, M. M. Farhan, and S. Alshybani, "Performance Evaluation of OLSR and AODV Routing Protocols over Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks”, 2019 1st Int. Conf. Intell. Comput. Eng. Towar. Intell. Solut. Dev. Empower. our Soc. ICOICE 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICOICE48418.2019.9035171.
R. Arnous, E.-S. M., and M. Saber, "A Proposed Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, Int. J. Comput. Appl., Vol. 178, No. 41, pp. 26–30, 2019, doi: 10.5120/ijca2019919305.
Yefa Mai, Yuxia Bai, and Nan Wang, "Performance Comparison and Evaluation of the Routing Protocols for MANETs Using NS3”, J. Electr. Eng., Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 187–195, 2017, doi: 10.17265/2328-2223/2017.04.003.
J. Mwanza, "Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)”, No. January, pp. 33–48, 2009.
B. N. Alhamadani, “Distortion Detection for Multi Class Barcode using Fine Localization with Image Recognize,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 2021.
A. M. MM and A. N. Mohammed, “Review on Chaotic Theory using DNA Encoding with Image Encryption,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2021.
A. N. Wazzan, N. Basil, M. Raad, and H. K. Mohammed, “PID Controller with Robotic Arm using Optimization Algorithm,” Int. J. Mech. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 3746–3751, 2022.
A. M. MM and A. N. Mohammed, “Enhancement of Similarity for Image Segmentation,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–60, 2021.
M. M. Abdul Mounim and A. N. Mohammed, “Review on Chaotic Theory using DNA Encoding with Image Encryption,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2021.
Y. R. Mohammed, N. Basil, O. Bayat, and A. Hamid, “A New Novel Optimization Techniques Implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB-SIMULINK A New Novel Optimization Techniques Implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB-SIMULINK,” no. May, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and A. Ma’arif, “NB Theory with Bargaining Problem: A New Theory,” Int. J. Robot. Control Syst. Vol 2, No 3 (2022).
B. N. Alhamadani, “Implement Image Encryption on Chaotic and Discrete Transform Domain Encryption,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2021.
M. R. Abdullah, A. A. Ibrahim, N. B. M. Wasel, and M. M. Abdulwahid, “Enhance of the steering control system for electric golf cart using matlab with FOPID,” 2020.
N. B. Alhamadani and M. M. Abdelwahid, “Implementation of microstrip patch antenna using MATLAB,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2021.
B. N. Alhamadani, “Execute Image Processing by using FPGA Acceleration,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2021.
R. H. A. Faris, A. A. Ibrahim, N B Mohamad wasel, M. M. Abdulwahid, and M. F. Mosleh, “Optimization and Enhancement of Charging Control System of Electric Vehicle Using MATLAB SIMULINK,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 1105, no. 1, p. 12004.
N. Basil, M. Raad, A. N. Wazzan, and H. M. Marhoon, “Face Recognition with Real-Time Framing Based on Multi Task Convolutional Neural Network: A Case Study,” Int. J. Mech. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 3170–3178, 2022.
N. B. M. Wasel and M. M. Abdulwahid, “Implementation method for Wireless Signal Transfer Using Wincc and Smart Server in SCADA system,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2020.
H. M. Marhoon, A. R. Ibrahim, and N. Basil, “Enhancement of Electro Hydraulic Position Servo Control System Utilising Ant Lion Optimiser,” Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2453–2461, 2021.
N. Basil and M. Moutaz, “Design and Implementation of Chirp Fiber Bragg Grating for Long Haul Transmission System using Opti-system,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.
A. R. Ibrahim, N. Basil, and M. I. Mahdi, “Implementation enhancement of AVR control system within optimization techniques,” Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl., vol. 12, no. 2, 2021.
A. M. MM and A. N. Mohammed, “Design and Implementation of 200 G Passive Optical Network,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2021.
M. M. Abdulwahid and N. B. M. Wasel, “Design and Implementation of Water Level Tank Model by using SCADA System,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2020.
M. M. Abdulwahid, “Design and Implementation of Motor Speed Control Model by using PLC,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and S. Kurnaz, “Implementation of the parallel robot using FOPID with fuzzy type-2 in use social spider optimization algorithm,” Appl. Nanosci., pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13204-021-02034-9.
M. M. Abdulwahid and N. B. M. Wasel, “Optimum AP Estimation Location for the communication of different mmWave bands,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–53, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and M. A. Abdala, “Design of WiMAX Network for Istanbul Universities With OPNET,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel, “Rider Optimization Algorithm implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB with FOPID,” 2020.
Y. R. Mohammed, N. Basil, O. Bayat, and A. Hamid, “A New Novel Optimization Techniques Implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB-SIMULINK,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 4515–4521, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and O. Bayat, “Improve DC Motor System using Fuzzy Logic Control by Particle Swarm Optimization in Use Scale Factors,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 152–160, 2019.
F. S. Raheem and N. Basil, “Automation intelligence photovoltaic system for power and voltage issues based on Black Hole Optimization algorithm with FOPID,” Meas. Sensors, p. 100640, 2022.
N. Basil, H. M. Marhoon, S. Gokulakrishnan, and D. Buddhi, “Jaya optimization algorithm implemented on a new novel design of 6-DOF AUV body: a case study,” Multimed. Tools Appl., pp. 1–26, 2022.
K. Taofiq et al., “A photonic integrated quantum secure communication system,” Nature Photon., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 850–856, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00873-0.
Elsayed, E. E., Yousif, B. B., & Alzalabani, M. M. (2018). Performance enhancement of the power penalty in DWDM FSO communication using DPPM and OOK modulation. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 50(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-018-1508-y
Yousif, B. B., Elsayed, E. E., & Alzalabani, M. M. (2019). Atmospheric turbulence mitigation using spatial mode multiplexing and modified pulse position modulation in hybrid RF/FSO orbital-angular-momentum multiplexed based on MIMO wireless communications system. Optics Communications, 436, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.12.034
Yousif, B. B., & Elsayed, E. E. (2019). Performance Enhancement of an Orbital-Angular-Momentum-Multiplexed Free-Space Optical Link under Atmospheric Turbulence Effects Using Spatial-Mode Multiplexing and Hybrid Diversity Based on Adaptive MIMO Equalization. IEEE Access, 7, 84401–84412. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924531
Elsayed, E. E., & Yousif, B. B. (2020). Performance enhancement of the average spectral efficiency using an aperture averaging and spatial-coherence diversity based on the modified-PPM modulation for MISO FSO links. Optics Communications, 463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.125463
Elsayed, E. E., & Yousif, B. B. (2020). Performance enhancement of M-ary pulse-position modulation for a wavelength division multiplexing free-space optical systems impaired by interchannel crosstalk, pointing error, and ASE noise. Optics Communications, 475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126219
Elsayed, E.E., Yousif, B.B. Performance evaluation and enhancement of the modified OOK based IM/DD techniques for hybrid fiber/FSO communication over WDM-PON systems. Opt Quant Electron 52, 385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-020-02497-0
Elsayed, E.E., Yousif, B.B. Performance enhancement of hybrid diversity for M-ary modified pulse-position modulation and spatial modulation of MIMO-FSO systems under the atmospheric turbulence effects with geometric spreading. Opt Quant Electron 52, 508 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-020-02612-1
Elsayed, E.E., Yousif, B.B. & Singh, M. Performance enhancement of hybrid fiber wavelength division multiplexing passive optical network FSO systems using M-ary DPPM techniques under interchannel crosstalk and atmospheric turbulence. Opt Quant Electron 54, 116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-03485-8
Elsayed, E. E., Alharbi, A. G., Singh, M., & Grover, A. (2022). Investigations on wavelength-division multiplexed fibre/FSO PON system employing DPPM scheme. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 54(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-03717-5
Elsayed, E.E., Kakati, D., Singh, M. et al. Design and analysis of a dense wavelength-division multiplexed integrated PON-FSO system using modified OOK/DPPM modulation schemes over atmospheric turbulences. Opt Quant Electron 54, 768 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-04142-4
H. M. Marhoon, H. A. Abdulnabi, and Y. Y. Al-Aboosi, “Designing and analysing of a modified rectangular microstrip patch antenna for microwave applications,” J. Commun., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 668–674, 2022.
A. Alsudani and H. M. Marhoon, “Performance Enhancement of Microstrip Patch Antenna Based on Frequency Selective Surface Substrate for 5G Communication Applications,” Evolution (N. Y)., vol. 4, p. 7.
H. M. MARHOON, “Design and optimisation of microstrip bowtie antenna based on graphene material for terahertz applications,” Politek. Derg., p. 1.
A. A. Sahrab and H. M. Marhoon, “Design and Fabrication of a Low-Cost System for Smart Home Applications,” J. Robot. Control, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 409–414, 2022.
H. M. Marhoon, N. Qasem, N. Basil, and A. R. Ibrahim, “Design and Simulation of a Compact Metal-Graphene Frequency Reconfigurable Microstrip Patch Antenna with FSS Superstrate for 5G Applications,” 2022.
M. Shafeay, S. KURNAZ, and H. M. Marhoon, “Performance Enhancement Of Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna For Indoor Applications,” Des. Eng., pp. 9867–9881, 2021.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Wireless Subscribers with AODV Routing Protocol Simulated on Mobile Ad-hoc Networks utilized Ad-hoc on-Demand Distance Vector

Status:

Version 1

Editorial Note

Abstract

Figures

1. introduction

2. Related Work

3. Manet Model

4. Results and Analysis

6. Conclusion

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1