Design of Cruise Control System Simulated with Jaya Optimization Algorithm using MATLAB

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2478894/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Design of Cruise Control System Simulated with Jaya Optimization Algorithm using MATLAB

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2478894/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

February 24, 2023. Research Square has withdrawn several other preprints by this author for substantial overlap with published works by other authors.

Editorial notes are used to provide important context regarding the topic of a preprint or to alert readers to potential issues concerning that preprint or a downstream publication associated with it. For more information on editorial notes, see our Editorial Policies.

In this article Proportional Integral Derivative Acceleration (PIDA) controller has been presented with Jaya Optimization Algorithm (JOA) to improve that perform for given Cruise Control System. For made greatest performance for the proposed model to make a comparison with the conventional P-I-D controller that could being achieve such the suitable stability for resolve the execution for overall Cruise Control System, additionally to create a step response of change compared with different optimized algorithms like PSO algorithm. The Jaya Optimization Algorithm (JOA) with P-I-D-A controller it is utilized for solve that efficiency work for Cruise System model for reduce overall error for controlled system. The controlled model had been achieved using MATLAB-Simulink.

Systems and Networking

Cruise Control System

PSO Algorithm

Jaya Optimization Algorithm

Proportional Integral Derivative Acceleration

MATLAB.

Cruise-Control-System it’s a system can be demonstrate for be made control for a Cruise to that Controlled System can employee for made a stabilization in given proposed system for avert instable alike via losing for receive a response or other, the proposed system is present a lot of overall error's on use cause for control utilize in given Cruise additionally, a lot of issues such as both settling and rising times it would to calculate as the proofing for the performed implementation[1–4], the utilize for proposed Jaya-Optimization-Algorithm (JOA) can be defined as an extraction technique to made tune within conventional-Proportional-Integral-Derivative via design given transfer-functions for simulated Control-System, performed of given proposed cruise system. Additionally, the transfer functions were introduced to designing a PIDA controller to utilize the P-I-D by inserting the MATLAB library it involves 4 parameters coefficients known as respectively, P-I-D, A. the cruise control it an cruise system can uses in three main transfer functions to work. The cruise-control-system can be built by using three types of transfer functions the first one amplifier for the power to be guarantee the signal will arrive to the system without losses, additionally the second one it will enhance the amplifier via utilize the enhanced transfer function which is called stable or stabilizer and this piece of control can achieve a good performance due to it development additionally the last one will generate the given control power to the output, the numerical signal that is shown in the feedback of control will make the signal more pure to the output as shown in Fig. 1[5–7].

In (2019) Yang et al. [1] had been utilize given Cruise-Control-System in enhance step response for given Cruise-Control-System (CCS) to get more efficiency in the Angular velocity, Overshooting, Rising Time, Settling Time using the conventional PID Controller to solve the Stabilization for Cruise Control System (CCS) utilize particle swarming optimized.

In (2020) A. Ibrahim et al. [2] had been evaluated Cruise-Control-System in improve Stabilization for Cruise-Control-System (CCS) using Fuzzy Control to solve that Overshooting for Cruise Control System Model.

In (2020) Yong et al. [3] had been enhanced Cruise-Control-System in simulate angular velocity of Cruise-Control-System using conventional PD Controller and Fuzzy Logic Controller for solve Stabilization for Cruise-Control-System (CCS) Model.

In (2020) Xiang et al. [4] had been illustrated Cruise-Control-System in execute angular velocity for Cruise-Control-System using PI Controller and genetic algorithm for solve stabilization for Cruise-Control-System (CCS) Model.

In (2021) I. Ahmed et al. [5] had been used Cruise-Control-System in execute angular velocity for Cruise-Control-System using PID Controller and bat algorithm for solve Stabilization for Cruise-Control-System (CCS) Model.

performed design for given cruise-control-system could be simulated by using Simulink of MATLAB being utilize the transfer functions depend on the conventional design for cruise-control-system that obtained by the researchers that previously worked can refer in [1]. Additionally, the overall modeling for separated transfer-functions could being showed such the following equations respectively:

$$\frac{1}{s+0.1}$$

$$\frac{1}{s+4}$$

$$\frac{1}{s+10}$$

Additionally, the random signal parameters in feedback their values as mean, variance, seed, sample time presented as the following values 0, 36, 0, 0.1[8].

The overall cruise control system presented and described as a block diagram can shown below in the following figures:

While regulating blend progress issues, this piece of appraisal that conversations about an unparalleled Jaya Optimization assessment strategy. Rao carried out the enormous improvement of the Jaya calculation beginning around 2016 [9]. A recuperation of standard considering everybody shouldn't stress over any cutoff points to accomplish its objective. In each enhancement, this assessment rapidly propels toward the best response. The structure for fundamental algorithm improvement assessment that display at mentioned figure below. In light of everything, changing bosses are utilized to change tireless information into non-driving forward parts. The ideal synchronous problems in that lines for that square when cutoff could make that steady factor's assessment cycle to vindicate the restrictions [10–12]. In addition, prior to changing related solid factors, specialists genuinely take a gander at the best attributes in both progressing forward and whole numbers endpoints to guarantee that necessities are not removed happening as expected to changing, despite the way that this coordinated effort increments assessment time [13–17]. Along these lines, the principal Jaya framework has been restored to deal with a course of action of plan factors in progress issues while remaining mindful of major consistence. There are no algorithmic endpoints in this system, and it joins rapidly to the best everything thought about approach. The introduction of endpoints is the key stage in this strategy. All factors huge frameworks are made carelessly in a particularly solid spot. Additionally, synchronous breaking point values stay in dependable spot, when excellent and whole number variable's consistent region is changed into an electronic space including the end furthest ranges of a related with reason in matching two moderate advanced and whole number parts values [18–19].

In the going with table that depict Jaya upgraded limits with the better characteristics for people, number of variables, breaking point of ages and accentuations on Cruise Control System.

Table 1

Jaya Optimized Factors.
Jaya Optimization Algorithm Parameters	Values
Populations	10
Variables Number	10
Iterations Number	5

The comparisons had created and derived to given cruise-control-system for experiment overall quality and efficient for both P-I-D and P-I-D-A on the proposed cruise control system by comparison via that coefficient for enhance efficient for analysis, the derived comparison among conventional P-I-D controller with Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm [1] and P-I-D-A the proposed Jaya Optimization Algorithm in that given system, additionally four parameters had been used as shown in Table 2,3. The last parameters that called acceleration is inserted as enhanced element for conventional P-I-D to give the suitable stabilization and 0% for the maximum overshooting, 1.175 for rise time, 3.122 for peak time, 25.23 for settle time:

Table 2

Comparisons in PID and PIDA Parameters with cruise-control-system.
Parameters	PSO-PID [1]	JOA-PIDA [Proposed]
${K}_{P}$	24.0125	25.5043
${K}_{I}$	3.5670	2.5001
${K}_{D}$	1.0567	0.6782
${K}_{A}$	-	0.3

Table 3

Comparisons for overall response to cruise-control-system.
Parameters	PSO-PID [1]	JOA-PIDA [Proposed]
$\%Mp$	32.4	0
$Tr$	2.9	1.175
$Tp$	7.063	3.122
$Ts$	32.41	25.23

In this article, the Jaya Optimization Algorithm (JOA) has been utilized to developing cruise-control-system. Additionally, P-I-D-A controller has been used, when the ecoefficiency assessment for P-I-D based in valuable which received by JOA. Analysis acquired on the proposed system shown the development on overall step response via cruise-control-system, when the coefficients reached to Max of overshoot, rise duration, up peaking duration and settle time are 0%, 1.175, 3.122, 25.23 second. Such results had presented and described a greatest development when compare with same parameter values accomplished for different method.

Funding: No funding was received for this work.

Availability of data and materials: No data sets were generated or analyzed in the present study.

Code availability: Present work was done using Optisystem tool.

Conflict of interest: The author declare that he has no conflict of interest.

Yang, A. N. A. E. Gaber, R. Hamdy, and A. S. Abdel-Khalik, “Position Control of Arm Manipulator Within Fractional Order PID Utilizing Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm,” in 2019 IEEE Conference on Power Electronics and Renewable Energy (CPERE), 2019, pp. 135–139.
A.Ibrahim, A. N. Amudhan, A. T. Mathew, and A. P. Sudheer, “Trajectory Tracking of Omni Directional robot using Fuzzy Controller with Visual Feedback,” in 2020 International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), 2020, pp. 1–6.
Yong, S. Kuntanapreeda, and N. Chaiyaratana, “MIMO controller design for a parallel manipulator system: A practitioner’s approach,” in 2002 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2002. IEEE ICIT’02., 2002, vol. 2, pp. 673–677.
Xiang, H.-H. Chang, and C.-T. Lin, “Fuzzy control of a six-degree motion platform with stability analysis,” in IEEE SMC’99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No. 99CH37028), 1999, vol. 1, pp. 325–330.
I. Ahmed, V. Osuna, and D. Oliva, Evolutionary computation techniques: a comparative perspective, vol. 686. Springer, 2017.
A. A. El-Fergany and M. A. El-Hameed, “Efficient frequency controllers for autonomous two-area hybrid microgrid system using social-spider optimiser,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 637–648, 2017.
Y. R. Mohammed, N. Basil, O. Bayat, and A. Hamid, “A New Novel Optimization Techniques Implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB-SIMULINK,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 4515–4521, 2020.
N. B. Maan Moutaz, “Enhance of the Steering Control System for Electric Golf Cart Using MATLAB with FOPID,” Int. J. Adv. Trends Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 4575–4579, 2020.
Mohamadwasel, N. B. "Rider Optimization Algorithm implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB with FOPID." IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 928. No. 3. IOP Publishing, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and M. A. Abdala, “Design of WiMAX Network for Istanbul Universities With OPNET,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and O. Bayat, “Improve DC Motor System using Fuzzy Logic Control by Particle Swarm Optimization in Use Scale Factors,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 152–160, 2019.
M. M. Abdulwahid and N. B. M. Wasel, “Optimum AP Estimation Location for the communication of different mmWave bands,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–53, 2020.
B. N. Alhamadani, “Distortion Detection for Multi Class Barcode using Fine Localization with Image Recognize,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 2021.
A. M. MM and A. N. Mohammed, “Review on Chaotic Theory using DNA Encoding with Image Encryption,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2021.
A. N. Wazzan, N. Basil, M. Raad, and H. K. Mohammed, “PID Controller with Robotic Arm using Optimization Algorithm,” Int. J. Mech. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 3746–3751, 2022.
A. M. MM and A. N. Mohammed, “Enhancement of Similarity for Image Segmentation,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–60, 2021.
M. M. Abdul Mounim and A. N. Mohammed, “Review on Chaotic Theory using DNA Encoding with Image Encryption,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2021.
Y. R. Mohammed, N. Basil, O. Bayat, and A. Hamid, “A New Novel Optimization Techniques Implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB-SIMULINK A New Novel Optimization Techniques Implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB-SIMULINK,” no. May, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and A. Ma’arif, “NB Theory with Bargaining Problem: A New Theory,” Int. J. Robot. Control Syst. Vol 2, No 3 (2022).
B. N. Alhamadani, “Implement Image Encryption on Chaotic and Discrete Transform Domain Encryption,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2021.
M. R. Abdullah, A. A. Ibrahim, N. B. M. Wasel, and M. M. Abdulwahid, “Enhance of the steering control system for electric golf cart using matlab with FOPID,” 2020.
N. B. Alhamadani and M. M. Abdelwahid, “Implementation of microstrip patch antenna using MATLAB,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2021.
B. N. Alhamadani, “Execute Image Processing by using FPGA Acceleration,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2021.
R. H. A. Faris, A. A. Ibrahim, N B Mohamad wasel, M. M. Abdulwahid, and M. F. Mosleh, “Optimization and Enhancement of Charging Control System of Electric Vehicle Using MATLAB SIMULINK,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 1105, no. 1, p. 12004.
N. Basil, M. Raad, A. N. Wazzan, and H. M. Marhoon, “Face Recognition with Real-Time Framing Based on Multi Task Convolutional Neural Network: A Case Study,” Int. J. Mech. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 3170–3178, 2022.
N. B. M. Wasel and M. M. Abdulwahid, “Implementation method for Wireless Signal Transfer Using Wincc and Smart Server in SCADA system,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2020.
H. M. Marhoon, A. R. Ibrahim, and N. Basil, “Enhancement of Electro Hydraulic Position Servo Control System Utilising Ant Lion Optimiser,” Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2453–2461, 2021.
N. Basil and M. Moutaz, “Design and Implementation of Chirp Fiber Bragg Grating for Long Haul Transmission System using Opti-system,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.
A. R. Ibrahim, N. Basil, and M. I. Mahdi, “Implementation enhancement of AVR control system within optimization techniques,” Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl., vol. 12, no. 2, 2021.
A. M. MM and A. N. Mohammed, “Design and Implementation of 200 G Passive Optical Network,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2021.
M. M. Abdulwahid and N. B. M. Wasel, “Design and Implementation of Water Level Tank Model by using SCADA System,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2020.
M. M. Abdulwahid, “Design and Implementation of Motor Speed Control Model by using PLC,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and S. Kurnaz, “Implementation of the parallel robot using FOPID with fuzzy type-2 in use social spider optimization algorithm,” Appl. Nanosci., pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13204-021-02034-9.
M. M. Abdulwahid and N. B. M. Wasel, “Optimum AP Estimation Location for the communication of different mmWave bands,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–53, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and M. A. Abdala, “Design of WiMAX Network for Istanbul Universities With OPNET,” Inform. J. Appl. Mach. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. Commun. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel, “Rider Optimization Algorithm implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB with FOPID,” 2020.
Y. R. Mohammed, N. Basil, O. Bayat, and A. Hamid, “A New Novel Optimization Techniques Implemented on the AVR Control System using MATLAB-SIMULINK,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 4515–4521, 2020.
N. B. Mohamadwasel and O. Bayat, “Improve DC Motor System using Fuzzy Logic Control by Particle Swarm Optimization in Use Scale Factors,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 152–160, 2019.
F. S. Raheem and N. Basil, “Automation intelligence photovoltaic system for power and voltage issues based on Black Hole Optimization algorithm with FOPID,” Meas. Sensors, p. 100640, 2022.
N. Basil, H. M. Marhoon, S. Gokulakrishnan, and D. Buddhi, “Jaya optimization algorithm implemented on a new novel design of 6-DOF AUV body: a case study,” Multimed. Tools Appl., pp. 1–26, 2022.
K. Taofiq et al., “A photonic integrated quantum secure communication system,” Nature Photon., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 850–856, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00873-0.
Elsayed, E. E., Yousif, B. B., & Alzalabani, M. M. (2018). Performance enhancement of the power penalty in DWDM FSO communication using DPPM and OOK modulation. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 50(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-018-1508-y
Yousif, B. B., Elsayed, E. E., & Alzalabani, M. M. (2019). Atmospheric turbulence mitigation using spatial mode multiplexing and modified pulse position modulation in hybrid RF/FSO orbital-angular-momentum multiplexed based on MIMO wireless communications system. Optics Communications, 436, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.12.034
Yousif, B. B., & Elsayed, E. E. (2019). Performance Enhancement of an Orbital-Angular-Momentum-Multiplexed Free-Space Optical Link under Atmospheric Turbulence Effects Using Spatial-Mode Multiplexing and Hybrid Diversity Based on Adaptive MIMO Equalization. IEEE Access, 7, 84401–84412. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924531
Elsayed, E. E., & Yousif, B. B. (2020). Performance enhancement of the average spectral efficiency using an aperture averaging and spatial-coherence diversity based on the modified-PPM modulation for MISO FSO links. Optics Communications, 463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.125463
Elsayed, E. E., & Yousif, B. B. (2020). Performance enhancement of M-ary pulse-position modulation for a wavelength division multiplexing free-space optical systems impaired by interchannel crosstalk, pointing error, and ASE noise. Optics Communications, 475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126219
Elsayed, E.E., Yousif, B.B. Performance evaluation and enhancement of the modified OOK based IM/DD techniques for hybrid fiber/FSO communication over WDM-PON systems. Opt Quant Electron 52, 385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-020-02497-0
Elsayed, E.E., Yousif, B.B. Performance enhancement of hybrid diversity for M-ary modified pulse-position modulation and spatial modulation of MIMO-FSO systems under the atmospheric turbulence effects with geometric spreading. Opt Quant Electron 52, 508 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-020-02612-1
Elsayed, E.E., Yousif, B.B. & Singh, M. Performance enhancement of hybrid fiber wavelength division multiplexing passive optical network FSO systems using M-ary DPPM techniques under interchannel crosstalk and atmospheric turbulence. Opt Quant Electron 54, 116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-03485-8
Elsayed, E. E., Alharbi, A. G., Singh, M., & Grover, A. (2022). Investigations on wavelength-division multiplexed fibre/FSO PON system employing DPPM scheme. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 54(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-03717-5
Elsayed, E.E., Kakati, D., Singh, M. et al. Design and analysis of a dense wavelength-division multiplexed integrated PON-FSO system using modified OOK/DPPM modulation schemes over atmospheric turbulences. Opt Quant Electron 54, 768 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-04142-4
H. M. Marhoon, H. A. Abdulnabi, and Y. Y. Al-Aboosi, “Designing and analysing of a modified rectangular microstrip patch antenna for microwave applications,” J. Commun., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 668–674, 2022.
A. Alsudani and H. M. Marhoon, “Performance Enhancement of Microstrip Patch Antenna Based on Frequency Selective Surface Substrate for 5G Communication Applications,” Evolution (N. Y)., vol. 4, p. 7.
H. M. MARHOON, “Design and optimisation of microstrip bowtie antenna based on graphene material for terahertz applications,” Politek. Derg., p. 1.
A. A. Sahrab and H. M. Marhoon, “Design and Fabrication of a Low-Cost System for Smart Home Applications,” J. Robot. Control, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 409–414, 2022.
H. M. Marhoon, N. Qasem, N. Basil, and A. R. Ibrahim, “Design and Simulation of a Compact Metal-Graphene Frequency Reconfigurable Microstrip Patch Antenna with FSS Superstrate for 5G Applications,” 2022.
M. Shafeay, S. KURNAZ, and H. M. Marhoon, “Performance Enhancement Of Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna For Indoor Applications,” Des. Eng., pp. 9867–9881, 2021.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Design of Cruise Control System Simulated with Jaya Optimization Algorithm using MATLAB

Status:

Version 1

Editorial Note

Abstract

Figures

1. introduction

2. Related Work

3. The Mathematical Model For The Cruise Control System

4. Jaya Optimization Algorithm Method

5. Results and Analysis

5. Conclusions

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1

Parameters	PSO-PID [1]	JOA-PIDA [Proposed]
\({K}_{P}\)	24.0125	25.5043
\({K}_{I}\)	3.5670	2.5001
\({K}_{D}\)	1.0567	0.6782
\({K}_{A}\)	-	0.3