Materials and methods
Chemicals: Sodium alginate (SA, Mw: 4.2× 105, M/G = 1.52), Carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (CM-cellulose; CMC-Na, Viscosity: 1000–1400 mpa s, SD = 1.2), Glycerol (medical grade) and acetic acid, (CH₃COOH, glacial, ReagentPlus®, ≥ 99%) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA). Mineral water (Ca: 205.867 mg/L, Mg: 124.588 mg/L, K: 26.005 mg/L, Fe: 0.008 mg/L, Na: 138.181 mg/mL, S: 176.11 mg/L, F: 0.64 mg/L, Si: 48.21 mg/L, Cl: 21.94 mg/L, CO3− 2: 1433.5 mg/L) was obtained from local company in Türkiye. Ultrapure water was prepared by a Milli-Q50 SP Reagent Water System (Millipore Corporation, MA, USA) for the preparation of samples. Other reagents were of analytical grade.
Preparation of J. communis L. plant and extract: J. communis L. plant leaves and berries were collected above the village of İmaret, near Sivas, Türkiye, N39° 41' 54.3444'' E37°1' 5.6712'' at 1415 masl in 2022. The collected juniper leaves and berries were cleaned and spread out in a layer approximately 2 cm deep in a well-aerated shady place to dry for a month at RT before extracted. The extraction was carried out using soxhlet extractors in accordance with TAPPI standard (TAPPI, 1988). The subsamples for the extraction consisted of 50 g air-dried leaves and berries, which were grounded into fine powder immediately prior to the distillation. (The ratio of the biomass to solvent was 1:10) Grounded plant material was transferred to an extraction thimble which was placed in a Soxhlet apparatus with a connected reflux condenser. Appropriate solvent (ethanol and ethyl acetate) was then added to the flask and used as a solvent. After 6 h of extraction and complete exhaustion of the J. communis herbal material, the obtained extracts were evaporated to dryness under vacuum at 40°C and stored in sterile glass bottles at 4°C until further experiments.
Preparation and pharmaceutical compositions of sodium alginate/sodium-carboxymethylcellulose (SA/CMC) hydrogel
Hydrogel solution was prepared in the following manner: A homogeneous solution of mineral water was obtained by adding 0.5% v/v of CH₃COOH in 100 mL at RT under vigorous stirring (pH ⁓ 4.8-5). Next, 1.5%w/v CMC-Na and 1.5% w/v SA power were slowly added and stirred at 37°C until complete solubilization. To complete the carboxymethylation reaction, the reagents were mixed together by slowly adding the 6.5% v/v glycerol to form a uniform sticky solution at 37°C for 6 h in a water bath. To prepare J. communis plant leaves extract (designated as JL/SA-CMC) and berries extract (designated as JB/SA-CMC)-loaded SA/CMC hydrogels, leaf and berry extract (5%w/v) was added to the SA/CMC mixture respectively to obtain final composition of SA/CMC hydrogel. One set of 10 cc syringes was filled with SA/CMC hydrogel. Another sets of 10 cc syringes were filled with JL/SA-CMC and JB/SA-CMC hydrogels. The syringes were capped with a male Luer cap. The gel filled syringes were then placed into a Tyvek pouch and sterilized in an autoclave at 110°C for 30 minutes. The hydrogels were allowed to cool at room temperature (22°C ± 2°C) under an aseptic environment to achieve the desired hydrogels.
Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis
The chemical structure of SA/CMC, JL/SA-CMC and JB/SA-CMC hydrogels was characterized by infrared (IR) spectroscopy. A sample of the 20 mg hydrogels were dried at 45°C for a period of 12 hours in order to evaluate the functional groups of the hydrogels. The spectra were measured on a Fourier transform (FT-IR) spectrophotometer (Bruker Alpha II spectrometer, Germany) in the wavelength range of 400–4000 cm− 1 with a resolution of 4 cm− 1.
Antimicrobial activity
The antimicrobial activity of the hydrogels was evaluated quantitatively by using the broth micro-dilution method according to the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI, 2020). In the antimicrobial activity study was used 3 indicator microorganisms including Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 292123, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Proteus vulgaris ATCC 7829. The stock solution of hydrogels was prepared by dissolving 1 g of hydrogel in 2.5 ml sterile dH2O and sterilized by autoclaving at 110°C for 5 min. Afterwards, by taking a sample from here, dilutions were prepared in various concentrations in the range of 300 mg/ml to 25 mg/ml in Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB). The study was briefly carried out as follows; after 18 ± 2 h incubation at 37°C in MHB medium, the densities of indicator microorganisms were adjusted McFarland standard No: 0.5 using the same medium. Firstly, dilution series of samples (100 µl) were transferred to microtiter plates and then adjusted indicator microorganism (100 µl) was added to the wells. Piperacillin/Tazobactam (8:1), indicator microorganism suspension and sterile MHB was used as the reference antimicrobial agents, negative control, and positive control, respectively. All assays were performed in triplicate. After the all-microtiter plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, the absorbance was recorded at 600 nm on microplate reader (Spectro Star Nano, Germany) and the lowest concentration that inhibits the indicator microorganism growth was determined as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value. Also, to evaluate the antibactericidal effect of sub-MIC concentrations, the inhibition ratio (%) was calculated by Eq. 1 (Kamoun et al. 2015):
$${I}{R}\left({\%}\right)=100-\left[\frac{{OD}_{GS}-{OD}_{B1}}{{OD}_{NC}-{OD}_{PC}}\right]*100$$
1
Where; the ODB1 is the absorbance of medium containing only dilutions of the hydrogel samples, ODGS is the absorbance of the bacterial solutions after incubating growth medium, ODNC is the absorbance of the negative control and ODPC is the absorbance of the positive control.
In vitro cytotoxicity assays
Mouse fibroblast L929 cells were used for the cytotoxicity assays of the hydrogels. Cells were grown in medium composed of DMEM (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), 10% FBS (Capricorn, USA), 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (100 IU/mL). For the study, 1 ml of each of the hydrogels (SA/CMC, JL/SA-CMC and JB/SA-CMC) were diluted in 5 ml DMEM vortexed for 5 minutes and incubated for 24 h. The cells were seeded on 96-well plates (100 µL/well), then the cells were exposed to dilutions of the hydrogels, from each of the hydrogel dilutions different volumes were extracted in order to achieve in the cell growth medium different concentrations of the hydrogels (100 µg. mL− 1, 50 µg. mL− 1, 25 µg. mL− 1, 12. 5 µg. mL− 1, 6.25 µg. mL− 1, 3.125 µg. mL− 1, 1.56 µg. mL− 1, and 0.78 µg. mL− 1), then were incubated at 5% CO2 atmosphere and 37°C for 2 days. Cytotoxicity effects on L929 cell lines were determined by XTT assay 24 h after exposure to the different concentrations. Cell viability was measured in a microplate reader in the reference range of 475 nm. It was determined according to the observed orange color intensity at the end of the incubation period. All absorbance’s were compared with control samples (cells without any test concentration) representing 100% cell viability. The data were presented graphically and by regression was estimated the representative IC50 for each of the hydrogels. All processes were accomplished in accordance with the ISO 10993-5 protocol.
Primary skin irritation test
The evaluation of skin irritation is one of the major index of dermal safety in Pharmaceutical/cosmetic applications. Skin compatibility of the hydrogels was conducted using the primary skin irritation test and can be considered as the first clinical step of the safety evolution. The study was carried out after review and approval of the research project by the Research Ethics Committee of Sivas Cumhuriyet University with approval number: 65202830-050.04.04-681. The dermal safety was conducted according to ISO-10993-10:2021 (Tests for irritation and skin sensitization) taking in account the procedure followed in previous works in the literature (Horn-Huey et al. 2013; Jibry et al. 2004). Briefly, six male Albino mice weighing approximately 20 g (5 weeks old) were obtained from animal hospital of Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Türkiye. Mice were caged in a laboratory with standardized environmental conditions (20°C ± 2, 35–45% Relative humidity) and a constant day/night cycle. They were fed with a standard rat chow diet and water ad libitum in specific pathogen free laboratory for one week. 24-hr prior to the test, the hair from the back of each mouse were clean- shaved on both sides of the dorsal skin to expose adequately large test areas. The dorsal skin of mice was divided in four test sites (approximately 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm) for application and observation. The hairless dorsal skin was wiped with EtOH. Untreated control side was marked out on their upper backs. All mice were treated topically with their respective formulations once daily on day 1 of the 3-day study, with an application time of 24h, 48h, and 72h. 50 mg of SA/CMC, JL/SA-CMC and JB/SA-CMC hydrogel was applied onto the test area on the lower/upper back and carefully rubbed in. At the end of the each application time, the treated area was gently wiped with water-soaked gauze to remove any residual vehicle from the skin surface.
For the dermatologically correct assessment of differences in skin surfaces, each of the mice was kept in separate cages for the duration of the experiment. Moreover, all the visual assessments and the clinical evaluation was performed by a veterinary surgeon (not the investigator who applied the preparations). The skin irritation of hydrogel samples, such as erythema or edema, was evaluated by the scoring system of Draize dermal irritation test, including (0): no erythema or no edema, (1): very slight erythema or edema, (2) well-defined erythema or edema, (3): moderate erythema or edema, (4): severe erythema or edema.
Tissue adhesion of the hydrogels
Strong tissue adhesion is essential for in situ hydrogels in tissue bonding to resist mechanical forces during dynamic movements. In addition, adhesive hydrogels must be able to readily adhere to a variety of fresh living tissues, including pulmonary, gastric, spleen, cutis, muscle, adipocyte, and femur (Xiaoxuan et al. 2020). To demonstrate this in an experimental study, 100 mg of the freshly prepared hydrogel was applied to one side of the tissue of the mice. Then, the surface was lightly pressed manually, the pressing surface was covered with latex gloves in order not to interfere with the interaction of the hydrogels and the tissue. In order to vividly display the adhesive behavior of prepared hydrogels with various biological tissues was explored. The composition of the matrix hydrogel and the extracted combinations with matrix hydrogel were evaluated on each type of tissue.
Data analysis
All experimental results were analyzed using Origin Pro 20219.8.0.200 (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, USA), Image Tool software and Sigma Plot for Windows Version 12.3 (Sigma Plot Software, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviations (SD) of the indicated number of experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05) for independent variables. Erythema/edema scores were evaluated by the Draize dermal irritation scoring system (DDISS). For all tests, a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.