Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18.
Arbaugh, J. B. B. (2014). System, scholar or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12048
Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2013). Investigating The Effectiveness Of Predict-Observe- Explain Strategy On Teaching Photo Electricity Topic. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 548–564.
Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2082–2098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010
Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175–191.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
Bhadani, K., Stöhr, C., Hulthén, E., Quist, J., Bengtsson, M., Evertsson, M., & Malmqvist, J. (2017). Student Perspectives on Video-Based Learning in CDIO-Based Project Courses. The 13th International CDIO Conference Proceedings, Calgary, Canada, 689–704. https://research.chalmers.se/publication/250948
Bilen, K., Özel, M., & Köse, S. (2016). Using action research based on the predict-observe-explain strategy for teaching enzymes. Turkish Journal of EducationTURJE, 5(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.70576
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Bower, K. M. (2003). When to use Fisher’s Exact Test. American Society for Quality, 2(4), 35–37. http://www.keithbower.com/Miscellaneous/Fisher’s Exact Test.htm
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brenner, D. G., Matlen, B. J., Timms, M. J., Gochyyev, P., Grillo-Hill, A., Luttgen, K., & Varfolomeeva, M. (2017). Modeling student learning behavior patterns in an online science inquiry environment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 405–425.
Chen, P. S., Lambert, A., & Guidry, K. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Cheng, K.-H. H., & Tsai, C.-C. C. (2011). An investigation of Taiwan University students’ perceptions of online academic help seeking, and their web-based learning self-efficacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 150–157.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman-Young, S., Spanjer, D. M., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1099–1105). National Association of School Psychologists.
Christenson, S. L., Wylie, C., & Reschly, A. L. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Clark, R., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36(1), 6–11.
Cochran, W. G. (1952). The χ2 Test of Goodness of Fit. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729380
D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., & Haertel, G. (2014). Simulations for STEM Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. www.sri.com/education
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The Support of Autonomy and the Control of Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0023498424&partnerID=40&md5=367f97e21ea5c6a344d00ee97efdcf15
Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: What does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800104
Ding, L., Kim, C. M., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers and Education, 115, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.016
Dixson, M. D., Greenwell, M. R., Rogers-Stacy, C., Weister, T., & Lauer, S. (2017). Nonverbal immediacy behaviors and online student engagement: bringing past instructional research into the present virtual classroom. Communication Education, 66(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1209222
Donnelly, D. F., Linn, M. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2014). Impacts and Characteristics of Computer-Based Science Inquiry Learning Environments for Precollege Students. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 572–608. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314546954
Dyer, T., Aroz, J., & Larson, E. (2018). Proximity in the Online Classroom:Engagement, Relationships, and Personalization. Journal of Instructional Research, 7(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2018.10
Fisher, K. (2010). Online student engagement: CCSSE finds enrollment status and online experience are key. Community College Week, 22(20), 7–9.
Franke, T. M., Ho, T., & Christie, C. A. (2012). The Chi-Square Test: Often Used and More Often Misinterpreted. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011426594
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. Te, Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
Fryer, L. K., & Bovee, H. N. (2016). Supporting students’ motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning : Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903
Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2013). Primary students’ scientific reasoning and discourse during cooperative inquiry-based science activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.01.001
Goggins, S., & Xing, W. (2016). Building models explaining student participation behavior in asynchronous online discussion. Computers and Education, 94, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.002
Gromada, A., & Shewbridge, C. (2016). Student Learning Time (No. 127). August, 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1787/5JM409KQQKJH-EN
Harris, L. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03216875
Hong, J. C., Tsai, C. R., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Chu, K. C., Gu, J., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2019). The effect of the “Prediction-observation-quiz-explanation” inquiry-based e-learning model on flow experience in green energy learning. Computers and Education, 133, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.009
Karamustafaoğlu, S., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2015). Understanding Electrochemistry Concepts using the Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 923–936.
Kehrwald, B. A., & Bentley, B. P. (2020). Understanding and Identifying Cognitive Load in Networked Learning. In Mobility, Data and Learner Agency in Networked Learning, Research in Networked Learning (pp. 103–115). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36911-8_7
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Clark, R., Kirchener, Paul, Sweller, John, & Clark, Richard. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(December 2012), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102
Kline, R. B. (2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). In Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14136-000
Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Hennis, T., de Vries, P., Hatala, M., Dawson, S., Siemens, G., & Gašević, D. (2019). Examining communities of inquiry in Massive Open Online Courses: The role of study strategies. Internet and Higher Education, 40(2019), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.001
Lazonder, A. W. (2014). Inquiry Learning. In M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 453–464). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_36
Lee, H. S., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20304
Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
Lei, M., Clemente, I. M., & Hu, Y. (2019). Student in the shell: The robotic body and student engagement. Computers and Education, 130(November 2018), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.008
Li, H., Gobert, J., & Dickler, R. (2019). Testing the robustness of inquiry practices once scaffolding is removed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11528 LNCS, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_25
Luo, T. (2015). Instructional guidance in microblogging-supported learning: insights from a multiple case study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9097-2
MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C. (2000). Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I × J chi-square tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970871
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
Mason, R. B. (2011). Student Engagement with, and Participation in, an e-Forum. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 258–268.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187
McHugh, M. L. (2012). The Chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018
Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student Engagement in Online Learning: What Works and Why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20018
Miles, D., Mensinga, J., & Zuchowski, I. (2018). Harnessing opportunities to enhance the distance learning experience of MSW students: an appreciative inquiry process. Social Work Education, 37(6), 705–717.
MolecularWorkbench. (n.d.). Next-Generation Molecular Workbench. Visual, Interactive Simulations for Teaching & Learning Science (Vol. 2014). The Concord Consortium. http://mw.concord.org/nextgen/
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.001
Mount, N. J., Chambers, C., Weaver, D., & Priestnall, G. (2009). Learner immersion engagement in the 3D virtual world: principles emerging from the DELVE project. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 8(3), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2009.08030040
O’Brien, J. (1993). Action research through stimulated recall. Research in Science Education, 23(1), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357063
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
Pallant, A., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Reasoning with Atomic-Scale Molecular Dynamic Models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019638.01800.d0
Parker, A. (2003). Identifying predictors of academic persistence in distance education. United States Distance Learning Assocication Journal, 17(1), 55–62.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
PhET. (n.d.). States of Matter: Basics. In PhET interactive simulations. University of Colorado. https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/states-of-matter-basics
Podolefsky, N. S., Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2009). Student choices when learning with computer simulations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1179(2009), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266722
Raspopovic, M., Jankulovic, A., Runic, J., & Lucic, V. (2014). Success factors for e-Learning in a developing country: A case study of Serbia. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1586
Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H.-R. (2019). A Teacher-Focused Intervention to Enhance Students’ Classroom Engagement. In Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions (pp. 87–102). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813413-9.00007-3
Rojas, D., Kapralos, B., & Dubrowski, A. (2016). The role of game elements in online learning within health professions education. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 220, pp. 329–334). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-625-5-329
Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2011). Quality of Learners’ Time and Learning Performance Beyond Quantitative Time-on-Task. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(5), 125–137.
Romero, M., & Lambropoulos, N. (2011). Internal and External Regulation to Support Knowledge Construction and Convergence in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 9(1), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v9i23.1439
Samsudin, A., & Efendi, R. (2019). Teaching Solar System Topic through Predict-Observe-Explain-Apply (POEA) Strategy: A Path to Students’ Conceptual Change. Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.3658
Schmidt, J. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Beymer, P. N. (2018). A person‐in‐context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 19–43.
Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Gillet, D., Pelliccione, L., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using educational data from teaching and learning to inform teachers’ reflective educational design in inquiry-based STEM education. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.014
Sharpe, D. (2015). Chi-Square Test is Statistically Significant: Now What? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation Practical Assessment, 20. https://doi.org/10.7275/tbfa-x148
Sharples, M., Scanlon, E., Ainsworth, S., Anastopoulou, S., Collins, T., Crook, C., Jones, A., Kerawalla, L., Littleton, K., Mulholland, P., & O’malley, C. (2015). Personal Inquiry: Orchestrating Science Investigations Within and Beyond the Classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.944642
Sheeran, N., & Cummings, D. J. (2018). An examination of the relationship between Facebook groups attached to university courses and student engagement. Higher Education, 76, 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0253-2
Shen, W. (2014). Using video recording system to improve student performance in high-fidelity simulation. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 269 LNEE, 1753–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7618-0_203
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. ACER Press.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching Courses Online : A Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135.
Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., & Winne, P. H. (2020). Analytics for student engagement. In Intelligent Systems Reference Library (Vol. 158, pp. 23–48). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_3
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. The Falmer Press.
Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 25(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250922
Young, M. R. (2010). The Art and Science of Fostering Engaged Learning. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(S1), 1–18. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-241861819/the-art-and-science-of-fostering-engaged-learning