Of the 4,049,590 questionnaires sent out, 345,673 (9%) were completed by 288,173 unique individuals, of whom 257,341 (89%) consented to record linkage, required to obtain their test result. Following linkage, 53,530 were excluded because they reported a previous positive test that was not recorded on the database, 5,687 because they had asymptomatic infections, and 37,343 because they were recruited beyond six months follow-up. Of the remaining 160,781 individuals, 80,332 (50%) had previous symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and 80,449 (50%) had never had a positive test for SARS-CoV2 infection. Of the 80,332 people who had previous symptomatic infections, 12,947 have so far completed questionnaires at both six- and 12-month follow-up and 4,196 have completed questionnaires at both six- and 18-month follow-up. The corresponding figures for the 80,449 individuals never infected were 11,026 and 1,711 respectively.
Changes in recovery status
Six months following SARS-CoV-2 infection, 6,407 (49.5%) people reported being fully recovered, 5,649 (43.6%) partially and 891 (6.9%) not recovered. At 12-month follow-up, the figures were 6,575 (50.8%), 5,412 (41.8%) and 960 (7.4%) respectively (c2 trend, p=0.323). Forty one percent of people reported full recovery at both six- and 12-month follow-up, 35% reported persistent incomplete/no recovery, 12% reported improvement and 12% deterioration (Table 1). Between six and 18 months, the figures were 36%, 36%, 14% and 15% respectively.
Of those who felt partially recovered at six months, 1,179/5,649 (21%) had improved by 12 months and 421/1,934 (22%) by 18 months and, of the 891 people not recovered at six months, 404 (45%) had some degree of improvement by 12 months, and 28 (3%) had fully recovered. Of those who felt partially recovered at six months, 458/5,649 (8%) reported deterioration at 12 months and 189/1,934 (10%) at 18 months. In addition, of 6,407 who reported being fully recovered at six months, 1,039 (16%) reported deterioration by 12 months.
Depression prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection was more common among people who reported deterioration in recovery status between six and 12 months (Table 2). Similar patterns were observed comparing six- and 18-month follow-up (Supplementary Table 1). Among those not fully recovered at six months, improvement at 12 months was less likely among older people and those with depression prior to COVID-19 and more likely among the most affluent, after adjusting for potential confounders (Table 3). Among those who reported full or partial recovery at six months, deterioration at 12 months was less likely among older people and the most affluent and more likely among people with prior depression (Table 3). The associations were not statistically significant comparing six- and 18-month follow-up (Supplementary Table 2).
Changes in symptoms
The percentage who reported at least one of the 26 symptoms did not change between six- and 12-month, and six- and 18-month follow-up, among people with previous symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection but increased significantly among those never infected (Table 4).
The prevalence of confusion and altered taste and smell decreased significantly between six and 12 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection contrasting with no significant change in confusion and altered smell, and an increase in altered taste, among those never infected (Table 4). The reductions were significant compared to those never infected after adjusting for potential confounders (Table 5).
Reduced prevalence of altered taste/smell and confusion was specific to those who reported an improvement in their recovery status following SARS-CoV-2 infection (Supplementary Table 4). The prevalence of confusion six months following symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly higher among those with a history of depression or anxiety than those without (1,090/5,839 (18.7%) versus 780/7,108 (11.0%); p<0.001) and improvement in confusion between six- and 12-months was less likely among people with pre-existing depression or anxiety (Table 5).
People with previous symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection reported significant increases in the prevalence of both dry and productive cough between six- and 12-month follow-up (Table 4). However, these symptoms were also reported more frequently over time in the never infected group. The increased prevalence of both dry and productive cough remained significantly higher among those previously infected than those never infected, after adjusting for confounders (Table 5). The factors associated with increased prevalence of dry cough were younger age, more pre-existing long-term conditions, and specifically pre-existing depression/anxiety (Table 5). Increased prevalence of productive cough was associated with male sex and pre-existing respiratory disease. Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, late onset cough was specific to those who reported deterioration in their recovery status (Supplementary Table 4).
Increases in the prevalence of hearing problems between six- and 12-month follow-up were reported by both those with previous symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and those never infected (Table 4). After adjustment for confounders, the increased prevalence of hearing problems was significantly higher among those previously infected than those never infected (Table 5). Other factors associated with late onset hearing problems were socioeconomic deprivation, SARS-CoV-2 infection severity, and more pre-existing long-term conditions and specifically depression/anxiety.
Between six- and 18-months follow-up, increased prevalence of dry cough, productive cough and hearing problems were all significant compared to those never infected after adjusting for potential confounders (Supplementary Table 5).
Changes in quality of life
Following symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, median EQ-5D score decreased slightly from 75 (IQR 55-86) at six months to 74 (IQR 53-85) at 12 months (p<0.001). However, it also fell among those never infected, from 80 (IQR 64-90) to 77 (IQR 61-90) (p<0.001). In the fully adjusted Poisson regression model, symptomatic infection was associated with a larger fall in EQ-5D score compared with those never infected (IRR 0·98, 95% CI 0·98-0·98).