An alternative method of chest compression from over-the-head during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

doi:10.21203/rs.2.11675/v1

Download PDF

Research article

An alternative method of chest compression from over-the-head during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.11675/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 26 Nov, 2019

Read the published version in BMC Emergency Medicine →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background

Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial respiration using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side, with compression carried out from behind the patient’s head.

Methods

The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial respiration after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compression and respiration were conducted from behind the patient’s head.

Results

Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. The average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p<0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p<0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p<0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p<0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p<0.001). The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values.

Conclusions

The demonstrated higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method conducted by one person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions than only for CPR conducted in confined spaces.

Critical Care & Emergency Medicine

Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

emergency medicine

sudden cardiac arrest

cardiopulmonary resuscitation

advanced life support

heart massage

High quality chest compression and artificial respiration improves the effectiveness of CPR resuscitation and increases survival rates in patients with sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) [1–4]. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) defines in its guidelines how CPR should be conducted [5]. Ensuring highly effective CPR can be particularly difficult when artificial respiration using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person [6]. This situation can occur in-hospital when, after beginning CPR, a member of medical staff has to wait for the resuscitation team, or out-of-hospital when a qualified person conducting CPR is waiting for the medical emergency team to arrive [7].

If a two-person medical emergency team is conducting advanced life support (ALS), difficulties can occur when one of the team is conducting chest compression and artificial respiration using a bag-valve-mask device, while the other team member is carrying out other resuscitation actions such as defibrillation, treatment of reversible causes of SCA etc. [8,9]. The ERC guidelines recommend conducting chest compressions from the patient’s side. Chest compression from behind the patient’s head is permitted in the case of CPR conducted in confined spaces [5]. The authors of a few studies have presented various CPR methods conducted by one person and assessed their effectiveness. The results obtained differ as regards key parameters in both chest compression and artificial ventilation [8–14].

Scientific research has shown that minimizing the interruptions between chest compressions during CPR has a direct influence on decreasing hemodynamic disorders, limiting the occurrence of complications, as well as increasing the effectiveness of CPR [15–19]. Interruptions during CPR can result from two ventilations, defibrillation or other resuscitation actions [5,17,18,20].

In response to the doubts described above, assessment was carried out of the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic in terms of chest compression and artificial ventilation from behind the patient’s head, in comparison to compression from the patient’s side with ventilation from behind the head.

The research was conducted in the Scientific Medical Emergency Laboratory of the Faculty of Health Science at the University of Bielsko-Biala. The subject of the study were two methods of CPR—’standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method (figure 1) consisted of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and then two attempts at artificial respiration using a bag-valve-mask device after moving round to behind the patient’s head. To carry out the next 30 chest compressions, the paramedic returned to their position at the patient’s side. The OTH method (figure 2) consisted of 30 chest compressions from behind the patient’s head, and then two attempts at artificial respiration using a bag-valve-mask device from the same position. Both CPR methods were carried out using an ‘Ambu Man W’ manikin, programmed with the parameters for an adult male with a body mass of 80 kg. Ventilation was carried out using a ‘Ambu Mark IV’ self-inflating bag. The research method consisted of analyzing CPR cycles (compressions/ventilation) carried out by research participants within a 5 minute period (figure 3). The data received from the manikin was wirelessly transmitted to a computer with Ambu CPR Software version 3.1.1, which allowed for assessment of the quality of chest compressions and artificial ventilation for the parameters under research, based on reference values according to European Resuscitation Council guidelines.

Figure 1. Chest compression and ventilation conducted using the ‘standard’ method.

Own material.

Figure 2. Chest compression and ventilation conducted using the ‘over-the-head’ method.

Own material.

Figure 3. Example record of chest compressions and artificial ventilation (Paramedic no. 5 –OTH method).

Both CPR methods were carried out by members of medical emergency response teams. An advertisement was posted to which a group of men responded, from whom those qualified to take part in the research were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The following research qualification criteria were adopted: formal training as a paramedic, men and women, at least five years’ experience working in a medical emergency response team, current employment in the Bielsko-Biala Emergency Services, voluntary participation in the research. The exclusion criteria included: lack of professional experience in conducting chest compression from behind the patient’s head, lack of permission for participation in the first and/or second stage of the research.

At the first meeting with the volunteers, a two stage research program was agreed upon, with a 1 day break between the stages. The first stage consisted of: random selection by the research volunteers of the order of the methods for conducting CPR, a reminder of the principles for the method drawn and the applicable reference values for given parameters, trial chest compression and artificial ventilation conducted by each volunteer on a manikin using the method drawn for one minute, and five minutes of simulated CPR by the volunteer on the manikin using the method drawn. The second stage of the research consisted of: a reminder of the principles for conducting the second method and the applicable reference values for the given parameters, trial chest compression and artificial ventilation conducted by each volunteer on a manikin using the second method for one minute, and five minutes of simulated CPR by the volunteer on the manikin using the second method.

After the two stages of the research were completed, assessment was made of the results for the research parameters tested for chest compression and artificial ventilation. The research results were recorded in such a way as to prevent identification of the participants according to applicable legal regulations. The research project received the approval of the Bioethics Committee in Bielsko-Biała. The results were compiled in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The data was then imported into Statistica software manufactured by StatSoft (Ser.No:AXFP301D415123AR-B). To start with, basic statistical parameters were calculated for quantitative variables. Compliance tests were carried out for the normal distribution using the Kołmogorowa-Smirnowa test. For quantitative discrete (categorial) variables and qualitative variables, the distribution of abundance and percentage distributions for particular categories of these variables were determined. The basic criteria for the selection of the statistical method for data analysis were: variable type (qualitative, quantitative); ordinal, quotient and interval variables; compliance with the normal distribution; and skewness and curtosis values. Comparative analysis of the percentage fraction with regard to the cardiopulmonary resuscitation method was conducted using a structure index test. Evaluation of the interdependence of qualitative variables was conducted using Pearson chi-square tests of independence (Χ²), or chi-square tests of independence (Χ² NW) using the highest credibility function. Comparative analysis of quantitative variables for when normal distribution and variance homogeneity conditions were met were conducted using parameter tests such as the Student’s t-test. In other cases, the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon test were used. Evaluation of the interdependence of quantitative variables for normal distribution was conducted using the Pearson correlation. For variables with a significantly different distribution to the normal distribution, the Spearman correlation was used.

The research was conducted in 2016 with the participation of 38 male paramedics employed in the Bielsko-Biala Emergency Services. The few women working in medical response teams did not volunteer to participate in the research. The paramedics participating in the research lived in the Bielsko-Biala region and had significant professional experience in advanced resuscitation techniques.

Table 1.

The research results obtained were arranged into nine research parameters, taking into account the CPR method used and the range of reference values for individual parameters (Table 1).

The data presented shows that research participants conducting CPR using the OTH method more frequently achieved statistically significant (p<0.05) shorter interruptions times between chest compression cycles than with the STD method.

In order to assess of the depth of chest compressions using the STD method compared to the OTH method, statistical analysis was conducted on the frequency of too shallow compressions (<50 mm), correct compressions (50–60 mm) and too deep compressions

(>60 mm) taking into account the number of compressions made using a given method. It was shown that research participants conducting CPR using the OTH method more frequently made statistically significant correct depth compressions than with the STD method (p<0.001).

Analysis of chest compressions cycles that were too slow (<100/min.), correct (100–120/min.) and too fast (>120/min.), taking into account the number of cycles conducted using a given method, showed that research participants conducting CPR using the OTH method more often made statistically significant correct rate chest compressions than with the STD method (p<0.001).

Analysis of chest compressions with complete or incomplete recoil showed that research participants conducting CPR using the OTH method more often made statistically significant chest compressions with complete recoil than with the STD method (p<0.001).

Assessment of the place chest compressions were made showed that research participants conducting CPR using the OTH method more often made statistically significant chest compressions in the correct place than with the STD method (p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis showed that the duty cycle in CPR using both the STD and OTH methods did not display a statistically significant difference (p>0.05).

It was shown that research participants conducting CPR made cycles of chest compressions and the number of ventilations in the correct proportion 30:2, with the frequency showing no statistically significant difference between the OTH and STD methods (p > 0.05).

In order to assess the tidal volume of the artificial ventilation made using the OTH method compared to the STD method, analysis was made of ventilation with too low tidal volume (<480 ml), correct tidal volume (480–560 ml) and too high tidal volume (>560 ml). It was shown that there is no statistically significant difference in the frequency of correct tidal volume between the OTH and STD methods (p>0.05). Research participants made a statistically significant higher number of ventilations with too low tidal volume when using the STD method than in the OTH method (p<0.001). Research participants made a statistically significant higher number of ventilations with too high tidal volume when using the OTH method than in the STD method (p<0.001).

Analysis of the frequency of stomach inflation showed that in research participants conducting CPR there were no statistically significant differences in ventilations with stomach inflation for both methods (p < 0.05).

The subject of numerous studies related to CPR has been the length of interruptions between chest compressions. Perkins et al. [5] claimed that effective treatment of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is dependent on the length of time between chest compressions necessary for the other resuscitation actions. Other authors are of the same opinion [17,19], and indicate that any interruptions in chest compression, including those for artificial ventilation, have a significant negative effect on a patient’s chances of survival.

Our research has shown that the average length of time between chest compression cycles resulting from the necessity to conduct two attempts at ventilation is significantly shorter in the OTH method than when the STD method is used (p<0.001). Similar results were obtained by Maisch et al. [8] in their research comparing the effectiveness of CPR carried out using several methods. Our research shows that as a person conducting CPR using the OTH method is not required to change position, this significantly shortens the length of time between chest compressions, resulting in an increase in chest compressions applied compared to the STD method.

Irrespective of whether the person conducting chest compressions is at the patient’s side or behind their head, they must adjust the pressure on the sternum in order to achieve the correct depth of compression. This depth has been assessed in numerous scientific studies [1, 21–23]. In their research, Maisch et al. [8] compared CPR conducted by paramedics from the patient’s side and from behind the patient’s head in terms of the depth of chest compressions. The author did not find significant differences between the frequency of insufficient and excessive chest compression depths and the reference values. The research results demonstrated that during over-the-head CPR, when the paramedic does not change position, it is easier to adjust the pressure on the sternum to ensure that compressions of the correct depth are made.

The quality of CPR is affected by the rate with which chest compressions are made. Perkins et al. [5] recommend conducting chest compressions on adults at a rate of 100–120 compressions per minute. Scientific studies have proved that rates of compression of below 100/min. and above 120/min. result in a drop in cardiac capacity, and a subsequent increase in patient mortality [2,24]. Our research has shown that in CPR conducted using the OTH method, chest compression cycles of the correct rate are made significantly more often than in the STD method. Chest compressions of insufficient and excessive rate occurred significantly more often in CPR cycles using the STD method.

During CPR, it is extremely important to conduct chest compressions when the chest is complete recoil. Monsieurs et al. [25] recommend that the person conducting chest compressions should take care not to press on the chest in the relaxation phase, thus allowing the chest walls to return to their anatomical shape. Fried et al. [26] assessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation carried out on 108 patients with SCA. In the group studied, a total of 112,569 compressions were made, of which 12% were conducted without complete recoil. In our research, we analyzed chest compressions made with complete and incomplete recoil using the STD and OTH methods. It was shown that compressions with incomplete recoil were made significantly more often during chest compressions using the STD method.

An important factor that affects the quality of CPR is the place where chest compressions are made. In Perkins et al. [5] meta-analysis, they recommend conducting chest compressions in the centre of the patient’s chest to ensure quick identification of the correct place for compressions on the bottom half of the sternum. Our study has shown that a very small percentage of chest compressions were made in the incorrect place by research participants—in the ‘standard’ method 0.68%, and in the ‘over-the-head’ method 0.34% (p<0.001). These results suggest that due to the lower percentage of compressions made in the incorrect place, using the OTH method can have a more beneficial influence on the hemodynamic effect of CPR than the STD method.

Based on scientific studies, it has been determined that the person conducting cardiopulmonary resuscitation should maintain the correct ratio of the time the chest is compressed to the total time from one compression to the next [5,27,28]. Our research showed no statistically significant differences for this parameter between the STD and OTH methods (p>0.001).

The authors of numerous studies have demonstrated that during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, optimal blood flow through the organs is ensured by chest compressions and artificial ventilation at a ratio of 30 to 2 [5,29]. The research showed that for both methods there was no significant difference in maintaining the recommended ratio of chest compressions to artificial ventilation.

Excessive or insufficient ventilation volumes can have negative consequences for a patient with SCA. ERC and AHA guidelines define the volume of air for artificial ventilation as 6–7 ml/kg of patient body mass [25,30]. This value was adopted in our research as a ventilation volume reference parameter. It was demonstrated that the percentage of correct volume ventilations did not differ significantly in both methods (p>0.05). Ventilation with insufficient volume was conducted significantly more often in the STD method (p<0.001). Ventilation with excessive volume was conducted significantly more often in the OTH method (p<0.001).

Conducting artificial ventilation can result in air finding its way into the stomach, causing regurgitation and inhaling of stomach contents into the airways. If the stomach is full of air, this can put pressure on the diaphragm and cause problems with ventilation. Studies by numerous authors have confirmed the importance of reducing the frequency of ventilation and inspiratory pressure so as to minimize the risk of blowing air into the stomach during positive pressure ventilation in patients with unprotected airways [5,31–33]. Our research showed that the percentage of artificial breaths where air found its way into the stomach did not differ significantly in both methods (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Our research has shown that when CPR is conducted using the STD method, there can be significantly more difficulties in maintaining the correct resuscitation parameters than when applying the OTH method. The research results have shown that the STD method does not ensure significantly higher quality CPR for any of the designated ERC parameters. The values of five of the nine parameters tested are significantly closer to the reference values when using the OTH method. The results of our study conducted in simulated conditions suggest that the over-the-head method can be used to a wider extent than only in CPR conducted in confined spaces.

CPR - cardiopulmonary resuscitation

STD—standard

OTH - over-the-head

SCA - sudden cardiac arrest

ERC - European Resuscitation Council

ALS - advanced life support

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Paramedics who volunteered for research gave written consent.

The research project received the approval of the Bioethics Committee in Bielsko-Biała

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Please contact Michal Cwiertnia for data requests.

Funding

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

MC, MM, MK conceived the study, designed the trial; MK,RB,TI supervised the data collection; MC, MM,MD provided statistical advice on study, design and analyzed the data; MC drafted the manuscript and all authors contributed substantially to its revision.

All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Vadeboncoeur TF, Stolz U, Panchal A, Silver A, Venuti M, Tobin J, et al. Chest compression depth and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2014; 85 (2): 82–8.
Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, Brown SP, Brooks SC, Callaway CW, et al. Chest Compression Rates and Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Critical Care Medicine 2015; 43 (4): 840–8.
Kovacs A, Vadeboncoeur TF, Stolz U, Spaite DW, Irisawa T, Silver A, et al. Chest compression release velocity: Association with survival and favorable neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015; 92: 107–114.
Ashoor HM, Lillie E, Zarin W, Pham B, Khan PA, Nincic V, et al. Effectiveness of different compression-to-ventilation methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review. Resuscitation 2017; 118: 112–125.
Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, Castren M, Smyth MA, Olasveengen T, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015; 95: 81–99.
Fallaha JF, Spooner BB, Perkins GD. Does Dual Operator CPR help minimize interruptions in chest compressions? Resuscitation 2009; 80 (9): 1011–4.
Bossaert L, Van Hoeyweghen R. Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques. The Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group. Resuscitation 1989; 17: S99–109, discussion S199–206.
Maisch S, Gamon E, Ilisch A, Goetz AE, Schmidt GN. Comparison of the over-the-head, lateral and alternating positions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by a single rescuer with a bag-valve-mask device. Emerg Med J 2011; 28 (11): 974–978.
Bolling G, Steen PA, Wik L. Standard versus over-the-head cardiopulmonary resuscitation during simulated advanced life support. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007; 11 (4): 443–447.
Handley AJ, Handley JA. Performing chest compressions in a confined space. Resuscitation 2004; 61 (1): 55–61.
Handley AJ. Teaching hands placement for chest compression—a simpler technique Resuscitation 2002; 53: 29–36.
Perkins GD, Stephenson BT, Smith CM, Gao F. A comparison between over-the-head and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2004; 61 (2): 155–161.
Hupfl M, Duma A, Uray T, Maier C, Fiegl N, Bogner N, et al. Over-the-Head Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Efficacy in Basic Life Support Performed by Professional Medical Personnel with a Single Rescuer: A Simulation Study. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2005; 101 (1): 200–205.
Chi CH, Tsou JY, Su FC. Comparison of chest compression kinematics associated with over-the-head and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27 (9): 1112–1116.
Xanthos T, Karatzas T, Stroumpoulis K, Lelovas P, Simitsis P, Vlachos I, et al. Continuous chest compressions improve survival and neurologic outcome in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30(8): 1389–94.
Perkins GD, Brace SJ, Smythe M, Ong G, Gates S. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: recent advances in resuscitation and effects on outcome. Heart 2012; 98 (7): 529–535.
Cunningham LM, Mattu A, O’Connor RE, Brady WJ. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: the importance of uninterrupted chest compressions in cardiac arrest resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30 (8): 1630–1638.
Cheskes S, Schmicker RH, Verbeek PR, Salcido DD, Brown SP, Brooks S, et al. The impact of peri-shock pause on survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest during the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium PRIMED trial. Resuscitation 2014; 85: 336–342.
Vaillancourt C, Everson-Stewart S, Christenson J, Andrusiek D, Powell J, Nichol G. The impact of increased chest compression fraction on return of spontaneous circulation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not in ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 1501–1507.
Souchtchenko SS, Benner JP, Allen JL, Brady WJ. A Review of Chest Compression Interruptions During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Strategies for the Future. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2013; 45 (3): 458–466.
Lampe JW, Yin T, Bratinov G, Weiland TR, Kaufman CL, Berg RA, et al. Developing a kinematic understanding of chest compressions: the impact of depth and release time on blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. BioMed Eng 2015; 14: 1–16.
Stiell IG, Brown SP, Nichol G, Cheskes S, Vaillancourt C, Callaway CW, et al. What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients? Circulation 2014; 130 (22): 1962–1970.
Stiell IG, Brown SP, Christenson J, Cheskes S, Nichol G, Powell J, et al. What is the role of chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation? Crit Care Med 2012; 40 (4): 1192–1198.
Idris AH, Guffey D, Aufderheide TP, Brown S, Morrison LJ, Nichols P, et al. Relationship between chest compression rates and outcomes from cardiac arrest. Circulation 2012; 125: 3004–3012.
Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, Greif R, Maconochie IK, Nikolaou NI, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2015; 95: 1–80.
Fried DA, Leary M, Smith DA, Sutton RM, Niles D, Herzberg DL, et al. The prevalence of chest compression leaning during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 1019–1024.
Koeken Y, Aelen P, Noordergraaf GJ, Paulussen I, Woerlee P, Noordergraff A. The influence of nonlinear intra-thoracic vascular behavior and compression characteristics on cardiac output during CPR. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 538–544.
Dean JM, Koehler RC, Schleien CL, Atchinson D, Gervais H, Berkowitz I, et al. Improved blood flow during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation with 30% duty cycle in infant pigs. Circulation 1991; 84: 896–904.
Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, Swor RA, Terry M, Bobrow BJ, et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132: 414–435.
Neumar RW, Shuster M, Callaway CW, Gent LM, Atkins DL, Bhanji F, et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132: 315–367.
Bouvet L, Albert ML, Augris C, Boselli E, Ecochard R, Rabilloud M, et al. Real-time detection of gastric insufflation related to facemask pressure-controlled ventilation using ultrasonography of the antrum and epigastric auscultation in nonparalyzed patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesthesiology 2014; 120 (2): 326–334.
Piegeler T, Roessler B, Goliasch G, Fischer H, Schlaepfer M, Lang S, et al. Evaluation of six different airway devices regarding regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) - A human cadaver pilot study. Resuscitation 2016; 102: 70–74.
Von Goedecke A, Mitterschiffthaler L, Paal P, Mitterlechner T, Wenzel V, Herff H. Optimizing the unprotected airway with a prototype Jaw-Thrust-Device—a prospective randomized cross-over study. Anesthesia 2009; 64 (11): 1236–1240.

Table 1. Collective summary of simulated CPR situation results for STD and OTH methods achieved by research participants.

Parameters researched

Reference value

STD

OTH

Significance

Average time of interruptions between compression cycles [s]

Up to 10 seconds

9.184

7.316

p<0.001

Depth of chest compressions

Too shallow

(<50 mm)

3898

27.80 %

3103

20.77 %

p<0.001

Correct

(50-60 mm)

7104

50.65 %

8997

60.22 %

p<0.001

Too deep

(>60 mm)

3022

21.55 %

2840

19.01 %

p<0.001

Rate of chest compressions

Too slow

(<100/min.)

12.84%

8.62%

p<0.001

Correct

(100-120/min.)

206

46.39%

256

53.78%

p<0.001

Too fast

(>120/min.)

181

40.77%

179

37.60%

p<0.001

Chest wall recoil

Complete recoil

11856

84.54%

13664

91.46%

p<0.001

Place of chest compression

Centre of the chest

13928

99.32%

14889

99.66%

p<0.001

Duty cycle

(ratio of the time the chest is compressed to the total time from one compression to the next)

50%/50%

42.974% / 57.026%

42.237% / 57.763%

p>0.05

Compression-ventilation

ratio

30:2

78.51%

81.44%

p>0.05

Tidal volume

Too low

(<480 ml)

459

51.37%

401

42.14%

p<0.001

Correct

(480-560 ml)

152

17.05%

167

17.57%

p>0.05

Too high

(>560 ml)

282

31.58%

354

40.28%

p<0.001

Stomach inflation

none

0.25%

0.34%

p>0.05

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 26 Nov, 2019

Read the published version in BMC Emergency Medicine →

Editorial decision: Major revision
29 Aug, 2019
Review #2 received at journal
21 Aug, 2019
Review #1 received at journal
14 Aug, 2019
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
06 Aug, 2019
Reviewers invited by journal
01 Aug, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
01 Aug, 2019
Editor invited by journal
16 Jul, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
16 Jul, 2019
Submission checks completed at journal
15 Jul, 2019

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

An alternative method of chest compression from over-the-head during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

List of abbreviations

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Paramedics who volunteered for research gave written consent.

Consent for publication

Availability of data and material

Funding

Authors’ contributions

Acknowledgments

Competing Interests

References

Tables

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1