Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Following High-dose Re-irradiation for Recurrent Lung Cancer

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-251694/v1

Download PDF

Research

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Following High-dose Re-irradiation for Recurrent Lung Cancer

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-251694/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Re-irradiation is one of the treatment options for recurrence after initial radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer. However, the safety and efficacy of high-dose re-irradiation for recurrent lung cancer has yet to be completely understood. This study investigated the outcomes of high-dose re-irradiation for patients with recurrent lung cancer at our clinic.

Methods: Data were collected from 36 patients with lung cancer (median age, 68 years) who received high-dose re-irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregional recurrence after initial radiotherapy in the locally advanced stage. Histology findings showed that 11 (30.6%), 14 (38.9%), and 11 (30.6%) patients had adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma, respectively. The interval from initial radiotherapy to re-irradiation was 23.4 months. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors, while late toxicities ≥grade3 were evaluated according to the CTCAE ver. 3.0.

Results: The median follow-up was 14.6 months. The 1-year LC, PFS, and OS were 74.1%, 45.2%, and 78.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that histology was a significant prognostic factor for LC (p = 0.02), while histology (p = 0.04) and distant metastasis (p = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors for PFS. Grade 5 late toxicities occurred in 2 patients (5.6%) who exhibited esophageal perforation and bronchial perforation. No other ≥grade3 late toxicities occurred.

Conclusion: High-dose re-irradiation for recurrent locally advanced lung cancer was effective and feasible. Lung adenocarcinoma might therefore be a good indication for re-irradiation.

Oncology

lung cancer

re-irradiation

late toxicities

histology

IMRT

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality, with 2.1 million new lung cancer cases and 1.8 million deaths worldwide.[1] Radiotherapy plays a significant role in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC).[2, 3] Studies have shown that radiotherapy had a local control of 63%, 44%, 38%, and 32% at 1, 2, 3, and at 5 years in locally advanced NSCLC, respectively, and 61% at 2 years in limited-stage SCLC.[4, 5] This implies that in-field recurrence after radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer is not uncommon. Several treatment options, such as radiotherapy, surgery, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, have been considered for recurrent lung cancer.[6, 7] However, post-radiotherapy complications following re-irradiation for lung cancer recurring after radiotherapy have remained of great concern due to the increased cumulative dose to normal organs. Nonetheless, avoiding normal tissues with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) during re-irradiation may keep the cumulative dose to normal tissues as low as possible and increase safety. Given the small number of reports available on high-dose re-irradiation for in-field recurrence of advanced lung cancer after initial radiotherapy,[8] its efficacy and safety, as well as those who exhibit good prognosis with re-irradiation, have remained uncertain.

The current study analyzed patients who underwent re-irradiation for recurrent lung cancer after radiotherapy at our clinic and determined the efficacy of treatment, adverse events, and characteristics of patients with good prognosis after re-irradiation.

Patient characteristics

Data were collected from 36 patients with lung cancer (median age, 68 years; range, 45–88 years) who received definitive re-irradiation using IMRT for local recurrence after (chemo-)radiotherapy in the locally advanced stage. The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Among the included patients, 29 (80.6%) and 7 (19.4%) were male and female, respectively. Performance status (PS) according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) was 0–1 and 2–3 in 31 (86.1%) and 5 (5.6%) patients, respectively. Histology findings showed that 11 (30.6%), 14 (38.9%), and 11 (30.6%) patients had adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma, respectively. Among the analyzed patients, 22 (61.1%), 13 (36.1%), and 1 (2.8%) had primary site, lymph node, and both primary and lymph node recurrence, respectively, while 23 (63.9%) and 7 (19.4%) patients had recurrent tumors that came in contact with the trachea/bronchus and esophagus, respectively. The duration from initial radiotherapy to re-irradiation was 23.4 (range, 8.5–102.6) months. The median initial radiation dose, re-irradiation dose, and total dose (BED10) was 72 Gy (range, 48.0–84.0), 86.8 Gy (range, 56.0–119.6), and 154.3 Gy (range, 107.8–191.6), respectively, while the median follow-up was 14.6 months (range, 0.4–88.6).

Table 1

Patient characteristics
Characteristics
Age	Median (range)	68	(45–88)
Sex	Male Female	29 7	(80.6%) (19.4%)
PS	0,1 2–4	31 5	(86.1%) (5.6%)
Histology	AC SCC SCLC	11 14 11	(30.6%) (38.9%) (30.6%)
Recurrent sites	Primary site LNs Both	22 13 1	(61.1%) (36.1%) (2.8%)
Organs adjacent to the recurrent tumor	Trachea/bronchus Esophagus	23 7	(63.9%) (19.4%)
DM	Positive Negative	5 31	(13.9%) (86.1%)
Treatment interval (months)	Median (range)	23.4	(8.5–102.6)
Dose of initial RT (BED10)	Median (range)	72.0	(48.0–84.0)
Dose of re-RT (BED10)	Median (range)	86.8	(56.0–119.6)
Cumulative dose (BED10)	Median (range)	154.3	(107.8–191.6)
PTV (cc)	Median (range)	73.6	(8.8–460.6)
Abbreviations: PS, performance status; AC, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SCLC, small cell carcinoma; LN, lymph node; DM, distant metastases; BED, biological effective dose; PTV, planning target volume.

Treatment

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging for treatment planning were obtained in the supine position using a BrightSpeed™ CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) and SIGNA EXCITE HDx 1.5T™ (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). Clinical target volume (CTV) was considered equal to gross tumor volume (GTV), while the planning target volume (PTV) was calculated by adding a margin of approximately 5 mm to each CTV. Plans were generated using BrainSCAN (ver. 5.31) RT Treatment Planning Software (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) with the pencil beam algorithm before November 2010 and thereafter using iPlan RT Dose (ver. 4.1.2) software (Brainlab AG) with the Monte Carlo algorithm. All patients underwent IMRT using a 6-MV linear accelerator (Novalis, Brainlab AG). Daily image guidance was performed, while treatments were performed on consecutive days.

Clinical outcome evaluation

In principle, patients were followed-up after 4 weeks and then every 3 months thereafter, with CT being performed at each visit. The latest visit or date of contact was used for right-censoring patients who were alive at the time of analysis. Tumor responses after re-irradiation were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors ver1.1.¹⁰ Local control (LC) was defined as recurrence at the re-irradiated site. Progression-free survival (PFS) was as the duration from re-irradiation to disease progression or death from any cause. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from re-irradiation to death from any cause. Late toxicities ≥ grade3 were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 3.0.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using JMP pro 14 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). LC, PFS, and OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified through univariate analysis using the log-rank test and multivariate analysis using the COX proportional hazards model. Statistical tests were based on a two-sided significance level, with p values of < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

LC, progression-free survival, and overall survival

The 1-year, 2-year, and median LC was 74.3%, 42.1%, and 15.7 months, respectively (Fig. 1A). Multivariate analysis identified histology as a significant prognostic factor for LC (p = 0.02). The 1-year LC for adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma was 100%, 58.3%, and 75.0%, respectively (Fig. 1B). The 1-year, 2-year, and median PFS was 45.2%, 17.0%, and 10.4 months, respectively (Fig. 2A). Multivariate analysis identified histology (p = 0.04) and distant metastasis (p = 0.01) as significant prognostic factors for PFS. The 1-year PFS for adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma was 63.6%, 58.3%, and 10.4%, respectively (Fig. 2B), while distant metastasis-positive and -negative disease had a 1-year PFS of 0% and 53.1%, respectively. The 1-year, 2-year, and median OS was 78.7%, 54.4%, and 26.7 months, respectively (Fig. 3). Univariate analysis identified no significant prognostic factor for OS. Details regarding statistical analysis are presented in Table 2.

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses for the factors associated with LC, PFS, and OS.
			LC			PFS			OS
Variables		n	1-year LC (months)	Univariate p value	Multivariate p value	1-year PFS (months)	Univariate p value	Multivariate p value	1-year OS (months)	Univariate p value	Multivariate p value
Age	≥ 68 < 68	17 19	67.5% 82.5%	0.26	−	41.9% 48.1%	0.32	−	76.9% 79.4%	0.76	−
Gender	Male Female	29 7	72.9% 83.3%	0.19	−	45.0% 50.0%	0.46	−	83.5% 50.0%	1.00	−
PS	0,1 ≥ 2	33 3	72.8% 100%	0.25	−	44.7% 66.7%	0.42	−	81.2% 50.0%	0.93	−
histology	AC SCC SCLC	11 14 11	100% 58.3% 75.0%	< 0.01	0.02	63.6% 58.3% 10.4%	< 0.01	0.04	67.5% 100% 59.3%	0.09	−
DM	Positive negative	5 31	100% 72.2%	0.17	−	0% 53.1%	< 0.01	0.01	66.7% 79.8%	0.08	−
Interval (months)	≥ 24 < 24	19 17	86.7% 63.5%	0.93	−	57.0% 35.4%	0.81	−	72.1% 85.9%	0.86	−
Re-RT dose (BED10)	≥ 85 < 85	18 18	79.3% 68.4%	0.32	−	57.6% 32.4%	0.03	0.24	80.7% 76.7%	0.60	−
PTV volume (cc)	≥ 74 < 74	18 18	92.3% 55.6%	< 0.01	0.06	39.8% 50.4%	0.19	−	75.0% 84.4%	0.87	−
Abbreviations: SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; NSCLC, non-small cell carcinoma; NOS, not otherwise specified; LC, local control; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; RT, radiotherapy; NR, not reported; BED, biological effective dose; conv, conventional radiotherapy; PTV, planning target volume; G, grade; b/w, between; DM, distant metastases

Toxicities

Grade 5 late toxicities occurred in 2 patients (5.6%), with no other ≥ grade3 late toxicities having occurred. One patient, a 70-year-old woman, underwent re-irradiation with 66 Gy in 30 fractions for mediastinal lymph node recurrence that appeared 59.4 months after chemoradiation with 60 Gy in 30 fractions for locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma. She developed esophageal perforation and died 11.3 months after re-irradiation. CT before re-irradiation showed lymph node metastasis with suspected esophageal invasion. The other patient, a 59-year-old male with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the primary trachea, developed local recurrence 20.7 months after initial chemoradiation with 60 Gy in 30 fractions and was re-irradiated with 70 Gy in 28 fractions. The patient developed tracheal perforation 8.2 months after irradiation and died.

The current study retrospectively analyzed patients who received high-dose re-irradiation for recurrent lung cancer after initial radiotherapy. Although several studies have been available on high-dose re-irradiation after radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer, albeit in a relatively small number of patients, the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors have varied.[9–14] Table 3 briefly summarizes the previous studies, including our results.

Table 3

Summary of published studies on treatment outcomes of re-irradiation for recurrent lung cancer.
Study	n	Histology	Median follow-up (months)	Median interval (months)	Median initial dose	Median re-irradiation dose	LC	OS	Severe late toxicities (≥ G3)	Prognostic factors
Wu et al [9]	23	SCC: 9 AC: 7 SCLC: 7	15	13	66 Gy conv	51 Gy conv	1y: 51% 2y: 42%	1y: 59% 2y: 21%	G3 pulmonary fibrosis (n = 2)	NR
Kelly et al [10]	36	SCC: 12 AC: 14 NSCLC, NOS: 8 Other: 2	15	22	61.5 Gy	50 Gy/4 Fx	NR	1y: 59% 2y: 43%	G3 cough (n = 1) G3 pneumonitis (n = 7) G3 esophagitis (n = 3) G3 skin (n = 2)	Isolated recurrence outside the previous treatment field for PFS.
McAvoy et al [11]	33	SCC: 14 AC: 15 NSCLC: 4	11	36	66 Gy	66 Gy (RBE) proton beam	1y: 54%	1y: 47%	G4 esophagitis (n = 1) G4 tracheal necrosis (n = 2)	NR
Griffioen et al [12]	24	NSCLC: 22 SCLC: 2	19.3	51	59.8 Gy	60 Gy	Median: 6.7 mo	1y: 51%	G5 Bleeding (n = 3)	PTV size for OS
Sumita et al [13]	21	SCC: 6 AC: 5 SCLC: 7 other: 3	22.1	26.8	NSCLC: 60Gy SCLC: 43.1Gy	NSCLC: 60Gy SCLC: 50Gy	1y: 57% 2y: 34%	1y: 76% 2y: 64%	G3 pneumonitis (n = 1)	Re-RT dose for LC PTV size for OS
Schlampp et al [14]	62	SCC: 32 AC: 16 SCLC: 10 Others: 4	8.2	14	60 Gy	38.5 Gy	Median: 6.5 mo	Median: 9 mo	G5 pneumonitis (n = 1) G4 esophageal fistula (n = 1) G3 esophageal stenosis (n = 1) G3 pneumothorax (n = 1) G3 pneumonitis (n = 2)	Number of involved LNs, dose of re-RT, and interval b/w RT and re-RT for OS
This study	36	SCC: 14 AC: 11 SCLC: 11	16	23	NSCLC: 60Gy SCLC: 45Gy conv	86.8 Gy (BED₁₀)	1y: 74% 2y: 42% Median:15.7 mo	1y: 79% 2y: 54% Median: 26.7 mo	G5 esophageal perforation (n = 1) G5 tracheal perforation (n = 1)	Histology for LC and PFS
Abbreviations: SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; NSCLC, non-small cell carcinoma; NOS, not other specified; LC, local control; OS, overall survival; RT, radiotherapy; NR, not reported; BED, biological effective dose; conv, conventional radiotherapy; G, grade; b/w, between.

Available studies on the outcomes of re-irradiation after curative irradiation for locally advanced lung cancer have shown a 1-year LC of 51–57% with a median duration of 6.5–6.7 months and 1-year OS of 47–76% with a median duration of 9 months.[9–14] The current study showed a 1-year LC rate of 74% with a median duration of 15.7 months and a 1-year OS of 79% with a median duration of 26.7 months. We believe that our results were better than those reported previously, which may perhaps be due to the higher re-irradiation dose used herein. The aforementioned studies also identified various prognostic factors for high-dose re-irradiation after radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer. Accordingly, Sumita et al. reported that a re-irradiation dose of 60 Gy or more was a favorable prognostic factor for LC (median LC rate 18.2 vs. 6.8 months).[13] The current study, on the other hand, identified histology as a prognostic factor for LC and PFS, a novel finding that may help determine recurrence after radiotherapy. Moreover, given that our median re-irradiation dose was higher than that used previously, the difference in LC rate according to histological type may become apparent during high-dose re-irradiation. Although data are not shown, our analysis revealed that systemic therapy after re-irradiation did not contribute to LC, PFS, and OS. In an analysis of stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with NSCLC, Shiue et al. reported that adenocarcinoma, small GTV, and high prescription dose were favorable prognostic factors and suggested avoiding low prescription doses for SCC.[15] In the case of lung cancer re-irradiation, higher doses for squamous cell carcinoma may improve LC rates, despite the potential risk for adverse events when recurrence develops close to a risk organ.

Given that serious adverse events may occur during lung cancer re-irradiation, caution is required. The incidence of G3 or higher adverse events has been reported to vary from 4.8–36.1%,[9–14] which may be attributed to the prescribed dose and radiotherapy technique used. Given that the incidence of adverse events above G3 was only 5.5% in the current study, we believe that the treatment was relatively safer compared to previous reports. The current study observed two G5 cases, one involving esophageal perforation and the other involving tracheal perforation. In the case of high-dose re-irradiation near the trachea and esophagus or in cases of direct invasion to trachea, bronchus, and esophagus, careful explanation should be given to the patients prior to obtaining consent given the risk for serious adverse events. Incidentally, we are in the process of analyzing the relationship between late toxicities after re-irradiation and cumulative dose to risk organs.

Some limitations of the current study are worth noting. First, this was a retrospective study that included a limited number of patients. Second, post-treatment after re-irradiation varied, while the dose and number of fractions for re-irradiation had not been standardized. Moreover, it remains unclear whether the similar results would obtained in the case of recurrence after the PACIFIC regimen, especially for NSCLC, given that this was before the PACIFIC regimen was introduced. Considering that local recurrence is not uncommon even after treatment of NSCLC with PACIFIC regimens,[16] salvage therapy with re-irradiation might be a good option. Given the risks involved with surgical resection of the chest after radical irradiation,[17] we believe that the possibility of high-dose re-irradiation as a salvage treatment should be explored.

Our results indicated that high-dose re-irradiation after radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer is a relatively safe and effective treatment and may be considered a treatment option for recurrent lung cancer. Moreover, patients with lung adenocarcinoma had high LC rates, which may be useful in determining indications. Nonetheless, further validation of high-dose re-irradiation for recurrence after lung cancer radiotherapy is needed through prospective studies.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The institutional review board of Miyakojima IGRT Clinic approved our study protocol (study number: M6), while all participants provided informed consent prior to treatment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

None.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors' contributions

KT obtained IRB approval and built the patient database, wrote the manuscript. HD and HS conducted statistical analysis. RO and KO designed the study and conducted interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Enago for English language review.

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.
van Meerbeeck JP, Fennell DA, De Ruysscher DK. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet [Internet]. 2011;378:1741–55. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673611601657
Vansteenkiste J, De Ruysscher D, Eberhardt WEE, Lim E, Senan S, Felip E, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol [Internet]. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi89-98. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23860613
Bütof R, Gumina C, Valentini C, Sommerer A, Appold S, Zips D, et al. Sites of recurrent disease and prognostic factors in SCLC patients treated with radiochemotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2017;7:36–42.
MacHtay M, Paulus R, Moughan J, Komaki R, Bradley J, Choy H, et al. Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:716–22.
Sugimura H, Nichols FC, Yang P, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, et al. Survival After Recurrent Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer After Complete Pulmonary Resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:409–18.
Yuan M, Huang LL, Chen JH, Wu J, Xu Q. The emerging treatment landscape of targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther [Internet]. Springer US; 2019;4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-019-0099-9
De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Le Pechoux C, Peeters S, Belderbos J. High-dose re-irradiation following radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e620–4.
Wu KL, Jiang GL, Qian H, Wang LJ, Yang HJ, Fu XL, et al. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for locoregionally recurrent lung carcinoma after external beam irradiation: A prospective phase I-II clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:1345–50.
Kelly P, Balter PA, Rebueno N, Sharp HJ, Liao Z, Komaki R, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with lung cancer previously treated with thoracic radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78:1387–93.
McAvoy SA, Ciura KT, Rineer JM, Allen PK, Liao Z, Chang JY, et al. Feasibility of proton beam therapy for reirradiation of locoregionally recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol [Internet]. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2013;109:38–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.014
Griffioen GHMJ, Dahele M, De Haan PF, Van de Ven PM, Slotman BJ, Senan S. High-dose, conventionally fractionated thoracic reirradiation for lung tumors. Lung Cancer [Internet]. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2014;83:356–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.12.006
Sumita K, Harada H, Asakura H, Ogawa H, Onoe T, Murayama S, et al. Re-irradiation for locoregionally recurrent tumors of the thorax: A single-institution, retrospective study. Radiat Oncol [Internet]. Radiation Oncology; 2016;11:5–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0673-z
Schlampp I, Rieber J, Adeberg S, Bozorgmehr F, Heußel CP, Steins M, et al. Re-irradiation in locally recurrent lung cancer patients. Strahlentherapie und Onkol. 2019;195:725–33.
Shiue K, Cerra-Franco A, Shapiro R, Estabrook N, Mannina EM, Deig CR, et al. Histology, Tumor Volume, and Radiation Dose Predict Outcomes in NSCLC Patients After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. J Thorac Oncol [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2018;13:1549–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.06.007
Raben D, Rimner A, Senan S, Broadhurst H, Pellas T, Dennis PA, et al. Patterns of Disease Progression with Durvalumab in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (PACIFIC). Int J Radiat Oncol. Elsevier Inc; 2019;105:683.
Dickhoff C, Dahele M, Hashemi SM, Senan S, Smit EF, Hartemink KJ, et al. Surgical Treatment of Complications After High-Dose Chemoradiotherapy for Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons; 2017;104:436–42.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Following High-dose Re-irradiation for Recurrent Lung Cancer

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1