1. Patients and ethics
Thirty breast cancer patients who underwent surgery in Beijing Hospital from May 2022 to August 2022 were consecutively selected. The inclusion criteria included the following: (1) invasive breast cancer confirmed by core needle biopsy, (2) tumor size ≥ 1 cm, (3) mastectomy, And (4) agreement to provide specimens and signed informed consent. The exclusion criteria included the following: (1) use of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, (2) previous breast-conserving surgery, and (3) refusal to sign the consent form and provide specimens.
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital on the basis of the Declaration of Helsinki (IRB Number in Ethical approval: 2022BJYYEC-130-02), and written informed consent was obtained from the patients.
2. Tissue sampling and processing
Tumor samples and corresponding normal samples were excised from surgical specimens, with a length of approximately 0.5 cm×0.5 cm×0.5 cm. The tumor sample was excised from the tumor center, and the normal tissue was excised from the normal gland more than 2 cm away from the tumor. The samples were placed in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% calf serum and double antibody (penicillin + streptomycin) and stored in a 4°C ice box. The surface of each tissue near the center of the tumor was defined as the detection surface (Figure 1A). An equilateral triangle was sketched on the measurement surface, and the three fixed points of the triangle were used as detection site (Figure 1B).
3. Detection of H+ flux in tumor samples and normal samples
(1). An NMT workstation (Xuyue (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.) was used to detect the H+ flux in real time. The workstation included imFluxes V2.0 software (YoungerUSA LLC, Amherst, MA 01002, USA), integrated voltage signal acquisition, 3D motion control, and image acquisition.
(2). Preparation of H+ sensor: Microsensors (Φ5 ± 1 μm, XY-CGQ-01, YoungerUSA) were drawn, silanized and filled with electrolyte (15 mM NaCl + 40 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0) to a length of 1 cm from the tip of the microsensor. A 40-50 µm column of selective liquid ion exchangers (H+ LIX, XY-SJ-H, YoungerUSA) was packed in front of the microsensor. Insert the Ag/AgCl glass microflux sensor holder (NMT-HC-32) from the tail of the H+ sensor to make full contact with the electrolyte. An Ag/AgCl ultralow permeability solid reference electrode (NMT-HC-86) was used as the reference electrode.
(3). Calibration of H+ sensor: The H+ sensor was calibrated at three different H+ concentrations: pH 6.5, pH 7.2 and pH 7.5. Then, we detected the H+ flux by the sensor with the Nernst slope in the range of 58 ± 5 mV/decade. After each test, the same sensor was recalibrated according to the same procedure and standard. The data will be discarded if the calibration fails after the test,
(4). Sampling rule selection: According to the formula J = −D0·(dc/dx), dx is the distance that the microsensor moves from a point close to the sample to another point vertically away from the sample surface at a certain frequency. dx is usually 5 - 35 μm, and 30 µm was used in our study.
(5). Detection of H+ flux: All tests were completed within 2 hours after the specimen was isolated. First, filter paper strips and resin blocks were used to attach tumor or normal samples to the bottom of the dish, exposing the top surface of the samples. Second, the test solution (0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM KCl, 137 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM NaHCO3, 0.1 mM KH2PO4, 0.1 mM Na2HPO4, 5.6 mM glucose, pH 7.2) was added to the dish until the samples were submerged. After ten minutes, the test solution was discarded, and 8 ml of new test solution was added. Third, the H+ flux rate sensor was placed at a distance of approximately 50 µm from the detection site on the sample surface under the microscope. Each site will be detected for 3 minutes. The H+ flux rate was directly detected via Imfluxes V2.0 software, and the H+ flux unit was mol∙cm-2∙s-1. Positive values represent efflux, and negative values represent influx. The composition of the NMT system is shown in Figure 2.
4. Treatment with docetaxel
We randomly chose 4 tumor samples from those with H+ efflux. First, the sample was detected for 3 minutes to obtain stable H+ flux. Then, 10 mg/L docetaxel(Aventis Pharma S.A. France) was added to the petri dish. After the the signal was stable, H+ flux was recorded for 3 minutes.
5. Pathological examination
After the detection of H+ flux was completed, the tissue samples were labeled with nanocarbon on the opposite side of the test surface and fixed with 10% neutral formalin solution. All pathological examinations were performed in the Pathology Department of Beijing Hospital. The inspection included tumor histological type, histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, human epidermal growth receptor-2 (HER-2) status, and Ki-67 index. According to the 2020 CAP clinical guidelines, ER/PR positivity was defined as tumor cell expression of 1% - 100% [17]. According to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. HER-2 positivity was defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with ISH positivity[18]. Four molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER-2 positive and triple-negative breast cancer), were classified according to ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki67 expression [19].
6. Statistical methods
SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for analysis. H+ flux was described according to the mean±standard deviation. The differences in H+ flux between tumor samples and normal samples were compared by independent sample t tests. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences among molecular subtypes. For all tests, differences were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05.