As the myopic refractive error increases, excessive axial elongation of the eyeball occurs, applying biomechanical tension to the posterior pole of the eyeball, and the sclera becomes thinner, leading to a series of complications[15]. As the degree of myopia increases, the prevalence of pathological myopia also increases[16]. Pathological myopia can lead to an irreversible decline in BCVA, which is one of the important causes of blindness[17]. After a long period of repair and reconstruction, the implanted sclera eventually fuses with the recipient’s sclera. Scleral thickness increases significantly, and scleral hardness increases significantly, yielding mechanical reinforcement of the sclera. Neovascularization improves visual function in patients with high myopia by improving the nutritional status of the posterior pole of the eye. Yan[18] implanted allogeneic sclera into the posterior part of rabbit eyes and assessed biomechanical factors. It was found that allogeneic sclera is a good biomechanical material. All these results indicate that posterior scleral reinforcement is a good method to strengthen the sclera and delay the progression of myopia.
Snyder-Thompson percutaneous stereotaxic rhizotomy (PSR) surgery[11] is characterized by severe injury, marked scar formation after myotomy, and high operational requirements. Our posterior sclera reinforcement operation is easy for operators to learn. The macular area and the optic nerve are not touched, and the degree of disturbance to the extraocular muscles is small, which means that the operation is very safe.
In our study, the AL increased by 0.07 mm, and the myopic refractive error increased by 0.05 D at 3 months after surgery. At 6 months postoperatively, the AL increased by 0.12 mm, and the myopic refractive error decreased by 0.28 D. At 1 year postoperatively, the AL and myopic refractive error increased by 0.31 mm and 0.53 D. The AL increased by 0.19 mm, and the myopic refractive error increased 0.50 D at 2 years after the operation. In a follow-up study on the changes in AL and myopic refractive error of school-age children (6–8 years old) in Shanghai, China[19], the baseline myopic refractive error was ± 0.04 ± 0.80 D, and the baseline AL was 22.75 mm ± 0.72 mm. The AL of the eye increased by 0.27 mm at 1 year and 0.52 mm at 2 years. In our study, 1 year after PSR, the AL of the eyes increased to nearly the AL of children with emmetropia of the same age, and the AL of the eyes at two years after operation was much shorter than that in the children with emmetropia. Perhaps because the sample size of the 2-year group was too small, the changes were not statistically significant. However, a significant reduction in the rate of axial growth was beneficial for this group.
In a follow-up study by Hu[20] on the effects of posterior scleral reinforcement surgery, the AL of the control group increased by 0.75 mm within one year. Compared with this method, our modified posterior scleral reinforcement method was effective in controlling AL. In addition, a follow-up study of Chen’s[12] modified Snyder-Thompson posterior scleral reinforcement surgery showed a 0.41 mm increase in the number of myopia cases in the control group within a year. In Shen’s[21] study, the control group wore rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses to correct high myopia and exhibited an average annual increase of 0.44 mm in AL.
Statistical analysis of myopic refractive error in the four groups yielded P > 0.05, which indicated that there were no significant differences between the postoperative and preoperative myopic refractive errors; that is, the increase in myopic refractive error was not obvious. At six months after the operation, the myopic refractive error decreased. At 1 year, the error increased by 0.53 D. In the study by Shen[21] et al., the myopic refractive error of the control group increased by 1.00 D and that of the PSR group increased by 0.44 Similarly, the control group had an annual increase of 0.75 D, and the PSR group had an annual increase of 0.45 D in Xue[13] et al.’s study. In our study, at 1 year, the increase in myopic refractive error was also largely consistent with the findings of these two previous studies. In Chen's[12] study, the operator made a conjunctival incision from the temporal side, extending to the nasal side to the superior rectus muscle and then to the inferior rectus muscle. Shen[21] underwent a 210-degree periconjunctival incision along the inferior temporal margin, followed by a radial incision at both ends. Both surgical procedures are difficult for beginners to learn and traumatic for patients. In contrast, our surgical method is minimally invasive and easy to perform.
It is worth considering that there was a relatively large increase in AL and refractive error in this study one year after the operation, and we found that almost all of these patients underwent surgery after July 2019. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, this group of patients were quarantined at home for at least six months, and some patients even needed to attend online courses. During the pandemic, there were fewer outdoor activities, more near activities and a lack of physical exercise. According to the research of Tideman JWL[22] et al., reading time, not participating in sports activities and less time for outdoor activities are all independent factors leading to the acceleration of eye axis growth in school-age children. Therefore, we speculate that the AL and refractive error of this group may have been affected by the pandemic.
Although the changes in logMAR visual acuity in the four groups were not statistically significant, they all showed a downward trend (BCVA increased). BCVA did not decrease significantly in any of the patients, which indicated that the operation does not cause damage to patients' vision within a short period of time, but follow-ups should be performed.
There are some limitations of our study: (1) because of the lack of a control group, we can compare the follow-up results with those of only previous studies of the same type; (2) the long-term effect of the surgery was not assessed due to the short follow-up period; and (3) due to the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the loss to follow-up rate of the patients in this study was high, and almost no patients returned for all the follow-ups.