General Studies
The pyrrolopyrimidinehydrazide was synthesised using a well-established technique described in the literature [14]. The HPPHoCB ligand was synthesised in a single step by direct condensation of pyrrolopyrimidinehydrazide and 2-chlorobenzaldehyde in a molar ratio (1:1) with a quantifiable yield. Scheme-1 illustrates the synthesis of HPPHoCB ligand. The complexes are soluble in most organic solvents but not in water or ethanol. The elemental analysis data shows that the metal to ligand ratio in all complexes is 1:2 (expect Cr (III) complex). The complexes are powdered solids that are coloured and non-hygroscopic. The complexes molar conductance values at room temperature (measured in 10− 3M nitrobenzene) range from 0.679 to 11.51 ohm− 1 cm2 mol− 1, indicating that they are non-electrolytes [21]. TLC was used to ensure the purity of the ligand and its metal complexes.
Table-1
Physico-chemical and analytical data of HPPHoCB ligand and its metal complexes
Comp | Color | MW | % Yield | MP/DP | Element Content | Cond | MM |
M | C | H | N | Cl |
HPPHoCB | L. brown | 271.000 | 81.36 | 189 | - | 57.49 | 3.71 | 25.78 | 13.05 | - | - |
Cr(PPHoCB)3 | Green | 861.996 | 79.34 | 261 | 6.03 | 54.29 | 3.13 | 24.36 | 12.36 | 1.173 | 3.87 |
Mn(PPHoCB)2 | White | 594.938 | 77.98 | 228 | 9.23 | 52.44 | 3.03 | 23.53 | 11.93 | 0.778 | - |
Fe(PPHoCB)2 | Blue | 595.845 | 83.20 | 238 | 9.37 | 52.36 | 3.02 | 23.5 | 11.91 | 1.054 | 5.51 |
Co(PPHoCB)2 | Brown | 598.993 | 79.30 | 244 | 9.85 | 52.09 | 3.01 | 23.37 | 11.90 | 0.786 | 4.51 |
Ni(PPHoCB)2 | Green | 598.693 | 77.98 | 258 | 9.8 | 52.11 | 3.01 | 23.38 | 11.90 | 11.51 | 3.22 |
Pd(PPHoCB)2 | Brown | 646.000 | 84.52 | 245 | 16.41 | 48.30 | 2.79 | 21.67 | 17.00 | 0.341 | - |
Cu(PPHoCB)2 | Green | 603.000 | 77.67 | 238 | 10.5 | 51.69 | 2.98 | 23.2 | 11.80 | 0.489 | 1.86 |
Zn(PPHoCB)2 | Colorless | 605.400 | 83.85 | 251 | 10.8 | 51.54 | 2.97 | 23.13 | 11.70 | 0.249 | - |
Cd(PPHoCB)2 | Colorless | 653.800 | 84.38 | 256 | 21.42 | 47.76 | 2.77 | 17.19 | 10.85 | 0.997 | - |
Hg(PPHoCB)2 | Colorless | 740.590 | 81.96 | 263 | 27.09 | 42.13 | 2.43 | 18.9 | 9.59 | 0.679 | - |
Spectral Studies
FT(IR) Spectra
The bonding of the HPPHoCB ligand to transition metal ions was analysed by comparing the FT(IR) spectra of the synthesised complexes to those of the free HPPHoCB ligand (Table-2). Some significant bands were chosen to study the influence of HPPHoCB ligand vibration on transition metal complexes. The absence of stretching vibrations due to the aldehyde ν(CHO) and amino ν(NH2) moiety of hydrazide confirms the development of the HPPHoCB ligand, and instead a strong new band formed at 1655 cm− 1 corresponding to the azomethine ν(HC = NN-) group [22]. After complexation, the band due to azomethine vibration moved to a lower frequency of 1579–1588 cm− 1, showing that the azomethine-N was coordinated to metal ions [23–24]. The HPPHoCB ligand has a distinctive strong band at 3187 cm− 1, which is attributed to aromatic ν(N-H), which disappears in metal complex spectra, confirming deprotonation and coordination of the pyrrole group [25]. This is further confirmed by the appearance of a lower frequency band at 600–608 cm− 1 in metal complexes as a result of (M–N) [26–30]. A broad band identified as aliphatic (NH) in the range of 3195–3289 cm− 1 suggests the presence of the HPPHoCB ligand as well as the complexes [31–32]. All of the compounds attributed to ν(M→N) include metal ligand bands in the 572–599 cm− 1 and 510–555 cm− 1 regions [33–34].
Table-2
FT(IR) spectral data of HPPHoCB ligand and its metal complexes
Comp | NH (Ali) | NH (Aro) | C-H (Aro) | C-H (aldehyde) | >C = N- (aro) | .C = N- (ali) | C-N (aro amine) | N-N- (ali) | C-Cl | o–di sub benzene ring | M-N/M→N |
HPPHoCB | 3281 | 3187 | 3058 | 2896 | 2070 | 1655 | 1311 | 1009 | 900 | 739 | - |
Cr(PPHoCB)3 | 3197 | - | 3058 | 2986 | 2011 | 1580 | 1309 | 1087 | 915 | 729 | 600, 552, 514 |
Mn(PPHoCB)2 | 3203 | - | 3060 | 2986 | 2014 | 1581 | 1324 | 1021 | 860 | 730 | 623, 550, 515 |
Fe(PPHoCB)2 | 3202 | - | 3060 | 2983 | 2013 | 1583 | 1316 | 1023 | 859 | 729 | 583, 543, 515 |
Co(PPHoCB)2 | 3197 | - | 3059 | 2979 | 1999 | 1579 | 1307 | 1088 | 859 | 729 | 602, 552, 512 |
Ni(PPHoCB)2 | 3195 | - | 3059 | 2980 | 2000 | 1579 | 1304 | 998 | 859 | 728 | 602, 552, 520 |
Pd(PPHoCB)2 | 3194 | - | 3060 | 2980 | 2014 | 1578 | 1306 | 1004 | 858 | 728 | 600, 548, 510 |
Cu(PPHoCB)2 | 3287 | - | 3061 | 2980 | 2000 | 1586 | 1311 | 1022 | 870 | 735 | 599, 555, 511 |
Zn(PPHoCB)2 | 3201 | - | 3060 | 2980 | 1998 | 1588 | 1321 | 982 | 876 | 753 | 608, 535, 521 |
Cd(PPHoCB)2 | 3279 | - | 3062 | 2888 | 2018 | 1581 | 1279 | 996 | 887 | 723 | 608, 534, 513 |
Hg(PPHoCB)2 | 3289 | - | 3060 | 2980 | 1998 | 1584 | 1315 | 1043 | 905 | 723 | 572, 536, 511 |
1 H NMR Spectra
Table-3 shows the 1H NMR spectral data of the HPPHoCB ligand and its Mn(II), Pd(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), and Hg(II) complexes. The aromatic NH proton can be assigned to the signal at δ12.968 in the spectrum of free HPPHoCB ligand [35]. This signal vanished in the spectra of metal complexes containing Pd(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), and Hg(II), confirming the coordination of the HPPHoCB ligand to the metal ion via the deprotonated pyrrole group. Signals at δ8.496–8.770 and δ8.404–8.525 in the spectrum of HPPHoCB ligand are ascribed to -CH = and aliphatic NH protons, respectively [36–37]. The aromatic protons in the HPPHoCB ligand and its metal complexes range from δ7.545 to 8.060 ppm [38–40].
Table-3
1H NMR spectral data of HPPHoCB ligand and its metal complexes
Comp | NH (aro) | CH (ali) | NH (Ali) | Aromatic Protons |
HPPHoCB | 12.968 | 8.649 | 8.464 | 7.548–8.044 |
Mn(PPHoCB)2 | - | 8.65 | 8.457 | 7.550–8.05 |
Pd(PPHoCB)2 | - | 8.651 | 8.465 | 7.550–8.050 |
Zn(PPHoCB)2 | - | 8.644 | 8.475 | 7.550–8.051 |
Cd(PPHoCB)2 | - | 8.725 | 8.467 | 7.550–8.050 |
Hg(PPHoCB)2 | - | 8.77 | 8.45 | 7.550–8.05 |
Magnetic Moment Measurements And Electronic Spectra
The electronic absorption spectra of the ligand and the complexes were recorded in chloroform in the region 200–900 nm. The observed electronic transitions and calculated ligand field parameters of the metal complexes are listed in Table-4. The electronic spectra provided enough information regarding the arrangements of the ligand around the central metal ions. The spectrum of the ligand shows two bands at 410, 285 and 230 nm which are attributed to π→π* transitions. In the electronic spectra of the complexes, intra-ligand π→π* transitions appear in the region 235–291 nm [41]. Bands appearing in all metal complexes at 420–485 nm are assigned to the ligand to metal charge transfer transitions [42].
The electronic spectrum of [Cr(PPHoCB)3] complex showed two bands at 555nm and 445nm assignable to 4A2g(F) → 4T2g(F)(ν1) and 4A2g(F) → 4T1g(F)(ν2) transitions, respectively in an octahedral geometry being assumed [43]. The 4A2g(F) →4T1g(P)(ν3) band expected to be at ca. 430nm in UV region, generally was hidden by the broad charge transfer band. Racah interelectronic repulsion parameter (B) is calculated according to the formula [44].
B = (2ν12 − 3ν1ν2 + ν22/(15ν2 − 27ν1).
And from this, values of nephelauxetic parameter (β) are computed as β = B/Bo (Bo for free Cr(III) ion = 918 cm− 1 ). The calculated Dq, B, β and ν2/ ν1 values as well as the magnetic moment (3.87 B.M.) confirm an octahedral environment around Cr(III) ion [45–46].
Magnetic susceptibility measurement of the Fe(II) complex was made at room temperature, which indicate that the Fe(II) complex was paramagnetic, corresponding to 2 + oxidation state of iron in this complex. The electronic spectrum of the Fe(II) complex displayed absorption band at 660 nm which were assigned to 5T2g→5Eg transition [47]. Also, the band at 455, 420 and 395 nm are assigned to L → M charge transfer. The Fe(II) complex had a magnetic moment value of 5.51 B.M. which was consistent with high spin octahedral geometry [48–51].
Co(II) complex of HPPHoCB at room temperature shows magnetic moment 4.51 BM. This value is in good agreement with those reported for octahedral Co(II) complexes [52]. The Co(II) complex exhibited two distinct absorptions at ∼900nm and 510nm assigned to 4T1g(F) →4T2g(F) (ν1) and 4T1g(F) →4T2g(P) (ν2), respectively, which suggests octahedral geometry around the Co(II) ion [53]. ν3 is not observed, but it is calculated by appropriate equation [54], which is very close to metal to ligand charge transfer transition [55–56].
The Ni(II) complex reported herein are high spin with room temperature magnetic moment value 3.22 BM, which is in the normal range observed for octahedral complexes [57–59]. The electronic spectra of Ni(II) complex displayed two bands at 978 and 610nm, assigned to 3A2g(F)→ 3T2g(F) (ν1) and 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(F) (ν2), transitions, respectively [60]. These are the characteristic bands of octahedral environment around Ni(II) ion. The Band-fitting equations [61] have been used to calculate the and third transition 3A2g(F)→ 3T1g(P) (ν3) and ligand field parameters (Dq, B, β, and β%) for Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes indicated significant covalent character of metal ligand bonds (Table-4). The value of Racah parameter (B) is less than free ion value, suggesting an orbital overlap and delocalization of electron on the metal ion. The nephelauxetic ratio (β) for the metal complexes is less than one suggesting partial covalency in the metal ligand bond [62–64].
The copper complex of HPPHoCB ligand shows bands at 635, which can be assigned to 2B1g → 2A1g (ν1) transition. It is a characteristic band of square planar geometry around the Cu(II) [65]. The room temperature magnetic moment value 1.86 falls in the range normally observed for square planar complexes [66]. Electronic spectra of homo-binuclear [Mn(PPHoCB)2] complex exhibited weak absorption bands in the range 423 and 515nm and these bands were assigned as 6A1g → 4Eg(4D), and 6A1g → 4T1g(4P) transitions, respectively, which is concordant with octahedral geometry of the metal complexes [67]. The observed magnetic moment value (6.10BM) also supported high spin octahedral geometry for [Mn(PPHoCB)2] complex [68–69].
The electronic spectra of Pd(II), Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) complexes show intense bands at region 402–425, 353–375 and 222-298nm which are assigned to the intra ligands N → M(II) and N-M(II) LMCT, respectively. These spectral features indicate the bonding of HPPHoCB to the M(II) via nitrogen atom [70–72].
Table-4
Electronic spectral data of HPPHoCB ligand and its metal complexes
Compound | λnm | Transition |
HPPHoCB | 410 | π→π∗ |
285 | π→π∗ |
230 | π→π∗ |
Cr(PPHoCB)3 | 555 | 4A2g(F) → 4T2g(F)(ν1) |
445 | 4A2g(F) → 4T1g(F)(ν2) |
Mn(PPHoCB)2 | 515 | 6A1g → 4T1g(4P) |
423 | 6A1g → 4Eg(4D) |
Fe(PPHoCB)2 | 660 | 5T2g→5Eg |
455, 420, 395 | L → M charge transfer |
Co(PPHoCB)2 | ∼900 | 4T1g(F) →4T2g(F) (ν1) |
510 | 4T1g(F) →4T2g(P) (ν2) |
Ni(PPHoCB)2 | 978 | 3A2g(F)→ 3T2g(F) (ν1) |
610 | 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(F) (ν2) |
Pd(PPHoCB)2 | 425, 375, 298 | L → M charge transfer |
Cu(PPHoCB)2 | 635 | 2B1g → 2A1g (ν1) |
Zn(PPHoCB)2 | 411, 366, 291 | L → M charge transfer |
Cd(PPHoCB)2 | 405, 353, 238 | L → M charge transfer |
Hg(PPHoCB)2 | 402, 360, 222 | L → M charge transfer |
Esr Spectra
To understand the stereochemistry of [Cu(PPHoCB)2], the electronic spin resonance spectrum was recorded in a solid state at liquid nitrogen temperature. The ground state can be calculated using the [Cu(PPHoCB)2] complex's g-tensor values (g|| = 2.12, g⊥ = 2.05, gave = 2.07, G = 2.46) [73–74]. In square planar complexes, the unpaired electron is in the dx2−y2 orbital, resulting in 2B1g as the ground state with g|| > g⊥ > 2, whereas the unpaired electron is in the dz2 orbital, resulting in 2A1g as the ground state with g|| > g⊥ > 2. Because g|| > g⊥ > 2 in this scenario, the unpaired electron is most likely in the dx2−y2 orbital, implying square planar geometry surrounding the copper(II) ion [75–76]. There was no signal at half field in the spectrum, ruling out the idea of a dimeric form [77].
X-ray Diffraction
The X-ray diffraction of the homo-binuclear metal complexes was scanned in the 2θ range of 10–80˚ at wavelength 1.5406. The associated data of diffractogram depict the 2θ value for each peak, relative intensity and interplanar spacing (d-values). By using Scherer’s formula, the average crystallite size (dxrd) of the metal complexes was calculated. The XRD patterns exhibited sharp crystalline peaks which specify the crystalline phase of metal complexes [78]. The Cu(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Mn(II) Schiff base metal complexes have an average crystallite size of 1, 21, 45 and 41 nm respectively. The h2 + k2 + l2 values were Cr(III), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II). The calculated lattice parameter for metal complexes is a = b = c = 7.5, 7.04, 6.59 and 3.18. The observed values of the metal complexes may belong to octahedral systems [79–81].
Biological Studies
Antibacterial studies
The antimicrobial activities of the synthesized HPPHoCB ligand and its metal complexes were screened in vitro against diverse bacteria and fungi strains are shown in Tables-5 & Table-6 respectively. In general, the antibacterial screening data reveal that all the compounds were active against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with zones of inhibition ranging in between 16.9 and 30.5 mm. Also, all the metal complexes were active against Staphylococcus aureus with greater inhibitory values (20.87–30.5 mm), than HPPHoCB ligand (5.9mm). This expectation is traceable to chelation theory effect [82], which decreases the polarity of the metal atom due to partial sharing of its charge with donor groups of the ligand and the possibility of π-electron delocalization over the whole chelate rings, leading to increase in lipophilic character that allows permeation into the bacterial membrane’s lipid layers. The ligand was more sensitive against Bacillus subtilis than the complexes, except Mn(II) complex with zone of inhibition values 16.3 mm. In addition, Hg(II) complex had the highest inhibitory zone value of 30.52 mm against Escherichia coli compared to other compounds and even the reference drug, streptomycin with 22.0 mm (Table-5). The higher value exhibited by Hg(II) complex may be attributed to the bioactivity and biotoxicity of Hg2+ metal in coordination with the ligands, leading to easy penetration into the cell-lipid membrane, which obstruct and destroy the respiration process of the test organism [83]. The Hg(II) complex in comparison to all other complexes, is more toxic and effective towards the microbes- Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with inhibitory zone values of 30.8, 26.7, 30.52 and 20.1 mm respectively, and to the standard (streptomycin) with respective inhibition values of 22.0, 21.42 22.0 and 24.0 mm. Result of this kind, in which test compounds have greater antibacterial efficacy than the standard- streptomycin has been reported [84–85].
Table-5
Antibacterial studies of HPPHoCB ligand and its metal complexes
Compound | Antibacterial Activity (zone of inhibition) |
S. aureus | B. subtilis | E. coli | P. aeruginosa |
HPPHoCB | 5.90 | 16.90 | 15.21 | 13.09 |
Cr(PPHoCB)3 | 20.32 | 19.55 | 19.35 | 20.98 |
Mn(PPHoCB)2 | 19.54 | 16.30 | 18.56 | 16.56 |
Fe(PPHoCB)2 | 20.87 | 15.21 | 20.18 | 19.99 |
Co(PPHoCB)2 | 22.63 | 19.35 | 20.99 | 20.98 |
Ni(PPHoCB)2 | 25.67 | 18.56 | 22.60 | 12.76 |
Pd(PPHoCB)2 | 19.47 | 25.63 | 21.23 | 14.55 |
Cu(PPHoCB)2 | 20.98 | 24.45 | 19.90 | 19.57 |
Zn(PPHoCB)2 | 16.56 | 23.78 | 18.50 | 20.67 |
Cd(PPHoCB)2 | 19.99 | 19.03 | 19.60 | 22.69 |
Hg(PPHoCB)2 | 30.80 | 26.70 | 30.52 | 20.10 |
Streptomycin | 22.00 | 21.42 | 22.00 | 24.00 |
Antifungal Studies
The antifungal studies showed that the ligand and its complexes that were active against the three fungi- Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavous and Fusarium species in most cases, possess almost two and half times potency (22.9–35.6 mm) compared to the standard fluconazole (11.3–15.9 mm), except only Mn(II) complex with (9.8 mm) zone of inhibition very close to that of fluconazole (11.3 mm) against Aspergillus flavous (Table − 6). The transition complexes of were resistant to the Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus flavous. Interestingly, all the compounds were more active (29.6–35.0 mm) compared to the reference drug (13.9 mm) against Fusarium species, with the chelates having larger values of inhibition in the range 31.9–35.0 mm than the ligand with inhibitory zone values range 10.3–10.7 mm, corroborating effect of Tweedy’s chelation theory [85–86]. The results revealed Cr(III) complex to be the best with highest fungicidal activities compared to other complexes against the three fungi.
Table-6
Antifungal studies of HPPHoCB ligand and its metal complexes
Compound | Antibacterial Activity (zone of inhibition) |
Aspergillus niger | Aspergillus flavous | Fusarium species |
HPPHoCB | 10.60 | 10.30 | 10.70 |
Cr(PPHoCB)3 | 30.32 | 19.55 | 32.35 |
Mn(PPHoCB)2 | 29.54 | 9.80 | 33.66 |
Fe(PPHoCB)2 | 30.87 | 25.21 | 31.18 |
Co(PPHoCB)2 | 33.78 | 29.35 | 31.99 |
Ni(PPHoCB)2 | 34.57 | 23.67 | 34.60 |
Pd(PPHoCB)2 | 29.47 | 25.63 | 31.90 |
Cu(PPHoCB)2 | 20.98 | 22.90 | 32.25 |
Zn(PPHoCB)2 | 29.60 | 23.78 | 33.58 |
Cd(PPHoCB)2 | 30.22 | 29.03 | 32.78 |
Hg(PPHoCB)2 | 35.00 | 35.60 | 35.0 |
Fluconazole | 15.9 | 11.30 | 13.9 |
In Vitro Cytotoxicity
It is evident from the data recorded in Table-7 that all prepared transition complexes displayed cytotoxic activity with LD50 = 2.178–8.439 × 10− 4 M/mL, against Artemia salina, while the HPPHoCB ligand was inactive for this assay [87–90].
Table-7
Brine shrimp bioassay of HPPHoCB and their metal (II/III) complexes
Compound | LD50 (M) |
HPPHoCB | - |
Cr(PPHoCB)3 | > 2.178 × 10− 4 |
Mn(PPHoCB)2 | > 3.45 × 10− 4 |
Fe(PPHoCB)2 | > 6.11 × 10− 4 |
Co(PPHoCB)2 | > 3.78 × 10− 4 |
Ni(PPHoCB)2 | > 4.57 × 10− 4 |
Pd(PPHoCB)2 | > 8.49 × 10− 4 |
Cu(PPHoCB)2 | > 4.57 × 10− 4 |
Zn(PPHoCB)2 | > 5.91 × 10− 4 |
Cd(PPHoCB)2 | > 7.05 × 10− 4 |
Hg(PPHoCB)2 | > 4.75 × 10− 4 |